Viewing biotechnology as a lens through which to analyse new ways of governing
populations, in this article we consider how the United Nations has globally
communicated biotechnology’s risks, uncertainties and opportunities to
develop and expand what we refer to as ‘responsible expertise’.
We specifically examine the activities of UNESCO and the FAO to show how these
organizations operate as agencies of rule by, on the one hand, marshalling expertise
about biotechnology to identify populations ‘at risk’ and, on
the other, capturing the imagination of people as responsible subjects with
appropriate expertise to manage their own uncertain futures. As an orientation that
engages both expert knowledge and moral judgement, the promotion of responsible
expertise around the world signals a strategic shift in the UN’s efforts
to tame bio-technology for the everyday decision-maker.
Anderson, Kym
,
Chantal Nielsen
,
Sherman Robinson
and
Karen Thierfelder
(2001) ‘Estimating the Global Economic Effects
of GMOs’, in
Philip Pardey
(ed.) The Future of Food: Biotechnology Markets and Policies in an
International Setting, pp. 49-74.
Washington, DC: IFPRI
.
2.
Arce, Alberto
(2000) ‘Creating or Regulating Development:
Representing Modernities through Language and Discourse’, in
Alberto Arce
and
Norman Long
(eds) Anthropology, Development and Modernities, pp.
32-51.
London: Routledge
.
3.
Beck, Ulrich
(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.
London: Sage
.
4.
Beck, Ulrich
(1999) World Risk Society.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
5.
Briggs, Charles L.
(2004)
‘Theorizing Modernity Conspiratorially: Science, Scale, and the
Political Economy of Public Discourse in Explanations of a Cholera Epidemic’
, American Ethnologist31(2):
164-187
.
6.
Bujra, Janet
(2000) ‘Risk and Trust: Unsafe Sex, Gender and
AIDS in Tanzania’, in
Pat Caplan
(ed.) Risk Revisited.
London: Pluto
.
7.
Buttel, F.
(1993)
‘Ideology and Agricultural Technology in the Late Twentieth
Century: Biotechnology as a Symbol and Substance’
, Agriculture and Human Values10(2):
5-15
.
8.
Caplan, Pat
(2000a) ‘Introduction: Risk
Revisited’, in
Pat Caplan
(ed.) Risk Revisited.
London: Pluto
.
9.
Caplan, Pat
(ed.) (2000b) Risk Revisited.
London: Pluto
.
10.
Castel, Robert
(1991) ‘From Dangerousness to
Risk’, in
Graham Burchell
,
Colin Gordon
and
Peter Miller
(eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
11.
CGRFA (Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture)
(2005) ‘Code of Conduct on Biotechnology as it
Relates to Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture’. URL
(consulted October 2006): http://www.fao.org/ag/cgrfa/biocode.htm
12.
Comaroff, John
and
Jean Comaroff
(eds) (2001) Millennial Capitalism and the Culture of
Neoliberalism.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
.
13.
Current Anthropology Forum
(2002)
‘Anthropology in Public’
, Current Anthropology43(4):
619-630
.
14.
Dean, Mitchell
(1999) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern
Society.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
15.
Douglas, Mary
(1990)
‘Risk as a Forensic Resource’
, Daedalus119(14):
1-16
.
16.
Douglas, Mary
(1992) Risk and Blame.
London: Routledge
.
17.
Douglas, Mary
and
Aaron Wildavsky
(1982) Risk and Culture.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
18.
Elyachar, J.
(2006)
‘Best Practices: Research, Finance, and NGOs in Cairo’
, American Ethnologist33(3):
413-426
.
19.
Erickson, Richard
and
Aaron Doyle
(eds) (2003a) Risk and Morality.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press
.
20.
Erickson, Richard
and
Aaron Doyle
(eds) (2003b) ‘Risk and
Morality’, in
Richard Erickson
and
Aaron Doyle
(eds) Risk and Morality, pp. 1-10.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press
.
21.
Erickson, Richard
,
Dean Barry
and
Aaron Doyle
(2000)
‘The Moral Hazards of Neoliberalism: Lessons from the Private
Insurance Business’
, Economy and Society29(4):
532-558
.
22.
Escobar, Arturo
(1988)
‘Power and Visibility: The Invention and Management of
Development in the Third World’
, Cultural Anthropology4(4):
428-443
.
23.
Escobar, Arturo
(1995) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of
the Third World.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
24.
Ewald, François
(1991) ‘Insurance and Risk’,
in
Graham Burchell
,
Colin Gordon
and
Peter Miller
(eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
25.
Ferguson, James
(1990) The Anti-Politics Machine:
‘Development’, Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in
Lesotho.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
26.
Ferguson, James
and
Akhil Gupta
(2002)
‘Spatializing States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality’
, American Ethnologist29(4):
981-1002
.
27.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
(1999a) Reports from International Organizations on their
Policies, Programmes and Activities on Agricultural Biological Diversity. Part
II: International Agricultural Research Centres of CGIAR. Commission on
Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 8th Regular Session, 19-23 April.
Rome: FAO
.
28.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
(2000)
Implications and Development of Biotechnology
. Twenty-fifth FAO Regional Conference for Asia and the
Pacific, Yokohama, Japan, 28 Aug.-1 Sept.
29.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
(2001) Agricultural Biotechnology for Developing Countries:
Results of an Electronic Forum. FAO Research and Technology Paper 8.
Rome: FAO
.
30.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
(2002a) ‘UN Statement on the Use of GM foods as
Food Aid in Southern Africa’. FAO newsroom, 27 August,
Rome
.
31.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
(2002b) Public Agricultural Research: The Impact of IPRs on
Biotechnology in Developing Countries. Report of an Expert Meeting, 24-27
June.
Rome: FAO
. URL (consulted November 2006): www.fao.org/Biotech/doc.asp
32.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
(2003a) ‘Agriculture 21: A New Social Contract on
Biotechnology’. URL (consulted November 2006): http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0305sp1.htm
33.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
(2003b) ‘Weighing the GMO Arguments: For,
Against’, March. URL (consulted November 2006): http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/focus/2003/gmo7.htm
34.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
(2003c) ‘FAO Warns of “Molecular
Divide” Between North and South’, FAO newsroom, 18
February,
Rome
.
35.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
(2005) ‘Biotechnology in Food and Agriculture: FAO
Statement on Biotechnology’. URL (consulted November 2006): http://www.fao.org/Biotech/stat/asp
36.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO)
(1999) Que es el Codex Alimentarius? Rome: FAO/WHO.
37.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
/
World Health Organization (WHO)
(2001) Report of the Second Session of the Codex Ad Hoc
Intergovernmental Task Force on Foods Derived from Biotechnology. Joint
FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme, Codex Alimentarius Commission.
Chiba: FAO/WHO
.
38.
Foucault, Michel
(1991) ‘Governmentality’, in
Graham Burchell
,
Colin Gordon
and
Peter Miller
(eds) The Foucault Effect, pp. 87-104.
London: Harvester Wheatsheaf
.
39.
Fresco, Louise
(2003)
‘“Which Road Do We Take?” Harnessing Genetic
Resources and Making use of Life Sciences, a New Contract for Sustainable Agriculture’
, paper presented at the EU Discussion Forum, ‘Towards
Sustainable Agriculture for Developing Countries: Options from Life Sciences and
Biotechnologies’, Brussels, 30-31 January.
40.
García Canclini, Néstor
(1995) Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving
Modernity.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
. (Reissued 2005.)
41.
Glowka, Lyle
(2002) ‘The Role of Law in Realising the Potential
and Avoiding the Risks of Modern Biotechnology: Selected Issues of Relevance to
Food and Agriculture’. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food
and Agriculture, Background Study Paper No. 19.
Rome: FAO
.
42.
Greene, Shane
(2004)
‘Indigenous People Incorporated? Culture as Politics, Culture as
Property in Pharmaceutical Bioprospecting’
, Current Anthropology45(2):
211-237
.
43.
Hayden, Cori
(2003) When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of
Bioprospecting in Mexico.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
44.
Heller, Chaia
(2004) ‘Risky Science and Savoir-faire: Peasant
Expertise in the French Debate over Genetically Modified
Crops’, in
Marianne E. Lien
and
Brigitte Nerlich
(eds) The Politics of Food, pp. 81-99.
Oxford: Berg
.
45.
Hunt, Alan
(2003) ‘Risk and Moralization in Everyday
Life’, in
Richard Erickson
and
Aaron Doyle
(eds) Risk and Morality, pp. 165-192.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press
.
46.
Ilcan, Suzan
and
Lynne Phillips
(2003)
‘Making Food Count: Expert Knowledge and Global Technologies of Government’
, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology40(4):
441-461
.
47.
Ilcan, Suzan
and
Lynne Phillips
(2006) ‘Circulations of Insecurity: Globalizing
Food Standards in Historical Perspective’, in
Jim Bingen
and
Lawrence Busch
(eds) Agricultural Standards: The Shape of the Global Food and Fiber
System.
Dordrecht: Springer
.
48.
Inda, Jonathan X.
(2005) ‘Analytics of the Modern: An
Introduction’, in
Jonathan X. Inda
(ed.) Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality and Life
Politics.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
49.
Inter Press Service (2001) Transgenicos: La fase oculta. Quito: Abya-Yala.
50.
Jansen, Kees
and
Sietze Vellema
(eds) (2004) Agribusiness and Society: Corporate Responses to
Environmentalism, Market Opportunities and Public Regulation.
London and New York: Zed Press
.
51.
Killworth, Paul
(2000) ‘A Risky Cease-fire: British Infantry
Soldiers and Northern Ireland’, in
Pat Caplan
(ed.) Risk Revisited, pp. 133-155.
London: Pluto
.
52.
Knight, Frank
(1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit.
Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
.
53.
Larner, Wendy
and
William Walters
(eds) (2004) Global Governmentality: Governing International
Spaces.
London and New York: Routledge
.
54.
Latour, Bruno
(1987) Science in Action.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
55.
Lupton, Deborah
(ed.) (1999) Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions
and Perspectives.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
56.
Mackey, Eva
(1999) ‘Constructing an Endangered Nation: Risk,
Race and Rationality in Australia’s Native Title
Debate’, pp. 108-130 in
Deborah Lupton
(ed.) Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and
Perspectives.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
57.
Nugent, Steve
(2000) ‘Good Risk, Bad Risk: Reflexive
Modernization and Amazonia’, in
Pat Caplan
(ed.) Risk Revisited.
London: Pluto
.
58.
O’Malley, Pat
(1996) ‘Risk and
Responsibility’, in
Andrew Barry
,
Thomas Osborne
and
Nikolas Rose
(eds) Foucault and Political Reason.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
59.
O’Malley, Pat
(2000)
‘Uncertain Subjects: Risks, Liberalism and Contract’
, Economy and Society29(4):
460-484
.
60.
O’Malley, Pat
(2004) Risk, Uncertainty and Government.
London: Glasshouse Press
.
61.
Paley, Julie
(2001) Marketing Democracy: Power and Social Movements in
Post-dictatorship Chile.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
62.
Pardey, Philip
(ed.) (2001) The Future of Food: Biotechnology Markets and
Policies in an International Setting.
Washington, DC: IFPRI
.
63.
Paul, Helena
and
Ricarda Steinbrecher
(2003) Hungry Corporations: Transnational Biotech Companies
Colonize the Food Chain.
London and New York: Zed Press
.
64.
Phillips, Lynne
and
Suzan Ilcan
(2003)
‘“A World Free From Hunger”: Global
Imagination and Governance in the Age of Scientific Management’
, Sociologia Ruralis43(4):
434-453
.
65.
Pinstrup-Andersen, Per
and
Marc Cohen
(2001) ‘Rich and Poor Country Perspectives on
Biotechnology’, in
Philip Pardey
(ed.) The Future of Food: Biotechnology Markets and Policies in an
International Setting, pp. 17-47.
Washington, DC: IFPRI
.
66.
Rifkin, Jeremy
(1998) The Biotech Century.
New York: Tarcher/Putnam
.
67.
Rose, Nikolas
(1996) Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and
Personhood.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
68.
Rose, Nikolas
(1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
69.
Rota, Gladis
and
Juan Izquierdo
(2003)
‘Comics as a Tool for Teaching Bio-technology in Primary Schools’
, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology6(2). URL (consulted November 2006): www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/
70.
Sasson, Albert
(1998) Biotechnologies in Developing Countries: Present and
Future, vol. 2: International Cooperation.
Paris: UNESCO
.
71.
Sasson, Albert
(2001) Biotechnologies in Developing Countries: Present and
Future, vol. 3: Regional and Sub-regional Cooperation and Joint Ventures.
Paris: UNESCO
.
72.
Shepherd, Chris
(2006)
‘From In Vitro to In Situ: On the Precarious Extension of
Agricultural Science in the Indigenous “Third World”‘
, Social Studies of Science36(3):
399-426
.
73.
Shiva, Vandana
(1993) Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity
and Bio-technology.
London: Zed
.
74.
Shiva, Vandana
(1997) Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge.
Cambridge, MA: South End Press
.
75.
Shiva, Vandana
(2000) Stolen Harvest: The Hijacking of the Global Food
Supply.
Cambridge, MA: South End Press
.
76.
Singh, R. B.
(2002) Science and Technology for Sustainable Food Security,
Nutritional Adequacy, and Poverty Alleviation in the Asia-Pacific Region.
Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and Pacific
.
77.
Staples, Amy
(2006) The Birth of Development.
Kent, OH: Kent State University Press
.
78.
Stone, Glenn Davis
(2002)
‘Both Sides Now: Fallacies in the Genetic-modification Wars,
Implications for Developing Countries, and Anthropological Perspectives’
, Current Anthropology43(4):
611-619
.
79.
Swaminathan, Monkombu
(1996) Sustainable Agriculture: Towards an Evergreen
Revolution.
Delhi: Konark Publishers
.
80.
Trigo, Eduardo
,
Greg Taxier
,
Carl Pray
and
Ruben Echeverria
(2001) ‘Agricultural Biotechnology in Latin
America and the Caribbean’, in
Philip Pardey
(ed.) The Future of Food: Biotechnology Markets and Policies in an
International Setting, pp. 221-250.
Washington, DC: IFPRI
.
81.
UN
(2004) ‘Environmentally Sound Management of
Biotechnology’, Chapter 16 in Agenda 21.
New York: UN Department of Economic and Social
Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development
. URL (consulted November 2006): http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21chapter16.htm
82.
UNESCO
(2002) Report by the Director-General on the Results of the
Feasibility Study on the Creation of an International Basic Sciences
Programme. Executive Board, 165th session, 19 Sept.
Paris: UNESCO
.
83.
UNESCO
(2004) UNESCO-Mainstreaming: The Needs of LDCs. Report
from the Director-General. URL (consulted November 2006): http://www.unesco.org/ldc
84.
UNESCO
(2005a) ‘The UNESCO/Biotechnology Action Council
(BAC) Programme’. URL (consulted November 2006): http://portal.unesco.org/sc_nat/ev.php?URL_ID=2494&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201&reload=1062152397
85.
UNESCO (2005b) Biotechnology and Education Training Centre. URL (consulted
November 2006): http://www.unesco-betcen.abc.hu/
86.
UNESCO
(2005c) ‘Biotechnology and Society in the
Twenty-first Century’. URL (consulted November 2006): http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/meetings/eur_genoa_99.htm
87.
UNESCO
(2005d) ‘Science for the Twenty-first Century: A
New Commitment: Biotechnology: Solution or Problem?’ URL
(consulted November 2006): http://www.unesco.org/bpi/science/content/press/anglo/13.htm
88.
Valverde, Marianna
(2003) Law’s Dream of a Common Knowledge.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
89.
Ventura Santos, Ricardo
(2002)
‘Indigenous Peoples, Postcolonial Contexts and Genomic Research
in the Late 20th Century: A View from Amazonia (1960-2000)’
, Critique of Anthropology22(1):
81-104
.
90.
Wendt, Jan
and
Juan Izquierdo
(2003)
‘Management of Appropriate Agricultural Biotechnology for Small
Producers: Case Study - Ecuador’
, Electronic Journal of Biotechnology6(1):
3-7
.
91.
Wilkinson, John
(2002)
‘Genetically Modified Organisms, Organics and the Contested
Construction of Demand in the Agro-Food System’
, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food10(2):
3-11
.
92.
Zaid, A.
,
H. G. Hughes
,
E. Porceddu
and
F. Nicholas
(2001) Glossary of Biotechnology for Food and
Agriculture. FAO Research and Technology Paper 9.
Rome: FAO
.
93.
Zaloom, Caitlin
(2004)
‘The Productive Life of Risk’
, Cultural Anthropology19(3):
365-391
.
