The military offers a form of welfare-for-work but when personnel leave they lose this safety net, a loss exacerbated by the rollback neoliberalism of the contemporary welfare state. Increasingly the third sector has stepped in to address veterans’ welfare needs through operating within and across military/civilian and state/market/community spaces and cultures. In this paper we use both veterans’ and military charities’ experiences to analyse the complex politics that govern the liminal boundary zone of post-military welfare. Through exploring ‘crossing’ and ‘bridging’ we conceptualise military charities as ‘boundary subjects’, active yet dependent on the continuation of the civilian-military binary, and argue that the latter is better understood as a multidirectional, multiscalar and contextual continuum. Post-military welfare emerges as a competitive, confused and confusing assemblage that needs to be made more navigable in order to better support the ‘heroic poor’.
AlcockP (2012) “New policy spaces: the impact of devolution on third sector policy in the UK”. Social Policy & Administration46: 219–238
2.
AnconaD GCaldwellD F (1992) “Bridging the Boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams”. Administrative Science Quarterly37: 634–665
BashamV M (2013) War, Identity and the Liberal State: Everyday Experiences of the Geopolitical in the Armed Forces, Abingdon: Routledge
5.
BodeIBrandsenT (2014) “State-third sector partnerships: a short overview of key issues in the debate”. Public Management Review16: 1055–1066
6.
BrandsenTPestoffV (2006) “Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services”. Public Management Review8: 493–501
7.
CarlsonB EStromwallL KLietzC A (2013) “Mental health issues in recently returning women veterans: implications for practice”. Social Work58: 105–114
8.
ChaneyPWincottD (2014) “Envisioning the third sector's welfare role: critical discourse analysis of ‘post-devolution’ public policy in the UK 1998-2012”. Social Policy & Administration48: 757–781
9.
Charity Commission, 2012, Support for armed forces veterans: briefing for Welsh Affairs Select Committee – Charity Commission
10.
CowenD (2005) “Welfare warriors: towards a genealogy of the soldier citizen in Canada”. Antipode37: 654–678
11.
CowenD (2008a) Military Workfare: The Soldier and Social Citizenship in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press
12.
CowenD (2008b) “The soldier-citizen”. In: IsinE (eds) Recasting the Social in Citizenship, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 189–209
13.
CowenDSicilianoA (2011) “Surplus masculinities and security”. Antipode43: 1516–1541
14.
DandeckerCWesselySIversonARossJ (2006) “What's in a name? Defining and caring for ‘veterans’: the United Kingdom in an international perspective”. Armed Forces & Society32: 161–177
15.
DefournyJNyssensM (2010) “Social enterprise in Europe: at the crossroads of market, public policies and the third sector”. Policy and Society29: 231–242
16.
DeVerteuilGWilsonK (2010) “Reconciling indigenous need with the urban welfare state? Evidence of culturally-appropriate services and spaces for aboriginals in Winnipeg, Canada”. Geoforum41: 498–507
17.
Devon County Council, 2014, “South West Penisula (Devon, Plymouth, Torbay, Cornwall and Isles of Scilly) veterans' health assessment needs” (Devon County Council, Exeter)
18.
EdwardsRFowlerZ (2007) “Unsettling boundaries in making a space for research”. British Educational Research Journal33: 107–123
19.
FinlaysonG (1994) Citizen, State and Social Welfare in Britain, 1830–1990, Oxford: Clarendon Press
20.
Fossey M, 2013, “Transition support for British Army early service leavers: an evaluation of the Future Horizons Programme” (RFEA, ITC Catterick, London)
21.
GalUYooYBolandR J (2004) “The dynamics of boundary objects, social infrastructures and social identities”. Working Papers on Information Systems4: 194–206
22.
GierynT (1999) Cultural Boundaries of Science, London: The University of Chicago Press
HermanAYarwoodR (2014) “From service to civilian: the geographies of post-military lives”. Geoforum53: 41–50
26.
HigateP (2000) “Ex-servicemen on the road: travel and homelessness”. Sociological Review48: 331–348
27.
JohnsenSJonesARuggJ (2008) The Experiences of Homeless Ex-service Personnel in London, York: Centre for Housing Policy
28.
KarstenHLyytinenKHurskainenMKoskelainenT (2001) “Crossing boundaries and conscripting participation: representing and integrating knowledge in a paper machinary project”. European Journal of Information Systems10: 89–98
29.
KearnsR AJosephA E (1997) “Restructuring health and rural communities in New Zealand”. Progress in Human Geography21: 18–32
30.
KendallJ (2009) “The third sector and the policy process in the UK: ingredients in a hyperactive horizontal policy environment”. In: KendallJ (eds) Handbook of Third Sector Policy in Europe: Multi-level Processes and Organised Civil Society, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
MacLeavyJPeoplesC (2009) “Workfare-warfare: neoliberalism, “active” welfare and the new American way of war“. Antipode41: 890–915
33.
MacManusDWesselyS (2011) “Why do some ex-armed forces personnel end up in prison?”. British Medical Journal343: 4–5
34.
MechanicM B (2004) “Beyond PTSD: mental health consequences of violence against women – a response to Briere and Jordan”. Journal of Interpersonal Violence19: 1283–1289
35.
MilbourneL (2009) “Remodelling the third sector: advancing collaboration or competition in community-based initiatives?”. Journal of Social Policy38: 277–297
36.
MilliganCFyfeN R (2005) “Preserving space for volunteers: exploring the links between voluntary welfare organisations, volunteering and citizenship”. Urban Studies42: 417–433
37.
Ministry of Defence (2011) The Armed Forces Covenant: Today and Tomorrow, London: Ministry of Defence
MohanGMohanJ (2002) “Placing social capital”. Progress in Human Geography26: 191–210
40.
MohanJ (2003) “Voluntarism, municipalism and welfare: the geography of hospital utilization in England in 1938”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers28: 56–74
41.
MumfordA (2012) “Veteran care in the United Kingdom and the sustainability of the ‘Military Covenant’“. The Political Quarterly83: 820–826
42.
NajamA (2000) “The four-c's of third sector-government relations: cooperation, confrontation, complementarity, and co-optation”. NonProfit Management & Leadership10: 375–396
43.
National Audit Office (2012) Managing change in the Defence workforce, London: National Audit Office
44.
O'LearyPTsuiM-SRuchG (2013) “The boundaries of the social work relationship revisited: towards a connected, inclusive and dynamic conceptualisation”. British Journal of Social Work43: 135–153
PhillipsSHebbT (2010) “Financing the third sector: introduction”. Policy and Society29: 181–187
47.
PozoAWalkerC (2014) UK Armed Forces Charities: An Overview and Analysis, London: Directory of Social Change
48.
RieschH (2010) “Theorizing boundary work as representation and identity”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour40: 452–473
49.
Royal Marine Association (2014) Royal marines Association
50.
SkocpolT (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, Boston: Harvard University Press
51.
SmithS R (2010) “Hybridization and nonprofit organizations: the governance challenge”. Policy and Society29: 219–229
52.
ValentineG (2001) Social Geographies: Space & Society, Harlow: Pearson Education
53.
WalkerD I (2013) “Anticipating army exit: identity constructions of final year UK career soldiers”. Armed Forces & Society39: 284–304
54.
WareV (2010) “Whiteness in the glare of war: soldiers, migrants and citizenship“. Ethnicities10: 313–330
55.
Watson-ManheimM BChudobaK MCrowstonK (2012) “Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work”. Information Systems Journal22: 29–52
56.
WhiteM DMulveyPFoxA MChoateD (2012) “A hero's welcome? Exploring the prevalence and problems of military veterans in the arrestee population”. Justice Quarterly29: 258–286
57.
WolchJ (1990) The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition, New York, NY: Foundation Center
58.
WoodwardR (2004) Military Geographies, Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
59.
YarwoodR (2011) “Voluntary sector geographies, intraorganisational difference, and the professionalisation of volunteering: a study of land search and rescue organisations in New Zealand”. Environment and Planning C29: 457–472
