Physical limitations restrict occupational performance in the virtual context for people with cervical spinal cord injuries.
Critical reflection on practice
A review of smart device goals in 10 health care records at one hospital identified three types of occupational therapy intervention. Compensation involved alternative methods of physical access, positioning, and customisation of devices. Acquisition involved providing opportunities for learning and overcoming challenges. Education and training sought to empower users and their families to use smart devices successfully.
Implications for practice
Occupational therapists need to incorporate virtual occupations and the use of personal smart devices within current practice. This requires keeping abreast of mainstream technology advances as well as providing clients with opportunities and support within the virtual context.
American Occupational Therapy Association (2013) Apps for occupational therapy: Find apps for your practice area. Available at: www.aota.org/apps (accessed 8 July 2014).
2.
Anthony L, Kim Y and Findlater L (2013) Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 27 April–2 May, pp. 1223–1232, Paris: ACM. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2466158 (accessed 1 November 2014).
3.
AOTA (2014) (2014) Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process, 3rd edition. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy68: S1–S48.
BurwashSCCookB (2014) Connected and mobile: Social media tools and apps for occupational therapy and mental health appplications. OT Practice19(5): CE1–CE8.
6.
CookAMPolgarJM (2012) Essentials of Assistive Technologies, St. Louis, MO: Elsevier/Mosby.
7.
FagerSKBurnfieldJM (2013) Patients’ experiences with technology during inpatient rehabilitation: Opportunities to support independence and therapeutic engagement. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology9(2): 121–127.
8.
FisherAG (2009) Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model, Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press Inc.
9.
FolanABarclayLCooperC (2015) Exploring the experience of clients with tetraplegia utilizing assistive technology for computer access. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology10(1): 46–52.
10.
KirshblumSCBurnsSPBiering-SorensenF (2011) International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine34(6): 535–546.
11.
Larsson LundMLövgren-EngströmALLexellJ (2011) Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: Experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology6(5): 402–411.
ParkLGHowie-EsquivelJDracupK (2014) A quantitative systematic review of the efficacy of mobile phone interventions to improve medication adherence. Journal of Advanced Nursing70(9): 1932–1953.
14.
RakoskiDRFergusonRC (2013) The virtual context of occupation: Integrating everyday technology into everyday practice. OT Practice18(9): CE1–CE8.
15.
SchererMJ (2005) Living in the State of Stuck: How Assistive Technology Impacts the Lives of People with Disabilities, 4th ed. Brookline, Massachusetts: Brookline Books.
Trewin S, Swart C and Pettick D (2013) Physical accessibility of touchscreen smartphones. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 21–23 October, Bellevue, Washington.
18.
VerdonckMRyanS (2008) Mainstream technology as an occupational therapy tool: Technophobe or technogeek?British Journal of Occupational Therapy71(6): 253–256.
19.
VerdonckMMcCormackCChardG (2011) Irish occupational therapists’ views of electronic assistive technology. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy74(4): 185–190.
20.
VerdonckMStegglesENolanM (2014) Experiences of using an environmental control system (ECS) for persons with high cervical spinal cord injury: The interplay between hassle and engagement. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology9(1): 70–78.
