In this paper, we are concerned with the relationship between creativity, ignorance and mobility. We understand creativity as a social process of recombination, which is strongly shaped by the actors’ lack of knowledge (or: ignorance) and thus argue in favor of a conceptual shift: Instead of analyzing creativity from a knowledge perspective, the analytical focus is on the participants’ evolving ignorance. In a qualitative multiple-case study research of creative processes in three domains, biotechnology, legal services and board game design, we explore the time-spatial dynamics of collaboration under the influence of two distinct forms of ignorance: unrecognized and specified ignorance. Initially, participants do not know what they do not know and are unable to purposefully directed search for inspiration. In this stage, overlapping local opportunities play a significant role to afford serendipitous encounters. Creative processes take a decisive turn, once participants manage to specify their ignorance. It becomes possible to circumscribe missing expertise and to search for it more purposefully – or to intentionally refrain from further inquiry. Now mutual attraction of experts enables interaction across distance. Places deemed irrelevant are circumvented.
AbbottA (2010)
Varieties of ignorance. The American Sociologist41(2): 174–189.
2.
AmabileTM (1996) Creativity and Context.
Boulder:
Westview Press.
3.
BalconiMBrusoniSOrsenigoL (2010)
In defence of the linear model: An essay. Research Policy39(1): 1–13.
4.
BatheltHGibsonR (2015)
Learning in ‘organized anarchies’: The nature of technological search processes and knowledge flows at international trade fairs. Regional Studies49(6): 985–1002.
5.
BatheltHGlücklerJ (2011) The Relational Economy: Geographies of Knowing and Learning.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
6.
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP (2004)
Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography28(1): 31–56.
7.
BeckUWehlingP (2012) The politics of non-knowing. An emerging area of social and political conflict in reflexive modernity. In: Dominguez RubioFBaertP (eds) The Politics of Knowledge.
London, New York:
Routledge, pp.33–57.
8.
BodenMA (1994) What is creativity? In: BodenMA (ed) Dimensions of Creativity.
Cambridge, London:
MIT Press, pp.75–117.
9.
Brinks V (2016) Situated affect and collective meaning: A community perspective on processes of value creation and commercialization in enthusiast-driven fields. Environment and Planning A 48(6): 1152–1169.
CsikszentmihalyiM (1997) Creativity. The Psychology of Creativity and Invention.
New York:
HarperCollins Publishers.
12.
EisenhardtK (1989)
Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
13.
FiresteinS (2012) Ignorance. How It Drives Science.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
14.
FloridaR (2005) Cities and the Creative Class.
New York, London:
Routledge.
15.
FortwengelJSchüsslerESydowJ (2017)
Studying organizational creativity as process: Fluidity or duality?Creativity and Innovation Management26(1): 5–16.
16.
GassmannOSchweitzerF (2014) Managing the unmanageable: The fuzzy front end of innovation. In: GassmannOSchweitzerF (eds) Managing of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation.
Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London:
Springer, pp.3–14.
17.
Grabher G, Melchior A, Schiemer B, Schüssler E and Sydow J (2017) From being there to being aware: Confronting geographical and sociological imaginations of copresence. Environment and Planning A (online first).
18.
GrossM (2007)
The unknown in process. Dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge and related concepts. Current Sociology55(5): 742–759.
19.
GrossM (2016)
Risk as zombie category: Ulrich Beck’s unfinished project of the ‘non-knowledge’ society. Security Dialogues47(5): 386–402.
20.
HagelJBrownJSDavisonL (2010) The Power of Pull: How Small Moves, Smartly Made, Can Set Big Things in Motion.
New York:
Basic Books.
21.
HargadonABBechkyBA (2006)
When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science17(4): 484–500.
22.
HeffernanMJönsH (2013)
Research travel and interdisciplinary identities in the University of Cambridge, 1885–1955. The British Journal for the History of Science46(2): 255–286.
23.
Ibert O, Hautala J and Jauhiainen J (2015) From cluster to process: New economic geographic perspectives on practices of knowledge creation. Geoforum 65: 323–327.
24.
Ibert O and Müller F C (2015) Network dynamics in constellations of cultural differences: relational distance in innovation processes in legal services and biotechnology. Research Policy 44(1): 181–194.
25.
KoestlerA (1964) The Act of Creation.
London:
Hutchinson & Co.
26.
LangleyA (1999)
Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
27.
Long LingoEO’MahonyS (2010)
Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Administrative Science Quarterly55(1): 47–81.
28.
MartinRMoodyssonJ (2013)
Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies20(2): 170–187.
29.
MaskellP (2014)
Accessing remote knowledge: The roles of trade fairs, pipelines, crowdsourcing and listening posts. Journal of Economic Geography14(5): 883–902.
30.
McGoeyL (2012)
The logic of strategic ignorance. The British Journal of Sociology63(3): 553–575.
31.
MertonRK (1936)
The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Journal of Sociology1(6): 894–904.
32.
MertonRK (1987)
Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Review of Sociology13: 1–28.
33.
MertonRKBarberE (2004) The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science.
Princeton, Oxford:
Princeton University Press.
34.
MeusburgerPFunkeJWunderE (eds) (2009) Milieus of Creativity. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Spatiality of Creativity.
Dordrecht:
Springer.
35.
MontuoriA (1998) Creative inquiry: From instrumental knowing to love of knowledge. In: PetrankerJ (ed) Light of Knowledge: Essays on the Interplay of Knowledge, Time & Space.
Oakland:
Dharma Publishing, pp.173–210.
36.
Müller FC and Ibert O (2015) (Re-)sources of innovation: Understanding and comparing time-spatial innovation dynamics through the lens of communities of practice. Geoforum 65: 338–350.
37.
PageSE (2008) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
38.
Perry-SmithJEMannucciPV (2017)
From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review42(1): 53–79.
39.
ReckwitzA (2017) The Invention of Creativity: Modern Society and the Culture of New.
Cambridge, UK and Malden,
MA: Polity Press.
40.
RobertsJ (2012)
Organizational ignorance: Towards a managerial perspective on the unknown. Management Learning44(3): 215–236.
41.
RuttenR (2017)
Beyond proximities: The socio-spatial dynamics of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography41(2): 159–177.
42.
Schmidt S, Müller FC, Ibert O and Brinks V (2017) Open region: Creating and expoiting opportunities for innovation at the regional scale. European Urban and Regional Studies (online first).
43.
ShearmurRCarrincazeauxCDoloreuxD (2016) The geographies of innovations: Beyond one-size-fits-all. In: ShearmurRCarrincazeauxCDoloreuxD (eds) Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation.
Cheltenham, Northampton:
Edward Elgar, pp.1–16.
44.
SmithsonM (1989) Ignorance and Uncertainty. Emerging Paradigms.
New York:
Springer.
45.
StarkD (2009) The Sense of Dissonance. Accounts of Worth in Economic Life.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
46.
VedresBStarkD (2010)
Structural folds: Generative disruptions in overlapping groups. American Journal of Sociology115(4): 1150–1190.
47.
WeickKE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
48.
YinRK (2014) Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 5th Edition.
Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC:
SAGE.
