In response to Dragos Simandan’s commentary on our own article, we argue that the statistical error theory he believes can knit together all the fragments of economic geography is just another version of monism; something that we contested in the original paper. Rather than repairing economic geography, statistical error theory will only reproduce disciplinary fragmentation.
Barnes T. ( 2004) Placing ideas, genus loci, heterotopia and geography’s quantitative revolution. Progress in Human Geography28(5): 1-31.
2.
Longino H. ( 2003) An interview with Helen Longino. The Dualist10: article 5.
3.
Plummer P. and Sheppard E. ( 2007) A methodology for evaluating regional political economy . In: Fingleton B (ed.) New Directions in Economic Geography. London: Edward Elgar, 250-276.
4.
Popper K. ( 1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Sheppard E. ( 2005) Knowledge production through critical GIS: Genealogy and prospects. Cartographica40(4): 5-21.
6.
Simandan D. ( 2011) Is engaged pluralism the best way ahead for economic geography?Commentary on Barnes and Sheppard (2009). Progress in Human Geography. doi: 10.1177/0309132510390874.
