Occupational therapists working with children with handwriting issues lack a standard framework for selecting treatment activities. This study investigated the utility of a decision-making guide, the Tool for Optimising Written Productivity (TOW-P). In the study, 14 occupational therapists used the TOW-P to guide the selection of interventions for 60 children with handwriting issues. The therapists completed two questionnaires about the usefulness of the tool. Feedback was used to modify the structure and format of the tool. The results indicated that the TOW-P provides a clinically useful framework to assist therapists in the selection of appropriate intervention strategies for children with written productivity issues.
AmundsonSWeilM (1992) Handwriting evaluation and intervention in the school setting. In: Case-SmithJPehoskiC, eds. Development of hand skills in the child. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association, 63–78.
2.
AustinCHerbertSI (1995) Clinical guidelines: should we be worried?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58 (11), 481–84.
3.
BenbowM (1995) Principles and practice of teaching handwriting. In: HendersonAPehoskiC, eds. Hand function in the child: foundations for remediation. St Louis, MI: Mosby, 255–81.
4.
BonneyM (1992) Understanding and assessing handwriting difficulty: perspectives from the literature. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 39 (3), 7–15.
5.
ChuS (1997) Occupational therapy for children with handwriting difficulties: a framework for evaluation and treatment. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60 (12), 514–20.
6.
CornhillHCase-SmithJ (1996) Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50 (9), 732–39.
7.
DalyCJKelleyGTKraussA (2003) Relationship between visual-motor integration and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten: a modified replication study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57 (4), 459–62.
8.
FederKPMajnemerA (2007) Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49 (4), 312–17.
9.
FederKMajnemerASynnesA (2000) Handwriting: current trends in occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67 (3), 197–204.
10.
GoyenTADuffS (2005) Discriminant validity of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration in relation to children with handwriting dysfunction. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52 (2), 109–15.
11.
GrahamS (1992) Issues in handwriting instruction. Focus on Exceptional Children, 25 (1), 1–14.
12.
GrahamSWeintraubN (1996) A review of handwriting research: progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8 (1), 7–87.
13.
HammerschmidtSLSudsawadP (2004) Teachers' survey on problems with handwriting: referral, evaluation, and outcomes. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58 (2), 185–92.
14.
Handley-MoreDDeitzJBillingsleyFFCogginsTE (2003) Facilitating written work using computer word processing and word prediction. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57 (2), 139–51.
15.
HiggsJJonesM (2000) Clinical reasoning in health professions. 2rd ed.New York: Butterworth Heinemann.
16.
KoziatekSMPowellNJ (2003) Pencil grips, legibility, and speed of fourth-graders' writing in cursive. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57 (3), 284–88.
17.
LawM (1987) Measurement in occupational therapy: scientific criteria for evaluation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54 (3), 133–38.
18.
LawMLettsL (1989) A critical review of scales of activities of daily living. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43 (8), 522–28.
19.
LawMCooperBStrongSStewartDRigbyPLettsL (1996) The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (1), 9–23.
20.
MarrDCermakS (2003) Consistency of handwriting in early elementary students. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57 (2), 161–67.
21.
OehlerEDeKreyHEadryEFogoJLewisEMaherCShillingA (2000) The effect of pencil size and shape on the pre-writing skills of kindergartners. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 19 (3/4), 53–60.
22.
PremingerFWeissPLWeintraubN (2004) Predicting occupational performance: handwriting versus keyboarding. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58 (2), 193–201.
23.
ReismanJE (1991) Poor handwriting: who is referred?American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45 (9), 849–52.
24.
RigbyPSchwellnusH (1999) Occupational therapy decision making guidelines for problems in written productivity. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 19 (1), 5–27.
25.
RogersJCase-SmithJ (2002) Relationships between handwriting and keyboarding performance of sixth-grade students. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56 (1), 34–39.
26.
RubinNHendersonA (1982) Two sides of the same coin: variations in teaching methods and failure to learn to write. Special Education Forward Trends, 9 (4), 17–24.
27.
SchwellnusHLockhartJ (2002) The development of the Tool for Optimizing Written Productivity (TOW-P). Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 22 (3/4), 5–22.
28.
SlaterDYCohnES (1991) Staff development through analysis of practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45 (11), 1038–44.
StrongJGilbertJCassidySBennettS (1995) Expert clinicians' and students' views on clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58 (3), 119–23.
31.
SudsawadPTromblyCAHendersonATickle-DegnenL (2002) Testing the effect of kinesthetic training on handwriting performance in first-grade students. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56 (1), 26–33.
32.
TsengMHCermakSA (1993) The influence of ergonomic factors and perceptual-motor abilities on handwriting performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47 (10), 919–26.
33.
TsengMHChowSM (2000) Perceptual-motor function of school-age children with slow handwriting speed. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54 (1), 83–88.
34.
TsengMHHsuehI (1997) Performance of school-aged children on a Chinese handwriting speed test. Occupational Therapy International, 4 (4), 294–303.
35.
WoodwardSSwinthY (2002) Multisensory approach to handwriting remediation: perceptions of school-based occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56 (3), 305–12.
