This article is concerned with role identity and its relationship to the professional thinking and action of occupational therapists. In this informed viewpoint, the notion that occupational therapists could be perceived as gap fillers is explored, based on empirical data that focused on the roles adopted and the guiding philosophies enacted by occupational therapists working in child and adolescent mental health.
Following the presentation of interview data from four occupational therapists, two cogent issues are presented and discussed. The first issue posits that a failure to ground practice in occupational philosophies contributes to perpetuating an incoherent role identity. The second issue discusses whether the recovery of an occupational paradigm in practice can liberate occupational therapists from role incoherence and enable them to reclaim their identity as therapists of occupation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarrisR (1984) Towards an image of one's own: Sources of variation in the role of occupational therapists in psychosocial practice. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 4(1), 3–23.
2.
BarrisRKielhofnerGWattsJ (1988a) Occupational therapy in psychosocial practice. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
3.
BarrisRKielhofnerGWattsJ (1988b) Bodies of knowledge in psychosocial practice. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
4.
ClarkFLarsonE (1993) Developing an academic discipline: The science of occupation. In: HopkinsHSmithH eds. Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy. 8th ed.Philadelphia: JB Lippincott.
5.
CreekJ (1999) Communicating the nature and purpose of occupational therapy. In: CreekJ, ed. Occupational therapy: New perspectives. London: Whurr.
FeaverSCreekJ (1993) Models of practice: What use are they?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(1) 2–6.
8.
GooderJ (1997) Who defines our practice? Why does it matter?New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 29–32.
9.
HeardC (1977) Occupational role acquisition: A perspective on the chronically disabled. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 243–47.
10.
JoyceL (1993) Occupational therapy: A cause without a rebel. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(12), 447.
11.
KielhofnerG (1977) Temporal adaptation: A conceptual framework for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 235–42.
12.
KielhofnerG (1997) Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
13.
KielhofnerGBurkeJ (1980) A model of human occupation, part one: Conceptual framework and content. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 572–81.
14.
KreftingL (1991) Rigour in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 214–22.
15.
MatsutsuyuJ (1971) Occupational behaviour: A perspective on work and play. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 291–94.
16.
MeyerA (1922) The philosophy of occupational therapy. Archives of Occupational Therapy, 1–10. (1977) Reprinted American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 639–42.
17.
O'SheaB (1977) Muriel Driver Memorial Lecture. Pawn or protagonist? Interactional perspective of professional identity. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 101–108.
18.
PolatajkoH (1994) Dreams, dilemmas and decisions for occupational therapy practice in a new millennium: A Canadian perspective. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 590–94.
19.
ReillyM (1962) Occupational therapy can be one of the great ideas of 20th century medicine. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16, 1–9.
20.
ReillyM (1966) A psychiatric occupational therapy programme as a teaching model. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20, 60–67.
21.
RogersJ (1982) The spirit of independence: The evolution of a philosophy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 709–15.
22.
StraussACorbinJ (1990) Basics of qualitative research. London: Sage.
23.
YerxaE (1967) Authentic occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21, 1–9.
24.
YerxaE (1983) Audacious values: The energy source of occupational therapy practice. In: KielhofnerG, ed. Health through occupation: Theory and practice in occupational therapy. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
25.
YerxaE (1994) Dreams, dilemmas, and decisions for occupational therapy practice in a new millennium: An American perspective. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 586–89.
26.
YerxaEClarkFFrankGJacksonJParhamDPierceDSteinCZemkeR (1989) An introduction to occupational science: A foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6, 1–17.
