In post-industrial cities throughout the world abandoned railroads, demolished freeways, disused canals, and other derelict industrial ruins are being transformed into ecologically inspired and aesthetically designed leisure, consumption, and tourist spaces based upon the principles of Landscape Urbanism and ideas about sustainable park design. New York City’s High Line is one example of this growing trend. Sustainable parks like the High Line claim to provide economic, ecological, and equity benefits associated with the 3 Es of sustainability. Our research on the development of New York City’s High Line suggests that while the High Line meets the economic piece of the sustainability triad with its promise of generating growth, its success in terms of the ecological dimension of sustainability is unclear. More troubling is the High Line’s neglect of the social equity component of the discourse of sustainability. Our work brings together several key arguments in the critical literature on urban sustainability to examine how structural constraints associated with creating post-industrial ecological spaces in a climate of neoliberal urbanization play out in the paradigmatic case of the High Line.
AngottiT (2011) New York For Sale: Community Planning Confronts Global Real Estate, Boston: MIT Press.
2.
BrashJ (2011) Bloomberg's New York: Class and Governance in the Luxury City, Athens: University of Georgia Press.
3.
BrennerN (2013) Open city or the right to the city?Topos85: 42–45.
4.
BrennerNTheodoreN (2002) Cities and the geographies of actually existing neoliberalism. Antipode34(3): 349–379.
5.
CainC (2014) Negotiating with the growth machine: Community benefit agreements and value conscious growth. Sociological Forum29(4): 937–938.
6.
ChakrabartiV (2013) A Country of Cities: A Manifesto for Urban America, New York: Metropolis Books.
7.
CornerJ (2006) Terra Fluxus. In: WaldheimC (ed.) The Landscape Urbanism Reader, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, pp. 21–33.
8.
CranzGBolandM (2004) Defining the sustainable park: A fifth model for urban parks. Landscape Journal23(2): 102–120.
9.
Dastrup S (2015) The effect of neighborhood change on New York City Housing Residents. A report prepared for NYC Center for Economic Opportunity. Available at: www.nyc.gov/html/ceo/downloads/pdf/nns_15.pdf.
10.
DavidJHammondR (2011) The High Line: The Inside Story of New York City's Park in the Sky, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
11.
DavidsonM (2013) The sustainable and entrepreneurial park? Contradictions and persistent antagonisms at Syndey’s Olympic park. Urban Geography34(5): 657–676.
12.
DavidsonMLeesL (2005) New build gentrification and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A37: 1165–1190.
13.
De MagalhaesCCarmonaM (2009) Dimensions and models of contemporary public space management in England. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management52(1): 111–129.
14.
DuanyATalenE (2013) Landscape Urbanism and Discontents: Dissimulating the Sustainable City, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
15.
Final Report (2015) The effects of neighborhood change on New York City Housing Authority residents. New York City Center for Economic Opportunity. Available at: www.nyc.gov/html/ceo/downloads/pdf/nns_15.pdf.
16.
FisherDCampbellLSvendsenE (2012) The organizational structure of urban environmental stewardship. Environmental Politics21(1): 26–48.
17.
Foderaro L (2014) Focusing on lesser known open spaces in New York. New York Times, May 6 B4.
GouldKLewisT (2017) Green Gentrification: Urban Sustainability and the Struggle for Environmental Justice, New York: Routledge.
23.
GreenbergM (2008) Branding New York How a City in Crisis was Sold to the World, New York: Routledge.
24.
GothamFGreenbergM (2014) Crisis Cities: Disaster and Redevelopment in New York and New Orleans, New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
HallPSternP (2014) Implicating waterfronts in regional sustainability. Local Environment19(6): 591–604.
26.
HalleDTisoE (2014) New York's New Edge: Contemporary Art, the High Line, and Urban Megaprojects on the Far West Side, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
HarveyD (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialsim: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler71(B): 3–18.
James Corner Field Operations, Diller Scofidio and Rentro (2015) The High Line, New York: Phaidon Press.
30.
Joassart-MarcelliPWolchJSalimZ (2011) Building the healthy city: The role of nonprofits in creating active urban parks. Urban Geography32: 682–711.
31.
Keil R and Whitehead M (2012) Cities and the politics of sustainability. In: Clarke MK and John P (eds) Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics to The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp.520–544.
32.
KelbaughD (2014) The environmental paradox of the city, Landscape Urbanism, and New Urbanism. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development13(1): 1–15.
33.
JorgensenAKeenanR (2012) Urban Wildscapes, New York: Routledge.
34.
LeitnerHPeckJSheppardE (2006) Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers, New York: Guilford Press.
35.
Levere M (2014) The High Line Park and the Capitalization of Public Goods. Report for Department of Economics, University of San Diego. Available at: http://econweb.ucsd.edu/˜mlevere/pdfs/highline_paper.pdf (accessed 30 March 2016).
36.
LoganJMolotchH (2007) Urban Fortunes, Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
LoughranK (2014) Parks for profit: The high line growth machines, and the uneven development of urban public space. City & Community13(1): 49–57.
38.
MarcuseP (1998) Sustainability is not enough. Environment and Organization10(2): 103–111.
39.
MayerM (2007) Contesting the neoliberalization of urban governance. In: LeitnerHPeckJSheppardE (eds) Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers, New York: Guilford Press, pp. 90–115.
40.
MolotchH (1976) The City as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology82(2): 309–332.
41.
MolotchH (1993) The political economy of growth machines. Journal of Urban Affairs15(1): 29–53.
42.
Molotch H and Treskon M (2009) Changing art: SoHo, Chelsea and the dynamic geography of galleries in New York City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33(2): 517–541.
PerkinsH (2013) Consent to neoliberal hegemony through coercive urban environmental governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(1): 311–332.
48.
RacoM (2014) Privatisation, managerialism and the changing politics of sustainability planning in London. In: LeesLImrieLR (eds) Sustainable London: The Future of a Global City, Bristol: Policy Press.
49.
RothenbergJ (2012) Selling art to the world in Chelsea. Visual Studies27(3): 277–294.
50.
Rothenberg J and Lang S (2015) Repurposing the High Line: Aesthetic experience and contradiction in West Chelsea. City, Culture and Society DOI:10.1016/j.ccs.2015.10.001.
51.
SternfeldJGopnikAStilgoeJ (2001) Walking the High Line, New York: Steidl&Pace/MacGill.
52.
TalenE (2013) The social apathy of Landscape Urbanism. In: DuanyATalenE (eds) Landscape Urbanism and its Discontents: Dissimulating the Sustainable City, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers, pp. 105–114.
53.
ThompsonI (2012) Ten tenents and six questions for landscape urbanism. Landscape Research37(1): 7–26.
54.
Tretter E (2014) Sustainability and neoliberal urban development: The environment, crime and the remaking of Austin’s downtown. Urban Studies 50(11): 2222–2237.
55.
WaldheimC (2010) On landscape, ecology and other modifiers to urbanism. Topos71: 20–24.
56.
WashburnA (2013) The Nature of Urban Design, Washington: Island Press.
57.
WhileAJonasAGibbsD (2004) The environment and entrepreneurial city: Searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(3): 549–569.
58.
WolchJByrneJNewellJ (2014) Urban green space, public health and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning125: 234–244.
59.
ZukinS (1995) The Culture of Cities, Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
