Focus groups are increasingly used by health professionals for obtaining research data and for gathering opinions about the perceived qualities of a service. The advantages of this method are that it is easily understood, reflects cultural differences and has a high face validity by providing convincing findings. Focus groups are especially useful for exploring the attitudes and experiences associated with a particular topic.
Although occupational therapists may be using focus groups, only a very few studies have been reported. This paper provides background information on focus groups which will assist in weighing this method against a number of other group techniques. Personal experience and a wide range of published material contribute to guidelines for preparing for and conducting focus groups. Practical suggestions and approaches are offered to help occupational therapists to increase the credibility and dependability of their results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BassettJLloydCBassettH (2001) Work issues for young people with psychosis: barriers to employment. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64 (2), 66–72.
2.
BeckettK (1985) Focus groups: a market research tool. Credit Union Executive, 25 (1), 8–12, 15.
3.
CalnanSSixmaHJCalnanMWGroenewegenPP (2000) Quality of local authority occupational therapy services: developing an instrument to measure the user's perspective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (4), 155–62.
4.
CareyMA (1995) Comment: Concerns in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Health Research, 5 (4), 487–95.
5.
CareyMASmithMW (1994) Capturing the group effect in focus groups: a special concern in analysis. Qualitative Health Research4 (1), 123–27.
6.
ChiarelliPCockburnJ (1999) The development of a physiotherapy continence promotion programme using a consumer focus. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 45 (2), 111–19.
7.
CogganCPattersonPFillJ (1997) Suicide: qualitative data from focus group interviews with youth. Social Science and Medicine, 45 (10), 1563–70.
8.
CurtinMJaramazovicE (2001) Occupational therapists' views of evidence-based practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64 (5), 214–22.
9.
DACUM (1983) DACUM booklets. British Columbia, Canada: Ministry of Education.
10.
DelbecqAHVan de VenHGustafsonH, eds (1986) Group techniques for programme planning — a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Middleton, WI: Green Briar.
11.
FernEF (1982) The use of focus groups for idea generation: the effects of group size, acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quality and quantity. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 1–13.
12.
HollisV (1993) Core skills and competencies, part 4: application and expectation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56 (5), 181–84.
13.
HollisVMadillHDarrahJRivardA (2001a) Therapists' voices. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists' Conference, Calgary, Alberta: Book of Abstracts. Abstract T25. Toronto: CAOT.
14.
HollisVMadillHDarrahJRivardA (2001b) The impact of community initiatives on services provided by occupational and physical therapists. 21st Australian Conference of Occupational Therapists, Brisbane: Book of Abstracts. Abstract 899. Brisbane: AAOT.
15.
JonesJHunterD (1995) Consensus methods for medical and health service research. British Medical Journal, 311 (29), 376–80.
16.
KingE (1996) The use of self in qualitative research. In: RichardsonJ, ed. Handbook of qualitative research methods. Leicester: British Psychological Society, 175–88.
17.
KitzingerJ (1990) Audience understanding AIDS: a discussion of methods. Sociology of Health and Illness12, 319–35.
18.
KitzingerJ (1995) Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311 (29), 299–302.
19.
KruegerRA (1994) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
KruegerRA (1995) The future of focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 5 (4), 524–30.
21.
KruegerRA (1997a) Analysing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Laliberte-RudmanDYuBScottEPajouhandehP (2000) Exploration of the perspectives of persons with schizophrenia regarding quality of life. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54 (2), 137–47.
24.
LinstoneHATurnoffM (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and application. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25.
MaysNPopeC (1995) Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311 (29), 109–12.
26.
MertonRKFiskeMKendallPL (1956) The focused interview. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
27.
MorganDL (1988) Focus groups as qualitative research. Qualitative Research Methods Series No. 16. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
MorganDL (1995) Why things (sometimes) go wrong in focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 5 (4), 516–23.
29.
MorganDL (1997) The focus group guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
MorseJM (1994) Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
PhiloG (1990) Seeing and believing. London: Routledge.
34.
PowellRASingleH (1996) Focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 8 (5), 499–505.
35.
RaynesN (2000) Quality care: the inside story. Elderly Care, 11 (10), 8–10.
36.
SaulnierCF (2000) Groups as data collection method and data analysis technique. Small Group Research, 31 (5), 607–21.
37.
SchroderHM (1989) Managerial competence, the key to excellence. Iowa: Kendall Hunt, 61–117.
38.
SchwartzMLandisSERoweJEJanesCLPullmanN (2000) Using focus groups to assess primary care patient satisfaction. Evaluation and the Health Professions, March, 58–71.
39.
SCOTVEC, Scottish Vocational Education Council (1988) Credit where credit's due. The report of the Accreditation of Work-Based Learning Project. Edinburgh: Manpower Services Commission and the Scottish Education Department.
40.
SeckerJWimbushEWatsonJMilburnK (1995) Qualitative methods in health promotion research: some criteria for quality. Health Education Journal, 55, 74–87.
41.
SimJSnellJ (1996) Focus groups in physiotherapy evaluation and research. Physiotherapy82 (3), 189–98.
42.
SmithJM (1972) Group discussions in interviewing in advertising and marketing. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
43.
StewardB (2001) Using nominal group technique to explore competence in occupational therapy and physiotherapy students during first-year placements. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64 (6), 289–304.
44.
StewartDWShamdasaniPN (1990) Focus groups: theory and practice. London: Sage.
45.
SumsionT (1998) The Delphi technique: an adaptive research tool. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61 (4), 153–56.
46.
WhiteGEThomsonAN (1995) Anonymised focus groups as a research tool for health professionals. Qualitative Health Research, 5 (2), 256–61.
47.
VaughnSSchummJSSinagubJ (1996) Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
YallopS (2000) Identity issues for people living with HIV/AIDS: humans with potential or sexual victims?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (9), 419–24.
