Looked after children continue to perform poorly at school compared to their peers and care leavers are at increased risk of unemployment and poverty. Although there is a growing body of research on their education and recent studies have identified the factors associated with successful educational outcomes, less attention has been paid to whether, and if so how, the majority of children finishing Key Stage 41 with disappointing qualifications may be supported to make up any educational deficit beyond compulsory school-leaving age (currently 16 in the UK). Care leavers can exhibit remarkable resilience and leaving care may be an opportunity for positive change. Jennifer Driscoll reports on a small pilot study which explored young people's own accounts and explanations in relation to their educational experiences and attainment, together with their attitudes to and engagement with education, particularly with regard to their aspirations and motivation to persevere with it. The challenges for schools in providing support to young people who are notoriously self-reliant and resistant to accepting help are considered in the context of current tensions in educational policy.
AllenM, Into the Mainstream: Care leavers entering work, education and training, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2003.
2.
AjayiSQuigleyM, ‘By degrees: Care leavers in higher education’ in ChaseESimonAJacksonS (eds), In Care and After: A positive perspective, London: Routledge, 2006.
3.
BallSMaguireMMacraeS, Choice, Pathways and Transitions Post-16: New youth, new economies in the global city, London: RoutledgeFalmer, 2000.
4.
BerridgeD, ‘Theory and explanation in child welfare: Education and looked-after children’, Child & Family Social Work12: 1, pp 1–10, 2007.
5.
BerridgeDDanceCBeechamJFieldS, Educating Difficult Adolescents: Effective education for children in public care or with emotional and behavioural difficulties, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008.
6.
BerridgeDHenryLJacksonSTurneyL, Looked After and Learning: An evaluation of the virtual school head for looked after children local authority pilots, London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2009.
7.
CameronC, ‘Education and self-reliance among care leavers’, Adoption & Fostering31: 1, pp 39–49, 2007.
8.
CameronCJacksonHauari HHollingworthK, YiPPEE WP5 UK Report–Young people from a public care background: pathways to further and higher education in England: a case study, London: Thomas Coram Research Institute, 2011.
9.
DCSF (Department for Children, Schools and Families), Special Educational Needs in England: January 2008, Statistical First Release (SFR) 15/2008, DCSF/National Statistics, 2008a.
10.
DCSF, Children Looked After in England (including adoption and care leavers) — Year ending 31 March 2008, SFR 23/2008. DCSF/National Statistics, 2008b.
11.
DCSF, The Role and Responsibilities of the Designated Teacher for Looked after Children: Statutory guidance for school governing bodies, DCSF-01046-2009, Nottingham: DCSF, 2009.
12.
DCSF, Promoting the Educational Achievement of Looked After Children: Statutory guidance for local authorities, DCSF-00342-2010, Nottingham: DCSF, 2010.
13.
DfE (Department for Education)/National Statistics, Children Looked After in England (Including Adoption and Care Leavers) — Year Ending 31 March 2010 Statistical First Release (SFR) 27/2010, London: DfE2010a.
14.
DfE/National Statistics, Outcomes for Children Looked After by Local Authorities in England, as at 31 March 2010, Statistical First Release (SFR) 38/2010, London: DfE, 2010b.
15.
DfE, Customer Voice- wave 9: Aspirations of children in care, Research Brief DFE-RBX-10-03, London: DfE, 2010c.
16.
DfES (Department for Education and Skills), Care Matters: Transforming the lives of children and young people in care, Green Paper, London: DfES/The Stationery Office, 2006.
17.
DfES, Care Matters: Time for change, White Paper, London: DfES/The Stationery Office, 2007.
18.
DH (Department of Health), Outcome Indicators for Looked After Children: Twelve months to 30 September 2002, England, London: Office for National Statistics, 2003.
19.
DixonJWadeJByfordSWeatherlyHLeeJ, Young People Leaving Care: A study of costs and outcomes: Report to the DfES, York: University of York, Social Work Research and Development Unit, 2006.
20.
DriscollJ, ‘Supporting care leavers to fulfil their educational aspirations: Resilience, relationships and resistance to help’, Children & Society, 2011, forthcoming.
21.
CampbellF Fletcher, ‘Pupils who are “in care”: What Can Schools Do?’, in BaginskyM (ed), Safeguarding Children and Schools, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008.
22.
HaiNWilliamsA, Implementing the Children (Leaving Care) Act 2000: The experience of eight London boroughs, London: National Children's Bureau, 2004.
23.
HallamS, ‘Musical motivation; towards a model synthesising the research’, Music Education Research4: 2, pp 225–44, 2002.
HollandS, ‘Listening to children in care: A review of methodological and theoretical approaches to understanding looked after children's perspectives’, Children & Society23: 3, pp 226–35, 2009.
26.
House of Commons Children, Schools and Families Committee (HC CSFC), Looked after Children: Third Report of Session 2008–09, Volume I Report, together with formal minutes HC111-I, London: The Stationery Office, 2009.
JacksonS, ‘Reconnecting care and education: From the Children Act 1989 to Care Matters’, Journal of Children's Services5: 3, pp 48–59, 2010.
29.
JacksonSAjayiS, ‘Foster care and higher education’, Adoption & Fostering31: 1, pp 62–72, 2007.
30.
JacksonSMartinP, ‘Surviving the care system: Education and resilience’, Journal of Adolescence21: 5, pp 569–83, 1998.
31.
JacksonSSimonA, ‘The costs and benefits of educating children in care’, in ChaseESimonAJacksonS (eds), In Care and After: A positive perspective, London: Routledge, 2006.
32.
JacksonSAjayiSQuigleyM, By Degrees: The first year, from care to university, London: The Frank Buttle Trust, 2003.
33.
JacksonSAjayiSQuigleyM, Going to University from Care, London: National Children's Bureau/Frank Buttle Trust, 2005.
34.
LeesonC, ‘My life in care: Experiences of non-participation in decision-making processes’, Child & Family Social Work12: 3, pp 268–77, 2007.
35.
LipscombeJFarmerE ‘What matters in fostering adolescents?’, Social Work & Social Sciences Review13: 1, pp 41–58, 2007.
MeltzerHGatwardRCorbinTGoodwinRFordT, The Mental Health of Young People Looked After by Local Authorities in England, London: Office for National Statistics (ONS), 2003.
38.
MeltzerHLaderDCorbinTGoodwinRFordT, The Mental Health of Young People Looked After by Local Authorities in Scotland, London: ONS, 2004a.
39.
MeltzerHLaderDCorbinTGoodwinRFordT, The Mental Health of Young People Looked After by Local Authorities in Wales, London: ONS, 2004b.
40.
MunroEGrahamD MaskellWardH and National Care Advisory Service (NCAS), Evaluation of the Staying Put: 18+ Family Placement Pilot Programme. Interim Report: Overview of emerging themes and issues, DfE-RB030, London: DfE, 2010.
41.
National Children's Bureau, Guidelines for Research with Children and Young People, London: National Children's Bureau, 2009.
42.
Ofsted/SSI, The Education of Children who are Looked After by Local Authorities, London: Department of Health, 1995.
43.
O'SullivanAWestermanR, ‘Closing the gap: Investigating the barriers to educational achievement for looked after children’, Adoption & Fostering31: 1, pp 13–20, 2007.
44.
PecoraPKesslerRO'BrienKWhiteCWilliamsJHiripiEEnglishDWhiteJHerrickM, ‘Educational and employment outcomes of adults formerly placed in foster care: Results from the Northwest Foster Care Alumni Study’, Children and Youth Services Review28: 12, pp 1459–81, 2006.
45.
PiperC, Investing in Children: Policy, law and practice in context, Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 2008.
46.
RutterM, ‘Children in substitute care: Some conceptual considerations and research implications’, Children and Youth Services Review22:9–10, pp 685–703, 2000.
47.
SamuelsGPryceJ, ‘ “What doesn't kill you makes you stronger”: Survivalist self-reliance as resilience and risk among young adults aging out of foster care’, Children and Youth Services Review30, pp 1198–210, 2008.
48.
SEU (Social Exclusion Unit), A Better Education for Children in Care, London: SEU/Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2003.
49.
ShepherdCReynoldsFMoranJ, ‘ “They're battle scars, I wear them well”: A phenomenological exploration of young women's experiences of building resilience following adversity in adolescence’, Journal of Youth Studies13: 3, pp 273–90, 2010.
50.
SteinM, ‘Research review: Young people leaving care’, Child & Family Social Work11: 3, pp 273–74, 2006a.
51.
SteinM, ‘Young people aging out of care: The poverty of theory’, Children and Youth Services Review28: 4, pp 422–34, 2006b.
52.
SteinM, “Transitions from care to adulthood: Messages from research for policy and practice’, in SteinMMunroE (eds), Young People's Transitions from Care to Adulthood: International research and practice, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008.
53.
StraussACorbinJ, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (second edition), London: Sage Publications, 1998.
54.
UttingW, People Like Us: The report of the review of safeguards for children living away from home, DH/The Welsh Office: HMSO, 1997.
55.
WadeJDixonJ, ‘Making a home, finding a job: Investigating early housing and employment outcomes for young people leaving care’, Child & Family Social Work11: 3, pp 199–208, 2006.
56.
WadeJMunroE, “UK’, in SteinMMunroE (eds), Young People's Transitions from Care to Adulthood: International research and practice, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2008.
57.
WigfallVCameronC, ‘Promoting young people's participation in research’, in ChaseESimonAJacksonS (eds), In Care and After: A positive perspective, London: Routledge, 2006.
58.
WilliamsF, ‘What matters is who works: Why every child matters to New Labour’, Critical Social Policy24:3 pp 406–27, 2004.
59.
WinterK, ‘Widening our knowledge concerning young looked after children: The case for research using sociological models of childhood’, Child & Family Social Work11: 1, pp 55–64, 2006.
