Julia Gannon explores the findings of a study into the recording style and content of adoption files and the influences of these on the birth record counsellor's decision-making process. Her article focuses on the specific information shared or not shared with the adopted adult. It asserts that birth record counselling is one of the few tasks that propel the social worker back into the history of social work practice while simultaneously supporting service users through their search for information about their birth history and adoption. There is an emphasis on assessing how serviceable the recording style and content of adoption files are for adoptees. The research design involved semi-structured interviews with eight social workers currently holding birth record counselling cases. Four of the respondents were employed in local authority adoption teams and four were independent self-employed social workers in the field of adoption. The author's findings suggest that the knowledge birth record counsellors' gain from adoptees about how they experience their files has potential for practical application to social work practice in children and families teams today.
ArcherC.BurnellA., (eds), Trauma, Attachment and Family Permanence: Fear can stop you loving, London: Jessica Kingsley, 2003.
2.
BarclayP., Social Workers: Their role and tasks, London: National Institute for Social Work, Bedford Square Press, 1982.
3.
BriggsR., Learning How to Ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
4.
BristolM., Handbook on Social Case Recording, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1936.
5.
Central Council for the Education and Training of Social Workers (CCETSW), Requirements and Regulations for the Diploma in Social Work (Paper 30), London: CCETSW, 1989.
6.
CorbyB., ‘Theory and practice in long-term social work’, British Journal of Social Work12:6, pp 619–38, 1982.
7.
CustanceM., Defining the Electronic Social Care Record, London: Information Policy Unit — Social Care, Department of Health, 2004.
8.
DaviesM., The Essential Social Worker, London: Heinemann, 1981.
9.
Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS), Social Work Decisions in Child Care: Recent research findings and their implications, London: HMSO, 1985.
10.
DoyleC., ‘Casework’, in HanveyC.PhilpotT. (eds), Practising Social Work, London: Routledge, 1994.
11.
FeastJ.MarwoodM.WarburA.WebL., Preparing for Reunion: Adopted people, adoptive parents and birth parents tell their stories, London: The Children's Society, 1994.
12.
FullerR.PetchA., Practitioner Research: The reflexive social worker, Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999.
13.
HaimesE.TimmsN., Adoption, Identity and Social Policy: The search for distant relatives, Aldershot: Gower, 1985.
14.
HodgkinsP., Birth Records Counselling: A practical guide, London: BAAF, 1991.
15.
HollowayW.JeffersonT., Doing Qualitative Research Differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method, London: Sage, 2000.
16.
Houghton Report, Report of the Departmental Committee on the Adoption of Children, London: HMSO, 1972.
17.
HoweD., Attachment Theory for Social Work Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1995.
18.
HoweD.FeastJ., Adoption, Search and Reunion, London: The Children's Society, 2000.
19.
Hurst Report, Report of the Departmental Committee on the Adoption of Children, London: HMSO, 1954.
20.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M., Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook (second edition), London: Sage, 1994.
21.
ParkerJ., ‘Adoption and loss: Implications for contempory social work in the UK’, Practice14:3, pp 15–30, 2002.
22.
PrinceK., Boring Records? Communication, speech and writing in social work, London: Jessica Kingsley, 1996.
23.
LiboveL. Ribble, Learning to Listen, King of Prussia, PA: Organization and Design Development Inc., 1996.
24.
RobsonC., The Real World Research (second edition), Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.
