In this report I assess progress in legal geography – past and potential – in terms of its contributions to two significant projects in contemporary critical geographic thought: the discernment and diagnosis of spatial injustice and the idea of the right to the city. I argue that conventional spatial imaginaries tend to invisibilize injustices, obscure the contingencies and causes of injustice, and uncouple injustice from responsibility. Conventional legal imaginaries commonly legitimize injustices or render them as mere misfortunes, if not deserved fates. Because traces of the legal are commonly constitutive of the spatialities of injustice – underpinning them, shaping relations of power with respect to them, rendering places meaningful in distinctively legal ways – then much of what legal geographers do is investigate the contingencies and constraints of spatial justice. I also draw attention to recent work by non-geographers and the increased penetration of critical spatial thought into legal scholarship as grounds for anticipating future progress.
AttohK (2011) What kind of right is the right to the city?Progress in Human Geography35(5): 669–685.
2.
AzuelaAMeneses-ReyesR (2014) The everyday formation of urban space. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedar (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 167–189.
3.
BellowG (1996) Steady work: A practitioner’s reflections on political lawyering. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review31: 297–310.
4.
BensonM (2014) Rules of engagement: The spatiality of judicial review. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 215–238.
5.
BlomleyN (2014) Learning from Larry: Pragmatism and the habits of legal space. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 77–96.
6.
BoddieE (2010–11) Racial territoriality. UCLA Law Review58: 401–463.
7.
BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) (2014) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
ClowneyS (2013) Landscape fairness: Removing discrimination from the built environment. Utah Law Review2013: 1–62.
9.
CoutinS (2010) Confined within: National territories as zones of confinement. Political Geography29: 200–218.
10.
CummingsSEaglyI (2000–1) A critical reflection of law and organizing. UCLA Law Review48: 443–517.
11.
DelaneyD (2010) The Spatial, the Legal and the Pragmatics of World-Making: Nomospheric Investigations. London: Routledge.
12.
DelaneyD (2014) At work in the nomosphere: The spatiolegal production of emotions at work. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 239–262.
13.
EaganBPlaceJ (2013) Minding the gaps: Property, geography, and indigenous peoples in Canada. Geoforum44: 129–138.
14.
EwickP (1998) Punishment, power and justice. In: GarthBSaratA (eds) Justice and Power in Sociolegal Studies. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, pp. 36–54.
15.
FieldsG (2012) ‘This is our land’: Collective violence, property law, and imagining the geography of Palestine. Journal of Cultural Geography29: 267–291.
16.
FosterSGlickB (2007) Integrative lawyering: Navigating the political economy of urban redevelopment. California Law Review95: 1999–2072.
17.
GarthBSaratA (eds) (1998) Justice and Power in Sociolegal Studies. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
18.
GrinthalM (2011–12) Power with: Practice models for social justice lawyering. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change15: 25–36.
19.
HeinzeE (2013) The Concept of Injustice. Abingdon: Routledge.
20.
HerbertS (2014) Fear and loathing in the San Juan Islands: Endangered orcas and the legitimacy of environmental law. Environment and Planning A46: 1781–1796.
21.
HuntA (1990) Rights and social movements: Counter-hegemonic strategies. Journal of Law and Society17: 309–328.
22.
JeffreyAJakalaM (2014) The hybrid legal geographies of a war crimes court. Annals of the Association of American Geographers104: 652–667.
23.
KedarA (2014) Expanding legal geographies: A call for a critical comparative approach. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 95–119.
24.
KuykendallM (2014) Restatement of place. Brooklyn Law Review79: 757–820.
25.
LobelJ (2003) Success without Victory: Lost Legal Battles and the Long Road to Justice in America. New York: NYU Press.
26.
MannE (1999) Radical social movements and the responsibility of progressive intellectuals. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review32: 761–790.
27.
McCannM (1991) Legal mobilization and social reform movements: Notes on theory and its application. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society11: 225–254.
28.
MitchellD (2003) The Right to the City. New York: Guilford Press.
29.
MitchellD (2005) The S.U.V. model of citizenship: Floating bubbles, buffer zones and the rise of the ‘purely atomic’ individual. Political Geography24: 77–100.
30.
MitchellD (2010) Battle/fields: Braceros, agribusiness and the violent reproduction of the California agricultural landscape during World War II. Journal of Historical Geography36: 143–156.
31.
MitchellDHeynenN (2009) The geography of survival and the right to the city: Speculations on surveillance, legal innovation, and the criminalization of intervention. Urban Geography30: 611–630.
32.
MoliternoJ (2008) The lawyer as catalyst for social change. Fordham Law Review77: 1559–1590.
33.
MouldingP (2005) Fare or unfair? The importance of mass transit for America’s poor. Georgetown Journal on Poverty, Law and Policy12: 155–180.
34.
NeJaimeD (2011) The legal mobilization dilemma. Emory Law Journal61: 663–736.
35.
OlsonESayerA (2009) Critique and normative reasoning. Antipode41: 180–198.
36.
PruittL (2008) Place matters: Domestic violence and rural difference. Wisconsin journal of Law, Gender and Society23: 347–416.
37.
PruittL (2010) Spatial inequality as constitutional infirmary: Equal protection, child poverty and place. Montana Law Review71(1): 1–14.
38.
PruittL (2011) The geography of the class culture wars. Seattle University Law Review34: 767–814.
39.
PruittL (2014) The rural lawscape: Space tames law tames space. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 190–214.
40.
RenaultE (2010) A critical theory of social suffering. Critical Horizons1: 221–241.
41.
RiceD (2003–4) The Bus Riders Union: The success of the law and organizing model in the context of an environmental justice struggle. Environs26: 188–200.
42.
SaratAScheingoldS (2006) Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
43.
SchindlerS (forthcoming) Architectural exclusion. Yale Law Journal.
44.
SchraggerR (2013) Is a progressive city possible? Reviving urban liberalism for the twenty-first century. Harvard Law and Policy Review7: 231–252.
45.
SmithM (2014) States that come and go: mapping the geolegalities of the Afghanistan intervention. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 142–166.
46.
SojaE (2010) Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
47.
TorresG (2008–9) Social movements and the ethical construction of law. Capital Law Review37: 535–582.
48.
ValverdeM (2014) Studying the governance of crime and security: Space, time and jurisdiction. Criminology and Criminal Justice14: 379– 91.
49.
YanJ (2013) Rousing the sleeping giant: Administrative enforcement of title VI and new routes to equity in transit planning. California Law Review101: 1131–1183.
50.
ZickT (2006a) Property, place, and public discourse. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy21: 173–224.
51.
ZickT (2006b) Space, place and speech: The expressive topology. George Washington Law Review74: 439–505.
52.
ZickT (2009) Constitutional displacement. Washington University Law Review86: 515–608.
53.
ZickT (2010) Territoriality and the first amendment: free speech at – and beyond – our borders. Notre Dame Law Review85: 1543–1628.
