The study of geomorphology and soil erosion has garnered increasing attention globally due to mounting environmental concerns and the recognition of soil erosion as a critical issue with profound implications for ecosystem health and human well-being. This review paper examines recent trends and future directions in geomorphology and soil erosion research through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. The focus is specifically on the geomorphological dimensions of soil erosion, excluding purely agricultural or engineering approaches unless integrated within geomorphological frameworks. By using data from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, our methodological protocol encompasses four key stages: defining search criteria using keywords “geomorphology” and “soil erosion,” selecting and extracting relevant documents, pre-processing data, and analyzing results. The collected records provided a rich dataset comprising bibliographic information, abstracts, keywords, and other pertinent variables conducive to bibliometric analysis. The dataset reveals the United States, China, and the United Kingdom as top contributors, with Geomorphology and Science of the Total Environment as key journals. Citation patterns highlight pedo-geomorphology and land management, while keyword networks expose thematic clusters and emerging trends like UAV-based or Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry assessments. This review paper offers valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, facilitating informed decision-making and guiding efforts toward sustainable land management practices worldwide.
Acuña-PiedraJFQuesada-RománA (2021) Multidecadal biogeomorphic dynamics of a deltaic mangrove forest in Costa Rica. Ocean & Coastal Management211: 105770.
2.
AgrawalKBawejaYDwivediD, et al. (2017) A comparison of class imbalance techniques for real-world landslide predictions. In: 2017 International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Science (MLDS), pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/MLDS.2017.21.
3.
AichiAIkirriMAit HaddouM, et al. (2024) Integrated GIS and analytic hierarchy process for flood risk assessment in the Dades Wadi watershed (Central high Atlas, Morocco). Results in Earth Sciences2: 100019. DOI: 10.1016/j.rines.2024.100019.
4.
AkhtarZSajjadMImranM, et al. (2023) Risk mapping in managing flood vulnerability in disaster management. In: International Handbook of Disaster Research. Singapore: Springer Nature, 743–776. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-8388-7_177.
5.
Aldás-OnofreJCorderoB (2023) Bibliometric Analysis of Web of Science Database STEM Fields in Engineering and Mathematics. Ecuador’s Case Study, 255–270. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24985-3_19.
6.
Algeet-AbarqueroNMarchamaloMBonattiJ, et al. (2015) Implications of land use change on runoff generation at the plot scale in the humid tropics of Costa Rica. Catena135: 263–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.08.004.
7.
Álvarez-GarcíaJDurán-SánchezAdel Río-RamaM. de la C (2018) Systematic bibliometric analysis on Kaizen in scientific journals. The TQM Journal30(4): 356–370. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0171.
AnthonyEJBrunierGBessetM, et al. (2015) Linking rapid erosion of the Mekong River delta to human activities. Scientific Reports5(1): 14745. DOI: 10.1038/srep14745.
10.
AriaMCuccurulloC (2017) bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics11(4): 959–975. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
11.
Aznar-SánchezJABelmonte-UreñaLJVelasco-MuñozJF, et al. (2018) Economic analysis of sustainable water use: a review of worldwide research. Journal of Cleaner Production198: 1120–1132. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.066.
12.
BellFGCulshawMG (2001) Problems soils: a review from a British Perspective. In: Problematic Soils, pp. 1–35. DOI: 10.1680/ps.30435.0001.
13.
BezakNMikošMBorrelliP, et al. (2021) Soil erosion modelling: a bibliometric analysis. Environmental Research197: 111087. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111087.
14.
BornmannLMutzR (2015) Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the association for information science and technology66(11): 2215–2222.
15.
BorrelliPPoesenJVanmaerckeM, et al. (2022) Monitoring gully erosion in the European Union: a novel approach based on the Land Use/Cover Area frame survey (LUCAS). International Soil and Water Conservation Research10(1): 17–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.09.002.
16.
BrovkinaOCiencialaESurovýP, et al. (2018) Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) for assessment of qualitative classification of Norway spruce in temperate forest stands. Geo-Spatial Information Science21(1): 12–20. DOI: 10.1080/10095020.2017.1416994.
17.
BrownAGCareyCErkensG, et al. (2009) From sedimentary records to sediment budgets: Multiple approaches to catchment sediment flux. Geomorphology108(1-2): 35–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.01.021.
18.
BrownATomsPCareyC, et al. (2013) Geomorphology of the Anthropocene: time-transgressive discontinuities of human-induced alluviation. Anthropocene1: 3–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ancene.2013.06.002.
19.
BrunierGOirySLachausséeN, et al. (2022) A machine-learning approach to intertidal mudflat mapping combining multispectral reflectance and geomorphology from UAV-based monitoring. Remote Sensing14(22): 5857. DOI: 10.3390/rs14225857.
20.
BryanRB (2000) Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope. Geomorphology32(3-4): 385–415. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00105-1.
21.
CallonMCourtialJPLavilleF (1991) Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics22(1): 155–205. DOI: 10.1007/BF02019280.
22.
CamachoMEQuesada-RománAMataR, et al. (2020) Soil-geomorphology relationships of alluvial fans in Costa Rica. Geoderma Regional21: e00258. DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00258.
23.
CamposNQuesada-RománAGranados-BolañosS (2022) Mapping mountain landforms and its dynamics: study cases in tropical environments. Applied Sciences12(21): 10843. DOI: 10.3390/app122110843.
24.
CaoLLiuSWangS, et al. (2021) Factors controlling discharge-suspended sediment hysteresis in karst basins, southwest China: implications for sediment management. Journal of Hydrology594: 125792. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125792.
25.
CarraraAFaustoG (2013) Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards. Springer Science & Business Media, 5.
26.
Carrión-MeroPMontalván-BurbanoNMorante-CarballoF, et al. (2021) Worldwide research trends in landslide science. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(18): 9445. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189445.
27.
ChenYChenWJanizadehS, et al. (2022) Deep learning and boosting framework for piping erosion susceptibility modeling: spatial evaluation of agricultural areas in the semi-arid region. Geocarto International37(16): 4628–4654. DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1892212.
28.
ChenPMaJMaX, et al. (2023) Groundwater recharge in typical geomorphic landscapes and different land use types on the loess plateau, China. Hydrological Processes37(4): 1–17. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14860.
29.
DavenportDWBreshearsDDWilcoxBP, et al. (1998) Viewpoint: sustainability of Pinon-Juniper ecosystems: a unifying perspective of soil erosion thresholds. Journal of Range Management51(2): 231. DOI: 10.2307/4003212.
30.
DelgadoDSadaouiMLudwigW, et al. (2025) Assessment of soil erosion by RUSLE in the Ecuadorian basins (2001−2020) based on GIS and high-resolution satellite data: main drivers and changes on soil erosion. Geomorphology469: 109515.
31.
DengGJiangHZhuS, et al. (2024) Projecting the response of ecological risk to land use/land cover change in ecologically fragile regions. The Science of the Total Environment914: 169908.
32.
DiyabalanageSSamarakoonKKAdikariSB, et al. (2017) Impact of soil and water conservation measures on soil erosion rate and sediment yields in a tropical watershed in the Central Highlands of Sri Lanka. Applied Geography79: 103–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.004.
33.
DoerrSHShakesbyRAWalshRPD (2000) Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews51(1–4): 33–65. DOI: 10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00011-8.
34.
DonthuNKumarSMukherjeeD, et al. (2021) How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research133: 285–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
35.
DotterweichM (2013) The history of human-induced soil erosion: geomorphic legacies, early descriptions and research, and the development of soil conservation—a global synopsis. Geomorphology201: 1–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.07.021.
36.
DurrantLJVadherANTellerJ (2023) Disaster risk management and cultural heritage: the perceptions of European world heritage site managers on disaster risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction89: 103625. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103625.
37.
EchchakouiS (2020) Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. Journal of Marketing Analytics8(3): 165–184. DOI: 10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9.
38.
EltnerAKaiserACastilloC, et al. (2016) Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry–merits, limits and developments. Earth Surface Dynamics4(2): 359–389.
39.
FarooqR (2023) Knowledge management and performance: a bibliometric analysis based on Scopus and WOS data (1988–2021). Journal of Knowledge Management27(7): 1948–1991. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-06-2022-0443.
40.
FernándezTPérezJCardenalJ, et al. (2016) Analysis of landslide evolution affecting olive groves using UAV and photogrammetric techniques. Remote Sensing8(10): 837. DOI: 10.3390/rs8100837.
41.
Fernández-MoyaJAlvaradoAForsytheW, et al. (2014) Soil erosion under teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) plantations: general patterns, assumptions and controversies. Catena123: 236–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.08.010.
42.
FerreiraCSSeifollahi-AghmiuniSDestouniG, et al. (2022) Soil degradation in the European Mediterranean region: processes, status and consequences. The Science of the Total Environment805: 150106.
43.
GaoLHuangJChenX, et al. (2018) Contributions of natural climate changes and human activities to the trend of extreme precipitation. Atmospheric Research205: 60–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.02.006.
44.
García-RuizJMBegueríaSNadal-RomeroE, et al. (2015) A meta-analysis of soil erosion rates across the world. Geomorphology239: 160–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.008.
45.
GhosalKDas BhattacharyaS (2020) A review of RUSLE model. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing48(4): 689–707. DOI: 10.1007/s12524-019-01097-0.
46.
GoudieAS (2006) Global warming and fluvial geomorphology. Geomorphology79(3-4): 384–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.023.
47.
Granados-BolañosSQuesada-RománAAlvaradoGE (2021) Low-cost UAV applications in dynamic tropical volcanic landforms. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research410: 107143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.107143.
48.
GuerraCARosaIMDValentiniE, et al. (2020) Global vulnerability of soil ecosystems to erosion. Landscape Ecology35(4): 823–842. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-020-00984-z.
49.
GuleriaDKaurG (2021) Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using VOSviewer and RStudio Bibliometrix, 1989–2019. Library Hi Tech39(4): 1001–1024. DOI: 10.1108/LHT-09-2020-0218.
50.
GustavssonMKolstrupESeijmonsbergenAC (2006) A new symbol-and-GIS based detailed geomorphological mapping system: renewal of a scientific discipline for understanding landscape development. Geomorphology77(1-2): 90–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.026.
51.
Herrera-FrancoGCarrión-MeroPMontalván-BurbanoN, et al. (2022) Geoheritage and geosites: a bibliometric analysis and literature review. Geosciences12(4): 169. DOI: 10.3390/geosciences12040169.
52.
HosseinalizadehMKariminejadNChenW, et al. (2019) Spatial modelling of gully headcuts using UAV data and four best-first decision classifier ensembles (BFTree, Bag-BFTree, RS-BFTree, and RF-BFTree). Geomorphology329: 184–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.01.006.
53.
IslamAGuchhaitSK (2024) Riverbank erosion: a natural process, 43–98. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-47010-3_3.
54.
KariminejadNPourghasemiHRHosseinalizadehM (2022) Analytical techniques for mapping multi-hazard with geo-environmental modeling approaches and UAV images. Scientific Reports12(1): 14946. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18757-w.
55.
KariminejadNSepehrABernatek-JakielA, et al. (2023) Ecological engineers or underground plumbers? Mechanisms of the biological activities in controlling soil pipes and gully headcuts. Environmental Earth Sciences82(24): 595. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-023-11302-6.
56.
KariminejadNMohsenJDomazetovićF, et al. (2024) An overview of the importance of DEM resolution in soil erosion assessment. Papers in Applied Geography10: 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/23754931.2024.2341165.
57.
KeQZhangK (2024) Scale issues in runoff and sediment delivery (SIRSD): a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Earth-Science Reviews251: 104729.
58.
KeesstraSDBoumaJWallingaJ, et al. (2016) The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. SOIL2(2): 111–128. DOI: 10.5194/soil-2-111-2016.
59.
KellerEASwansonFJ (1979) Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth Surface Processes4: 361–380.
60.
KimSSShinDYLimET, et al. (2022) Disaster damage investigation using artificial intelligence and drone mapping. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B3-2022, 1109–1114. DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1109-2022.
61.
KirwanMLMurrayAB (2007) A coupled geomorphic and ecological model of tidal marsh evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America104(15): 6118–6122. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700958104.
62.
KopittkePMMinasnyBPendallE, et al. (2024) Healthy soil for healthy humans and a healthy planet. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology54(3): 210–221.
63.
KouliMSoupiosPVallianatosF (2009) Soil erosion prediction using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, Chania, Northwestern Crete, Greece. Environmental Geology57(3): 483–497. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-008-1318-9.
64.
KumarSSharmaDRaoS, et al. (2022) Past, present, and future of sustainable finance: insights from big data analytics through machine learning of scholarly research. Annals of Operations Research332: 1–44. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04410-8.
65.
KustGAndreevaOCowieA (2017) Land Degradation Neutrality: concept development, practical applications and assessment. Journal of Environmental Management195: 16–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.043.
66.
LalRBoumaJBrevikE, et al. (2021) Soils and sustainable development goals of the united nations: an international union of soil sciences perspective. Geoderma Regional25: e00398.
67.
LarsenPVon InsM (2010) The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics84(3): 575–603.
68.
LimWMKumarS (2023) Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometrics analysis: a sensemaking approach. Global Business and Organizational Excellence43: 17–26. DOI: 10.1002/joe.22229.
69.
LiuCZhangFCarl JohnsonV, et al. (2021) Spatio-temporal variation of oasis landscape pattern in arid area: human or natural driving?Ecological Indicators125: 107495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107495.
70.
Martín-MartínAThelwallMOrduna-MaleaE, et al. (2021) Google scholar, Microsoft academic, Scopus, dimensions, Web of science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics126(1): 871–906. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4.
71.
MiddletonNJ (2017) Desert dust hazards: a global review. Aeolian Research24: 53–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2016.12.001.
72.
Montalván-BurbanoNPérez-VallsMPlaza-ÚbedaJ (2020) Analysis of scientific production on organizational innovation. Cogent Business & Management7(1): 1745043. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1745043.
73.
MontanarellaLBadraouiMChudeV, et al. (2015) Status of the World’s Soil Resources: Main Report. Rome, Italy: FAO, 608.
74.
MukherjeeDMarcWKumarS, et al. (2022) Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research148: 101–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042.
75.
MutaqinBWIsnainMNMarfaiMA, et al. (2023) Assessing the accuracy of open-source digital elevation models for the geomorphological analysis of very small islands of Indonesia. Applied Geomatics15(4): 957–974. DOI: 10.1007/s12518-023-00533-8.
76.
Pacheco QuevedoRVelastegui-MontoyaAMontalván-BurbanoN, et al. (2023) Land use and land cover as a conditioning factor in landslide susceptibility: a literature review. Landslides. DOI: 10.1007/s10346-022-02020-4.
77.
PasternackGBGoreJLWienerJS (2021) Geomorphic covariance structure of a confined mountain river reveals landform organization stage threshold. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms46(13): 2582–2606. DOI: 10.1002/esp.5195.
78.
PetschkoHBellRLeopoldP, et al. (2013) Landslide inventories for reliable susceptibility maps in lower Austria. In: Landslide Science and Practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 281–286. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31325-7_37.
79.
PranckutėR (2021) Web of science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications9(1): 12. DOI: 10.3390/publications9010012.
80.
PuigdefábregasJ (2005) The role of vegetation patterns in structuring runoff and sediment fluxes in drylands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms30(2): 133–147. DOI: 10.1002/esp.1181.
81.
Quesada-RománAMata-CambroneroE (2021) The geomorphic landscape of the Barva volcano, Costa Rica. Physical Geography42(3): 265–282.
82.
Quesada-RománABallesteros-CánovasJAGranados-BolañosS, et al. (2020) Dendrogeomorphic reconstruction of floods in a dynamic tropical river. Geomorphology359: 107133. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107133.
83.
Quesada-RománABallesteros-CánovasJAGranados-BolañosS, et al. (2022) Improving regional flood risk assessment using flood frequency and dendrogeomorphic analyses in mountain catchments impacted by tropical cyclones. Geomorphology396: 108000. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.108000.
84.
Quesada-RománAPeralta-ReyesM (2023) Geomorphological mapping global trends and applications. Geographies3(3).
85.
Quesada-RománAQuirós-AriasLZamora-PereiraJC (2022) Interactions between geomorphology and production chain of high-quality coffee in Costa Rica. Sustainability14(9): 5265. DOI: 10.3390/su14095265.
86.
Quesada-RománAUmaña-OrtízJZumbado-SolanoM, et al. (2023) Geomorphological regional mapping for environmental planning in developing countries. Environmental Development48: 100935. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100935.
87.
Quesada-ValverdeMEQuesada-RománA (2023) Worldwide trends in methods and resources promoting geoconservation, geotourism, and geoheritage. Geosciences13(2): 39. DOI: 10.3390/geosciences13020039.
88.
QuintonJNFienerP (2024) Soil erosion on arable land: an unresolved global environmental threat. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment48(1): 136–161.
89.
RaoPKShuklaA (2023) Sustainable strategic management: a bibliometric analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment32(6): 3902–3914. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3344.
90.
RaviSBreshearsDDHuxmanTE, et al. (2010) Land degradation in drylands: interactions among hydrologic–aeolian erosion and vegetation dynamics. Geomorphology116(3-4): 236–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.023.
91.
RenschlerCSHarborJ (2002) Soil erosion assessment tools from point to regional scales—the role of geomorphologists in land management research and implementation. Geomorphology47(2–4): 189–209. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00082-X.
92.
Rodríguez-InsuastiHMontalván-BurbanoNSuárez-RodríguezO, et al. (2022) Creative economy: a worldwide research in business, management and accounting. Sustainability14(23): 16010. DOI: 10.3390/su142316010.
93.
RossiMTorriDDe GeeterS, et al. (2022) Topographic thresholds for gully head formation in Badlands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms47(15): 3558–3587. DOI: 10.1002/esp.5473.
94.
SahaSRoyJArabameriA, et al. (2020) Machine learning-based gully erosion susceptibility mapping: a case study of Eastern India. Sensors20(5): 1313. DOI: 10.3390/s20051313.
95.
SallesTHussonLReyP, et al. (2023) Hundred million years of landscape dynamics from catchment to global scale. Science379(6635): 918–923. DOI: 10.1126/science.add2541.
96.
SamarinMZweifelLRothV, et al. (2020) Identifying soil erosion processes in alpine grasslands on aerial imagery with a U-Net convolutional neural network. Remote Sensing12(24): 4149. DOI: 10.3390/rs12244149.
97.
SánchezADde la Cruz Del Río RamaMGarcíaJÁ (2017) Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases Scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics23(1): 8–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.02.001.
98.
SarkarBRahmanAIslamA, et al. (2024) Soil erosion and sediment yield estimation in a tropical monsoon dominated river basin using GIS-based models. Geocarto International39(1): 2309181. DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2024.2309181.
99.
SartoriMFerrariEM'BarekR, et al. (2024) Remaining loyal to our soil: a prospective integrated assessment of soil erosion on global food security. Ecological Economics219: 108103.
100.
ScheingrossJSLimayeABMcCoySW, et al. (2020) The shaping of erosional landscapes by internal dynamics. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment1(12): 661–676. DOI: 10.1038/s43017-020-0096-0.
101.
ShaoWZhangZGuanQ, et al. (2024) Comprehensive assessment of land degradation in the arid and semiarid area based on the optimal land degradation index model. Catena234: 107563. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107563.
102.
SinghVKSinghPKarmakarM, et al. (2021) The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics0123456789: 5113–5142. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
103.
SivakumarMVKStefanskiR (2007) Climate and land degradation — an overview. In: SivakumarMVKNdiang’uiN (eds) Climate and Land Degradation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 105–135. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72438-4_6.
104.
UgrinaMJurićA (2023) Current trends and future perspectives in the remediation of polluted water, soil and air—a review. Processes11(12): 3270. DOI: 10.3390/pr11123270.
105.
van EckNJWaltmanL (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics84(2): 523–538. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
106.
Villatoro-SánchezMLe BissonnaisYMoussaR, et al. (2015) Temporal dynamics of runoff and soil loss on a plot scale under a coffee plantation on steep soil (Ultisol), Costa Rica. Journal of Hydrology523: 409–426. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.058.
107.
WaltmanLvan EckNJNoyonsECM (2010) A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics4(4): 629–635. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002.
108.
WangS ‐JLiuQ ‐MZhangD ‐F (2004) Karst rocky desertification in southwestern China: geomorphology, landuse, impact and rehabilitation. Land Degradation & Development15(2): 115–121. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.592.
109.
WangJZhenJHuW, et al. (2023) Remote sensing of soil degradation: progress and perspective. International Soil and Water Conservation Research11(3): 429–454.
110.
WardPJBlauhutVBloemendaalN, et al. (2020) Review article: natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences20(4): 1069–1096. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-20-1069-2020.
111.
WeeraratnaS (2022) Understanding Land Degradation. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12138-8.
112.
WeslatiOSerbajiM-M (2024) Spatial assessment of soil erosion by water using RUSLE model, remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Mellegue Watershed, Algeria–Tunisia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment196(1): 14. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-12163-z.
113.
WestobyMJBrasingtonJGlasserNF, et al. (2012) ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology179: 300–314.
114.
WilkinsonBHMcElroyBJ (2007) The impact of humans on continental erosion and sedimentation. Geological Society of America Bulletin119(1–2): 140–156. DOI: 10.1130/B25899.1.
115.
WindrimLBrysonMMcLeanM, et al. (2019) Automated mapping of woody debris over harvested forest plantations using UAVs, high-resolution imagery, and machine learning. Remote Sensing11(6): 733. DOI: 10.3390/rs11060733.
116.
WoodworthKAPasternackGB (2022) Are dynamic fluvial morphological unit assemblages statistically stationary through floods of less than ten times bankfull discharge?Geomorphology403: 108135. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108135.
117.
WuXChenXZhanFB, et al. (2015) Global research trends in landslides during 1991–2014: a bibliometric analysis. Landslides12(6): 1215–1226. DOI: 10.1007/s10346-015-0624-z.
118.
WuSChenLWangN, et al. (2018) Modeling rainfall‐runoff and soil erosion processes on hillslopes with complex rill network planform. Water Resources Research54(12): 117–133. DOI: 10.1029/2018WR023837.
119.
XiongMLengG (2024) Global soil water erosion responses to climate and land use changes. Catena241: 108043.
120.
XiongLTangGStroblJ, et al. (2016) Paleotopographic controls on loess deposition in the Loess Plateau of <scp>China</scp>. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms41(9): 1155–1168. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3883.
121.
YaoXYuJJiangH, et al. (2016) Roles of soil erodibility, rainfall erosivity and land use in affecting soil erosion at the basin scale. Agricultural Water Management174: 82–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.001.
122.
ZhaiLSunLZhangY (2024) Development trends in soil erosion fields based on the quantitative evaluation of innovation subjects and innovation content from 1991 to 2020. Sustainability16(2): 795. DOI: 10.3390/su16020795.
123.
ZhaoLHuangCWuF (2016) Effect of microrelief on water erosion and their changes during rainfall. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms41(5): 579–586. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3844.
124.
ZhaoYLiuLKangS, et al. (2021) Quantitative analysis of factors influencing spatial distribution of soil erosion based on geo-detector model under diverse geomorphological Types. Land10(6): 604. DOI: 10.3390/land10060604.
125.
ZhuangYDuCZhangL, et al. (2015) Research trends and hotspots in soil erosion from 1932 to 2013: a literature review. Scientometrics105(2): 743–758. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1706-3.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
