The past decade has seen a dramatic re-scaling of digital geopolitics: in the place of state-less and scale-less imaginaries of the digital world, a new imaginary centers on a great power rivalry. Stacks—assemblages of platforms and infrastructures exercising governance over populations and space—and their relation to states have become central. Yet neither global nor bipolar imaginaries adequately capture the vast and increasingly heterogeneous typology of geopolitical arrangements between states and stacks. This paper pulls together studies of state territoriality, digital platforms, and more-than-human infrastructures to reconceptualize the stack geographically: historically entangled with the state but with distinct spatialities.
AbelJRColemanL (2020) Dreams of infrastructure in global Asias. Verge: Studies in Global Asias6(2): vi.
2.
AgnewJ (1994) The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy1(1): 53–80.
3.
AgnewJ (2010) Still trapped in territory?Geopolitics15(4): 779–784.
4.
AgnewJ (2020) The Confines of Territory. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
AkhterM (2015) Infrastructure nation: state space, hegemony, and hydraulic regionalism in Pakistan. Antipode47: 1–22.
6.
AmooreL (2017) What does it mean to govern with algorithms?Antipode Online (Intervention Symposium—Algorithmic Governance)6: 16.
7.
AmooreL (2018) Cloud geographies: computing, data, sovereignty. Progress in Human Geography42(1): 4–24.
8.
AmooreL (2020) Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. Durham: Duke University Press.
9.
AndersonB (2019) Cultural geography II: the force of representations. Progress in Human Geography43(6): 1120–1132.
10.
AndradeR (2020) Algorithmic governance on the New Silk Road: an essay on power and technology across cities and regimes. Conexão Política9(1): 31.
11.
AshJ (2012) Technology, technicity, and emerging practices of temporal sensitivity in videogames. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44(1): 187–203.
12.
AshJ (2016) The Interface Envelope: Gaming, Technology, Power. Reprint edition. New York; London; Oxford: Bloomsbury Academic.
13.
AshJAndersonBGordonR, et al. (2018) Digital interface design and power: friction, threshold, transition. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(6): 1136–1153.
14.
AshJKitchinRLeszczynskiA (2018) Digital turn, digital geographies?Progress in Human Geography42(1): 25–43.
15.
BarbrookRCameronA (1996) The Californian ideology. Science as Culture6(1): 44–72.
16.
BarlowJP (1996) A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Electronic frontier foundation. Available at: https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence (accessed 20 August 2024).
BaruaM (2021) Infrastructure and non-human life: a wider ontology. Progress in Human Geography45(6): 0309132521991220.
19.
BennetTJoyceP (eds) (2010) Material Powers: Cultural Studies, History and the Material Turn. London: Routledge.
20.
BerjonRCaffarraCBonfiglioF, et al. (2025) #EuroStack: European strategic sovereign digital infrastructures. EuroStack.
21.
BissellD (2020) Affective platform urbanism: changing habits of digital on-demand consumption. Geoforum115: 102–110.
22.
BissellD (2023) The politics of deautomation: being disaffected by platform capitalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space0(0): 02637758231205105.
23.
BradleyA (2011) Originary Technicity: The Theory of Technology from Marx to Derrida. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
BradyD (2021a) Between nation and state: boundary infrastructures, communities of practice and everyday nation-ness in the Chinese rail system. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space39(7): 1436–1452.
25.
BradyD (2021b) The circulatory panopticon: real names, rail infrastructure and Foucault’s realist turn. Political Geography90: 102463.
26.
BradyDLinW (2023) Automating passenger work: airport labour at the transductive interface. Social & Cultural Geography25(4): 525–543. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2023.2197873.
27.
BrattonBH (2015) The stack: on software and sovereignty. In: Software Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Bratton (2018) On hemispherical stacks: notes on multipolar geopolitics and planetary-scale computation. In: WangS (ed) As We May Think: Feedforward. Guangzhou: Guangdong Museum of Art, 77–85.
29.
BrennerNEldenS (2009) Henri Lefebvre on state, space, territory. International Political Sociology3(4): 353–377.
30.
BrennerNSchmidC (2011) Planetary urbanisation. In: GandyM (ed) Urban Constellations. New York: Jovis, pp. 10–13.
31.
BrownCL (2008) China’s second-generation national identity card: merging culture, industry, and technology for authentication, classification, and surveillance. In: BennettCJLyonD (eds) Playing the Identity Card: Surveillance, Security and, Identification in Global Perspective. New York: Routledge, 57–74.
32.
CalzadaI (2022) How digital citizenship regimes are rescaling European nation-states. Space and Polity26(1): 44–52.
33.
CalzadaIBustardJRT (2023) The dilemmas around digital citizenship in a post-Brexit and post-pandemic Northern Ireland: towards an algorithmic nation?Citizenship Studies27(2): 271–292.
34.
CaprottiFLiuD (2020) Platform urbanism and the Chinese smart city: the co-production and territorialisation of Hangzhou City Brain. Geojournal, Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-020-10320.
35.
CardulloPKitchinR (2019) Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. Geojournal84(1): 1–13.
36.
CarseA (2016) Keyword: infrastructure: how a humble French engineering term shaped the modern world In: Infrastructures and Social Complexity. New York: Routledge.
37.
ChandelSJingjiZYunnanY, et al. (2019) The golden shield project of China: a decade later—an in-depth study of the great Firewall. In: 2019 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery, Guilin, China, 1 October 2019, p. 119.
38.
ChenL (2016) From fintech to finlife: the case of fintech development in China. China Economic Journal9(3): 225–239.
39.
ChenY (2017) WeChat use among Chinese college students: exploring gratifications and political engagement in China. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication10(1): 25–43.
40.
ChenXOakesT (2023) Time-space companions: digital surveillance, social management, and abuse of power during the covid-19 pandemic in China. Critical Asian Studies55(2): 282–305.
41.
ChenYMaoZQiuJL (2018) Super-sticky WeChat and Chinese society. In: Emerald Points. 1st edition. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing.
42.
ChewBCShenXAnsellJ (2020) Alipay entered Malaysia: a closer look at the new market entry strategy driven by Chinese tourists. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets12(4): 561–577.
43.
ChuJY (2014) When infrastructures attack: the workings of disrepair in China. American Ethnologist41(2): 351–367.
44.
ChubbA (2015) China’s Shanzhai Culture: ‘Grabism’ and the politics of hybridity. Journal of Contemporary China24(92): 260–279.
45.
CoeNMYangC (2022) Mobile gaming production networks, platform business groups, and the market power of China’s tencent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers112(2): 307–330.
46.
CooleDHFrostS (2010) Introducing the new materialisms. In: CooleDHFrostS (eds) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press, 1–46.
47.
CreemersR (2017) Cyber China: upgrading propaganda, public opinion work and social management for the twenty-first century. Journal of Contemporary China26(103): 85–100.
48.
CreemersR (2020) China’s conception of cyber sovereignty: rhetoric and realization. In: BroedersDWJBergBvan den (eds) Governing Cyberspace: Behavior, Power and Diplomacy. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 107–145.
49.
DammannFGlaszeG (2023) Governing digital circulation: the quest for data control and sovereignty in Germany. Territory, Politics, Governance11(6): 1100–1120.
50.
DammannFEichenmüllerCGlaszeG (2022) Geographies of “digital governmentality”. Digital Geography and Society3: 100034.
51.
DarlingJ (2014) Another letter from the home office: reading the material politics of asylum. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32(3): 484–500.
52.
DattaA (2018) The digital turn in postcolonial urbanism: smart citizenship in the making of India’s 100 smart cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers43(3): 405–419.
53.
DattaA (2023) The digitalising state: governing digitalisation-as-urbanisation in the global south. Progress in Human Geography47(1): 141–159.
54.
DattaniK (2020) “Governtrepreneurism” for good governance: the case of Aadhaar and the India Stack. Area52(2): 411–419.
55.
DavisMXiaoJ (2021) De-westernizing platform studies: history and logics of Chinese and U.S. Platforms. International Journal of Communication15: 20.
56.
de LaetMMolA (2000) The Zimbabwe bush pump: mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science30(2): 225–263.
57.
de SetaG (2021) Gateways, sieves and domes: on the infrastructural topology of the Chinese stack. International Journal of Communication15: 24.
58.
de SetaG (2023) QR code: the global making of an infrastructural gateway. Global Media and China8(3): 362–380.
59.
DefraigneJC (2022) US industrial policy: the not-so-visible hand of the state and securing the dominance of US prime movers. In: DefraigneJ-CWoutersJTraversaE, et al. (eds) EU Industrial Policy in the Multipolar Economy. London: Edward Elgar Publishing, 210–241. Available at: https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781800372634/book-part-9781800372634-12.xml (accessed 30 May 2024).
60.
DeLandaM (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
61.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia(Tran. B Massumi). Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.
62.
DeNardisL (2012) Hidden levers of internet control: an infrastructure-based theory of internet governance. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 720–738.
63.
DittmerJ (2016) Theorizing a more-than-human diplomacy: assembling the British foreign office, 1839–1874. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy11(1): 78–104.
64.
DittmerJ (2017) Diplomatic Material: Affect, Assemblage, and Foreign Policy. Durham: Duke University Press.
65.
DodgeMKitchinR (2005) Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers95(1): 162–180.
66.
EldenS (2004) Between Marx and Heidegger: politics, philosophy and Lefebvre’s the production of space. Antipode36(1): 86–105.
67.
EldenS (2013) The Birth of Territory. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
68.
EldenS (2017) Legal terrain—the political materiality of territory. London Review of International Law5(2): 199–224.
69.
EldenS (2021) The limits of territory and terrain. Dialogues in Human Geography11(2): 213–217.
70.
ErieMSStreinzT (2021) The Beijing Effect: China’s digital Silk Road as transnational data governance. Journal of International Law and Politics54(1): 1–92.
71.
EscobarA (2011) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
72.
FarnanODarerAWrightJ (2016) Poisoning the well: exploring the great firewall’s poisoned DNS responses. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, Vienna, Austria, 24 October 2016. ACM, pp 95–98.
73.
FarrellHNewmanAL (2019) Weaponized interdependence: how global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security44(4): 42–79.
74.
FarrellHNewmanA (2023) Underground Empire: How America Weaponized the World Economy. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
75.
FerraryMGranovetterM (2009) The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and Society38(2): 326–359.
FoucaultM (2009) Security, territory, population. In: SenellartMEwaldFFontanaA, et al. (eds) Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
78.
FurlongK (2011) Small technologies, big change: rethinking infrastructure through STS and geography. Progress in Human Geography35(4): 460–482.
79.
FurlongK (2020) Geographies of infrastructure I: economies. Progress in Human Geography44(3): 572–582.
80.
FurlongK (2021) Geographies of infrastructure II: concrete, cloud and layered (in)visibilities. Progress in Human Geography45(1): 190–198.
81.
FurlongK (2022) Geographies of infrastructure III: infrastructure with Chinese characteristics. Progress in Human Geography46(3): 915–925.
82.
GießmannS (2018) Money, credit, and digital payment 1971/2014: from the credit card to Apple pay. Administration & Society50(9): 1259–1279.
83.
GießmannS (2023) On identification: theory and history of a media practice. In: GießmannSRöhlTTrischlerR, et al. (eds) Materiality of Cooperation. Medien der Kooperation – Media of Cooperation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 131–154.
84.
GillespieT (2010) The politics of ‘platforms. New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.
85.
GirardT (2024) National identity and the limits of platform power in the global economy. International Studies Quarterly68(3): sqae090.
86.
GogginG (2022) Living with digital platforms in Asia-Pacific: editorial note. Asian Journal of Communication32(5): 397–398.
87.
GoswamiM (2004) Producing India: From Colonial Economy to National Space. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
88.
GrahamSMarvinS (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
89.
GruinJ (2019) Financializing authoritarian capitalism: Chinese fintech and the institutional foundations of algorithmic governance. Finance and Society5(2): 84–104.
GuldiJ (2012) Roads to Power: Britain Invents the Infrastructure State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
92.
GunstSDe VilleF (2021) The Brussels effect: how the GDPR conquered Silicon Valley. European Foreign Affairs Review26(3): 437–458.
93.
HallS (2023) Anticipating Sino-UK fintech networks and the changing geographies of money as infrastructure. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55(4): 931–948.
94.
HanakataNCBignamiF (2023) Platform Urbanization, its recent acceleration, and implications on citizenship. The case of Singapore. Citizenship Studies27(2): 189–209.
95.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–599.
96.
HarrisM (2023) Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World. New York, Boston, London: Little, Brown and Company.
97.
HartG (2001) Development critiques in the 1990s: culs de sacs and promising paths. Progress in Human Geography25(4): 649–658.
98.
HayesNMiscioneGWestrupC (2013) Overflows of technological innovation in emerging economies: the case of M-Pesa. 2617305. Rochester, NY: SSRN. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2617305 (accessed 30 May 2024).
99.
IngoldT (2002) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
100.
JasanoffSKimS-H (eds) (2015) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
101.
JiaLWinseckD (2018) The political economy of Chinese internet companies: financialization, concentration, and capitalization. International Communication Gazette80(1): 30–59.
102.
JiangM (2010) Authoritarian informationalism: China’s approach to Internet sovereignty. SAIS review of international affairs30(2): 71–89.
103.
JiangM (2014) The business and politics of search engines: a comparative study of Baidu and Google’s search results of Internet events in China. New Media & Society16(2): 212–233.
104.
JinDY (2015) Digital platforms. In: Imperialism and Political Culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
105.
JonesRMerrimanP (2012) Network nation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44(4): 937–953.
106.
JoycePMukerjiC (2017) The state of things: state history and theory reconfigured. Theory and Society46(1): 1–19.
107.
KeaneMWuH (2018) Lofty ambitions, new territories, and turf battles: China’s platforms “go out”[1]. Media Industries Journal5(1): 312.
108.
KeaneMYuH (2019) A digital empire in the making: China’s outbound digital platforms. International Journal of Communication13: 4624–4641.
109.
KezerZ (2009) An imaginable community: the material culture of nation-building in early republican Turkey. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27(3): 508–530.
110.
KinsleyS (2014) The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies. Progress in Human Geography38(3): 364–384.
KitchinRDodgeM (2011) Code/space: software and everyday life. In: Software Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
113.
LagerkvistJ (2012) Principal-agent dilemma in China’s social media sector? The party-state and industry real-name registration Waltz. Epub ahead of print 2012.
114.
LamarreT (2017) Platformativity: media studies, area studies. Asiascape: Digital Asia4(3): 285–305.
115.
LarkinB (2013) The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology42(1): 327–343.
116.
LaszczkowskiM (2020) Railway territorialities: topology and infrastructural politics in Alpine Italy. Transfers10(2/3): 230–249.
117.
LatourB (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
118.
LauerJ (2017) Creditworthy: a history of consumer surveillance and financial identity in America. In: Columbia Studies in the History of U.S. Capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
119.
LauerJ (2020) Plastic surveillance: payment cards and the history of transactional data, 1888 to present. Big Data & Society7(1): 2053951720907632.
120.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
121.
LemkeT (2015) New materialisms: Foucault and the ‘government of things. Theory, Culture & Society32(4): 3–25.
122.
LeszczynskiA (2020) Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space38(2): 189–208.
123.
LeszczynskiAElwoodS (2022) Glitch epistemologies for computational cities. Dialogues in Human Geography12(3): 361–378.
124.
LeszczynskiAKongV (2022) Gentrification and the an/aesthetics of digital spatial capital in Canadian “platform cities”. Canadian Geographies/Géographies canadiennes66(1): 8–22.
125.
LinSSidawayJDWoonCY (2019) Reordering China, respacing the world: belt and Road initiative (一带一路) as an emergent geopolitical culture. The Professional Geographer71(3): 507–522.
126.
LinSShimazuNSidawayJD (2021) Theorising from the belt and Road initiative (一带一路). Asia Pacific Viewpoint62(3): 261–269.
LuMQiuJL (2023) Transfer or translation? Rethinking traveling technologies from the global south. Science, Technology & Human Values48(2): 272–294.
129.
LynchCR (2020) Contesting digital futures: urban politics, alternative economies, and the movement for technological sovereignty in Barcelona. Antipode52(3): 660–680.
MainwaringS (2017) Dongles. In: MaurerBSwartzL (eds) Paid: Tales of Dongles, Checks, and Other Money Stuff. Infrastructures. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
132.
MaleckiEJWeiH (2009) A wired world: the evolving geography of submarine cables and the shift to Asia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers99(2): 360–382.
133.
MarkovichSMalkaniAPTsengA, et al. (2017) Hip to Be Square: Disruption in the U.S. Mobile Payment Market. Kellogg School of Management Cases. Kellogg School of Management4: 1–14.
134.
MarstonSAJonesJPWoodwardK (2005) Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers30(4): 416–432.
MaurerB (2012) Mobile money: communication, consumption and change in the payments space. Journal of Development Studies48(5): 589–604.
137.
MaurerB (2015) How Would You like to Pay? How Technology Is Changing the Future of Money. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
138.
MazzucatoM (2011) The entrepreneurial state. Soundings49(Winter): 131–142.
139.
McKuneSAhmedS (2018) The contestation and shaping of cyber norms through China’s internet sovereignty agenda. Epub ahead of print 2018.
140.
McMorrowRLiuNJuSF (2020) The transformation of ant financial. Financial Times.
141.
MeehanK (2014) Tool-power: water infrastructure as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum57: 215–224.
142.
MerrimanPJonesR (2016) Nations, materialities and affects. Progress in Human Geography41(5): 600–617.
143.
MigozziJUrbanMWójcikD (2024) “You should do what India does”: FinTech ecosystems in India reshaping the geography of finance. Geoforum151: 103720. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103720.
144.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. California: University of California Press.
145.
MooreA (2008) Rethinking scale as a geographical category: from analysis to practice. Progress in Human Geography32(2): 203–225.
146.
MorrisC (2022) Digital displacement: the spatialities of contentious politics in China’s digital territory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers47(4): 1075–1089.
MunnL (2023b) Technical Territories: Data, Subjects, and Spaces in Infrastructural Asia. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
155.
MurphyAB (2013) Territory’s continuing allure. Annals of the Association of American Geographers103(5): 1212–1226.
156.
MurphyAB (2022) Taking territory seriously in a fluid, topologically varied world: reflections in the wake of the populist turn and the COVID-19 pandemic. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography104(1): 27–42.
157.
NaughtonB (2020) Chinese industrial policy and the digital Silk Road: the case of Alibaba in Malaysia. Asia Policy15(1): 23–39.
158.
OliveiraGde LTMurtonGRippaA, et al. (2020) China’s belt and Road initiative: views from the ground. Political Geography82: 102225.
159.
OngACollierSJ (2005) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Blackwell.
160.
O’MaraM (2005) Cities of Knowledge: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Available at. DOI: 10.1515/9781400866885 (accessed 3 June 2024).
161.
O’MaraM (2019) The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America. 1st edition. New York: Penguin Press.
162.
PfotenhauerSLaurentBPapageorgiouK, et al. (2022) The politics of scaling. Social Studies of Science52(1): 3–34.
163.
PlantinJ-Cde SetaG (2019) WeChat as infrastructure: the techno-nationalist shaping of Chinese digital platforms. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 257–273.
164.
PlantinJ-CLagozeCEdwardsPN, et al. (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society20(1): 293–310.
165.
PollioA (2020) Making the silicon cape of Africa: tales, theories and the narration of startup urbanism. Urban Studies57(13): 2715–2732.
166.
PollioA (2022) Acceleration, development and technocapitalism at the silicon cape of Africa. Economy and Society51(1): 46–70.
167.
QianLChenR (2023) “Where you live determines how you are treated”: E-commerce geography and digital inequality in China. Eurasian Geography and Economics66: 1–26.
168.
Randell-MoonH (2023) Digital infrastructure, ultra-fast broadband, and citizenship in the Gigatown competition in the South Island, Aotearoa New Zealand. Continuum37(6): 783–800.
169.
RichardsonL (2020) Platforms, markets, and contingent calculation: the flexible arrangement of the delivered meal. Antipode52(3): 619–636.
170.
RichardsonLBissellD (2019) Geographies of digital skill. Geoforum99: 278–286.
171.
RippaAOakesT (2023) Infrastructural thinking in China: a research agenda. The China Quarterly255: 547–559.
172.
RolfSSchindlerS (2022) The US–China rivalry and the emergence of state platform capitalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55(5): 1255–1280. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221146545.
173.
SantoniG (2018) Foreign capital in Chinese telecommunication companies: from the variable interest entity model to the draft of the new Chinese foreign investment law corporate and financial markets law. Italian Law Journal4(2): 589–610.
174.
SaxenianA (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
175.
SaxenianA (2007) The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. 1st edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
176.
SchindlerSAlamiIDiCarloJ, et al. (2023) The second Cold war: US-China competition for centrality in infrastructure, digital, production, and finance networks. Geopolitics29(4): 1083–1120. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2023.2253432.
177.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
178.
ShenH (2017) Across the Great (Fire) Wall: China and the Global Internet. PhD dissertation. Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2142/97589 (accessed 28 February 2024).
179.
ShenH (2021) Alibaba: Infrastructuring Global China. New York: Routledge.
180.
ShenHHeY (2022) The geopolitics of infrastructuralized platforms: the case of Alibaba. Information, Communication & Society25(16): 2363–2380.
181.
ShenHFaklarisCJinH, et al. (2020) I can’t even buy apples if I don’t use mobile pay?’: when mobile payments become infrastructural in China. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction4(CSCW2): 1–26.
182.
SidawayJDRowedderSCWoonCY, et al. (2020) Introduction: research agendas raised by the belt and Road initiative. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38(5): 795–802.
183.
SimondonG (2017) On the mode of existence of technical objects(Trans. C Malaspina and J Rogove). 1st edition. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal Publishing.
184.
SmithN (1992) Contours of a spatialized politics: homeless vehicles and the production of geographical scale. Social Text33: 55–81.
185.
SolomonR (2013) Last in, first out: network archaeology of/as the stack. Amodern2: 1–23.
186.
SquireV (2014) Desert ‘trash’: posthumanism, border struggles, and humanitarian politics. Political Geography39: 11–21.
187.
SquireV (2015) Reshaping critical geopolitics? The materialist challenge. Review of International Studies41(01): 139–159.
188.
SrnicekN (2017) Platform Capitalism. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
189.
StarSL (1999) The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist43(3): 377–391.
190.
StarSLGriesemerJR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science19(3): 387–420.
191.
SteinbergM (2020) LINE as super app: platformization in East Asia. Social Media + Society6(2): 2056305120933285.
192.
SteinbergMLiJ (2017) Introduction: regional platforms. Asiascape: Digital Asia4(3): 173–183.
193.
SteinbergMMukherjeeRPunathambekarA (2022) Media power in digital Asia: super apps and megacorps. Media, Culture & Society44(8): 1405–1419.
194.
SteinbergMZhangLMukherjeeR (2024) Platform capitalisms and platform cultures. International Journal of Cultural Studies28(1): 21–29. DOI: 10.1177/13678779231223544.
195.
StevensH (2019) Digital infrastructure in the Chinese register. Made in China Journal4(2): 84–89.
196.
StieglerB (1998) Technics and Time: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
197.
StraubeT (2016) Stacked spaces: mapping digital infrastructures. Big Data & Society3(2): 2053951716642456.
198.
SuC (2023) Contingency, precarity and short-video creativity: platformization based analysis of Chinese online screen industry. Television & New Media24(2): 173–189.
199.
SuCFlewT (2021) The rise of Baidu, Alibaba and tencent (BAT) and their role in China’s belt and Road initiative (BRI). Global Media and Communication17(1): 67–86.
200.
SunP (2019) Your order, their labor: an exploration of algorithms and laboring on food delivery platforms in China. Chinese Journal of Communication12(3): 308–323.
201.
SwartzL (2020) New Money: How Payment Became Social Media. New Haven (Conn.): Yale University press.
202.
SwistTMageeL (2019) Assemblages of altruism in urban service delivery: seamful designs and cities. Journal of Urban Affairs41(5): 618–629.
203.
TanGKS (2021) Citizens go digital: a discursive examination of digital payments in Singapore’s Smart Nation project. Urban Studies59(12): 2582–2598. DOI: 10.1177/00420980211039407.
204.
TaylorPJ (1994) The state as container: territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography18(2): 151–162.
205.
TeevanCPouyéRKamathG (2025) From India Stack to EuroStack: Reconciling Approaches to Sovereign Digital Infrastructure. Brussels: ECDPM.
TörnbergP (2024) Platforms as states: the rise of governance through data power. In: SöderströmODattaA (eds) Data Power in Action. 1st Ed. Urban Data Politics in Times of Crisis. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp. 42–58. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.9827045.8 (accessed 13 February 2024).
208.
TsingAL (2012) On nonscalability. Common Knowledge18(3): 505–524.
209.
TurnerF (2010) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
210.
TusikovN (2017) Chokepoints: Global Private Regulation on the Internet. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
211.
UsherM (2018) Conduct of conduits: engineering, desire and government through the enclosure and exposure of urban water. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research42(2): 315–333.
212.
UsherM (2020) Territory incognita. Progress in Human Geography44(6): 1019–1046.
213.
van der VleutenE (2004) Infrastructures and societal change. A view from the large technical systems field. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management16(3): 395–414.
214.
van DijckJPoellTde WaalM (2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. New York: Oxford University Press.
215.
VerstraeteG (2002) Railroading America: towards a material study of the nation. Theory, Culture & Society19(5–6): 145–159.
216.
Vila SeoaneMF (2020) Alibaba’s discourse for the digital Silk Road: the electronic World Trade Platform and ‘inclusive globalization. Chinese Journal of Communication13(1): 68–83.
217.
WeissL (2014) America Inc.? Innovation and Enterprise in the National Security State. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca; NY: Cornell University Press.
218.
WilliamsR (1993) Cultural origins and environmental implications of large technological systems. Science in Context6(2): 377–403.
219.
WinnerL (1980) Do artifacts have politics?Dædalus109(1): 121–136.
220.
WójcikDCamilleriJ (2015) Capitalist tools in socialist hands’? China Mobile in global financial networks. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers40(4): 464–478.
221.
WoodsOBunnellTKongL (2023) The state-led platformisation of financial services: frictionless ecosystems and an expansive logic of “smartness” in Singapore. Geoforum146: 103849.
YangF (2022) The postcolonial route of WeChat: technological mimicry, excess, and orientalism. Asian Journal of Communication32(5): 448–461.
224.
YuYBradyDZhaoB (2022) Digital geographies of the bug: a case study of China’s contact tracing systems in the COVID-19. Geoforum; journal of physical, human, and regional geosciences137: 94–104.
225.
ZhangL (2020) When platform capitalism meets petty capitalism in China: Alibaba and an integrated approach to platformization. International Journal of Communication14: 21.
226.
ZhangJ (2022) Hardening national boundaries in a globally-connected world: technology, development and nationalism in China. Journal of Contemporary Asia52(5): 783–804.
227.
ZhangLChenJY (2022) A regional and historical approach to platform capitalism: the cases of Alibaba and Tencent. Media, Culture & Society44(8): 1454–1472.
228.
ZhaoY (2010) China’s pursuits of indigenous innovations in information technology developments: hopes, follies and uncertainties. Chinese Journal of Communication3(3): 266–289.
229.
ZhaoC (2022) Variable interest entity, offshore domesticated foreign finance, and the political economy of China’s internet firms: the case of Alibaba. Social Sciences11(3): 99.
