Recent years have seen a challenge to the territorial orthodoxy in urban studies. An interest in policy assemblage, mobility, and mutation has begun to open up ‘the what’ and ‘the where’ of urban policy making. Unfortunately—but perhaps not surprisingly—theoretical developments and empirical insights have run ahead of significant methodological considerations. This paper turns to some of the methodological consequences of studying the chains, circuits, networks, and webs in and through which policy and its associated discourses and ideologies are made mobile and mutable. It focuses on three rubrics under which methodological decisions can be made: ‘studying through’ (rather than studying up or down), techniques of following actors, policies, etc, and relational situations in which mobilization and assemblage happen. The paper concludes with a brief reflection on how academic research design and writing assemble cities and urban policy making in ways that parallel the assembling practices of policy actors.
AllenJCochraneA, 2007, “Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power”Regional Studies411161–1175.
2.
AminA, 2007, “Re-thinking the urban social”City11100–114.
3.
AminAGrahamS, 1997, “The ordinary city”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series22411–429.
4.
AndersonBMcFarlaneC, 2011, “Assemblage and geography”Area43124–127.
5.
BakerT, 2011, “Methodological challenges for situating mobile policy knowledge”, paper presented at the Institute of Australian Geographers conference, Wollongong, NSW, July; copy obtainable from the author, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Newcastle, NSW.
6.
BurawoyM, 2001, “Manufacturing the global”Ethnography2147–159.
ClarkeN, 2011, “Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement”Progress in Human Geography forthcoming.
9.
CookI, 2008, “Mobilising urban policies: The policy transfer of US Business Improvement Districts to England and Wales”Urban Studies45773–795.
10.
CookIWard, 2011, “Conferences, informational infrastructures, and mobile policies: The process of getting Sweden ‘BID-ready’”European Urban and Regional Studies forthcoming.
11.
CoxK R, 2001, “Territoriality, politics and the urban”Political Geography20745–762.
12.
DaviesJImbroscioD (Eds), 2009Theories of Urban Politics2nd edition (Sage, London).
13.
DickinsonR E, 1948, “The scope and status of urban geography: An assessment”Land Economics24221–238.
JacobsJ, 1996, “A geography of big things”Cultural Geographies131–27.
18.
LarnerWLaurieN, 2010, “Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water”Geoforum41218–226.
19.
McCannE, 2004, “‘Best places’: Inter-urban competition, quality of life, and popular media discourse”Urban Studies411909–1929.
20.
McCannE, 2008, “Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada's ‘four pillar’ drug strategy”Environment and Planning A40885–904.
21.
McCannE, 2011a, “Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda”Annals of the Association of American Geographers101107–130.
McCannE, 2011c, “Situated knowledge on the move? Reflections on urban policy mobilities/immobilities”, working paper, Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC.
24.
McCannEWardK, 2010, “Relationality/territoriality: Toward a conceptualization of cities in the world”Geoforum41175–184.
25.
McCannEWardK (Eds), 2011Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age (Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis, MN).
26.
McFarlaneC, 2009, “Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements”Geoforum40561–567.
27.
MarcusG E, 1995, “Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography”Annual Review of Anthropology2495–117.
28.
MasseyD, 1993, “Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place”, in Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change Eds BirdJCurtisBPutmanT.RobertsonG.TicknerL (Routledge, London) pp 59–69.
29.
NaderL, 1972, “Up the anthropologist—perspectives gained from studying up”, in Reinventing Anthropology Ed. HymesD (Random House, New York) pp 284–311.
30.
PeckJ, 2003, “Geography and public policy: Mapping the penal state”Progress in Human Geography27222–232.
31.
PeckJ, 2011, “Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation”Progress in Human Geography forthcoming.
32.
PeckJTheodoreN, 2010a, “Mobilizing policy: Models, method and mutations”Geoforum41169–174.
33.
PeckJTheodoreN, 2010b, “Recombinant workfare, across the Americas: Transnationalizing “fast” social policy”Geoforum41195–208.
34.
PrinceR, 2010, “Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand”Environment and Planning A42169–186.
35.
RichardsonL, 2000, “Writing: A method of inquiry”, in Handbook of Qualitative Research Eds DenzinN KLincolnY S (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 923–948.
36.
RobinsonJ, 2006Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development (Routledge, London).
37.
RobinsonJ, 2011, “Cities in a world of cities: The comparative gesture”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research351–23.
38.
RoyA, 2010Poverty Capital: Microfinance and the Making of Development (Routledge, London).
39.
SavitchHKantorP, 2002Cities in the International Marketplace: The Political Economy of Urban Development in North America and Western Europe (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
40.
ShoreCWrightS, 1997, “Policy: A new field of anthropology”, in Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power Eds ShoreCWrightS (Routledge, London) pp 3–39.
41.
ShoreCWrightSPeroD (Eds), 2011Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power (Berghahn, Oxford).
42.
WardK, 2006, “Policies in motion, urban management and state restructuring: The trans-local expansion of Business Improvement Districts”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research3054–75.
43.
WardK, 2007, “Business Improvement Districts: Policy origins, mobile policies and urban liveability”Geography Compass2657–672.
44.
WardK, 2010, “Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities”Progress in Human Geography34471–487.
45.
WardK, 2011, “Entrepreneurial urbanism, policy tourism and the making mobile of policies”, in The New Blackwell Companion to The City Eds BridgeGWatsonS (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford) pp 726–737.
46.
WedelJ RShoreCFeldmanGLathropS, 2005, “Toward an anthropology of public policy”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science60030–51.
47.
WolmanHGoldsmithM, 1992Urban Politics and Policy: A Comparative Perspective (Blackwell, Oxford).
