Inspired by philosopher Peter Hallward’s call for a renewed focus on political will, this article examines its conceptualization within three areas of the discipline: non-representational theory, post-politics, and Gramscian geographies. Non-representational theorists draw attention to the role of affect in shaping political life, but have little to say about conscious collective volition. In contrast, post-politics scholars offer an extensive vocabulary for understanding political will as a prescriptive form of agency, but risk confining the political to an abstract, regulative idea. Meanwhile, Gramscian geographies’ dialectical approach to political will can complement both by mediating between extremes of objective and subjective determination.
AbrahamssonC (2011) Book review forum: ‘Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things’. Dialogues in Human Geography1(3): 399–402.
2.
AbrahamssonC (2013) On the genealogy of lebensraum. Geographica Helvetica1: 1–8.
3.
AbrahamssonSBertoniFMolAMartínRI (2015) Living with omega-3: New materialism and enduring concerns. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space33(1): 4–19.
4.
AhmedS (2014) Willful Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.
5.
AlaimoS (2014) Thinking as the stuff of the world. O-Zone: A Journal of Object-Oriented Studies1: 13–21.
6.
AminAThriftN (2013) Arts of the Political: New Openings for the Left. Durham: Duke University Press.
BarnesTMincaC (2013) Nazi spatial theory: The dark geographies of Carl Schmitt and Walter Christaller. Annals of the Association of American Geographers103(3): 669–687.
14.
BarnettC (2008) Political affects in public space: normative blind-spots in non-representational ontologies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33(2): 186–200.
BassettK (2016) Event, politics, and space: Rancière or Badiou?Space and Polity20(3): 280–293.
17.
BlackmanL (2008) Affect, relationality, and the ‘problem of personality’. Theory, Culture & Society25(1): 23–47.
18.
BosteelsB (2011) The Actuality of Communism. London: Verso.
19.
BraunB (2011) Book review forum: ‘Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things’. Dialogues in Human Geography1(3): 390–393.
20.
Buck-MorssS (2013) A commonist ethics. In: ŽižekS (ed.) The Idea of Communism 2. London: Verso, 57–75.
21.
ChiesaLRudaF (2011) The event of language as force of life. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities16(3): 163–180.
22.
CosgroveD (2004) Landscape and Landschaft. GHI Bulletin35 (Fall): 57–71.
23.
DavidsonMIvesonK (2015) Recovering the politics of the city: From the ‘post-political city’ to a ‘method of equality’ for critical urban geography. Progress in Human Geography39(5): 543–559.
24.
DawkinsALoftusA (2013) The senses as direct theoreticians in practice. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers38(4): 665–677.
25.
DikeçM (2005) Space, politics, and the political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23(2): 171–188.
26.
DikeçM (2012) Politics is sublime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30(2): 262–279.
27.
DikeçMSwyngedouwE (2017) Theorizing the politicizing city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research41(1): 1–18.
DoucetteJ (2013a) The Korean thermidor: On political space and conservative reactions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers38(2): 299–310.
30.
DoucetteJ (2013b) Minjung tactics in a post-Minjung era? The survival of self-immolation and traumatic forms of labour protest in South Korea. In Gall G (ed) New Forms and Expressions of Conflict at Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 212–213.
31.
EkersMLoftusA (2013) Revitalizing the production of nature thesis: A Gramscian turn?Progress in Human Geography37(2): 234–252.
HallwardP (2014a) Defiance or emancipation?Radical Philosophy183 Jan/Feb: 21–32.
45.
HallwardP (2014b) On political will. In: PendakisADiamantiJBrownNRobinsonJSzemanI (eds) Contemporary Marxist Theory: A Reader. London: Bloomsbury, 515–532.
46.
HallwardP (2017) Concentration or representation: The struggle for popular sovereignty. Cogent Arts & Humanities4(1): 1–16.
47.
HartG (2013) Gramsci, geography, and the languages of populism. In: EkersMHartGKipferSLoftusA (eds) Gramsci: Space, Nature, Politics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 301–320.
48.
HartG (2014) Rethinking the South African Crisis: Nationalism, Populism, Hegemony. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
49.
HartG (2018) Relational comparison revisited: Marxist postcolonial geographies in practice. Progress in Human Geography42(3): 371–394.
50.
HayemJ (2012) The ‘voucher strike’: Workers’ political subjectivities in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies47(5): 516–529.
51.
HollandDLaveJ (eds) (2001) History in Person: Enduring Struggles, Contentious Practices, and Intimate Identities. Oxford: James Currey.
52.
JessopB (2005) Gramsci as a spatial theorist. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy8(4): 421–437.
53.
JohnstonA (2008) Phantom of consistency: Alain Badiou and Kantian transcendental idealism. Continental Philosophy Review41(3): 345–366.
54.
JoronenMHäkliJ (2017) Politicizing ontology. Progress in Human Geography41(5): 571–579.
55.
KakogianniMRancièreJ (2013) A precarious dialogue. Radical Philosophy181: 18–25.
56.
KaraliotasL (2017) Staging equality in Greek squares: Hybrid spaces of political subjectification. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research41(1): 54–69.
57.
KipferS (2013) City, country, hegemony: Antonio Gramsci’s spatial historicism. In: EkersMHartGKipferSLoftusA (eds) Gramsci: Space, Nature, Politics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 83–103.
58.
KipferSHartG (2013) Translating Gramsci in the current conjuncture. In: EkersMHartGKipferSLoftusA (eds) Gramsci: Space, Nature, Politics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 323–343.
KouvelakisS (2003) Philosophy and Revolution: From Kant to Marx. London: Verso.
61.
LanzaF (2013) Of chronology, failure, and fidelity: When did the May Fourth Movement end?Twentieth-Century China38(1): 53–70.
62.
LaveJ (2012) Changing practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity19(2): 156–171.
63.
LazarusS (1996) Anthropologie du Nom. Paris: Seuil.
64.
LemkeT (2017) Materialism without matter: The recurrence of subjectivism in object-oriented ontology. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory18(2): 133–152.
65.
LeysR (2011) The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry37(3): 434–472.
66.
LeysR (2012) Critical response III: Facts and moods: A reply to my critics. Critical Inquiry38(4): 882–891.
67.
LiebermanMD (2009) What zombies can’t do: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to the irreducibility of reflective consciousness. In: EvansJFrankishK (eds) In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 293–316.
68.
LoftusA (2009) The theses on Feuerbach as a political ecology of the possible. Area41(2): 157–166.
69.
LoftusA (2014) Against a speculative leftism. In: SwngedouwEWilsonJ (eds) The Post-Political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticization, Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 229–243.
70.
MarchartO (2007) Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
71.
MartinE (2013) The potentiality of ethnography and the limits of affect theory. Current Anthropology54(S7): S149–S158.
72.
MillerBNichollsW (2013) Social movements in urban society: The city as a space of politicization. Urban Geography34(4): 452–473.
73.
MitchellDAttohKStaeheliL (2015) Whose city? What politics? Contentious and non-contentious spaces on Colorado’s Front Range. Urban Studies52(14): 2633–2648.
74.
NeocosmosM (2010) Analysing political subjectivities: Naming the post-developmental state in Africa today. Journal of African and Asian Studies45(5): 534–553.
75.
PapouliasCCallardF (2010) Biology’s gift: Interrogating the turn to affect. Body and Society16(1): 29–56.
76.
PedenK (2014) Spinoza contra Phenomenology: French Nationalism from Cavaillès to Deleuze. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
77.
PithouseR (2013) The open door of every consciousness. South Atlantic Quarterly112(1): 91–98.
78.
PowerN (2009) Which equality? Badiou and Rancière in light of Ludwig Feuerbach. Parallax15(3): 63–80.
PykettJ (2018) Geography and neuroscience: Critical engagements with geography’s ‘neural turn’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers43(2): 154–169.
81.
RancièreJ (2004) Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
82.
RankinKN (2010) Reflexivity and post-colonial critique: Toward an ethics of accountability in planning praxis. Planning Theory9(3): 181–199.
83.
SheppardE (2008) Geographic dialectics?Environment and Planning A40(11): 2603–2612.
84.
SimonsenK (2012) In quest of a new humanism: Embodiment, experience and phenomenology as critical geography. Progress in Human Geography37(1): 10–26.
85.
SimpsonP (2017) Spacing the subject: Thinking subjectivity after non-representational theory. Geography Compass11(12): 1–13.
86.
SotirisP (2011) Beyond simple fidelity to the event: The limits of Alain Badiou’s ontology. Historical Materialism19(2): 35–59.
87.
SwyngedouwE (2009) The antinomies of the postpolitical city: In search of a democratic politics of environmental production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(3): 601–620.
88.
SwyngedouwE (2011) Interrogating post-democratization: Reclaiming egalitarian political space. Political Geography30(7): 370–380.
89.
TaylorC (2016) Close encounters of a critical kind: A diffractive musing in/between new material feminism and object-oriented ontology. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies16(2): 201–212.
90.
TemenosC (2017) Everyday proper politics: Rereading the post-political through mobilities of drug policy activism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42(4): 584–596.
ThomasP (2009a) The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony, and Marxism. Leiden: Brill.
93.
ThomasP (2009b) Gramsci and the political: From the state as ‘metaphysical event’ to hegemony as ‘philosophical fact’. Radical Philosophy153: 27–36.
94.
ThomasP (2017) Gramsci’s plural temporalities. In: MorfinoVThomasP (eds) The Government of Time: Theories of Plural Temporality in the Marxist Tradition. Leiden: Brill Academic Press, 174–209.
95.
ThomasP (2018) Reverberations of The Prince: From ‘heroic fury’ to ‘living philology’. Thesis 11147(1): 76–88.
96.
ThriftN (2008) Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. New York: Routledge.
97.
WainwrightJ (2010) On Gramsci’s ‘conceptions of the world’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35(4): 507–521.
98.
WolinR (1990) Carl Schmitt, political existentialism, and the total state. Theory and Society19(4): 389–416.
99.
ZerilliLM (2015) The turn to affect and the problem of judgment. New Literary History46(2): 261–286.
