Occupational therapy is evolving rapidly due to technological advances and demographic and sociocultural changes. Recognizing emerging trends is fundamental to developing responsive educational programs, evidence-based practices, and adaptive health policies. This study explores expert perspectives across five themes: (1) Future Technologies, (2) Neuroscience and Biotechnology Integration, (3) Technology-Based Therapy Approaches, (4) Sociocultural and Demographic Impacts, and (5) Innovative Educational Methods.
Method:
A three-round Delphi study was conducted with 36 occupational therapy professionals. The sample included 12 academicians (mean age (M) = 34.5, 67% female), 12 clinicians (M = 31.2, 75% female), and 12 final-year interns (M = 23.1, 92% female). The mean professional experience was 6.0 years for academicians and 5.8 years for clinicians. Thematic analysis and Kendall’s W were used to evaluate consensus.
Results:
Participants emphasized the importance of integrating virtual reality/augmented reality interventions, artificial intelligence-supported assessments, and telehealth into occupational therapy practice. Neuroplasticity-based interventions and simulation-based learning were highlighted for future competence. Ethical concerns regarding artificial intelligence, as well as cost and digital literacy barriers, were also noted.
Conclusion:
To meet future challenges, occupational therapists should enhance digital competencies, ensure accessibility, and develop inclusive, culturally responsive practices. Findings inform clinical, educational, and policy strategies in occupational therapy.
BalasubramanianRAgarwalD (2012) Delphi technique – a review. International Journal of Public Health Dentistry3: 16–26.
2.
BatukNAdıgüzelY (2022) Yerel yönetimlerin sosyal içerme faaliyetlerinin göçmenlerin toplumsal uyumuna etkisi: İstanbul örneği. Middle East Journal of Refugee Studies7: 51–79.
3.
BeardJROfficerAMCasselsAK (2016) The World Report on Ageing and Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. S163–S166.
4.
BerlucchiG (2011) Brain plasticity and cognitive neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation21: 560–578.
5.
BhattamisraSKBanerjeePGuptaP, et al. (2023) Artificial intelligence in pharmaceutical and healthcare research. Big Data and Cognitive Computing7: 10.
6.
BhiseSRathiMDabadghavR, et al. (2024) Use of virtual reality in physical rehabilitation: A narrative review. Current Medicine Research and Practice14: 122–127.
7.
BonannoMDe LucaRDe NunzioAM, et al. (2022) Innovative technologies in the neurorehabilitation of traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Brain Sciences12: 1678.
8.
Case-SmithJArbesmanM (2008) Evidence-based review of interventions for autism used in or of relevance to occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy62: 416–429.
9.
CasonJ (2015) Telehealth and occupational therapy: Integral to the triple aim of health care reform. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy69: 6902090010p6902090011–6902090010p6902090018.
10.
ChangHSongYCenX (2022) Effectiveness of augmented reality for lower limb rehabilitation: A systematic review. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics2022: 4047845.
11.
CharnessNBootWR (2009) Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science18: 253–258.
12.
ClarkFJacksonJCarlsonM, et al. (2012) Effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention in promoting the well-being of independently living older people: results of the Well Elderly 2 randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health66: 782–790.
13.
ClarkWESivanMO’ConnorRJ (2019) Evaluating the use of robotic and virtual reality rehabilitation technologies to improve function in stroke survivors: A narrative review. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering6: 2055668319863557.
14.
de AlmeidaRS (2022) Mobile mental health: Opportunities and challenges. In MarquesAJQueirósR (eds) Digital Therapies in Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health. IGI Global, pp. 1–20.
15.
De VilliersMRDe VilliersPJKentAP (2005) The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Medical Teacher27: 639–643.
16.
Del PinoRDíez-CirardaMUstarroz-AguirreI, et al. (2022) Costs and effects of telerehabilitation in neurological and cardiological diseases: A systematic review. Frontiers in Medicine9: 832229.
17.
GleggSMNLevacDE (2018) Barriers, facilitators and interventions to support virtual reality implementation in rehabilitation: A scoping review. PM&R10: 1237–1251. e1231.
18.
GrantT (2019) Using technology enhanced learning to promote the acquisition of practical skills in occupational therapy. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education3: 10.
19.
GrantTThomasYGossmanP, et al. (2021) The use of simulation in occupational therapy education: A scoping review. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal68: 345–356.
20.
HassonFKeeneySMcKennaH (2000) Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing32: 1008–1015.
21.
HensonPWisniewskiHHollisC, et al. (2019) Digital mental health apps and the therapeutic alliance: Initial review. BJPsych Open5: e15.
22.
HowardMC (2017) A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs. Computers in Human Behavior70: 317–327.
23.
HsuC-CSandfordBA (2007) The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation12: 10.
24.
HuotSBrowerJThamA, et al. (2021) Cultivating social occupations, spaces, and networks: Service providers’ perspectives on enabling immigrants’ social participation. Cadernos Brasileiros de Terapia Ocupacional29: 1–11.
25.
HwangN-KShimS-HCheonH-W (2023) Digital learning designs in occupational therapy education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education23: 7.
26.
JonesJToppingAWattisJ, et al. (2016) A concept analysis of spirituality in occupational therapy practice. Journal for the Study of Spirituality6: 38–57.
27.
KaelinVCNilssonILindgrenH (2024) Occupational therapy in the space of artificial intelligence: Ethical considerations and human-centered efforts. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy31: 2421355.
28.
KeeneySMcKennaHAHassonF (2011) The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
29.
KleimJAJonesTA (2008) Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage.
30.
LautJPorfiriMRaghavanP (2016) The present and future of robotic technology in rehabilitation. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports4: 312–319.
31.
LaverKGeorgeSThomasS, et al. (2015) Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation: An abridged version of a Cochrane review. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine51: 497–506.
32.
LindgrenHKaelinVCLjusbäckA-M, et al. (2024) To adapt or not to adapt? older adults enacting agency in dialogues with an unknowledgeable agent. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. New York, NY: ACM, pp. 307–316.
33.
LiuL (2018) Occupational therapy in the fourth industrial revolution. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy85: 272–283.
34.
Luckykumar DwarkadasATalasilaVChallaRK, et al. (2024) A review of the application of virtual and augmented reality in physical and occupational therapy. Software: Practice and Experience54: 1378–1407.
35.
MasieroSPoliPRosatiG, et al. (2014) The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation. Expert Review of Medical Devices11: 187–198.
36.
MehtaKSinghCChughH, et al. (2023) Revolutionizing healthcare by accessing the opportunities for virtual and augmented reality. In: 2023 7th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS). New York, NY: IEEE, pp. 836–841.
37.
MinopoulosGMMemosVAStergiouCL, et al. (2022) Exploitation of emerging technologies and advanced networks for a smart healthcare system. Applied Sciences12: 5859.
38.
NussbaumRKellyCQuinbyE, et al. (2019) Systematic review of mobile health applications in rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation100: 115–127.
39.
OkoliCPawlowskiSD (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management42: 15–29.
40.
PowellC (2003) The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing41: 376–382.
41.
QuYBaiBZhangZ (2023) The new generation of artificial intelligence technology ChatGPT causes: Potential legal risks and regulatory countermeasures. In:2023 8th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS). IEEE, pp. 1205–1211.
42.
RodgerSBennettSFitzgeraldC, et al. (2010) Use of simulated learning activities in occupational therapy curriculum.
43.
SajuSBabuAKumarAS, et al. (2022) Augmented reality vs virtual reality. International Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Sciences5: 379–383.
44.
SinghHSangrarRWijekoonS, et al. (2022) Applying ‘cultural humility’to occupational therapy practice: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open12(7): e063655.
45.
StirlingLMacLeanJ (2015) Roadmap for the development of at-home telemonitoring systems to augment occupational therapy. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems46: 569–580.
46.
TherapistsWFoOMackenzieLCoppolaS, et al. (2017) International occupational therapy research priorities: A Delphi study. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health37: 72–81.
47.
VoinescuASuiJStanton FraserD (2021) Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Medicine10: 1478.
48.
ZhuSSuiYShenY, et al. (2021) Effects of virtual reality intervention on cognition and motor function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience13: 586999.
