The papers accepted for publication in this themed issue reflect to a large extent the long-needed move toward recognizing the importance of a focus on tensions and contradictions as dualities. In this commentary, I will recap the tensions addressed not only in these papers but also in the commentary by Grabher and inquire into how they address them, for instance by unearthing the concepts these authors mobilize to theorize them. I will conclude that, from an organization theory perspective, economic geography seems to be on a good way to a more balanced and conflict-sensitive, even dialectical process understanding of creativity and organization that could well be pushed a little further in this direction.
AdlerPSBorysB (1996)
Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly41(1): 61–89.
2.
AhrneGBrunssonN (2018) Organization Unbound.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
3.
AshforthBEReingenPH (2014)
Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative.Administrative Science Quarterly59(3): 474–516.
4.
BarnesTJ (2018) A marginal man and his central contributions: The creative spaces of William (‘Wild Bill’) Bunge and American geography. Environment and Planning A.
5.
BatheltHGlücklerJ (2014)
Institutional change in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography38(3): 340–363.
6.
BrinksVIbertOMüllerFCet al. (2018) From ignorance to innovation: Serendipitous and purposeful mobility in creative processes – The case of biotechnology, legal services and board games. Environment and Planning A 50(8): 1742–1763.
7.
BurkeCMMorleyMJ (2016)
On temporary organizations: A review, synthesis and research agenda. Human Relations69(6): 1235–1258.
8.
CattaniGFerrianiS (2008)
A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science19: 824–844.
9.
CleggSRKornbergerM (eds) (2006) Space, Organizations and Management Theory.
Copenhagen:
Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
10.
DeFillippiRGrabherGJonesC (2007)
Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: Managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural industries. Journal of Organizational Behavior28: 511–521.
11.
DokkoGKaneAATrotorielloM (2014)
One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies35: 703–726.
12.
FarjounM (2017) Contradictions, dialectics and paradoxes. In: LanlgeyATsoukasH (eds) The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE, pp.87–109.
13.
FortwengelJSchüßlerESydowJ (2017)
Studying organizational creativity as process: Fluidity or duality?Creativity and Innovation Management26(1): 5–16.
14.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
15.
GrabherG (2018) Disconnectedness: A tale about peripherality, outsiders and architectural creativity. Environment and Planning A.
16.
GrabherGMelchiorASchiemerBet al. (2018)
From being there to being aware. Confronting geographical and sociological imaginations of copresence. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(1): 245–255.
17.
GraetzFSmithACT (2008)
The role of dualities in arbitrating continuity and change in forms of organizing. International Journal of Management Reviews10: 265–280.
18.
HautalaJIbertO (2018) Creativity in arts and sciences: Collective processes from a spatial perspective. Environment and Planning A.
19.
KoestlerA (1964) The Act of Creation.
London:
Picador.
20.
LamA (2018) Boundary-crossing careers and the ‘third space of hybridity’: Career actors as knowledge brokers between creative arts and academia. Environment and Planning A 50(8): 1716–1741.
21.
LangleyA (1999)
Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
22.
LawrencePRLorschJW (1967)
Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly12(1): 1–47.
23.
Long LingoEO'MahonyS (2010)
Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Administrative Science Quarterly55(1): 47–81.
24.
OrlikowskiWJ (2004)
Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science13(3): 249–273.
25.
OrtmannGSydowJ (2018) Dancing in chains: Creative practices in/of organizations. Organization Studies 40 (in print).
26.
ShalleyCEZhouJOldhamGR (2004)
The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?Journal of Management30(6): 933–959.
27.
SonensheinS (2016)
Routines and creativity: From dualism to duality. Organization Science27(3): 739–758.
28.
TasselliSKilduffMMengesJI (2015)
The microfoundations of organizational social networks: A review and an agenda for future research.Journal of Management41: 1361–1387.
29.
VedresBStarkD (2010)
Structural folds: Generative disruption in overlapping groups. American Journal of Sociology115(4): 1150–1190.
30.
VermeulenN (2018) The choreography of a new research field: Aggregation, circulation and oscillation. Environment and Planning A.
