Meaningful time use provides an indicator of quality of life and is a key area of interest to occupational therapists. Spinal cord injury is a prevalent and catastrophic acquired neurological impairment, which occurs most commonly in early adulthood. Spinal cord injury has been found to have little impact on life expectancy, but has a profound influence on productivity and participation. Understanding how people with spinal cord injury use their time is imperative if rehabilitation and quality of life outcomes are to be influenced.
Method:
A systematic review was completed and relevant studies located. These studies were then rated to discern their level of evidence.
Results:
A total of four published articles, from two studies, were found that fitted the inclusion criteria. All published studies were cross-sectional surveys. The level of evidence provided in these studies is relatively low.
Conclusion:
There has been limited research completed in the area of time use following spinal cord injury. There is a need for high quality evidence to inform occupational therapists about how people with spinal cord injury spend their time and how satisfied they are with the occupations in which they engage.
Access Economics Pty Limited (2009) The economic cost of spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury in Australia. Melbourne: The Victorian Neurotrauma Initiative.
2.
AthanasouJABrownDJMurphyGC (1996) Vocational achievements following spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 18(4), 191–96.
BarkerRNKendallMDAmstersDIPerhouseKJHainesTP (2009) The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 47(2), 149–55.
5.
BrownGTBurnsSA (2001) The efficacy of neurodevelopmental treatment in paediatrics: A systematic review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(5), 235–44.
6.
CsikszentmihalyiMLarsonR (1987) Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–36.
7.
CrippsRA (2008) Spinal cord injury, Australia, 2006–07. Injury research and statistics series number 48. Adelaide: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
8.
FarnworthL (2003) Time use, tempo and temporality: Occupational therapy's core business or someone else's business?Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 50(3), 116–26.
9.
FarnworthLMostertEHarrisonSWorrellD (1996) The experience sampling method: Its potential use in occupational therapy research. Occupational Therapy International, 3(1), 1–17.
10.
FrankelHLCollJRCharlifueSWWhiteneckGGGardnerBPJanousMAKrishnanKRNuseibehISavicGSettP (1998) Long-term survival in spinal cord injury: A fifty year investigation. Spinal Cord, 36(4), 266–74.
11.
GallATurner-StokesL (2008) Chronic spinal cord injury: Management of patients in acute hospital settings. Clinical Medicine, 8(1), 70–74.
12.
HarrisonP (2006) Spinal cord injury services: The development of a modern care pathway. British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 2(2), 81–86.
13.
HarveyASPentlandW (2010) What do people do? In: ChristiansenCHTownsendEA, eds. Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prenhall.
14.
KatzPMorrisA (2007) Time use patterns among women with rheumatoid arthritis: Association with functional limitations and psychological status. Rheumatology, 46(3), 490–95.
15.
KielhofnerGForsythKClayCEkbladhEHaglundLHemmingssonHKeponenROlsonL (2008) Talking with clients: Assessments that collect information through interviews. In: KielhofnerG. Model of Human Occupation: Theory and Application. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
16.
LawMStewartDPollockNLettesLBoschJWestmorlandM (1998) Critical review form — qualitative studies. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University.
17.
LawMPolatajkoHBaptisteSTownsendE (2002) Core concepts of occupational therapy. In: TownsendEStantonSLawMPolatajkoHBaptisteSThompson-FransonTKramerCSwedloveFBritnellSCampanileL, eds. Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Revised edition. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
18.
McKennaKLiddleJBrownALeeKGustafssonL (2009) Comparison of time use, role participation and life satisfaction of older people after stroke with a sample without stroke. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56(3), 177–88.
19.
MiglioriniCTongeBTaleporosG (2008) Spinal cord injury and mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42(4), 309–14.
20.
MolineuxM (2010) Occupational science and occupational therapy: Occupation at center stage. In: ChristiansenCHTownsendEA, eds. Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prenhall.
21.
MurphyGCYoungAEBrownDJKingNJ (2003) Explaining labour force status following spinal cord injury: The contribution of psychological variables. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(6), 276–83.
22.
National Health and Medical Research Council (2000) How to review the evidence: Systematic identification and review of the scientific literature.Handbook series on preparing clinical practice guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC.
23.
National Health and Medical Research Council (2007) NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC.
24.
NoreauLFougeyrollasP (2000) Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: The occurrence of handicap situations. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(4), 170–80.
25.
PentlandWEMcCollMA (1999) Application of time use research to the study of life with a disability. In: PentlandWEHarveyASLawtonPowell MMcCollMA, eds. Time use research in social sciences. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
26.
PentlandWEHarveyASWalkerJ (1998) The relationship between time use and health and well-being in men with spinal cord injury. Journal of Occupational Science, 5(1), 14–25.
27.
PentlandWEHarveyASWalkerJ (1999) The impact of spinal cord injury on men's time use. Spinal Cord, 37(11), 786–92.
28.
PhillipsBBallCSackettDBadenochDStrausSHaynesBDawsMHowickUpdated J. (2009) Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine levels of evidence. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025 Accessed 04.01.11.
29.
SchönherrMCGroothoffJWMulderGAEismaWH (2005) Participation and satisfaction after spinal cord injury: Results of a vocational and leisure outcome study. Spinal Cord, 43(4), 241–48.
30.
SchoppLHClarkMJHagglundKJShermanAKStoutBJGrayDBBoningerMJ (2007) Life activities among individuals with spinal cord injury living in the community: Perceived choice and perceived barriers. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52(1), 82–88.
31.
ScollonCNKim-PrietoCDienerE (2003) Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(1), 5–34.
32.
SekhonLHFehlingsMG (2001) Epidemiology, demographics and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine, 26(Suppl. 24), S2–S12.
33.
SmithNRKielhofnerGWattsJH (1986) The relationships between volition, activity pattern, and life satisfaction in the elderly. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40(4), 278–83.
YerxaEJBaumS (1986) Engagement in daily occupations and life satisfaction among people with spinal cord injuries. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 6(5), 271–83.
42.
YerxaEJLockerBaum S (1990) Quality of time use by adults with spinal cord injuries. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(4), 318–26.
43.
YerxaEJClarkFFrankG (1989) An introduction to occupational science: A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1–17.
