Catchment sediment budgeting is an attempt to identify the sources, sinks and pathways of eroded material within catchments. However, the identification of these quantities is not straightforward, and the conceptual underpinnings of sediment budgets make unwarranted and untested assumptions about process stability. Many sediment budgets leave one or more quantities unmeasured and obtain estimates of them by subtraction (assuming budget closure). Consequently, errors in sediment budgets are often hidden and are not quantified. There has been an emphasis on suspended sediment, which, for management purposes, may not be useful. Sediment budgeting can act as a framework for a research agenda on catchment processes. What has been lacking from this agenda has been an adequate consideration of the time taken for sediment to travel via the various pathways to the catchment outlet. The storage term in such budgets has been used as a poor substitute for a thorough understanding of sediment velocity through catchments.
BanasikKBarszczMBranskiJ (2005) Major components of a sediment budget for four river catchments in Poland. Sediment Budgets 2 (Proceedings of Symposium S1 held during the Seventh IAHS Scientific Assembly at Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, April). IAHS Publication292: 32–36.
2.
BartleyRHawdonAPostDARothCH (2007) A sediment budget for a grazed semi-arid catchment in the Burdekin basin, Australia. Geomorphology87: 302–321.
3.
BeachT (1994) The fate of eroded soil: Sediment sinks and sediment budgets of agrarian landscapes in Southern Minnestota, 1851–1988. Annals of the Association of American Geographers84: 5–28.
4.
BeginZBSchummSA (1979) Instability of alluvial valley floors: A method for its assessment. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers22: 347–350.
5.
BennettJP (1974) Concepts of mathematical modelling of sediment yield. Water Resources Research10: 485–492.
6.
BevenKJ (2006) A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology320: 18–36.
7.
BevenKJFreerJ (2001) Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems. Journal of Hydrology249: 11–29.
8.
BrackenLJWainwrightJ (2006) Geomorphological equilibrium: Myth and metaphor. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31: 167–178.
9.
BrownRBCutshallNHKlingGF (1981) Agricultural erosion indicated by 137Cs redistribution; II. Estimates of erosion rates. Soil Science Society of America Journal45: 1191–1197.
10.
ChurchMSlaymakerO (1989) Disequilibrium of Holocene sediment yield in glaciated British Columbia. Nature337: 452–454.
11.
DalgleishHYFosterIDL (1996) 137Cs losses from a loamy surface water gleyed soil (Inceptisol): A laboratory simulation experiment. Catena26: 227–245.
12.
Davies-ColleyRJSmithDG (2001) Turbidity, suspended sediment, and water clarity – a review. Journal of the American Water Resources Association37: 1085–1101.
13.
EbisemijuFS (1990) Sediment delivery ratio prediction equations for short catchment slopes in a humid tropical environment. Journal of Hydrology114: 191–208.
14.
EvansR (1992) An alternative way to assess water erosion of cultivated land – field-based measurements: An analysis of some results. Applied Geography22: 187–208.
15.
EvansR (1995) Some methods of directly assessing water erosion of cultivated land – a comparison of measurements made on plots and in fields. Progress in Physical Geography19: 115–129.
16.
FanHMCaiQQ (2005) A suspended sediment budget for the Liu River basin, China. Sediment Budgets 1(Proceedings of Symposium S1 held during the Seventh IAHS Scientific Assembly at Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, April). IAHS Publication291: 243–249.
17.
FrancisCWBrinkleyFS (1976) Preferential adsorption of 137Cs to micaceous minerals in contaminated freshwater sediment. Nature260: 511–513.
18.
GarzantiEAndòSVezzoliGAbdel MegidAAEl KamarA (2006) Petrology of Nile River sands (Ethiopia and Sudan): Sediment budgets and erosion patterns. Earth and Planetary Science Letters252: 327–341.
19.
GlymphLM (1954) Studies of sediment yields from watersheds. International Association for Hydrological Sciences Publication36: 173–191.
20.
GrafWL (1988) Fluvial Processes in Dryland Rivers. Berlin: Springer.
21.
JamesLA (2006) Bed waves at the basin scale: Implications for river management and restoration. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms31: 1692–1706.
22.
JohnsonRMWarburtonJ (2002) Annual sediment budget of a UK mountain torrent. Geografiska Annaler Series A – Physical Geography84A: 73–88.
23.
KelseyHM (1980) A sediment budget and an analysis of geomorphic processes in the Van Duzen River basin, north coastal California, 1941–1975. Geological Society of America BulletinPart 2: 1119–1216.
24.
KondolfGMMatthewsWVG (1991) Unmeasured residuals in sediment budgets – a cautionary note. Water Resources Research27(9): 2483–2486.
25.
LaronneJBReidIYitshakYFrostickLE (1994) The non-layering of gravel streambeds under ephemeral flood regimes. Journal of Hydrology159: 353–363.
26.
LeopoldLBWolmanRGMillerJP (1964) Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
27.
LiveseyRH (1975) Corps of Engineers methods for predicting sediment yields. In: Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yields and Sources. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Publication ARS-S-40, 16–32.
28.
LongmoreMEO’LearyBMRoseCWChandicaAL (1983) Mapping soil erosion and accumulation with the fallout isotope Caesium-137. Australian Journal of Soil Research21: 373–385.
29.
LuHMoranCJSivapalanM (2005) A theoretical exploration of catchment-scale sediment delivery. Water Resources Research41: W09415.
30.
ManerSB (1958) Factors affecting sediment delivery rates in the Red Hills physiographic area. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union30: 669–675.
31.
MatthewsG (1999) Sediment source analysis and preliminary sediment budget for the Noyo River. Report prepared by Matthews and Associates, Weaverville, California.
32.
MeybeckRH (1976) Total mineral dissolved transport by the world’s major rivers. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin21: 265–289.
33.
NicholasAPAshworthPJKikbyMJMacklinMGMurrayT (1995) Sediment slugs: Large-scale fluctuations in fluvial sediment transport rates and storage volumes. Progress in Physical Geography19: 500–519.
34.
NyssenJPoesenJVeyert-PicotMMoeyersonsJMaileMitikuDeckersJ (2006) Assessment of gully erosion rates through interviews and measurements: A case study from northern Ethiopia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms31: 167–185.
35.
NyssenJPoesenJMoeyersonsJMaileMitikuDeckersJ (2008) Dynamics of soil erosion rates and controlling factors in the Northern Ethiopian Highlands – towards a sediment budget. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms33: 695–711.
36.
ParsonsAJFosterIDL (2011) What can we learn about soil erosion from the use of 137Cs?Earth Science Reviews108: 101–113.
37.
ParsonsAJWainwrightJAbrahamsAD (1996) Runoff and erosion on semi-arid hillslopes. In: AndersonMGBrooksSM (eds) Advances in Hillslope Processes. Chichester: Wiley, 1061–1078.
38.
ParsonsAJWainwrightJPowellDMBrazierRE (2006) Is sediment delivery a fallacy?Earth Surface Processes and Landforms31: 1325–1328.
39.
ParsonsAJWainwrightJPowellDMKadukJBrazierRE (2004) A conceptual model for determining soil erosion by water. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms29: 1293–1302.
40.
PeartMRWallingDE (1988) Techniques for establishing suspended sediment sources in two drainage basins in Devon, UK: A comparative approach. Sediment Budgets(Proceedings of the Porto Alegre Symposium). IAHS Publication174: 269–279.
41.
PoesenJNachtergaeleJVerstraetenGValentinC (2003) Gully erosion and environmental change: Importance and research needs. Catena50: 91–133.
42.
PowellDMReidILaronneJBFrostickLE (1996) Bed load as a component of sediment yield from a semi-arid watershed of the northern Negev. In: WallingDEWebbBW (eds) Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives. Wallingford: International Association of Hydrological Sciences Press, 389–387.
43.
ProsserIRutherfordIOlleyJMYoungWJWallbrinkP (2001) Large-scale patterns of erosion and sediment transport in river networks, with examples from Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research52: 81–99.
44.
Ramos-ScharronCEMacDonaldLH (2007) Development and application of a GIS-based sediment budget model. Journal of Environmental Management84: 157–172.
45.
ReidILaronneJB (1995) Bedload sediment transport in an ephemeral stream and a comparison with seasonal and perennial counterparts. Water Resources Research31: 773–781.
46.
ReidLMDunneT (1996) Rapid Evaluation of Sediment Budgets. Reiskirchen: Catena Verlag (GeoEcology paperback), 164 pp.
47.
RejmanJUsowiczBDebickiR (1999) Source of errors in predicting silt soil erodibility with USLE. Polish Journal of Soil Science32: 13–22.
48.
RitchieJCSpraberryJAMcHenryJR (1974) Estimating soil erosion from the redistribution of fallout 137Cs. Soil Science Society of America Journal38: 137–139.
49.
RogowskiASTamuraT (1970) Erosional behavior of cesium-137. Health Physics18: 467–477.
50.
RoviraABatallaRJSalaM (2005) Fluvial sediment budget of a Mediterranean river: The lower Tordera (Catalan Coastal Ranges, NE Spain). Catena60: 19–42.
51.
RustomjiPCaitcheonGHairsineP (2008) Combining a spatial model with geochemical tracers and river station data to construct a catchment sediment budget. Water Resources Research44: W01422.
52.
RutherfordIDProsserIPDavisJ (1997) Simple approaches to predicting rates and extent of gully development. In WangSSYLanendoenEJShieldsFD (eds) Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, University of Mississippi, USA, 1125–1130.
53.
SidorchukA (1999) Dynamic and static models of gully erosion. Catena37: 401–414.
54.
SidorchukA (2006) Stages in gully evolution and self-organised criticality. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms31: 1329–1344.
55.
SlaymakerO (2003) The sediment budget as conceptual framework and management tool. Hydrobiologia494: 71–82.
56.
TrimbleSW (1983) A sediment budget for Coon Creek Basin in the driftless area, Wisconsin, 1853–1977. American Journal of Science283: 454–474.
TunnicliffeJFChurchM (2011) Scale variation of post-glacial sediment yield in Chilliwack Valley, British Colu mbia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms36: 229–243.
VerstraetenGPoesenJ (2000) Estimating trap efficiency of small reservoirs and ponds: Methods and implications for the assessment of sediment yields. Progress in Physical Geography24: 219–251.
61.
WainwrightJParsonsAJMuellerEBrazierRPowellDM (2010) Standing proud: A response to ‘Soil-erosion models: where do we really stand’ by Smith et al. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms35: 1349–1356.
62.
WainwrightJParsonsAJMuellerEBrazierRPowellDMFentiB (2008) A transport-distance approach to scaling erosion rates: 1. Background and model development. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms33: 813–826.
63.
WallingDECollinsA. (2008) The catchment sediment budget as a management tool. Environmental Science and Policy11: 136–143.
64.
WallingDERussellMAHodginsonRAZhangY (2002) Establishing sediment budgets for two small lowland agricultural catchments in the UK. Catena47: 323–353.
65.
WangZ-YLiYHeY (2007) Sediment budget of the Yangtze River. Water Resources Research43: W04401.
66.
WilcoxBPNewmanBDBrandesDDavenportDWReidK (1997) Runoff from a semiarid ponderosa pine hillslope in New Mexico. Water Resources Research33: 2301–2314.
67.
WilkinsonSNOlleyJMReadAMDeRoseRC (2005) Targeting erosion control using spatially distributed sediment budgets. Sediment Budgets 2(Proceedings of Symposium S1 held during the Seventh IAHS Scientific Assembly at Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, April). IAHS Publication291: 65–74.
68.
WilkinsonSNProsserIPRustomjiPReadAM (2009) Modelling and testing spatially distributed sediment budgets to relate erosion processes to sediment yields. Environmental Modelling and Software24: 489–501.
69.
WischmeierWHSmithDD (1978) Agricultural Handbook No. 537. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office,.
70.
YuillBTNicholsMH (2011) Patterns of grain-size dependent sediment transport in low-ordered ephemeral channels. Earth Surface Porcesses and Landforms36: 334–346.
