This third report examines interfaces as a key element enabling spatial skills, and development of new forms of digital spatialities for smart cities. Digital technology is becoming consubstantial to urban materiality, but map interfaces are particularly central tools for indexing (geographic) knowledge and expertise, accessing informational components of digital cities, and actively engaging digital dimensions of urban places.
Al NuaimiEAl Neyadi1HMohamedNAl-JaroodiJ (2015) Applications of big data to smart cities. Journal of Internet Services and Applications6: 25. DOI: 10.1186/s13174-015-0041-5.
2.
BakiciTAlmirallEWarehamJ (2013) A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy4(2): 135–148.
3.
BattyM (2013a) The New Science of Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BattyM (2013b) Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography3(3): 274–279.
5.
BattyMAxhausenKWGiannottiFPozdnoukhovABazzaniAWachowiczMOuzounisGPortugaliY (2012) Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics214: 481–518. DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3.
6.
BibriSE (2015) The Human Face of Ambient Intelligence: Cognitive, Emotional, Affective, Behavioral and Conversational Aspects. Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.
7.
CramptonJW (2015) Where can tell me who I am? Paper presented at the Conference of the South-Eastern Regional Division of the Association of American Geographers (SEDAAG 2015), Pensacola, Florida.
8.
CrangaMGrahamS (2007) Sentient cities, ambient intelligence and the politics of urban space. Information, Communication & Society10(6). DOI: 10.1080/13691180701750991.
9.
DanielSDoranMA (2013) GeoSmartCity: Geomatics contribution to the smart city. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. New York: ACM, pp. 65–71.
10.
DanielSDoranMA (2014) Geomatics and the smart city: A transversal contribution to the smart city development. Information Policy19(1–2): 57–72.
11.
De MontjoyeY-AHidalgoC-AVerleysenMBlondelV-D (2013) Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Scientific Reports3, Art. 1376. DOI: 10.1038/srep01376. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23524645 (accessed 06 May 2016).
DonoloRMDonoloM (2013) How to achieve smart cities through smart communication and representation of urban data. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-4/W1, 29th Urban Data Management Symposium, 29–31 May, London, pp. 83–87.
14.
DykesJAndrienkoGAndrienkoNPaelkeVSchieweJ (2010) Editorial: GeoVisualization and the digital city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems34(6): 443–451.
15.
FilipponiLVitalettiALandiGMemeoV (2010) Smart city: An event driven architecture for monitoring public spaces with heterogeneous sensors. Sensor Technologies and Applications (SENSORCOMM), Venice, 18–25 July, pp. 281–286.
GoodchildMF (2007) Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. Geojournal69(4): 211–221.
18.
GoodchildMJanelleD (2010) Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal75(1): 3–13.
19.
GoodchildMFJanelleDGGrossnerK (2014) Critical spatial thinking. In: StimsonRJ (ed.) Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Spatially Integrated Social Science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 26–42.
20.
HarveyFChrismanN (1998) Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment Planning A30(9): 1683–1694.
21.
Hernandez-MunozJ-MVercherJBMunozLGalacheJAPresserMHernandez GimezLAPetterssonJ (2011) Smart cities at the forefront of the future internet. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences6656: 447–462. Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-20898-0_32#page-1 (accessed 06 May 2016).
22.
HielkemaHHongistoP (2012) Developing the Helsinki smart city: The role of competitions for open data applications. Journal of the Knowledge Economy4: 190–204. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-012-0087-6.
KitchinR (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal79: 1–14.
25.
LeeJBednarzR (2009) Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. Journal of Geography in Higher Education33(2): 183–198.
26.
LeeJLeeH (2014) Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services. Government Information Quarterly31(1): S93–S105.
27.
LiNChenG (2010) Sharing location in online social networks. IEEE NetworkSept/Oct: 20–25.
28.
LoganJ-R (2013) Making a place for space: Spatial thinking in social science. Annual Review of Sociology38: 507–524.
29.
LussaultM (2007) L’homme spatial. Paris: Seuil.
30.
LussaultM (2009) De la lutte des classes à la lutte des places. Paris: Grasset.
31.
MadsenaLMRumpaC (2013) Considerations of how to study learning processes when students use GIS as an instrument for developing spatial thinking skills. Journal of Geography in Higher Education36(1): 97–116.
32.
MulliganCEAOlssonM (2013) Architectural implications of smart city business models: An evolutionary perspective. IEEE Communication Magazine51(6): 80–85.
33.
National Research Council (2006) Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K–12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
34.
NeirottiPDe MarcoACorinna CaglianoAManganoGScorranoF (2014) Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities38: 25–36.
35.
PosladSMaAWangZMeiH (2015) Using a smart city IoT to incentivise and target shifts in mobility behaviour: Is it a piece of pie?Sensors15: 13069–13096.
36.
PrandiFDe AmicisRPifferSSoaveMCadzowSGonzalez BoixED’HondtE (2013) Using CityGML to deploy smart-city services for urban ecosystems. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-4/W1, 29th Urban Data Management Symposium, London.
37.
PrandiFSoaveMDevigiliFAndreolliNDe AmicisR (2014) Services oriented smart city platform based on 3D city model visualization. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences II-4, 2014 ISPRS Technical Commission IV Symposium, 14–16 May, Suzhou, China.
38.
QuesnotTRocheS (2014) Measure of landmark semantic salience through geosocial data streams. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi4010001.
39.
QuesnotTRocheS (2015) Quantifying the significance of semantic landmarks in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In: FabrikantSIRaubalMBertolottoMDaviesCFreundschuh S BellS (eds) Spatial Information Theory (LNCS, vol. 9368). Cham: Springer, 468–489.
40.
Reforgiato RecuperoDCastronovoMConsoliSCostanzoTGangemiAGrassoLLodiGMerendinoGMongiovìMPresuttiVRapisardaSDRosaSSpampinatoE (2016) An innovative, open, interoperable citizen engagement cloud platform for smart government and users’ interaction. Journal of the Knowledge Economy7(2): 388–412.
41.
ReschB (2013) People as sensors and collective sensing-contextual observations complementing geo-sensor network measurements. In: KrispJM (ed.) Progress in Location-Based Services. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 391–406.
42.
RocheS (2014) Geographic information science I: Why does a smart city need to be spatially enabled?Progress in Human Geography38(5): 703–711.
43.
RocheS (2015) Geographic information science II: Less space, more places in smart cities. Progress in Human Geography. DOI: 10.1177/0309132515586296.
44.
RodriguesJIFigueiredoMDa CostaC (2013) Web3DGIS for city models with CityGML and X3D. 17th International Conference on Information Visualization, pp. 384–388. DOI: 10.1109/IV.2013.102
45.
SaglGReschBBlaschkeT (2015) Contextual sensing: Integrating contextual information with human and technical geo-sensor information for smart cities. Sensors15(7): 17013–17035.
46.
SchaffersHKomninosNPallotMTrousseBNilssonMOliveiraA (2011) Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In: DomingueJGalisAGavrasAZahariadisTLambertDClearyF (eds) Future Internet Assembly: Achievements and Technological Promises, Lecture Notes in Computer Science6656: 431–446. Available at: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-642-20898-0 (accessed 06 May 2016).
47.
SchöningJHechtBRaubalMKrügerAMarshMRohsM (2008) Improving interaction with virtual globes through spatial thinking: Helping users ask ‘why’? In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New York: ACM, pp. 129–138.
48.
SotirisZ (2013) Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems, Journal of the Knowledge Economy4(2): 217–231.
49.
Stuart SintonD (2016) Spatial thinking and GIS. In: BurteHKauppinenTHegartyM (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on Teaching Spatial Thinking from Interdisciplinary Perspectives (TSTIP 2015) at COSIT 2015, Santa Fe, NM. Available at: ceur-ws.org/Vol-1557 (accessed 06 May 2016).
50.
TaoW (2013) Interdisciplinary urban GIS for smart cities: Advancements and opportunities. Geo-spatial Information Science16(1): 25–34.
51.
VanoloA (2014) Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies51: 5883–5898.
52.
VilajosanaILlosaJMartinezBDomingo-PrietoMAnglesAVilajosanaX (2013) Bootstrapping smart cities through a self-sustainable model based on big data flows. IEEE Communications Magazine51(6): 128–134.
53.
VogiazouY (2007) Design for Emergence: Collaborative Social Play with Online and Location-Based Media. IOS Press, p. 192.
54.
WakabayashiaYIshikawabT (2011) Spatial thinking in geographic information science: A review of past studies and prospects for the future. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences21 (International Conference: Spatial Thinking and Geographic Information Sciences): 304–313.
55.
WhitmoreAAgarwalADa XuL (2014) The Internet of Things: A survey of topics and trends. Information Systems Frontiers17(2): 261–274.
56.
YinCHXiongZChenHWangJ-YCooperDBertrandD (2015) A literature survey on smart cities. Science China Information Sciences58(10): 1–18.
57.
ZanellaABuiNCastellaniAVangelistaLZorziM (2014) Internet of Things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal1(1): 22–32.
