Informal settlements in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, tend to be located in risky and marginal lands along the banks of cañadas, waterways that have been channelized and otherwise transformed by residents as they develop informal settlements on the margins of the formal city. These severely polluted waterways are represented as “decaying,” “filthy” and “dangerous” in Dominican planning discourse and drive conceptualizations of informality as an incomplete, liminal state and of informal settlements as liminal landscapes. However, while this deployment of metaphors of liminality in planning discourse supports forms of planning premised on fantasies of citizenship-formation and technical interventionism, a post-colonial, explicitly spatial conceptualization of liminality permits an understanding of the liminal as a source of agency and alternative productions of space. This article examines children's placemaking in the informal settlement of Los Platanitos, taking a phenomenological stance in order to understand their practices, imaginaries, and representations associated with their engagement with the cañada landscape. In contradiction to monolithic productions of the cañada as a liminal landscape defined through tropes of “decay,” “filth” and “danger,” children appropriate and re-construct these meanings of liminality through their everyday practices. By documenting children's productions of place through play, imagination, and representation, this article seeks to illuminate the transformative potential of children's agency for radical forms of urban planning situated in everyday practices.
AnsellAVan BlerkL (2005) ““Where we stayed was very bad …'': Migrant children's perspectives on life in informal rented accommodation in two southern African cities”. Environment and Planning A37: 423–440
2.
AravotI (2002) “Back to phenomenological placemaking”. Journal of Urban Design7(2): 201–212
3.
ArmstrongH (1999) “Design studios as research: an emerging paradigm for landscape architecture”. Landscape Review: A Journal of Landscape Architecture5(2): 5–25
4.
BaptistKNassarH (2008) “Social justice agency in the landscape architecture studio: an action research approach”. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education7(2): 91–103
5.
BartlettSHartRSatterthwaiteDde la BarraXMissairA (1999) Cities for Children: Children's Rights, Poverty and Urban Management, London: Earthscan
6.
BayatA (2000) “From `dangerous classes’ to ‘quiet rebels’: politics of the urban subaltern in the Global South”. International Sociology15: 533–557
7.
BeardV (2002) “Covert planning for social transformation in Indonesia”. Journal of Planning Education and Research22(1): 15–25
8.
BeazleyH (2003) “Voices from the margins: street children's subcultures in Indonesia”. Children's Geographies1(2): 181–200
9.
BhahbaH (2004) The Location of Culture, 2nd. London: Routledge
10.
BoscoF (2010) “Play, work or activism? Broadening the connections between political and children's geographies”. Children's Geographies8(4): 381–390
11.
BromleyCStaceyR (2012) “Feeling unsafe in urban areas: exploring older children's geographies of fear”. Environment and Planning A44: 428–444
12.
ButtimerA (1976) “Grasping the dynamism of lifeworld”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers66(2): 277–292
13.
ChantadaA (1996) “Medio ambiente, crisis y desarrollo: reflexiones en torno a los Ríos Ozama e Isabela”. In: FernándezA (eds) Antología Urbana de la Ciudad Alternativa, Santo Domingo: Ciudad Alternativa, pp. 149–181
14.
ChristouMSpyrouS (2012) “Border encounters: how children navigate space and otherness in an ethnically divided society”. Childhood19(3): 302–316
15.
CopeM (2008) “Patchwork neighborhood: children's urban geographies in Buffalo, New York”. Environment and Planning A40: 2845–2863
16.
CostaHCostaG (2007) “Between planning practice and the academic world: some comments from a Brazilian experience”. Planning Theory & Practice8: 387–395
17.
CrivelloGBoydenJ (2012) “On childhood and risk: an exploration of children's everyday experiences in rural Peru”. Children & Society26: 1–12
18.
DanaherTBriodM (2005) “Phenomenological approaches to research with children”. In: GreeneSHoganD (eds) Researching Children's Experience: Approaches and Methods, London: Sage Publications, pp. 217–235
19.
DaviesM (2008) “‘A Childish Culture?’: Shared understandings, agency and intervention: an anthropological study of street children in northwest Kenya”. Childhood15(3): 309–330
20.
DeCerteauM (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life, Transl. Steven Rendall, Berkeley: University of California Press
21.
ElwoodSMitchellK (2012) “Mapping children's politics: spatial stories, dialogic relations and political formation”. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography94(1): 1–15
22.
FrankelS (2007) “Researching children's morality: developing research methods that allow children's involvement in discourses relevant to their everyday lives”. Childhoods Today1: 1–25
23.
FriedmannJ (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
24.
FriedmannJ (2002) The Prospect of Cities, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
25.
GirouxH (1988) “Border pedagogy in the age of postmodernism”. Journal of Education170(3): 162–181
26.
GunderMHillierJ (2007) “Planning as urban therapeutic”. Environment and Planning A39: 467–486
27.
HallM (2007) “The postcolonial Caribbean as a liminal space: authoring other modes of contestation and affirmation”. The Howard Journal of Communications18: 1–13
28.
HardoyJSierraGTammarazioALedesmaGLedesmaLGarcíaC (2010) “Learning from young people and from our own experiences in Barrio San Jorge”. Environment & Urbanization22(2): 371–387
29.
HartR (1979) Children's Experience of Place, New York, NY: Irvington Publishers
30.
HeymanR (2001) “Why advocacy isn't enough: realising the radical possibilities of the classroom”. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education10: 174–178
31.
HollowaySValentineG (2000) “Spatiality and the new social studies of childhood”. Sociology34(4): 763–783
32.
HopkinsPPainR (2007) “Geographies of age: thinking relationally”. Area39(3): 287–294
33.
HortonJKraftlP (2006) “What else? Some more ways of thinking and doing ‘Children's Geographies’”. Children's Geographies4(1): 69–95
34.
HortonJKraftlPTuckerF (2008) “The challenges of ‘children's geographies’: reaffirmation”. Children's Geographies6(4): 335–348
35.
HowittR (2001) “Constructing engagement: geographical education for justice within and beyond tertiary classrooms”. Journal of Geography in Higher Education25(2): 147–166
36.
JeffreyC (2010) ‘Geographies of children and youth I: Eroding maps of life”. Progress in Human Geography34(4): 496–505
37.
KallioK (2007) “Performative bodies, tactical agents and political selves: rethinking the political geographies of childhood”. Space and Polity11(2): 121–136
38.
KallioK (2008) “‘The body as a battlefield: approaching children's politics”. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography90(3): 285–297
39.
KallioKHäkliJ (2011) “Tracing children's politics”. Political Geography30: 99–109
40.
KaluaF (2009) “Homi Bhabha's Third Space and African identity”. Journal of African Cultural Studies21(1): 23–32
41.
KlockerN (2007) “An example of ‘thin’ agency: child domestic workers in Tanzania”. In: PanelliRPunchSRobsonE (eds) Global Perspectives on Rural Childhood and Youth: Young Rural Lives, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 83–94
42.
LarkinsC (2014) “Enacting children's citizenship: developing understandings of how children enact themselves as citizens through actions and acts of citizenship”. Childhood21(1): 7–21
43.
LoebachJGillilandJ (2010) “Child-led tours to uncover children's perceptions and use of neighborhood environments”. Children, Youth and Environments20(1): 52–90
44.
LynchK (1979) “The spatial world of the child”. In: MichelsonWLevineS VMichelsonE (eds) The Child in the City: Today and Tomorrow, Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, pp. 102–127
45.
MaloneK (2001) “Children, youth and sustainable cities''. Local Environment6: 5–12
46.
MannionG (2007) “Going spatial, going relational: why ‘listening to children’ and children's participation needs reframing”. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education28(3): 405–420
47.
MatthewsHLimbMTaylorM (1999) “Reclaiming the street: the discourse of curfew''. Environment and Planning A31: 1713–1730
48.
MatthewsHTaylorMPercy-SmithBLimbM (2000) “The unacceptable flaneur: the shopping mall as a teenage hangout''. Childhood7: 279–294
49.
McKernanJ (1991) “Action inquiry: studied enactment”. In: ShortE (eds) Forms of Curriculum Inquiry, New York, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 309–326
50.
MiraftabF (2009) “Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the Global South”. Planning Theory8: 32–50
51.
MiraftabFWillsS (2005) “Insurgency and spaces of active citizenship: the story of Western Cape antieviction campaign in South Africa”. Journal of Planning Education and Research25(2): 200–217
52.
MooreR (1986) Childhood's Domain: Play and Place in Child Development, London: Croom Helm
53.
MorojelePMuthukrishnaN (2013) “‘My journey to school’: Photovoice accounts of rural children's everyday experiences in Lesotho”. Gender & Behaviour11(2): 5362–5377
54.
MossD (2010) “Memory, space and time: researching children's lives”. Childhood17(4): 530–544
55.
NairnKPanelliRMcCormackJ (2003) “Destabilizing dualisms: young people's experiences of rural and urban environments”. Childhood10(1): 9–42
56.
NavarroA (2006) El planeamiento urbano en la gestión municipal: Conceptos y critérios practices para técnicos y técnicas municipales, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Programa de Apoyo a la Reforma y Modernacición del Estado, PARME
57.
O'BrienMJonesDSloanDRustinM (2000) “Children's independent spatial mobility in the urban public realm”. Childhood7(3): 257–277
58.
PellingM (2002) “Assessing urban vulnerability and social adaptation to risk: evidence from Santo Domingo”. International Development Planning Review24(1): 59–76
59.
PhiloC (2000) “'The Corner-Stones of My World': Editorial introduction to special issue on spaces of childhood”. Childhood7: 243–256
60.
PhiloCSmithF (2003) “Guest editorial: political geographies of children and young people”. Space and Polity7: 99–115
61.
RauberI (1995) Actores sociales, luchas reivindicativas y política popular, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: Ediciones Ciudad Alternativa and COPADEBA
62.
SandercockL (1999) “Introduction translations: from insurgent planning practice to radical planning discourses”. Plurimondi1(2): 37–46
63.
SatterthwaiteDHartRLevyCMitlinDRossDSmitJStephensC (1996) The Environment for Children: Understanding and Acting on the Environmental Hazards that Threaten Children and Their Parents, London: Earthscan
64.
SchönD (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
65.
SkeltonT (2010) “Taking young people as political actors seriously: opening the borders of political geography”. Area42(2): 145–151
66.
SkeltonTValentineG (2003) “Political participation, political action and political identities: young d/deaf people's perspectives”. Space and Polity7(2): 117–134
67.
SpencerCWoolleyH (2000) “Children and the city: a summary of recent environmental psychology research”. Child: Care, Health and Development26(3): 181–198
68.
SweetEChakarsM (2010) “Identity, culture, land, and language: stories of insurgent planning in the Republic of Buryatia, Russia”. Journal of Planning Education and Research30(2): 198–209
69.
ThomassenB (2012) “Revisiting liminality: the danger of empty spaces”. In: AndrewsHRobertsL (eds) Liminal Landscapes: Travel, Experience and Spaces In-between (Contemporary Geographies of Leisure, Tourism and Mobility), London: Routledge, pp. 21–35
70.
TonnelatS (2008) “‘Out of frame:’ the (in)visible life of urban interstice”. Ethnography9(3): 291–324
71.
TurnerV (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure, New York, NY: De Gruyter
72.
TurnerV (1992) Blazing the Trail: Way Marks in the Exploration of Symbols, Tucson: The University of Arizona Press
73.
Van GennepA (1961) The Rites of Passage, Chicago: University of Chicago Press[1909, Les rites de passage (É. Nourry, Paris)]
74.
WardC (1978) The Child in the City, London: Architectural Press
75.
WoodB (2012) “Crafted within liminal spaces: young people's everyday politics”. Political Geography31: 337–346
76.
WoodEHallE (2011) “Drawings as spaces for intellectual play”. International Journal of Early Years Education19(3-4): 267–281
77.
YiftachelO (2009) “Theoretical Notes On `Gray Cities': the coming of urban apartheid?”. Planning Theory8: 88–100
78.
YoungL (2003) “The ‘place’ of street children in Kampala, Uganda: marginalisation, resistance, and acceptance in the urban environment”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21: 607–627
