This paper reflects on the possibilities and limits of participatory mapping as a tool for interrogating the power–knowledge inequalities that structure indigenous peoples’ engagements with postcolonial state cartography and bureaucracy. I describe mapping activities conducted in a remote Guaraní community in the Bolivian Chaco as part of a research project exploring the dynamics and legacies of Native Community Lands, a national indigenous land titling programme. While these exercises were designed to explore the disjunctures between state and indigenous knowledges of territory, they generated unexpected power dynamics that led me to reflect more deeply on the power of maps, the pitfalls of ‘countermapping’ as an activist practice and my own imbrication in a bureaucratic field of power. The paper concludes that participatory mapping can be a fruitful if ambivalent method for studying state bureaucracy, which demonstrates the value of examining the legal-cartographic knowledges of the state ‘from the margins’ – including from the perspective of the people and places they claim to represent.
AnthiasP (2018) Limits to Decolonization: Indigeneity, Territory, and Hydrocarbon Politics in the Bolivian Chaco.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
2.
Bhabha H (1995) Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
3.
BhandarB (2011)
Plasticity and post-colonial recognition: ‘Owning, knowing, and being.’.Law and Critique22: 227–249.
4.
BlomleyN (2010)
Cuts, flows, and the geographies of property. Law, Culture and the Humanities7: 203–216.
5.
BrennerNEldenS (2009)
Henri Lefebvre on state, space, territory. International Political Sociology3: 353–377.
6.
BryanJ (2009)
Where would we be without them? Knowledge, space and power in indigenous politics. Futures41: 24–32.
7.
BryanJ (2012)
Rethinking territory: Social justice and neoliberalism in Latin America’s territorial turn. Geography Compass6: 215–226.
8.
BryanJWoodD (2015) Weaponizing Maps: Indigenous Peoples and Counterinsurgency in the Americas.
New York:
Guilford Press.
9.
ChambersRGuijtI (2011) PRA five years later. In: CornwallA (ed.) The Participation Reader.
London:
Zed Books. pp.109–121.
10.
ChapinMLambZThrelkeldB (2005)
Mapping indigenous lands. Annual Review of Anthropology34: 619–638.
11.
ChapinMThrelkeldB (2001) Indigenous Landscapes: A Study in Ethnocartography.
Arlington, VA:
Center for the Support of Native Lands.
12.
CornwallA (ed.) (2011) The Participation Reader.
London:
Zed Books.
13.
CoulthardGS (2014) Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
14.
CramptonJW (2010)
Cartographic calculations of territory. Progress in Human Geography35(1): 92–103.
15.
DasVPooleD (2004) Anthropology in the Margins of the State.
Santa Fe:
School of American Research Press.
16.
FanonF (2007[1967]) Black Skin, White Masks. 1952 (Trans. Philcox R).
New York:
Grove Press.
17.
FoucaultM (1981) The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1.
Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
18.
GordonETGurdiánGCHaleCR (2003)
Rights, resources, and the social memory of struggle: Reflections and Black community land rights on Nicaragua’s Atlantic Coast. Human Organization62: 369–381.
19.
HarleyJB (1989)
Deconstructing the map. Cartographica26(2): 1–20.
20.
HerlihyPH (2003)
Participatory research mapping of indigenous lands in Darién, Panama. Human Organization62(4): 313–331.
21.
HodgsonDLSchroederRA (2002)
Dilemmas of counter-mapping community resources in Tanzania. Development and Change33: 79–100.
22.
HuntDStevensonSA (2017)
Decolonizing geographies of power: Indigenous digital counter-mapping practices on turtle Island. Settler Colonial Studies7(3): 372–392.
23.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space (Trans Nicholson-Smith D).
Oxford:
Basil Blackwell.
24.
LefebvreH (2009[1978]) Space and the state. In: Brenner N and Elden S (eds) State, Space, World: Selected Essays by Henri Lefebvre (Trans Moore G, Brenner N and Elden S). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 223-253.
25.
LouisRPJohnsonJTPramonoAH (2012)
Introduction: Indigenous cartographies and counter-mapping. Cartographica47(2): 77–79.
26.
MitchellT (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
27.
MollettS (2013)
Mapping deception: The politics of mapping Miskito and Garifuna space in Honduras. Annals of the Association of American Geographers103(5): 1227–1241.
28.
Ng’wenoB (2007) Turf Wars: Territory and Citizenship in the Contemporary State.
Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
29.
PelusoN (1995)
Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode27: 383–406.
30.
QuijanoA (2000)
Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepentla: Views from the South1(3): 533–580.
31.
RadcliffeSA (2011) Third space, abstract space, and coloniality: National and subaltern cartography in Ecuador. In: TeversonAUpstoneS (eds) Postcolonial Spaces: The Politics of Place in Contemporary Culture.
London:
Palgrave, pp.129–45.
32.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.
New Haven:
Yale University Press.
33.
Simpson A (2014) Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life Across the Borders of Settler States. Durham: Duke University Press.
34.
SparkeM (2005) In the Space of Theory: Postfoundational Geographies of the Nation-State.
Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
35.
Spivak G (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: Nelson C and Grossberg L (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 271-313. p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 9.0px Times}
36.
ThongchaiW (1994) Siam Mapped: The History of the Geobody of a Nation.
Honolulu:
University of Hawaii Press.
37.
WainwrightJBryanJ (2009)
Cartography, territory, property: Postcolonial reflections on indigenous counter-mapping in Nicaragua and Belize. Cultural Geographies16(2): 153–178.
38.
WoodD (2010) Rethinking the Power of Maps.
New York:
The Guildford Press.
