Recent work in the undeveloped Rio Murta Basin, located in Chilean Patagonia, identified an evolutionary trend in the fluvial system as it progresses toward and away from dynamic equilibrium. A location-for-time-substitution model employed over the longitudinal extent of a 16 km study site assessed the performance of extremal hypotheses in identifying dynamic equilibrium conditions. Numerous extremal hypotheses were successful in identifying the spatial trend, but no means were available to discern differences between them. Thus, this study uses field measurements within the evolutionary trend to propose a new metric for evaluating extremal hypotheses. A thorough review and synthesis of the extremal approach are additionally presented. The new method compares theoretical predictions against field-measured values to determine which extremal hypothesis is most effective in identifying the condition of dynamic equilibrium in a gravel-bed river. Channel width and depth are identified as the dependent stream variables that uniquely differentiate most extremal hypotheses from one another. The results indicate that extremal hypotheses based on energy metrics of the flow are most successful, with the strongest support for minimum kinetic energy and minimum specific stream power.
AbrahamsADLiGAtkinsonJF (1995) Step-pool streams: adjustment to maximum flow resistance. Water Resources Research31(10): 2593–2602.
2.
Ackers P (1992)1992Gerald Lacey memorial lecture, canal and river regime in theory and practice. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Water Maritime and Energy96(3): 167–178.
3.
BagnoldRA (1966) An approach to the sediment transport problem from general physics. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 422-I, US Department of the Interior.
4.
BeesonCEDoylePF (1995) Comparison of bank erosion at vegetated and non-vegetated channel bends. AWRA Water Resources Bulletin31(6): 983–990.
5.
BettessRWhiteWR (1987) Extremal hypotheses applied to river regime. In: ThorneCRBathurstJCHeyRD (eds) Sediment Transport in Gravel-Bed Rivers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 767–789.
6.
BironPMBuffin-BélangerTLarocqueM, et al. (2014) Freedom space for rivers: A sustainable management approach to enhance river resilience. Environmental Management54: 1056–1073.
7.
BlenchT (1957) Regime Behavior of Canals and River. London: Butterworth’s Scientific Publications.
8.
BrackenLJWainwrightJ (2006) Geomorphological equilibrium: Myth and metaphor?Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31: 167–178.
9.
Bravo-EspinosaMOsterkampWRLopesVL (2003) Bed load transport in alluvial channels. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering129(10): 783–795.
10.
BrierleyGJFryirsKA (2005) Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
11.
BrierleyGJFryirsK (2015) The use of evolutionary trajectories to guide ‘moving targets’ in the management of river futures. River Research and Applications32: 823–835.
12.
BullWD (1979) Threshold of critical power in streams. Geological Society of American Bulletin90: 453–464.
13.
CamporealeCPeronaPPorporatoA, et al. (2005) On the long-term behavior of meandering rivers. Water Resources Research41: W12403.
14.
CaoSKnightDW (1996) Regime theory of alluvial channels based upon the concept of stream power and probability. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers100: 160–167.
15.
CarsonMAGriffithsGA (1987) Bedload transport in gravel channels. Journal of Hydrology26: 1–151.
16.
ChangHH (1979) Minimum stream power and river channel patterns. Journal of Hydrology41: 303–327.
17.
ChangHH (1980) Geometry of gravel streams. ASCE Journal of the Hydraulics Division106(9): 1443–1456.
18.
ChangHH (1984) Comment on: Extremal hypotheses for river regime: An illusion of progress. By GriffithsGA. Water Resources Research20(11): 1767–1768.
19.
ChitaleSV (2003) Modeling for width adjustment in alluvial rivers. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering129(5): 404–407.
20.
ChenWMiedRP (2013) River velocities from sequential multispectral remote sensing images. Water Resources Research49: 3093–3103.
21.
ChurchM (2006) Bed material transport and the morphology of alluvial river channels. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science34: 325–354.
22.
ClaudeNRodriguesSBustilloV, et al. (2012) Estimating bedload transport in a large sand–gravel bed river from direct sampling, dune tracking and empirical formulas. Geomorphology179: 40–57.
23.
ComitiF (2012) How natural are Alpine mountain rivers? Evidence from the Italian Alps. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms37: 693–707.
24.
CopelandRRMcComasDNThorneCR, et al. (2001) Hydraulic design of stream restoration projects. Technical report ERDC/CHL TR-01–28. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center.
25.
Da SilvaAMF (2009) On the stable geometry of self-formed alluvial channels: Theory and practical application. Canadian Journal Civil Engineering36: 1667–1679.
26.
Da SilvaAMF (2013) River self-formation and regime channel geometry in the light of thermodynamic principles. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IAHR world congress (eds ZhaoyinWLeeJHJizhangGShuyouC), Chengdu, China, 9–13 September, p.12. Taylor and Francis.
27.
DarbySEThorneCR (1993) Discussion on: Effect of bank stability on geometry of gravel rivers. By Millar RG and Quick MC. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering119(12): 382–384.
28.
DaviesTRHSutherlandAJ (1980) Flow past deformable boundaries. Earth Surface Processes5: 175–179.
29.
DaviesTRHSutherlandAJ (1983) Extremal hypotheses for river behavior. Water Resources Research19(1): 141–148.
30.
DengZZhangK (1994) Morphologic equations based on the principle of maximum entropy. International Journal of Sedimentary Research9(1): 31–46.
31.
DeshpandeVKumarB (2012) Review and assessment of the theories of stable alluvial channel design. Water Resources39(4): 481–487.
32.
EatonBCChurchM (2009) Channel stability in bed load–dominated streams with nonerodible banks: Inferences from experiments in a sinuous flume. Journal of Geophysical Research114: F01024.
33.
EatonBCChurchMMillarRG (2004) Rational regime model of alluvial channel morphology and response. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms29: 511–529.
34.
EttemaRMusteM (2004) Scale effects in flume experiments on flow around a spur dike in flatbed channel. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering130(7): 635–646.
35.
FariasHD (1995) Physical and mathematical modelling of alluvial channels in regime. In: Proceedings of the XXVIth Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research. Vol. 1. London, UK, 348–353. London: Thomas Telford.
36.
FergusonRI (1986) Hydraulics and hydraulic geometry. Progress in Physical Geography10: 1–31.
37.
FergusonRI (2005) Estimating critical stream power for bedload transport calculations in gravel-bed rivers. Geomorphology70: 33–41.
38.
GranKBTalMWartmanED (2015) Co-evolution of riparian vegetation and channel dynamics in an aggrading braided river system, Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms40: 1101–1115.
39.
GrayWGGhidaouiMSKarneyBW (2018) Does the stream power theory have a physical foundation?Journal of Hydraulic Research56(5): 585–595.
40.
GriffithsGA (1981) Flow resistance in coarse gravel-bed rivers. ASCE Journal of the Hydraulics Division107(7): 899–918.
41.
GriffithsGA (1984) Extremal hypotheses for river regime: An illusion of progress. Water Resources Research20(1): 113–118.
42.
GriffithsGACarsonMA (2000) Channel width for maximum bedload transport capacity in gravel-bed rivers, South Island, New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology39(2): 107–126.
43.
HabersackHMLaronneJB (2002) Evaluation and improvement of bedload discharge formulas based on Helley-Smith sampling in an alpine gravel bed river. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering128(5): 484–499.
44.
HaddadchiAOmidMHDehghaniAA (2012) Assessment of bed-load predictors based on sampling in a gravel bed river. Journal of Hydrodynamics24(1): 145–151.
45.
HaddadchiAOmidMHDehghaniAA (2013) Bedload equation analysis using bed load-material grain size. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics61(3): 241–249.
46.
HarborDJ (1998) Dynamic equilibrium between an active uplift and the Sevier River, Utah. Journal of Geology106(2): 181–194.
47.
HendersonFM (1966) Open Channel Flow. New York: Macmillan.
48.
HeyRD (1978) Determinate hydraulic geometry of river channels. ASCE Journal of the Hydraulics Division104(6): 869–885.
49.
HeyRDThorneCR (1986) Stable channels with mobile gravel beds. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering112(8): 671–689.
50.
HjulstromF (1935) Studies of morphological activity of rivers as illustrated by the River Fyris. Bulletin of the Geological Institute University of Uppsala25: 221–527.
51.
HookeJM (2007) Complexity, self-organisation and variation in behaviour in meandering rivers. Geomorphology91: 236–258.
52.
HowardAD (1965) Geomorphological systems – equilibrium and dynamics. American Journal of Science263: 302–312.
53.
HuangHQNansonGC (2000) Hydraulic geometry and maximum flow efficiency as products of the principle of least action. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms25: 1–16.
54.
HuangHQNansonGC (2002) A stability criterion inherent in laws governing alluvial channel flow. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms27: 929–944.
55.
InglisCC (1947) Meanders and their bearing on river training. Maritime and Waterways Engineers Division, Institution of Civil Engineers5(17): 3–24.
56.
JamesLA (2017) Arrested geomorphic trajectories and the long-term hidden potential for change. Journal of Environmental Management202: 412–423.
57.
JeffersonMSW (1902) Limiting width of meander belts. The National Geographic Magazine13: 373–384.
58.
JiaY (1990) Minimum Froude number and the equilibrium of alluvial sand rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms15: 199–209.
59.
KanwalMShakirASMasoodM (2015) Evaluation of analytical methods and other regime theories as alternative to Lacey’s theory for alluvial channel design. Science International27(5): 4153–4159.
60.
KarkiKBeharaR (1992) Discussion of: First step away from Lacey’s regime equations. By Stevens MA and Nordin Jr. CF. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering118(4): 659–661.
61.
KennedyRG (1895) The prevention of silting in irrigation canals. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers119: 281–290.
62.
KondolfM (2011) Setting goals in river restoration: When and where can the river “heal itself”? In: SimonABennettSJCastroJM (eds) Stream Restoration in Dynamics Fluvial Systems: Scientific Approaches, Analyses and Tools. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union, Geophysical Monograph Series 194. Wiley Online Books, 29–43.
63.
LaceyG (1929) Stable channels in alluvium. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers229: 258–384.
64.
LambertiA (1988) About extremal hypotheses and river regime. In: International conference on river regime (ed WhiteWR), Wallingford, UK, 18–20 May 1988, 121–134. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
65.
LaneEW (1937) Stable channels in erodible material. Transactions of the American Society Civil Engineering102: 123–142.
66.
LaneEW (1955) Design of stable channels. Transactions of the American Society Civil Engineering120: 1234–1279.
67.
LeopoldLB (1994) A View of the River. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
68.
LeopoldLBLangbeinWB (1962) The concept of entropy in landscape evolution. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 500-A, US Department of the Interior, A1–A20.
69.
LeopoldLBLangbeinWB (1963) Association and indeterminacy in geomorphology. In: AlbrittonCCJr (ed) Fabric of Geology. Stanford, CA: Freeman, Cooper and Company, 184–192.
70.
LindleyES (1919) Regime channels. In: Proceedings of the Punjab Engineering Congress, Lahore, Pakistan, pp. 63–74. Lahore, Pakistan: Punjab Engineering Society.
71.
LisleTE (2008) The evolution of sediment waves influenced by varying transport capacity in heterogeneous rivers. In: HabersackHPiegayHRinaldiM (eds) Gravel-Bed Rivers VI: From Process Understanding to River Restoration. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 443–469.
72.
MackinJH (1948) Concept of the graded river. Geological Society of American Bulletin59: 463–512.
73.
MacklinMGLewinJ (2018) River stresses in anthropogenic times: Large-scale global patterns and extended environmental timelines. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment43(1): 3–23.
74.
MaddockT (1970) Indeterminate hydraulics of alluvial channels. ASCE Journal of the Hydraulics Division96(11): 2309–2323.
75.
MadejMASutherlandDGLisleTE, et al. (2009) Channel responses to varying sediment input: A flume experiment modeled after Redwood Creek, California. Geomorphology103: 507–519.
76.
MartinY (2003) Evaluation of bed load transport formulae using field evidence from the Vedder River, British Columbia. Geomorphology53: 75–95.
77.
MillarRQuickMC (1993) Effect of bank stability on geometry of gravel rivers. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering119(12): 1343–1363.
78.
MolnarPRamirezJA (1998) Energy dissipation theories and optimal channel characteristics of river networks. Water Resources Research34(7): 1809–1818.
79.
MolnarPRamirezJA (2002) On downstream hydraulic geometry and optimal energy expenditure: Case study of the Ashley and Taieri Rivers. Journal of Hydrology259: 105–115.
80.
NelsonJMKinzelPLegleiterCJ, et al. (2017) Using remotely sensed data to estimate river characteristics including water-surface velocity and discharge. Proceedings of the 37th IAHR world congress (ed GhaniAA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 13–18 August, pp. 1–10. Madrid: Taylor and Francis.
81.
ParkerGWilcockPRPaolaC, et al. (2007) Physical basis for quasi-universal relations describing bankfull hydraulic geometry of single-thread gravel bed rivers. Journal of Geophysical Research112(F4): F04005.
82.
PhillipsJD (1991) Multiple modes of adjustment in unstable river channel cross-sections. Journal of Hydrology123: 39–49.
83.
PhillipsJD (2009) Changes, perturbations, and responses in geomorphic systems. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment33(1): 17–30.
84.
PickupG (1976) Adjustment of stream-channel shape to hydrologic regime. Journal of Hydrology30: 365–373.
85.
PiégayH (2016) System approaches in fluvial geomorphology. In: KondolfGMPiégayH (eds) Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology. 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell, 79–102.
86.
PiégayHDarbySEMosselmanE, et al. (2005) A review of techniques available for delimiting the erodible river corridor: A sustainable approach to managing bank erosion. River Research and Applications21: 773–789.
87.
PizzutoJE (1990) Numerical simulation of gravel river widening. Water Resources Research26: 1971–1980.
88.
ReckingALiébaultFPeteuilC, et al. (2012) Testing bedload transport equations with consideration of time scales. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms37: 774–789.
89.
RichardsK (2004) Rivers, Form and Process in Alluvial Channels. West Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
90.
Rodriguez-IturbeIRinaldoARigonR, et al. (1992) Energy dissipation runoff production and the three-dimensional structure of river basins. Water Resources Research28(4): 1095–1103.
91.
RubeyWW (1952) Geology and mineral resources of the Hardin and Brussels quadrangles (in Illinois). US Geological Survey Professional Paper 218, US Department of the Interior.
92.
SchummSA (1960) The shape of alluvial channels in relation to sediment type. Professional Paper of the US Geological Survey 352B, US Department of the Interior, 17–30.
93.
ThompsonCCrokeJ (2013) Geomorphic effects, flood power, and channel competence of a catastrophic flood in confined and unconfined reaches of the upper Lockyer valley, southeast Queensland, Australia. Geomorphology197: 156–169.
94.
TranmerAW (2016) The assessment of extremal hypotheses for predicting the dynamic equilibrium of streams. PhD Thesis, University of Idaho, US.
95.
TranmerAWGooodwinPCaamañoD (2018) Assessment of alluvial trends toward dynamic equilibrium under chronic climatic forcing. Advances in Water Resources120: 19–34.
96.
VanoniVABrooksNH (1957) Laboratory studies of roughness and suspended load of alluvial streams. Report E-68, California Institute of Technology, CA.
97.
WainwrightJParsonsAJCooperJR, et al. (2015) The concept of transport capacity in geomorphology. Reviews of Geophysics53: 1155–1202.
98.
WalterRCMerrittsDJ (2008) Natural streams and the legacy of water powered mills. Science319: 299–304.
99.
WangSQWhiteWRBettessR (1986) A rational approach to river regime. In: Proceedings of the international conference on river sedimentation (eds WangSYShenHWDingLZ), Jackson, MS, 31 March–4 April, pp. 167–176. Jackson, MS: University of Misssissippi.
100.
WhiteWRBettessRParisE (1982) Analytical approach to river regime. ASCE Journal of the Hydraulics Division108(10): 1179–1193.
101.
WohlE (2004) Limits of downstream hydraulic geometry. Geology32(10): 897–900.
102.
WongMParkerG (2006) Reanalysis and correction of bed-load relation of Meyer-Peter and Müller using their own database. ASCE Journal of Hydraulic Engineering132(11): 1159–1168.
103.
WyzgaBZawiejskaJRadecki-PawlikA, et al. (2012) Environmental change, hydromorphological reference conditions and the restoration of Polish Carpathian rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms37: 1213–1226.
104.
YagerEMTurowskiJMRickenmannD, et al. (2012) Sediment supply, grain protrusion, and bedload transport in mountain streams. Geophysical Research Letters39(L10402).
105.
YalinMSda SilvaAMF (1999) Regime channels in cohesionless alluvium. Journal of Hydraulic Research37(6): 725–742.
106.
YalinMSda SilvaAMF (2000) Computation of regime channel characteristics on thermodynamic basis. Journal of Hydraulic Research38(1): 57–64.
107.
YangCT (1976) Minimum stream power and fluvial hydraulics. ASCE Journal of the Hydraulics Division102(HY7): 919–934.
108.
YangCTSongCSWoldenbergMJ (1981) Hydraulic geometry and minimum rate of energy dissipation. Water Resources Research17(4): 1014–1018.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
