Recent years have witnessed the beginnings of a renaissance in the field of comparative urban studies. The paper discusses this body of work’s history, drawing on contributions from across the social sciences. Following this it highlights some of the work’s limits, namely its weak theorization of place, scale and causality. The paper then offers a relational comparative approach to the study of cities as a means of attending to these limits. This acknowledges both the territorial and relational geographies behind the production of cities.
Abu-Lughod, J.1975: The legitimacy of comparisons in comparative urban studies: a theoretical position and an application to North African Cities. Urban Affairs Review11, 13-35.
2.
Abu-Lughod, J. and Hay, J.R.1977: Introduction. In Abu-Lughod, J. and Hay, J.R. editors, Third world urbanization, London: Methuen, 1-11.
3.
Amin, A. and Graham, S.1997: The ordinary city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS22, 411-30.
4.
Armer, J.M. and Grimshaw, A.D.1973: Comparative social research: methodological problems and strategies. London: Wiley.
5.
Armer, J.M. and Marsh, R.M., editors 1982: Comparative sociological research in the 1960s and 1970s. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
6.
Bendix, R.1963: Concepts and generalizations in comparative sociological studies. American Sociological Review28, 532-39.
7.
Boudreau, J., Hamel, P., Jouve, B. and Keil, R.2007: New state spaces in Canada: metropolitanization in Montreal and Toronto compared. Urban Geography28, 30-53.
8.
Bray, M., Adamson, B. and Mason, M.2007: Comparative education research: approaches and methods . Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC).
9.
Brenner, N.2001: The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography15, 525-48.
10.
Brenner, N.2004: New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Brinegar, S. and Leonard, J.2008: Poverty and affluence: a comparative analysis of economic segregation in metropolitan Cincinnati, Cleveland, and Columbus, Ohio, 1970-2000 . Urban Geography29, 581-606.
12.
Castells, M.1976: Urban sociology and urban politics: from a critique to new trends of research. In Walton, J. and Masotti, L.H., editors, The city in comparative perspective: cross-national research and new direction in theory, London: Sage, 291-300.
13.
Clark, T., editor 1974: Comparative community politics. London: Sage.
14.
Clarke, S.E.1995: Institutional logics and local economic development: a comparative analysis of eightAmerican cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research19, 48-53.
15.
Cole, A. and John, P.2001: Local governance in England and France. London: UCL Press.
16.
Collinge, C.1999: Self-organisation of society by scale: a spatial reworking of regulation theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17, 557-74.
17.
Connell, R.2007: Southern theory: social science and the global dynamics of knowledge. Cambridge: Polity .
18.
Cox, K.R.1993: The local and the global in the new urban politics: a critical review. Environment and Planning: Society and Space11, 433-48.
19.
Cox, K.R.1995: Globalisation, competition and the politics of local economic development. Urban Studies32, 213-24.
20.
Cox, K.R.2001: Territoriality, politics and the ‘urban’. Political Geography20, 745-62.
21.
Cox, K.R. and Mair, A.1991: From localised social structures to locality as agents . Environment and Planning A23, 197-213.
22.
Davis, D.E. and Tajbakhsh, K.2005: Symposium: Globalization and cities in comparative perspective . International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29, 89-91.
Dear, M. and Scott, A., editors 1981: Urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society. New York: Methuen.
25.
Denters, B. and Mossberger, K.2006: Building blocks for a methodology for comparative urban political research. Urban Affairs Review42, 550-71.
26.
Denters, B. and Rose, E., editors 2005: Comparing local governance - trends and developments. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
Derudder, B., Witlox, F. and Taylor, P.J.2007: United States cities in the world city network: comparing their positions using global origins and destinations of airline passengers . Urban Geography28, 74-91.
28.
DiGaetano, A.1997: Urban governing alignments and realignments in comparative perspective: development politics in Boston, Massachusetts, and Bristol, 1980-1996 . Urban Affairs Review32, 844-70.
29.
DiGaetano, A. and Klemanski, J.S.1993a: Urban regimes in comparative perspective: the politics of urban development in Britain. Urban Affairs Quarterly29, 54-83.
30.
DiGaetano, A. and Klemanski, J.S.1993b: Urban regimes capacity: a comparison of Birmingham and Detroit. Journal of Urban Affairs15, 367-84.
31.
DiGaetano, A. and Klemanski, J.S.1999: Power and city governance: comparative perspectives on urban development. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
32.
DiGaetano, A. and Strom, E.2003: Comparative urban governance: an integrated approach. Urban Affairs Review38, 356-95.
33.
Dogan, M. and Pelassy, D.1984: How to compare nations: strategies in comparative politics . Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
34.
Economic Intelligence Unit (EIU)2005: The Economist Intelligence Unit’s liveability ranking 2005. London: EIU.
35.
Elder, J.W.1976: Comparative cross-national methodology. In Inkeles, A.,Coleman, J. and Smelser, N., editors, Annual review of sociology, Palo Alto, CA: California Annual Reviews, 209-30.
36.
Ember, C.R. and Ember, M.2001: Cross-cultural research methodsWalnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
37.
Gingrich, A. and Fox, R.G., editors 2002: Anthropology: by comparison . New York: Routledge.
38.
Goodwin, M. and MacLeod, G.1999: Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography23, 503-27.
39.
Grimshaw, A.D.1973: Comparative sociology: in what ways different from other sociologies? In Armer, M. and Grimshaw, A.D., editors, Comparative social research: methodological problems and strategies, London : Wiley, 3-48.
40.
Hall, T. and Hubbard, P.1996: The entrepreneurial city: new urban politics, new urban geographies. Progress in Human Geography20, 153-74.
41.
Harding, A.1991: Growth coalitions, UK-style?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy9, 295-317.
42.
Harding, A.1994: Urban regimes and growth machines: towards a cross-national research agenda. Urban Affairs Quarterly29, 356-82.
43.
Harloe, M.1981: Notes on comparative urban research. In Dear, M. and Scott, A., editors, Urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society, New York: Methuen, 179-95.
44.
Hart, G.2001: Development critiques in the 1990s: cul de sacs and promising paths. Progress in Human Geography25, 649-58.
45.
Hart, G.2002: Disabling globalization: places of power in post-Apartheid South Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
46.
Hart, G.2004: Geography and development: critical ethnographies. Progress in Human Geography28, 91-100.
47.
Horvath, R.2004: The particularity of global places: placemaking practices in Los Angeles and Sydney. Urban Geography25, 92-119.
48.
Imrie, R. and Raco, M.1999: How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS24, 45-64.
49.
Jessop, B., Brenner, N. and Jones, M.2008: Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26, 389-401.
50.
Jessop, B., Peck, J. and Tickell, A.1999: Retooling the machine: economic crisis, state restructuring and urban politics. In Jonas, A.E.G. and Wilson, D., editors, The urban growth machine: critical perspectives twenty years later. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 141-59.
51.
John, P. 2009: Why study urban politics? In Davies, J. and Imbroscio, D., editors, Theories of urban politics (second edition), Abingdon: Routledge, 17-24.
52.
Jonas, A.E.G.1994: The scale politics of spatiality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12, 257-64.
53.
Jonas, A.E.G.2006: Pro scale: further reflections on the ‘scale debate’ in human geography. Transactions Institute of British Geographers NS31, 399-406.
54.
Jonas, A.E.G. and Wilson, D., editors 1999: The urban growth machine: critical perspectives twenty years later. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
55.
Kantor, P. and Savitch, H.V.2005: How to study comparative urban development politics: a research note. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29, 135-51.
56.
Kantor, P., Savitch, H.V. and Vicari Haddock, S.1997: The political economy of urban regimes: a comparative perspective. Urban Affairs Review32, 348-77.
57.
Keating, M.1991: Comparative urban politics: power and the city in the United States, Canada, Britain and France. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
58.
Kloostermann, R.C. and Lambregts, B.2007: Between accumulation and concentration of capital: toward a framework for comparing long-term trajectories of urban systems. Urban Geography28, 54-73.
59.
Kohn, M.L.1987: Cross-national research as an analytic strategy: American Sociological Association 1987 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review52, 713-31.
60.
Larner, W. and Le Heron, R.2002: From economic globalisation to globalising economic processes: towards post-structural political economies. Geoforum33, 415-19.
61.
Lauria, M., editor 1997: Reconstructing urban regime theory: regulating urban politics in a global economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
Leitner, H. and Miller, B.2007: Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: a commentary on Marsten, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS32, 116-25.
63.
Lijphart, A.1971: Comparative politics and the comparative method. The American Political Science Review65, 682-93.
64.
Lin, G.2007: Chinese urbanism in question: state, society, and the reproduction of urban spaces. Urban Geography28, 7-29.
65.
Logan, J.R., editor 2002: The new Chinese city: globalization and market reform. Oxford: Blackwell.
66.
Logan, J.R. and Molotch, H.1987: Urban fortunes: the political economy of place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
67.
Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D., editors 2003: Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Marcuse, P. and van Kempen, R.2000: Conclusion: a changed spatial order. In Marcuse, P. and van Kempen, R., editors, Globalizing cities: a new spatial order?, Oxford: Blackwell, 249-75.
69.
Marston, S.2000: The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography24, 219-42.
70.
Marston, S.A., Jones, J.P. and Woodward, K.2005: Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS30, 416-32.
71.
Masotti, L.H. and Walton, J.1976: Comparative urban research: the logic of comparison and the nature of urbanism. In Walton, J. and Masotti, L.H., editors, The city in comparative perspective: cross-national research and new direction in theory, London: Sage, 1-16.
72.
Massey, D.1993: Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Bird, J., Curtis, B., Putman, T., Robertson, G. and Tickner, L., editors, Mapping the futures: local cultures, global change, London: Routledge, 59-69.
73.
Massey, D.2007: World cityCambridge: Polity.
74.
McCann, E.J.2004: ‘Best places’: interurban competition, quality of life and popular media discourse. Urban Studies41, 1909-29.
75.
McFarlane, C.2008a: The comparative city: the urban imagination and the North-South divide. Mimeograph available from the author, Department of Geography, Durham University.
Mercer Consulting2009: Quality of living global city rankings 2009. Retrieved 7 October 2009 from http://www.mercer.com/qualityoflivingpr
78.
Mossberger, K.2009: Urban regime analysis. In Davies, J. and Imbroscio, D., editors, Theories of urban politics (second edition), Abingdon: Routledge, 40-54.
Nijman, J.2007b: Place-particularity and ‘deep analogies’: a comparative essay on Miami’s rise as a world city. Urban Geography28, 92-107.
81.
Osborne, P.2005: On comparability: Kant and the possibility of comparative studies. Boundary232, 3-22.
82.
Peck, J.1995: Moving and shaking: business élites, state localism and urban privatism. Progress in Human Geography19, 16-46.
83.
Peck, J.2002: Political economies of scale: fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography78, 331-60.
84.
Peck, J.2003: Geography and public policy: mapping the penal state. Progress in Human Geography27, 222-32.
85.
Peck, J. and Tickell, A.1995: Business goes local: dissecting the ‘business agenda’ in Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research19, 55-78.
86.
Pickvance, C.1986: Comparative urban analysis and assumptions about causality . International Journal of Urban and Regional Research10, 162-84.
87.
Pickvance, C.1995: Comparative analysis, causality and case studies in urban studies. In Rogers, A. and Vertovec, S., editors, The urban context: ethnicity, social networks and situational analysis, Oxford : Berg, 35-54.
88.
Pickvance, C. and Preteceille, E.1991: State restructuring and local power: a comparative perspective . London: Pinter.
89.
Pierre, J.1999: Models of urban governance: the institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review34, 372-96.
Przeworski, A. and Tuene, H.1970: The logic of comparative inquiry. New York: Wiley.
92.
Ragin, C.1982: Comparative sociology and the comparative method. In Armer, J.M. and Marsh, R.M., editors, Comparative sociological research in the 1960s and 1970s, Leiden: E.J. Brill , 102-20.
93.
Ragin, C.1987: The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
94.
Ragin, C. and Zaret, D.1983: Theory and method in comparative research: two strategies . Social Forces61, 731-54.
95.
Robinson, J.2002: Global and world cities: a view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26, 531-54.
96.
Robinson, J.2005: Urban geography: world cities, or a world of cities. Progress in Human Geography29, 757-65.
97.
Robinson, J.2006: Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. Abingdon: Routledge.
98.
Roy, A.2003a: City requiem: gender and the politics of poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
99.
Roy, A.2003b: Paradigms of propertied citizenship: transnational techniques of analysis. Urban Affairs Review38, 463-91.
100.
Savitch, H.V.1988: Post-industrial cities politics and planning in New York, Paris and London. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
101.
Savitch, H.V. and Kantor, P.1995: City business: an international perspective on marketplace politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research19, 495-512.
102.
Savitch, H.V. and Kantor, P.2002: Cities in the international marketplace: the political economy of urban development in North America and Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
103.
Sayer, A.1984: Method in social science: a realist approach (first edition) . London: Hutchinson.
104.
Sayer, A.1992: Method in social science: a realist approach (second edition) . London: Routledge.
105.
Schwirian, K.P., editor 1974: Comparative urban structure: studies in the ecologies of the city. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
106.
Sellers, J.2002: The nation state and urban governance: towards multilevel analysis. Urban Affairs Review37, 611-41.
107.
Sellers, J.2005: Re-placing the nation: an agenda for comparative urban politics. Urban Affairs Review40, 419-45.
108.
Sjoberg, G.1959: Comparative urban sociology. In Merton, R.K., Broom, L. and Cottrell, L.S. Jr, editors, Sociology today: problems and prospects, New York: Basic Books, 334-59.
109.
Smelser, N.1976: Comparative methods in social sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
110.
Smith, D.A.1991: Method and theory in comparative urban studies. International Journal of Comparative Sociology32, 39-58.
111.
Smith, N.1993: Homeless/global: scaling places. In Bird, J., Curtis, B. , Putnam, T., Robertson, G. and Tickner, L., editors, Mapping the futures: local cultures, global change, London: Routledge, 87-119.
112.
Stoker, G. and Mossberger, K.1994: Urban regime theory in comparative perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Planning12, 195-212.
113.
Swanson, G.1971: Frameworks for comparative research: structural anthropology and the theory of action. In Vallier, K., editor, Comparative methods in sociology: essays on trends and applications , Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 141-202.
114.
Swyngedouw, E.1992: The mammon quests: ‘glocalization’, interspatial competition, and the monetary order. In Dunford, M. and Kafkalas, M., editors, Cities and regions in the new Europe, London: Belhaven Press, 39-67.
115.
Swyngedouw, E.1997: Neither global nor local: ‘glocalisation’ and the politics of scale. In Cox, K.R. , editor, Spaces of globalization: reasserting the power of the local, New York: Guildford Press, 137-66.
116.
Swyngedouw, E.2000: Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18, 63-76.
117.
Tilly, C.1984: Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
118.
Tomlinson, R. and Beauregard, R., editors 2003: Emerging Johannesburg: perspectives on the post-apartheid city. London: Routledge.
119.
Trip, J.J.2007: Assessing quality of place: a comparative analysis of Amsterdam and Rotterdam. Journal of Urban Affairs29, 501-17.
120.
Walton, J.1973: Standardized case comparison: observations on method in comparative sociology. In Armer, M. and Grimshaw, A., editors, Comparative social research, New York: Wiley, 173-88.
121.
Walton, J.1975: Introduction: problems of method and theory in comparative urban studies. Urban Affairs Review11, 3-12.
122.
Walton, J.1976: Political economy of world urban systems: directions for comparative research. In Walton, J. and Masotti, L.H., editors, The city in comparative perspective: cross-national research and new direction in theory, London: Sage, 301-14.
123.
Walton, J.1982: Comparative urban studies. In Armer, J.M. and Marsh, R.T., editors, Comparative sociological research in the 1960s and 1970s, Leiden: E.J. Brill, 22-39.
124.
Walton, J.1990: Theoretical methods in comparative urban politics. In Logan, J.R. and Swanstrom, T., editors, Beyond the city limits: urban policy and economic restructuring in comparative perspective, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 243-60.
125.
Walton, J. and Masotti, L.H. , editors 1976: The city in comparative perspective: cross-national research and new direction in theory. London : Sage.
Ward, K.2000: A critique in search of a corpus: revisiting governance and re-interpreting urban politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS25, 169-85.
128.
Wolman, H. and Goldsmith, M.1992: Urban politics and policy: a comparative perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
129.
Wood, A.1996: Analysing the politics of local economic development: making sense of cross-national convergence. Urban Studies33, 1281-95.
130.
Wood, A.2005: Comparative urban politics and the question of scale. Space and Polity9, 201-15.
