Contracting communities: Conceptualizing Community Benefits Agreements to improve citizen involvement in urban development projects

Abstract

Contractual agreements are becoming increasingly important for city governments seeking to manage urban development. Contractual governance involves direct relations between the local state and different public and private actors and citizens. Although abundant literature exists on public–private partnerships related to urban development projects, agreements made between citizens, interest organizations and market parties, such as Community Benefits Agreements remain under-explored and under-theorized. While it may seem that the state is absent from contemporary forms of contractual governance, such agreements remain highly intertwined with government policies. The central aim of this paper is to better conceptualize Community Benefits Agreement practices in order to build understanding of how contractual governance caters for direct end-user involvement in urban development, and to yield insights into its potential as to render development processes more inclusive. Based on academic literature in planning and law, expert interviews and several case studies in New York City, this paper conceptualizes end-user involvement in urban development projects and innovates within urban planning and governance theory through the use of two new concepts—project collectivity and the image of a fourth chair.

Keywords

Community Benefits Agreements citizen involvement development agreements contracts urban planning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albrechts

(2015) Ingredients for a more radical strategic spatial planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42: 1–16.

A Seat at the Table (2013) Community Benefit Agreements. Available at: http://aseatatthetable.net (accessed 10 November 2013).

Ball

Maginn

(2005) Urban change and conflict: Evaluating the role of partnerships in urban regeneration in the UK. Housing Studies 20(1): 9–28.

Baxamusa

(2008) Empowering communities through deliberation: The model of Community Benefit Agreements. Journal of Planning Education and Research 27(3): 261–276.

Been

(2010) Community Benefit Agreements: A new local government tool or another variation on the exactions theme. The University of Chicago Law Review 77(1): 5–35.

Blakely

(2010) Governing ourselves: Citizen participation in Barcelona and Manchester. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34(1): 130–145.

Boonstra

(2015) Planning Strategies in an Age of Active Citizenship: A Post-structuralist Agenda for Self-organization in Spatial Planning, Groningen: InPlanning.

Brenner

Peck

Theodore

(2010) Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks 10(2): 182–222.

Brown

Potoski

van Slyke

(2006) Managing public service contracts: Aligning values, institutions, and markets. Public Administration Review 66(3): 323–331.

10.

Bryman

(2008) Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

11.

Camacho

(2005) Mustering the missing voices: A collaborative model for fostering equality, community involvement and adaptive planning in land use decision, first instalment. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 24: 3–69.

12.

Camacho

(2013) Community Benefits Agreements: A symptom, not the antidote, of bilateral land use regulation. Brooklyn Law Review 78(2): 355–383.

13.

CBP Kingsbridge Armory (2013) Community Benefits Program for the Kingsbridge National Ice Center in the Kingsbridge Armory on West Kingsbridge Road in the Northwest Bronx, Execution Draft. Available at: http://northwestbronx.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Exhibit-A-Community-Benefits-Program-1-1.pdf (accessed 11 August 2016).

14.

Davy

(2009) The poor land and the land: Poverty, property, planning. Town Planning Review 80(3): 227–265.

15.

De Vre K (2011) Werken aan de acceptatie van de windmolen. Trouw. Available at: http://www.trouw.nl/tr/nl/4332/Groen/article/detail/2440992/2011/06/03/Werken-aan-de-acceptatie-van-de-windmolen.dhtml (accessed 29 April 2015).

16.

Dear

(1992) Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association 58(3): 288–300.

17.

d'Iribarne

(1989) La logique de l'honneur – Gestions des entreprises et traditions nationals, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

18.

Donald R (2013) Fuels with benefits: Paying communities to host new energy infrastructure. Available at: http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/07/fuels-with-benefits-paying-communities-to-host-new-generation (accessed 10 August 2014).

19.

Durose

Lowndes

(2010) Neighbourhood governance: Contested rationales within a multi-level setting – A study of Manchester. Local Government Studies 36(3): 341–359.

20.

Fainstein

(2001) The City Builders, Property Development in New York and London, 1980-2000, Lawrence: KUP(1994).

21.

Fischel

(2001) Why are there NIMBYs? Land Economics 77: 144–152.

22.

Forester

(1989) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes, Cambridge: MIT Press.

23.

Frank

(2009) Yes in my backyard: Developers, government, and communities working together through development agreements and Community Benefit Agreements. Indiana Law Review 42: 227–255.

24.

Gilson

Sabel

Scott

(2009) Contracting for innovation: Vertical disintegration and interfirm collaboration. Columbia Law Review 109(3): 431–502.

25.

Gofen

(2015) Citizens' entrepreneurial role in public service provision. Public Management Review 17(3): 404–425.

26.

Gofen

Bresler-Gonen

Golan-Hoss

(2014) Hey, mayors, leave them kids alone: Entrepreneurial citizens, policy noncompliance, and local government response. Urban Affairs Review 50(3): 391–416.

27.

Gross

(2008) CBAs: Definitions, values and legal enforceability. Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law 17(1–2): 36–58.

28.

Gross J, LeRoy G and Janis-Aparicio M (2005) Community Benefits Agreements, making development projects accountable. Available at: http://www.goodjobsfirst.org/publications/community-benefits-agreements-making-development-projects-accountable (accessed 29 April 2015).

29.

Gualini E (2015) Planning and conflict, critical perspective on contentious urban developments, RTPI library series. New York, NY: Routledge.

30.

Hagman

Misczynski

(1978) Windfalls for Wipeouts: Land Value Capture and Compensation, Chicago, IL: ASPO.

31.

Harrison

Hoyler

(2014) Governing the new metropolis. Urban Studies 51: 2249–2266.

32.

Healey

(2006) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Hampshire: MacMillan.

33.

Innes

(1996) Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(4): 460–472.

34.

Janssen-Jansen

(2013) Delivering urban intensification outcomes in a context of discontinuous growth: Experiences from the Netherlands. Built Environment 39(4): 422–437.

35.

Janssen-Jansen

Spaans

van der Veen

(2008) New Instruments in Spatial Planning: An International Perspective on Non-financial Compensation, Delft: Delft University Press.

36.

Jones

(2003) Urban regeneration's poisoned chalice: Is there an impasse in (Community) participation-based policy? Urban Studies 40(3): 581–601.

37.

Jun

K-N

(2012) Escaping the local trap? The role of community-representing organizations in urban governance. Journal of Urban Affairs 35(3): 343–363.

38.

Keogh R (2013) Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District. Public Land and Resources Law Review Case Summaries 4(19): 1–6. Available at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr/vo0/iss4/19 (accessed 12 July 2016).

39.

Levelt

Metze

(2014) The legitimacy of regional governance networks: Gaining credibility in the shadow of hierarchy. Urban Studies 51: 2371–2386.

40.

Lloyd

(2008) Towards a ‘pooled sovereignty’ in community planning in Scotland? Local Economy 23(1): 58–68.

41.

Lloyd

Peel

(2008) From town centre management to the business improvement district model in Britain: Towards a new contractualism? In: Morçöl

Hoyt

Meek

(eds) Business Improvement Districts: Research, Theories, and Controversies, New York, NY: Taylor and Francis, pp. 71–94.

42.

Lloyd

Peel

(2012) Soft contractualism? Facilitating institutional change in planning and development relations in Scotland. Urban Research and Practice 5(2): 239–255.

43.

MacQueen

McLellan

Metzger

(2001) What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. American Journal of Public Health 91(12): 1929–1938.

44.

Manzo

Perkins

(2006) Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature 20(4): 335–350.

45.

Marantz

(2015) What do Community Benefits Agreements deliver? Evidence from Los Angeles. Journal of the American Planning Association 81(4): 251–267.

46.

Marcello

(2007) Community Benefit Agreements: New vehicle for investment in America's neighborhoods. Urban Lawyer 39(3): 657–669.

47.

Metzger

Allmendinger

Oosterlynck

(2015) Planning Against the Political: Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance, New York, NY: Routledge.

48.

Morgan

(2002) The new regeneration narrative – Local development in the multi-level polity. Local Economy 17(3): 191–199.

49.

Needham

Hoekveld

(2014) The European Union as an ethical community and what this means for spatial planning. European Planning Studies 22(5): 1010–1026.

50.

Niedt

(2013) The politics of eminent domain: From false choices to community benefits. Urban Geography 34(8): 1047–1069.

51.

Osborne

(2000) Public-Private Partnerships; Theory and Practice in International Perspective, London: Routledge.

52.

Peel

Lloyd

(2012) The Edinburgh concordat: Contractual, collaborative positive planning? Public Performance & Management Review 36(2): 275–289.

53.

Peel

Lloyd

Lord

(2009) Business improvement districts and the discourse of contractualism. European Planning Studies 17(3): 401–421.

54.

Perulli

(2012) I mondi del contratto. In: Perulli

(ed.) Il Dio Contratto, Turin: Einaudi, pp. 176–219. .

55.

Petts

Brooks

(2006) Expert conceptualisations of the role of lay knowledge in environmental decision making: Challenges for deliberative democracy. Environment and Planning A 38(6): 1045–1059.

56.

Richardson

Purdam

Cotterill

(2014) Responsible citizens and accountable service providers? Renegotiating the contract between citizen and state. Environment and Planning A 46(7): 1716–1731.

57.

Sabel

Zeitlin

(2008) Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance. The European Law Journal 14(3): 271–327.

58.

Sagalyn

(2007) Public/private development, lessons from history, research and practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 73(1): 7–22.

59.

Salkin P (2007) Understanding Community Benefit Agreements: Opportunities and traps for developers, municipalities and community organizations. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1025724 (accessed 29 April 2015).

60.

Seagrave

(1996) Defining community policing. American Journal of Police 15(2): 1–22.

61.

Sites

Chaskin

Parks

(2007) Reframing community practices for the 21^st century: Multiple traditions, multiple challenges. Journal of Urban Affairs 29(5): 519–541.

62.

Swanstrom

Winter

Sherraden

(2013) Civic capacity and school/community partnerships in a fragmented suburban setting: The case of 24:1. Journal of Urban Affairs 35(1): 25–42.

63.

Swyngedouw

(2005) Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies 42(11): 1991–2006.

64.

Townsend A (2010) It's absurd to buy project support. Crain's New Business. Available at: http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20100926/REAL_ESTATE02/100929869 (accessed 29 April 2015).

65.

United Nations (2008) Guidebook on Promoting Good Governance in Public-Private Partnerships, Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

66.

van Assche

Beunen

Duineveld

(2014) Power and contingency in planning. Environment and Planning A 46: 2385–2400.

67.

van Slyke

(2007) Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government – Nonprofit social services contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(2): 157–187.

68.

van der Veen

(2009) Contracting for Better Places: A Relational Analysis of Development Agreements in Urban Development Projects, Delft: Delft University Press.

69.

van der Veen

Korthals Altes

(2012) Contracts and learning in complex urban projects. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(5): 1053–1075.

70.

van der Veen M and Janssen-Jansen L (2013) CBAs, an approach for Dutch Planning? Paper presented at the AESOP-ACSP joint Conference, 15–19 July 2013, Dublin, Ireland.

71.

Vincent-Jones

(2000) Contractual governance: Institutional and organizational analysis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20(3): 317–351.

72.

Vincent-Jones

(2006) The New Public Contracting: Regulation, Responsiveness, Relationality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

73.

Watson

(2013) New labour's ‘Paradox of Responsibility’ and the unravelling of its macroeconomic policy. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 15: 6–22.

74.

Watson

(2014) Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference. Planning Theory & Practice 15(1): 62–76.

75.

Wolf-Powers

(2010a) Community Benefit Agreements in a value capture context. In: Ingram

Hong

(eds) Value Capture and Land Policy, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, pp. 217–232.

76.

Wolf-Powers

(2010b) Community Benefit Agreements and local government: A review of recent evidence. Journal of the American Planning Association 76(2): 141–159.

77.

Yin

(2009) Case Study Research, Design and Methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.