Introduction: Stroke affects activities of daily living such as eating. Little is known about how stroke survivors cope with eating difficulties in the long term. This research conducted in the United Kingdom explores the complex phenomenon of eating difficulties 6 months post stroke.
Method: This qualitative study used a participatory approach to explore the experiences of seven stroke survivors using a focus group and visual methods of photography, to explore the lived experiences of managing eating with a stroke disability.
Findings: Participants (n = 8) identified barriers to managing eating including physical, social, environmental and emotional issues. Participants recognised that sustaining eating activities regardless of their disabilities was important for their wellbeing. Stroke survivors sought opportunities to participate in occupations that revolved around eating, which enabled them to experience mastery over eating activities. Participants viewed eating activities as a way to self-monitor recovery and progression.
Conclusion: This study informs occupational therapy practice about how people living with stroke strive to adapt to eating difficulties.
BendzM (2000) Rules of relevance after a stroke. Social Science and Medicine51(5): 713–723.
2.
Bergold J and Thomas S (2012) Participatory research methods: a methodological approach in motion [110 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13(1): Art. 30. Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201302.
3.
BoradkarP (2010) Valued possessions: The worth of things. In: BergOSL (ed.) Design Things: A Critical Introduction to the Culture of Objects First, Oxford: Berg.
4.
BradyMCFredrickAWilliamsB (2013) People with aphasia: capacity to consent, research participation and intervention inequalities. International Journal of Stroke8(3): 193–196.
5.
BraunVClarkeV (2013) Planning and designing qualitative research. In: CarmichaelM (ed.) Successful Qualitative Research First, London: SAGE.
6.
BuzanT (2011) Buzan’s Study Skills: Mind Maps, Memory Techniques, Speed Reading and More!, 1st edn. Harlow, UK: BBC Active/Pearson.
7.
CarlssonEEhrenbergAEhnforsM (2004) Stroke and eating difficulties: long-term experiences. Journal of Clinical Nursing13(7): 825–834.
8.
CarterSMankoffJ (2005) When participants do the capturing. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems – CHI ’05. 899. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1054972.1055098.
9.
ColemanRKeatesSClarksonJet al.(2003) From margins to mainstream. In: ClarksonJKeatesSColemanRLebbonC (eds) Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population, London: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0001-0_1.
10.
CookT (2012) Where participatory approaches meet pragmatism in funded (health) research: the challenge of finding meaningful spaces. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research13(1): 18. Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201187.
11.
DemainSBurridgeJEllis-HillCet al.(2013) Assistive technologies after stroke: Self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Services Research13(1): 334.
12.
EliasN (2000) The Civilizing Process Revised, Ed: Blackwell Publishing.
13.
ErikssonGThamK (2009) The meaning of occupational gaps in everyday life in the first year after stroke. OTJR: Occupation, Participation, Health30(4): 184–192.
14.
GaverWBoucherAPenningtonSet al.(2004) Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions – Funology11(5): 53–56. Available at: http://eprints.gold.ac.uk/4720/.
15.
GoodleyDLawthomR (2006) Disability and Psychology, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
GreenJThorogoodN (2004) Qualitative methods for health research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research7(2): 7. Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs060274.
17.
Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party (2016) National Clinical Guideline for Stroke, London: Royal College of Physicians. Available at: www.rcplondon.ac.uk.
18.
JacobssonCAxelssonKOsterlindPOet al.(2000) How people with stroke and healthy older people experience the eating process. Journal of Clinical Nursing9(2): 255–264.
19.
LiamputtongPEzzyD (2005) Qualitative Research Methods, 2nd ed. Melbourne: OUP Australia and New Zealand.
20.
McDonaghDBrusebergAHaslamC (2002) Visual product evaluation: exploring users’ emotional relationships with products. Applied Ergonomics33(2): 231–240. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00008-X.
MariniIStebnickiMA (2012) The Psychological and Social Impact of Illness and Disability, London, UK: Springer.
23.
MedinJLarsonJArbinMVet al.(2010) Striving for control in eating situations after stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences24(4): 772–780. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20409051.
24.
MedinJWindahlMArbinMVet al.(2012) Eating difficulties among patients 3 months after stroke in relation to the acute phase. Journal of Advanced Nursing68(3): 580–589.
25.
NasrNLeonBMountainGet al. (2015) The experience of living with stroke and using technology: opportunities to engage and co-design with end users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. Early Online: 1–8, 2015 Informa UK Ltd. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1036469.
26.
NormanDA (2004) Emotional Design “Why we love or hate everyday things”, 2nd edn. New York: Basic Books, Pegasus Book Group.
27.
PerryLMcLarenS (2003a) Coping and adaptation at six months after stroke: experiences with eating disabilities. International Journal of Nursing Studies40(2): 185–195.
28.
PerryLMcLarenS (2003b) Eating difficulties after stroke. Journal of Advanced Nursing43(4): 360–369.
29.
PritchardEKBrownGTBarkerALet al.(2014) Exploring the association between volition and participation in daily life activities with older adults living in the community. Clinical Rehabilitation28(11): 1136–1144. Available at: http://cre.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0269215514529803.
30.
RendaGKuysB (2013) Design for disability: industrial design-led interventions for assistive cutlery. Hospitality and Society3(3): 229–237.
31.
RitchieJLewisJ (2003) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, London: SAGE.
32.
VisserM (1992) The Rituals of Dinner: The Origins, Evolution, Eccentricities, and Meaning of Table Manners, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
33.
WilliamsonB (2012) Getting a Grip: Disability in American Industrial Design of the Late Twentieth Century, Henry Francis du Winterthur Museum, Inc. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669668.
34.
WillsWJDickinsonAMMeahAet al.(2016) Reflections on the use of visual methods in a qualitative study of domestic kitchen practices. Sociology50(3): 471–484.
35.
YerxaE (2002) Habits in Contect: a synthesis, with implications for research in occupational science. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research22(1): 104–110. Available at: otj.sagepub.com. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492020220S125.
