Support services for the birth relatives of adopted children have received far less research scrutiny than those for adopters and the children themselves. Clive Sellick reports the first stage ‘mapping’ survey of a government-commissioned study into birth relative support services and services supporting contact following changes in policy and legislation. The type, range and delivery of such services, commissioned or provided by local authority and voluntary adoption agencies and adoption support agencies in England and Wales, are examined. The survey found that good opportunities exist for linking birth relative and contact support services. However, real challenges remain in promoting support services and reaching birth relatives and in funding and commissioning such services, particularly from the non-governmental sector.
ArgentH, (ed), Models of Adoption Support: What works and what doesn't, London: BAAF, 2003.
2.
BeekMSchofieldG, ‘Promoting security and managing risk: contact in long-term foster care’, in NeilEHoweD (eds), Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care: Research, theory and practice, London: BAAF, 2004.
3.
BorlandMO'HaraGTriseliotisJ, Permanency Planning and Disruption in Lothian Region, Edinburgh: Central Research Unit, Scottish Office, 1991.
4.
CharltonLCrankMKansaraKOliverC, Still Screaming: Birth parents compulsorily separated from their children, Manchester: After Adoption, 1998.
5.
CleaverH, Fostering Family Contact, London: The Stationery Office, 2000.
6.
CSCI (Commission for Social Care Inspection), Independent Fostering Providers, Personal Communication, 7 July2006; enquiries@csci.gsi.gov.uk.
7.
Department of Health, National Adoption Standards for England, London: Department of Health, 2001.
8.
FeastJHundlebyM, Directory of Intermediary Support Services in England and Wales for Birth Relatives, London, BAAF, 2005.
9.
FratterJ, Adoption with Contact: Implications for policy and practice, London: BAAF, 1996.
10.
GiltinanD, ‘Child care at the end of the millennium’, in HillM (ed), Shaping Childcare Practice in Scotland, London: BAAF, 2002.
11.
HartALuckockB, Developing Adoption Support and Therapy: New approaches for practice, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2004.
12.
HoweD, An Introduction to Social Work Theory, Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.
13.
HoweDSawbridgePHiningsD, Half a Million Women, London: Penguin, 1992.
14.
JacksonJ, ‘The Nottingham Drop-in: providing mutual support for birth mothers’, in ArgentH, Models of Adoption Support: What works and what doesn't, London: BAAF, 2003.
15.
LoganJSmithC, ‘Direct post-adoption contact: experiences of birth and adoptive families’, in NeilEHoweD (eds), Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care: Research, theory and practice, London: BAAF, 2004.
16.
LoweNMurchMBorkowskiMWeaverABeckfordVThomasC, Supporting Adoption: Reframing the approach, London: BAAF, 1999.
17.
National Assembly for Wales, Statutory Instruments, 2004, Children and Young Persons, Wales, The Adoption Support Services (Local Authorities) (Wales) No. 2 Regulations 2004.
18.
National Assembly for Wales, Statutory Instruments, 2004, Children and Young Persons, Wales, Social Care Wales, The Adoption Support Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005.
19.
NeilEHoweD, (eds), Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care: Research, theory and practice, London: BAAF, 2004.
20.
PhillipsRMcWilliamE, (eds), After Adoption: Working with adoptive families, London: BAAF, 1996.
21.
RushtonA, ‘The adoption of looked after children: a scoping review of research’, Social Care Institute for Excellence, Knowledge Review2, Bristol: The Policy Press, 2003.
22.
RushtonADanceC, Adoption Support Services for Families in Difficulty: A literature review and survey of UK practice, London: BAAF, 2002.
23.
SellickC, ‘Opportunities and risks: models of good practice in commissioning foster care’, British Journal of Social Work36:8, pp 1345–59, 2006a.
24.
SellickC, ‘Relational contracting between local authorities and independent fostering providers: lessons in conducting business for child welfare managers’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law28:2, pp 107–20, 2006b.
25.
SellickCHowellD, ‘Innovative, tried and tested: a review of good practice in fostering’, Social Care Institute for Excellence, Knowledge Review4, Bristol: The Policy Press, 2003.
26.
SellickCHowellD, ‘A description and analysis of multi-sectoral fostering practice in the United Kingdom’, British Journal of Social Work34:4, pp 481–99, 2004.
27.
Statutory Instrument No.1348, The Adoption Support Services (Local Authorities) (England) Regulations 2003, London: HMSO, 2003.
28.
TriseliotisJFeastJKyleF, The Adoption Triangle Revisited: A study of adoption, search and reunion experiences, London: BAAF, 2005.
29.
TriseliotisJShiremanJHundlebyM, Adoption Theory, Policy and Practice, London: Cassell, 1997.
30.
WedgePMantleG, Sibling Groups and Social Work, Aldershot: Avebury, 1991.
31.
YoungJNeilE, ‘The “Contact after Adoption” study: the perspective of birth relatives after non-voluntary adoption’, in NeilEHoweD (eds), Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care: Research, theory and practice, London: BAAF, 2004.
