A currently burgeoning literature in planning and policy studies engages with the travel of policy models across countries and sites through novel concepts such as policy translation, policy mobility, and mutations. Increasingly, this literature calls for ethnographic methods to study the travel of policy models. Such methods require various degrees of researcher’s participation in the policy process. As a result, ethnographers become entangled in complex webs of relationships during and after their fieldwork, which introduces political and ethical dimensions to ethnographic fieldwork. The literature on policy mobilities and translation, however, has provided few practical guidelines regarding the politics and ethics of conducting ethnographic research. Based on two vignettes from our research experiences in China and Turkey, we discuss the politics and ethics of applying ethnography to policy translation and offer a number of hints for future researchers.
Barham J (1996) The Southeastern Anatolia Project: Irrigation Transforms he area's prospects. Financial Times Survey (Turkey) 3–4 June.
2.
BenoitCJanssonMMillerA (2005) Community-academic research on hard-to-reach populations: Benefits and challenges. Qualitative Health Research15(2): 263–282.
3.
BeauchampTChildressJ (2008) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BensonDJordanA (2011) What we learnt from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review9(3): 366–378.
5.
BlausteinJ (2015) Speaking Truth to Power: Policy Ethnography and Police Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BuscherB (2014) Collaborative event ethnography: Between structural power and empirical nuance?Global Environmental Politics14(3): 132–138.
7.
BurawoyM (2009) The Extended Case Study Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations and One Theoretical Traditions, Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
BurawoyM (2001) Manufacturing the global. Ethnography2: 147–159.
9.
BurawoyM (2008) Extended case study method. Sociological Theory16: 4–33.
10.
ClarkeJBaintonDLendvaiN (2015) Making Policy Move: Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage, Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
ClearyML (2013) Cross-cultural Research with Integrity: Collected Wisdom from Researchers in Social Settings, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
CookIWardKSWardK (2015) Post-war planning and policy tourism: The international study tours of the Town and Country Planning Association 1947–1961. Planning, Theory and Practice16(2): 184–205.
13.
CookIWardK (2012) Conferences, informational infrastructures, mobile policies: the process of getting Sweden ‘BID’ ready. European Urban and Regional Studies19(2): 137–152.
14.
ComaroffJComaroffJ (2003) Ethnography on an awkward scale: Postcolonial anthropology and the violence of abstraction. Ethnography4(2): 147–179.
15.
Conceptualising Policy: Technologies of Governance and the Politics of Visibility (2011) In: Shore C, Wright S, and Però D (ed.) Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. New York: Berghahn Books, pp.1–26.
16.
DaniellKA (2012) Co-engineering and Participatory Water Management: Organizational Challenges for Water Governance. Report for the UNESCO International Hydrology Series, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
De JongMWangDYuC (2013a) Exploring the relevance of the eco-city concept in China: The case of Shenzhen Sino-Dutch Low Carbon City. Journal of Urban Technology20(2): 95–113.
18.
De JongMYuCChenX (2013b) Developing robust organizational frameworks for Sino-foreign eco-cities: Comparing Sino-Dutch Shenzhen Low Carbon City with other initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production57: 209–220.
19.
De JongM (2013) China's art of institutional bricolage: Selectiveness and gradualism in the policy transfer style of a nation. Policy and Society32(2): 89–101.
20.
De JongMEdelenbosJ (2007) An insider's look into policy transfer in transnational expert networks. European Planning Studies15(5): 687–706.
21.
DolowitzDMarshD (2000) Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance13(1): 5–24.
22.
EscobarO (2014) Scripting deliberative policy-making: Dramaturgic policy analysis and engagement know-how. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice17(3): 269–285.
23.
FournierVGreyC (2000) At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations53(1): 7–32.
24.
FreemanR (2009) What is ‘translation’?Evidence & Policy5(4): 429–447.
25.
FujiiL (2012) Research ethics 101: Dilemmas and responsibilities. Political Science and Politics45: 717–723.
26.
GAP-RDA (2002) GAP Regional Development Plan: Executive summary. Ankara, Turkey: GAP-RDA.
27.
GouldJ (2004) Positionality and scale: Methodological issues in the ethnography of aid. In: GouldJMarcussenHS (eds) Ethnographies of Aid. Exploring Development Texts and Encounters. HS Occasional Paper 24, Roskilde: International Development Studies, pp. 266–293.
28.
HarrisL (2008) Water rich, resource poor: Intersections of gender, poverty, and vulnerability in newly irrigated areas of south-eastern Turkey. World Development20(10): 20.
29.
KingfisherC (2013) A Policy Travelogue: Tracing Welfare Reform in Auoteroa/New Zealand and Canada, New York: Berghahn.
30.
KlotzbucherS (2014) “Embedded Research” in Collaborative Fieldwork. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs43(2): 65–85.
31.
KubikJ (2009) Ethnography of politics: Foundations, applications, prospects. In: SchatzE (ed.) Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 25–53.
32.
LendvaiNStubbsP (2009) Assemblages, translation, and intermediaries in South East Europe. European Societies11(5): 673–695.
33.
MarcusG (1998) Ethnography Through Thick and Thin, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
MarsdenGSteadD (2011) Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence. Transport Policy18(3): 492–500.
35.
MaybinJ (2014) Policy analysis and policy know-how: a case study of civil servants in England’s department of health. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice17(3): 286–304.
36.
McCannEWardK (2013) A multi-disciplinary approach to policy transfer research: geographies, assemblages, mobilities and mutations. Policy Studies34(2): 2–18.
37.
McCannEWardK (2012) Assembling urbanism: Following policies and “studying through” the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A44(1): 42–51.
38.
McCannEWardK (2011) Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39.
McNeilDSt. ClairAL (2013) The World Bank’s expertise: Observant participation in the world development report 2006, equity and development. In: MosseD (ed.) Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development, New York: Berghahn, pp. 103–123.
40.
Mosse D (2004) Is Good Policy Unimplementable? Reflections on the Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. Development and Change 35(4): 639–671.
41.
MosseD (2006) Anti-social anthropology? Objectivity, objection, and the ethnography of public policy and professional communities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute12(4): 935–956.
42.
Mosse D (2011) Politics and Ethics: Ethnographies of Expert Knowledge and Professional Identities. In: Shore C, Wright S and Però D (eds) Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. New York: Berghahn Books, pp.50–67.
43.
MukhtarovFDaniellK (forthcoming) Translation, diffusion and adaptation of water policy models. In: ConcaKWeindthalE (eds) Oxford Handbook of Water Politics and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
Mukhtarov F, Fox S, Mukhamedova N and Wegerich K (2015) Institutional design in the face of contextual relevance: water user groups in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan. Environmental Science & Policy 53: 206–214.
45.
Mukhtarov F (2017) Policies on the move: Translation, assemblages and ethnography. Environment and Planning C. C 35: 191–194.
46.
MukhtarovF (2014) Rethinking the travel of ideas: Policy translation in the water sector. Policy and Politics42(1): 71–88.
47.
Mukhtarov F (2009) The hegemony of integrated water resources management: A study of policy translation in England, Turkey and Kazakhstan. PhD Thesis, Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, Hungary.
48.
MukhtarovF (2008) Intellectual history and current status of integrated water resources management: A global perspective. In: Pahl-WostlCKabatPMöltgenJ (eds) Adaptive and Integrated Water Management: Coping With Complexity and Uncertainty, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer, pp. 167–187.
49.
PachiratT (2011) Every Twelve Second: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight, New Haven: Yale University Press.
50.
PachiratT (2009) The Political in Political Ethnography: Dispatches from the Kill Floor. In: SchatzE (ed.) Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 143–163.
51.
PeckJTheodoreN (2015) Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neo-liberalism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52.
PeckJTheodoreN (2012) Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A44: 21–30.
53.
PeckJTheodoreN (2010) Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum41(2): 169–174.
54.
Pierce R (2012) A Place for Ethics, A Place for Advocacy? American Journal of Bioethics 12(8).
55.
Pratt M (1991) Arts of the Contact Zone. Profession 33–40.
56.
PowC (2014) License to travel. City18(3): 287–306.
57.
PrinceR (2010) Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A42: 169–186.
58.
Rojas C (2007) International Political Economy/Development Otherwise. Globalizations 4(4): 573–587.
59.
SchatzE (2009) Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
60.
Schwartz-SheaPYanowD (2012) Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes, London: Routledge.
61.
ShoreCWrightS (1997) Anthropology of Policy: Perspectives on Governance and Power, Abington: Routledge.
62.
Shore C, Wright S and Pero D (2001) Policy Worlds Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. London: Berghahn Press.
63.
SimmonsBDobbinFGarrettG (2007) The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition or learning?Annual Review of Sociology33: 449–472.
64.
StoneD (2012) Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies3(6): 483–499.
65.
StubbsP (2014) Ethnographies of aid and development. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society39(3): 14–23.
66.
SultanaF (2007) Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: Negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research. ACME: E-Journal for Critical Geographies6(3): 374–385.
ÜnverO (1997) South-Eastern Anatolia integrated development programme. Water Resources Development13(2): 187–207.
70.
ÜnverO (2001) Institutionalizing the sustainable development approach: Coordination across traditional boundaries. Water Resources Development17: 511–520.
71.
van HulstMJGraafL devan den BrinkG (2012) The work of exemplary practitioners in neighborhood governance. Critical Policy Studies6(4): 434–451.
72.
WedelJShoreCFeldmanG (2005) Towards an anthropology of public policy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science600: 30–51.
73.
WhyteWF (1991) Participatory Action Research, Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.
74.
WillisPTrondmanM (2000) Manifesto for ethnography. Ethnography1(1): 5–16.
75.
Wright S and Reinhold S (2011) Studying through: A Strategy for Studying Political Transformations. Or Sex, Lies and British Politics. In: Shore C, Wright S and Però D (eds) Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 86–105.
76.
YanowD (2004) Translating local knowledge at organizational peripheries. British Journal of Management15(S1): 9–25.
77.
ZirakzadehC (2009) When nationalists are not separatists: Discarding and recovering academic theories while doing fieldwork in the Basque region of Spain. In: SchatzE (ed.) Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power, Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 97–119.
