This report reviews recent literature that provides a new understanding of the material formation of urban space in the context of carbon/post-carbon urbanism. First, it discusses the concept of extractivist urbanization, which links the excavation of terrestrial materials to a wider agenda of data mining. Second, it considers the relationship of cities to material flows, including debates around how ports and corridors might relate to the urbanization of both ‘circular’ and waste intensive commodity chains and consumption spaces. Third, it traces the relationship between climate change, the redesign of cities and the topographic profile of the Anthropocenic city.
AngeloHWachsmuthD (2020) Why does everyone think cities can save the planet?Urban Studies57(11): 2201–2221.
2.
AnguelovskiIConnollyJBrandAL (2018) From landscapes of utopia to the margins of the green urban life: for whom is the new green city?City22(3): 417–436.
3.
ArizaMA (2022) Disposable City: Miami’s Future on the Shores of Climate Catastrophe. New York, NY: Bold Type Books.
4.
BiggerPWebberS (2020) Green Structural Adjustment in the World Bank’s Resilient City. Annals of the Association of American Geographers111(1): 36–51.
5.
BiggerPMillingtonN (2020) Getting soaked? Climate crisis, adaptation finance, and racialized austerity. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space3(3): 601–623.
6.
BrandãoMLazarevicDFinnvedenG (2020) Handbook of the Circular Economy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
7.
ChristophersB (2018) Risk capital: urban political ecology and entanglements of financial and environmental risk in Washington, D.C. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space1: 144–164.
8.
CrangMHughesAGregsonN, et al. (2013) Rethinking governance and value in commodity chains through global recycling networks. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers38(1): 12–24.
9.
DawsonA (2019) Extreme Cities: The Peril and Promise of Urban Life in the Age of Climate Change. London, UK: Verso.
10.
DixonSJVilesHAGarrettB (2018) Ozymandias in the Anthropocene: the city as an emerging landform. Area50(1): 117–125.
11.
DobraszczykP (2017) Sunken cities: climate change, urban futures, and the imagination of submergence. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research41: 868–887.
FurlongK (2021) Geographies of infrastructure II: concrete, cloud, and layered (in)visibilities. Progress in Human Geography45(1): 190–198.
15.
GarrettBMelo ZuritaMIvesonK (2020) Boring cities: the privatization of subterranea. City24(1–2): 276–285.
16.
GohK (2020) Urbanising climate justice: constructing scales and politicising difference. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society13: 559–574.
17.
GrafeFJHilbrandtCS (2019) The temporalities of financialization: infrastuctures, dominations and openings in the Thames Tidal Tunnel. City23(4–5): 606–618.
18.
GranjouCPhillipsC (2019) Living and labouring soils: metagenomic ecology and a new agricultural revolution. BioSocieties14: 393–415.
19.
GustafsonS (2020) “We dredge because it doesn’t work”: urban political ecology and the uneven geographies of sediment metabolism. Urban Geography42(8): 1099–1118.
20.
HawkinsG (2021) Detaching from plastic packaging: reconfiguring material responsibilities. Consumption Markets & Culture24(4): 405–418.
21.
HodsonMMarvinS (2010) Urbanism in the Anthropocene: ecological urbanism or premium ecological enclaves?City14: 298–313.
22.
HughesAReimerS (2004) Geographies of Commodity Chains. London, UK: Routledge.
23.
JamiesonW (2021) For granular geography. Dialogues in Human Geography11(2): 275–293.
KlingerJM (2017) Rare Earth Frontiers: From Terrestrial Subsoils to Lunar Landscapes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
KnuthS (2016) Seeing green in San Francisco: city as growth frontier. Antipode48(3): 626–644.
27.
KnuthSStehlinJMillingtonN (2021) Rethinking climate futures through urban fabrics: (De)growth, densification, and the politics of scale. Urban Geography41(10): 1335–1343.
28.
KoshyNSJagadeeshKGovindanS, et al. (2021) Middlemen versus middlemen in agri-food supply chains in Bengaluru, India: big data takes a byte. Geoforum127: 293–302.
29.
LinSSidawayJDWoonCY (2019) Reordering China, respacing the world: Belt and Road Initiative as an emergent geopolitical culture. The Professional Geographer71(3): 507–522.
30.
LongJRiceJ (2019) From sustainable urbanism to climate urbanism. Urban Studies56(5): 992–1008.
31.
MeerowS (2017) Double exposure, infrastructure planning, and urban climate resilience in coastal megacities: a case study of Manila. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(11): 2649–2672.
32.
MezzadraSNeilsonB (2017) On the multiple frontiers of extraction: excavating contemporary capitalism. Cultural Studies31(2–3): 185–204.
33.
MillingtonNLawhonM (2019) Geographies of waste: conceptual vectors from the Global South. Progress in Human Geography43(6): 1044–1063.
34.
NelsonSHBiggerP (2022). Infrastructural nature. Progress in Human Geography46(1): 86–107.
35.
RobinECástan BrotoV (2021) Towards a postcolonial perspective on climate urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research45(5): 869–878.
36.
SidawayJRowedderSCWoonCY, et al. (2020) Introduction: research agendas raised by the Belt and Road Initiative. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38(5): 795–802.
37.
Taylor BuckNWhileA (2021) The urban bioeconomy: extracting value from the ecological and biophysical. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management84(2): 182–201.
38.
TubridyD (2020) Green climate change adaptation and the politics of designing ecological infrastructures. Geoforum113: 133–145.
39.
WachsmuthDAngeloH (2020) Green and gray: new ideologies of nature in urban sustainability policy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers108: 1038–1056.
40.
WadeM (2018) Hyper-planning Jakarta: the great garuda and planning the global spectacle. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography40(1): 158–172.
41.
WakefieldS (2021a) Critical urban theory in the Anthropocene. Urban Studies59: 917–936.
42.
WakefieldS (2021b) The possibility of islands in the Anthropocene. Dialogues in Human Geography11(3): 443–447.
43.
WebberSLeitnerHSheppardE (2020) Wheeling out urban resilience: philanthrocapitalism, marketization, and local practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers111(2): 343–363.
44.
WilliamsCRobinsonCBouzarovskiS (2019) China’s belt and road initiative and the emerging geographies of global urbanisation. The Geographical Journal186(1): 128–140.
45.
WinterT (2020) Geocultural power: China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Geopolitics26(5): 1376–1399.
46.
WoonCYDoddsK (2022) Subterranean displacements and replacements in Singapore: politics, materialities, and mentalities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers112(3): 763–771.
