The records of children and young people growing up in care have multiple purposes and audiences. Cathy Humphreys and Margaret Kertesz discuss the ways in which the characteristics of the documentation determine the record's usefulness to care leavers as a resource for identity at some point in later life. The Who Am I? action research project, based in Victoria, Australia, explores the extent to which records and current record-keeping practices facilitate this. Two approaches were found to be especially useful: the Knowledge Diamond framework, which harnesses the different knowledge brought by diverse groups to the task of developing principles for record-keeping; and the records continuum (constructing, storing and accessing the record), which provided a concept through which to understand the significance of the archive as a dimension of good practice. It was found that workers' accountability to the children now and in the future risks being overshadowed by the requirements of other stakeholders unless the principles that underpin effective record-keeping are articulated and implemented.
AasK, ‘From narrative to database: Technological change and penal culture’, Punishment and Society6:4, pp 379–93, 2004.
2.
AmesN, ‘Social work recording: A new look at an old issue’, Journal of Social Work Education35:2, pp 227–38, 1999.
3.
BaynesP, ‘Untold stories: A discussion of life story work’, Adoption & Fostering32:2, pp 43–49, 2008.
4.
CampbellL, ‘Who does “the system” think I am? Current practices and issues in making and keeping the child's “care” records’, Preliminary discussion paper for Who am I? current practice workshop 1, 2009; available at www.cfecfw.asn.au/know/research.
CheersDKufeldtKKleinRRideoutS, ‘Comparing Caring: The Looking After Children system in Canada and Australia’, Children Australia32:2, pp 21–28, 2007.
7.
CowlingL, ‘A collaborative life story archive? Issues for reflection and discussion’, Preliminary discussion paper for Who am I? current practice workshop 2, 2009; available at www.cfecfw.asn.au/know/research.
8.
CummingSFitzpatrickEMcAuliffeDMcKainSMartinCTongeA, ‘Raising the Titanic: Rescuing social work documentation from the sea of ethical risk’, Australian Social Work60:2, pp 239–57, 2007.
9.
DuncalfZ, Listen Up! Adult Care Leavers Speak Out: Research gathered from 310 care leavers aged 17–78, Manchester: Care Leavers' Association, 2010.
10.
GillinghamPHumphreysC, ‘Child protection practitioners and decision-making tools: Observations and reflections from the frontline’, British Journal of Social Work40, pp 2598–616, 2010.
11.
GoddardJDuncalfZMurrayS, ‘Access to Child Care Records: A comparative analysis of UK and Australian policy and practice’, Social Policy Association Annual Conference, Lincoln, 5–7 July 2010; available at www.social-policy.org.uk/lincoln/Goddard.pdf (accessed 5–7 July 2010).
12.
GoddardJFeastJKirtonD, ‘A childhood on paper: Accessing care records under the Data Protection Act 1998’, Adoption & Fostering29:3, pp 82–84, 2005.
13.
GoddardJFeastJKirtonD, ‘A childhood on paper: Managing access to child care files by post-care adults’, Adoption & Fostering32:2, pp 50–62, 2008.
14.
GoldingF, ‘Problems in accessing personal records: presentation to Who am I? current practice workshop 1’, Unpublished, 2009.
15.
HorrocksCGoddardJ, ‘Adults who grew up in care: Constructing the self and accessing care files’, Chid & Family Social Work11, pp 264–72, 2006.
16.
HREOC (Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission), Bringing them Home: The report of the national Inquiry into the separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families, Sydney: HREOC, 1997.
17.
HumphreysCMarcusGSandonARaeKWiseSWebsterMWatersS, ‘Informing policy with evidence: Successes, failures and surprises’, in DillKSheraWManionI (eds), Implementing Evidence Informed Practice: International perspectives, Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press Inc, 2011.
18.
IsonRL, ‘Systems thinking and practice for action research’, in ReasonPWBradburyH (eds), The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative inquiry and practice (second edition), London: Sage Publications, 2008.
19.
JacksonSKilroeS, Looking After Children: Good parenting, good outcomes reader, London: The Stationery Office, 1996.
20.
KagleJD, ‘Record-keeping: Directions for the 1990s’, Social Work38:2, pp 190–96, 1993.
21.
KirtonDPeltierEWebbE, ‘After all these years: Accessing care records’, Adoption & Fostering25:4, pp 39–49, 2001.
22.
McKemmishSAclandGWardNReadB, ‘Describing records in context in the continuum: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema’, Archivaria48, pp 3–43, Spring, 1999.
23.
MaslowA, ‘A theory of human motivation’, Psychological Review50, pp 370–96, 1943.
24.
MunroE, The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report, Department for Education, London: The Stationery Office, 2011.
25.
MurraySMaloneJGlareJ, ‘Building a life story: Providing records and support to former residents of children's homes’, Australian Social Work61:3, pp 239–55, 2008.
26.
MurraySMurphyJBraniganEMaloneJ, After the Orphanage: Life beyond the children fs home, Sydney: UNSW Press, 2009.
27.
NixonJHumphreysC, ‘Marshalling the evidence to inform an intersectorial framing of domestic violence’, Social Politics17:2, pp 137–58, Summer, 2010.
28.
PawsonRBoazAGraysonLLongABarnesC, ‘Types and quality of knowledge in social care’, Knowledge Review 3, Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE), Bristol: Policy Press, 2003.
29.
PartonN, ‘Challenges to practice and knowledge in child welfare social work: From the social’ to the ‘informational’, Children and Youth Services Review31:7, pp 715–21, 2009.
30.
PeckoverSWhiteSHallC, ‘Managing and making electronic children’, Information, Communication and Society11:3, pp 375–94, 2008.
31.
PetrCGWalterUM, ‘Best Practices Inquiry: A multidimensional value-critical framework’, Journal of Social Work Education41:2, pp 251–67, 2005.
32.
PrinceK, Boring Records? Communication, speech and writing in social work, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1996.
33.
PughGSchofieldG, ‘Unlocking the past: The experience of gaining access to Barnardo's records’, Adoption & Fostering23:2, pp 7–18, 1999.
34.
RoseRPhilpotT, The Child's Own Story: Life story work with traumatized children, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2005.
35.
RyanTWalkerR, Life Story Work: A practical guide to helping children understand their past, London: BAAF, 2007.
36.
SamuelM, ‘Social care professionals over-whelmed by paperwork’, Community Care8, 14 December 2005.
37.
Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee, Lost Innocents: Righting the record. Report on child migration, Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia, 2001.
38.
Senate Community Affairs Reference Committee, Forgotten Australians: A report on Australians who experienced institutional or out-of-home care as children, Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia, 2004.
39.
SteyaertJ, ‘Peeling the client information system onion: An international perspective’, in GouldNMoultrieK (eds), Effective Policy, Planning and Implementation, Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997.
40.
ThomasJHollandS, ‘Representing children's identities in core assessments’, British Journal of Social Work40, pp 2617–33, 2010.
41.
TregeagleSMasonJ, ‘Service user experience of participation in case management’, Child & Famiiy Social Work13, pp 391–401, 2008.
42.
TregeagleSTreleavenL, ‘Key questions in considering guided practice for vulnerable Australian children’, Australian Journal of Social Issues41:3, pp 359–68, 2006.
43.
WillisRHollandS, ‘Life story work: Reflections on the experience by looked after young people’, Adoption & Fostering33:4, pp 44–52, 2009.
44.
WinterKCohenO, ‘Identity issues for looked after children with no knowledge of their origins: Implications for research and practice’, Adoption & Fostering29:2, pp 44–52, 2005.
