The study discussed here by Gunnel Osterman, Anders Möller and Ingegerd Wirtberg aimed to find out if any observable themes or patterns recur when using the Marte Meo (MM) method with adoptive parents, and if the parents feel that working with this method helps them to interact with their child. The study used qualitative methods and comprised two parts: use of the MM method with couples who had adopted their first child within the past two months, and semi-structured interviews with the parents. The study group consisted of seven parent couples who had adopted children aged 5–15 months from overseas.
The principle of the MM method is for the child's need to be approached at its own tempo and rhythm. It encourages and motivates the parents to adjust their interplay to the child's actual behaviour, leading to better adjustment to the child's tempo and rhythm. This is important because initial video filming reveals that most parents adopt a tempo that is too fast for their child. During this initial period, the MM method may be one way of working to meet adoptive parents' need for advice and support in their efforts to be sensitive to the developmental needs of their child.
AxbergU.BrobergA.HanssonK.WirtbergI., ‘The development of a systemic school-based intervention: Marte Meo and coordination meetings’, Family Process3, pp 375–89, 2006.
3.
WiklundM. BäckBergstenB., Det moderna föräldraskapet — en studie av familjer och kön i förändring [Modern Parenting — A study of families and gender in change], Stockholm: Natur och Kultur, 1997.
4.
KranenburgMJ BakermansVan IJzendoornMHJufferF., ‘Less is more: Meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood’, Psychological Bulletin129, pp 195–215, 2003.
5.
BrodénM. Berg, Mor och barn i ingenmansland [Mother and Child in No Man's Land], Solna: Almquist & Wiksell, 1997.
BowlbyJ., A Secure Base: Clinical applications of attachment theory, London: Routledge, 1988.
8.
BrobergA., ‘To attach once more — a challenge for international adopted children’, in CarlbergIMJarenosK. Nordin, International adoptees in Sweden — what does the research say?, Stockholm: IMS och Gothia Förlag, 2007.
9.
BrobergA.GranqvistP.IvarssonT.MothanderP. Risholm, Anknytningsteori — Betydelsen av nära känslomässiga relationer [Attachment Theory — The importance of emotionally close relations], Stockholm: Natur och Kultur, 2006.
10.
ChisholmK., ‘A three-year follow-up of attachment and indiscriminate friendliness in children adopted from Romanian orphanages’, Child Development69, pp 1092–106, 1998.
11.
ChisholmK., ‘Attachment in children adopted from Romanian orphanages: Two case studies’, in CrittendenP. McKinseyClaussenA. Hartl (eds), The Organization of Attachment Relationships, Maturation, Culture and Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
12.
DalenM.SaetersdalB., Utenlandsadopterte barn i Norge: Sommerfugler i Vinterland [Internationally Adopted Children in Norway: Summer birds in a winterland], Oslo: JW Cappelen, 1988.
13.
DalenM.SaetersdalB., Utenlandsadopterte børn i Norge: Tilpasning, opplearing, identitetsutvikling, empirisk undersøkelse og teoretisk videreutvikling [Internationally Adopted Children in Norway: Adaptation, learning, identity development, empirical investigation and further theoretical development]Spesiallaererhøgskolen: University of Oslo, 1992.
14.
FukkinkRG, ‘Video feedback in widescreen: A meta-analysis of family programs’, Clinical Psychology Review28: 6, pp 904–16, 2008.
15.
GrayDD, Attaching in Adoption, Indianapolis, IN: Perspectives Press, 2002.
16.
HafstadR.øvreeideH., Föräldrafokuserat arbete med barn [Parent-focused Work with Children], Stockholm: Liber Förlag, 2001.
17.
HalldénG., Föräldrars tankar om barn [Parents' thoughts about children], Stockholm: Carlssons, 1992.
18.
HedenbroM.WirtbergI., Samspelets kraft. Marte meo — möjlighet till utveckling [The Power of Interaction. Marte Meo — possibility for development], Stockholm: Liber förlag, 2000.
19.
HjernA.VinnerljungB.LindbladF., ‘Suicide, psychiatric illness and social maladjustment in inter-country adoptees in Sweden’, The Lancet360, pp 443–48, 2002.
20.
JufferF.RosenboomL., ‘Infant–mother attachment of internationally adopted children in the Netherlands’, International Journal of Behavioral Development20: 1, pp 93–107, 1997.
21.
JufferF.KranenburgMJ BakermansVan IJzendoornMH, Promoting Positive Parenting: An attachment-based intervention, New York/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007.
22.
KalinauskieneL.CekuolieneD.Van IjzendoornMHKranenburgMJ BakermansJufferF.KusakovskajaI., ‘Supporting insensitive mothers: The Vilnius randomized control trial of video-feedback intervention to promote maternal sensitivity and infant attachment security’, Child, Care, Health and Development35: 5, pp 613–23, 2009.
MIAMyndigheten för internationella adoptionsfrågor [The public authority for questions on international adoption], www.mia.eu2009.
25.
øvreeideH.HafstadR., The Marte Meo Method and Developmental Supportive Dialogues, Haarderwiijk, the Netherlands: Aarts Productions, 1996.
26.
RutterMLKreppnerJMO'ConnorTG, ‘Specificity and heterogeneity in children's responses to profound institutional privation’, British Journal of Psychiatry179, pp 97–103, 2001.
27.
SOU (Swedish Government Official Reports)Adoption — till vilket pris? [Adoption — at what price?], Report 49, 2003.
28.
SternDN, The Interpersonal Work of the Infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology, New York: Basic Books, 2003.
29.
Van IjzendoornMHJufferF., ‘Adoption as intervention: Meta-analytic evidence for massive catch-up and plasticity in physical, socio-emotional and cognitive development’, Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry12, pp 1228–45, 2006.
30.
Van IJzendoornMHJufferF.DuyvestynMGC, ‘Breaking the intergenerational cycle of insecure attachment: A review of the effects of attachment-based interventions on maternal sensitivity and infant security’, Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry36, pp 225–48, 1995.
31.
VikK.HaftingM., ‘The outside view as facilitator of self-reflection and vitality: A phenomenological approach’, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology27: 3, pp 287–98, 2009.
32.
Von GreiffK., Föräldrar till internationellt adopterade barn [Parents of Internationally Adopted Children], FoU-rapport 1/2004, Stockholm: FoU Nordost, 2004.
