In a series of publications, Dorling has argued that there is a strong correlation between levels of inequality in Great Britain and the spatial concentration of Conservative party support at general elections. His interpretation of this relationship is questioned; the interpretation is inconsistent with the data and fails to take account of Britain’s changing party system and electoral geography.
Atkinson A (2015) Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
2.
AcemogluDRobinsonJA (2006) Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AnsellBWSamuelsDJ (2014) Inequality and Democratization: An Elite-Competition Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BartelsLM (2008) Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5.
BoixC (2003) Democracy and Redistribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DaltonR (2013) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advances Industrial Democracies (6th edition), Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
7.
DorlingD (2006) Class alignment. Renewal: A Journal of Labour Politics14: 8–19.
8.
DorlingD (2010) Injustice: Why Social Inequality Still Persists, Bristol: The Policy Press.
9.
DorlingD (2015) Injustice: Why Social Inequality Still Persists, (2nd edition). Bristol: The Policy Press.
10.
HenigBDorlingD (2015) May 2015 – A climate change in UK politics. Political Insight6(2): 20–21.
11.
JohnstonRJPattieCJ (2011) The British general election of 2010: A three-party contest or three two-party contests?The Geographical Journal177(1): 17–26.
12.
JohnstonRJPattieCJDorlingD (2001) From Votes to Seats: The Operation of the UK Electoral System since 1945, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
13.
MasseyDSDentonNA (1988) The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces67(3): 281–315.
14.
WilkinsonRPickettK (2009) The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, London: Allen Lane.
