The notion of cosmopolitanism captures the duality of the global world. On one hand, it represents an inclusive orientation towards the cultural Other, while on the other, it has become a form of cultural capital that is owned by the global elite and frequently used to demarcate social distinctions. This article, based on ethnographic research in an international school in China, introduces the concretization of this paradox. The article shows how teachers and students in a gated school – in which local students, by Chinese law, were not permitted to study – used different practices to signify invented Chineseness as legitimate and non-legitimate. This process is explored by deciphering practices of boundary-making that produced a unique bubble. Based on three mechanisms of boundary-making and groupness, I show how a cultural process of identification and differentiation challenges previous empirical assumptions of selective boundaries in reference to the locale. Instead, the presence of ambiguous perceptions of Chinese locality in school suggest the existence of elastic, continuous and unfixed boundaries.
BachJ (2011) Modernity and the urban imagination in economic zones. Theory, Culture & Society28(5): 98–122.
2.
BolayMReyJ (2020) Corporate cosmopolitanism: making an asset of diversity and mobility at Swiss international schools. ACME19(1): 106–130.
3.
BrubakerR (2002) Ethnicity without groups. European Journal of Sociology43(2): 163–189.
4.
BrummittNKeelingA (2013) Charting the growth of international schools. In: PearceR (ed) International Education and Schools: Moving Beyond the First 40 Years. London: Bloomsbury, 25–36.
5.
BunnellT (2005) Perspectives on international schools and the nature and extent of local community contact. Journal of Research in International Education4(1): 43–63.
6.
BunnellT (2008) International education and the ‘second phase’: a framework for conceptualizing its nature and for the future assessment of its effectiveness. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education38(4): 415–426.
7.
BunnellT (2020) The continuous growth and development of ‘International Schooling’: the notion of a ‘transitionary phase’. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education50(5): 764–768.
8.
CaffynR (2013) Boundaries and boundary management in international schools: psychodynamics and organizational politics. In: PearceR (ed) International Education and Schools: Moving Beyond the First 40 Years. London: Bloomsbury, 205–221.
9.
CarlsonSGerhardsJHansS (2017) educating children in times of globalisation: class-specific child-rearing practices and the acquisition of transnational cultural capital. Sociology51(4): 749–765.
10.
ChowR (1998) Introduction: on chineseness as a theoretical problem. Boundary 225(3): 1–24.
11.
CohenA (2000) Introduction: discriminating relations – identity, boundary and authenticity. In: CohenA (ed) Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Values. London: Routledge, 1–13.
12.
CohenE (1972) Toward a sociology of international tourism. Social Research39(1): 164–182.
13.
CreweEAxelbyR (2013) Anthropology and Development: Culture, Morality and Politics in a Globalised World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DiYanniR (2007) Internationalizing the US secondary and university curriculum. In: HaydenMLevyJThompsonJ (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Research in International Education. London: Sage, 152–163.
15.
FechterAM (2007a) Transnational Lives: Expatriates in Indonesia. Farnham: Ashgate.
16.
FechterAM (2007b) Living in a bubble: expatriates’ transnational spaces. In: AmitV (ed) Going First Class? New Approaches to Privileged Travel and Movement. New York: Berghahn Books, 36–52.
17.
GellarC (2002) International education: a commitment to universal values. In: HaydenMThompsonJWalkerG (eds) International Education in Practice: Dimensions for National and International Schools. London: Kogan Page, 5–30.
18.
HannerzU (1990) Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. Theory, Culture & Society7: 237–251.
19.
HaydenM (2006) Introduction to International Education: International Schools and Their Communities. London: Sage.
20.
HaydenM (2011) Transnational spaces of education: the growth of the international school sector. Globalisation, Societies and Education9(2): 211–224.
21.
HaydenMThompsonJ (2013) International schools: antecedents, current issues and metaphors for the future. In: PearceR (ed) International Education and Schools: Moving Beyond the First 40 Years. London: Bloomsbury, 3–24.
22.
HillI (2007) International education as developed by the International Baccalaureate Organization. In: HaydenMLevyJThompsonJ (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Research in International Education. London: Sage, 25–37.
23.
IgarashiHSaitoH (2014) Cosmopolitanism as cultural capital: exploring the intersection of globalization, education and stratification. Cultural Sociology8(3): 222–239.
24.
International Schools Consultancy (ISC) Research (2019) Data and intel. Available at: https://www.iscresearch.com/data (accessed 1 July 2019).
25.
JeffersD (2012) The ‘me to we’ social enterprise: global education as lifestyle brand. Critical Literacy6(1): 18–30.
26.
KochanD (2016) Home is where I lay down my hat? The complexities and functions of home for internal migrants in contemporary China. Geoforum71: 21–32.
27.
LamontM (2014) Reflections inspired by ethnic boundary making: institutions, power, networksby andreas wimmer. Ethnic and Racial Studies37(5): 814–819.
28.
LamontMMolnarV (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–195.
29.
LamontMBeljeanSClairM (2014) What is missing? Cultural processes and causal pathways to inequality. Socio-Economic Review12(3): 573–608.
30.
LedgerS (2016) Breaking through the cultural bubble: International schools engaging at the local level. International Schools Journal36(1): 27–39.
31.
LevittPJaworskyBN (2007) Transnational migration studies: past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology33: 129–156.
32.
LevyLPeiperlMAJonsenK (2016) Cosmopolitanism in a globalized world: an interdisciplinary perspective. Advances in Global Leadership9: 281–323.
33.
MertonR (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
34.
MeyerH (2015) Boundaries and the restriction of mobility within international school communities: a case study from Germany. In: BenjaminSDervinF (eds) Migration, Diversity and Education: Beyond Third Culture Kids. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 59–83.
35.
OngA (1999) Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
PearceR (1994) Globalization: learning from international schools. MobilityNovember: 27–29.
37.
PooleA (2018) ‘We are a Chinese school’: constructing school identity from the lived experiences of expatriate and Chinese teaching faculty in a type C international school in Shanghai, China. International Journal of Progressive Education14(1): 106–121.
38.
PooreP (2005) School culture. Journal of Research in International Education4(3): 351–361.
39.
PortesAManningRD (1986) The immigrant enclave: theory and empirical examples. In: NagelJOlzakS (eds) Comparative Ethnic Relations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 47–68.
40.
ResnikJ (2008) The constructing of the global worker through international education. In: ResnikJ (ed) The Production of Educational Knowledge in the Global Era. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 147–167.
41.
RobinsonJGwanX (2012) The changing face of international education in China. On the Horizon20(4): 305–312.
42.
SchubigerEReyJBolayM (2019) Fostering the next generation of “responsible world leaders”. TSANTSA - Journal of the Swiss Anthropological Association24: 121–126.
43.
SchwindtE (2003) The development of a model for international education with special reference to the role of host country nationals. Journal of Research in International Education2(1): 67–81.
44.
SwidlerA (1986) Culture in action: symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review51(2): 273–286.
45.
TanuDD (2016) Going to school in Disneyland: imagining an international school community in Indonesia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal25(4): 429–450.
46.
TarcPMishra-TarcA (2015) Elite international schools in the global south: transnational space, class relationalities and the ‘middling’ international schoolteacher. British Journal of Sociology of Education36(1): 34–52.
47.
TurnerBS (2007) The enclave society: towards a sociology of immobility. European Journal of Social Theory10(2): 287–304.
48.
WalkerG (2005) Partnerships: the way forward for the IBO. IB World Magazine45: 5–6.
49.
WeeninkD (2008) Cosmopolitanism as a form of capital. Sociology42(6): 1089–1106.
50.
WiegmanR (2000) Race, ethnicity and film. In: HillJGibsonCP (eds) Film Studies: Critical Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 156–166.
WrightELeeM (2014) Elite international baccalaureate diploma programme schools and inter-cultural understanding in China. British Journal of Educational Studies62(2): 149–169.
53.
YamatoYBrayM (2006) Economic development and the market place for education. Journal of Research in International Education5(1): 57–82.
54.
YanWHanYCaiY (2015) Internationalization and globalization in Chinese K–12 schools and university education. In: HaydenMLevyJThompsonJ (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Research in International Education. 2nd edition. London: Sage, 569–582.
55.
ZabanH (2015) Living in a bubble: enclaves of transnational jewish immigrants from Western countries in Jerusalem. Journal of International Migration and Integration16(4): 1003–1021.
