Tomb and temple robberies were an endemic concern throughout ancient Egyptian history. With the exception of the thefts recorded in the so-called Great Tomb Robbery Papyri of the 20th Dynasty, we have almost no direct information on those who committed them. These texts provide important details on the sociology of robbers that, thus far, has not been fully explored. For this article, a database containing the almost 400 individuals involved in temple and tomb robberies was created. This article is the first half of this study and addresses the questions of who the robbers were, what they robbed, and why.
AmerA. M. A.1996. Some observations on the statue-cults of Ramesses II, JSSEA26: 1–7.
2.
AntoineJ.-C.2014. Social position and the organisation of landholding in Ramesside Egypt: An analysis of the Wilbour Papyrus, SAK43: 17–46.
3.
AntoineJ.-C.2019. Ramsès XI, le premier prophète d’Amon et l’ascension de Piankh à Thèbes pendant l’Aire de la Renaissance, JEH12: 18–22.
4.
AntoineJ.-C.2023. What can we learn from the turnover of workmen at Deir el-Medina? In: DaviesB. G. (ed), Dispatches from Deir el-Medina. Wallasey: 1–39.
5.
AntoineJ.-C.2024. Papyrus PM 49.11.1, dating the Great Tomb Robberies, and the chronology of the late 20th Dynasty, ZÄS151.
6.
AldredC.1979. More light on the Ramesside tomb robberies. In: RuffleJ.GaballaG. A.Kitchen.K. A. (eds), Glimpses of Ancient Egypt/Orbis Aegyptiorum speculum: Studies in Honour of H. W. Fairman. Warminster: 92–99.
7.
AstonD. A.2020. ‘It was found that the thieves had violated them all’: Grave disturbance in late New Kingdom Thebes. In: AspöckE.KlevnäsA.Müller-ScheeßelN. (eds), Grave Disturbances: The Archaeology of Post-Depositional Interactions with the Dead. Oxford: 225–244.
8.
BottiG.PeetT. E.1928. Il giornale della necropoli di Tebe. Turin.
9.
CapartJ.GardinerA. H.WalleB. van de1936. New light on the Ramesside tomb-robberies, JEA22: 16–93.
10.
CarterH.GardinerA. H.1917. The tomb of Ramesses IV and the Turin plan of a royal tomb, JEA4: 130–158.
11.
CauvilleS.1990. Le temple de Dendara : Guide archéologique. BG 12. Cairo.
12.
CauvilleS.1997. Le temple de Dendara X : Les chapelles osiriennes. BE 117. Cairo.
13.
ČernýJ.1973. A Community of Workmen at Thebes in the Ramesside P. BE 50. Cairo.
14.
CollierM.DodsonA.HamernikG.2010. P. BM EA 10052, Anthony Harris, and Queen Tyti, JEA96: 242–247.
15.
CooneyK. M.2007. The Cost of Death: The Social and Economic Value of Ancient Egyptian Funerary Art in the Ramesside Period. EU 22. Leiden.
16.
CooneyK. M.2017. Coffin reuse: Ritual materialism in the context of scarcity. In: AmentaA.GuichardH. (eds), Proceedings of the First Vatican Coffin Conference. Vatican City: 19–22.
17.
CooneyK. M.2018. The end of the New Kingdom in Egypt: How ancient Egyptian funerary materials can help us understand society in crisis. In: KubischS.RummelU. (eds), The Ramesside Period in Egypt: Studies into Cultural and Historical Processes of the 19th and 20th Dynasties. SDAIK 41. Berlin: 63–87.
18.
DaumasF.1980. Quelques textes de l’atelier des orfèvres dans le temple de Dendara. In: VercoutterJ. (ed), Livre du centenaire : 1880–1980. Cairo: 109–118.
19.
DaviesB. G.2017. Variations in the size of the Deir el-Medina workforce. In: Di Biase-DysonC.DonovanL. (eds), The Cultural Manifestations of Religious Experience: Studies in Honour of Boyo G. Ockinga. ÄAT 85. Münster: 205–212.
20.
DaviesB. G.2017/18. The ignominy of Deir el-Medina and the cleansing of the necropolis workforce: A re-examination of the events of year 17 of Ramesses IX, JSSEA44: 159–181.
21.
DemaréeR. J.2010. Ramesside administrative papyri in the Civiche Raccolte Archeologiche e Numismatiche di Milano, JVEG42: 55–77.
22.
Desroches NoblecourtC.MoukhtarG.AdamC.1976. Le Ramesseum, X : Les annexes nord-ouest. Collection Scientifique du CEDAE. Cairo: 196–223.
23.
DodsonA.2019. Afterglow of Empire: Egypt from the Fall of the New Kingdom to the Saite Renaissance. New York.
24.
El-SaadyH.1998. Considerations on bribery in ancient Egypt, SAK25: 295–304.
25.
GardinerA. H.1941–1952. The Wilbour Papyrus. 4 vols. London.
26.
GasseA.2001. Panakhtemipet et ses complices (à propos du Papyrus BM EA 10054, Ro 2, 1–5), JEA87: 81–92.
27.
GardinerA. H.1947. Ancient Egyptian Onomastica, vol. 1. Oxford.
28.
GoeletO.1996. A new “robbery” papyrus: Rochester MAG 51.346.1, JEA82: 107–127.
29.
GoeletO.2016. Tomb robberies in the Valley of the Kings. In: WilkinsonR. H.WeeksK. R. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Valley of the Kings. Oxford: 448–466.
30.
GrandetP.2018. The “chapter on hierarchy” in Amenope’s onomasticon (# 67–125). In: KubischS.RummelU. (eds), The Ramesside Period in Egypt: Studies into Cultural and Historical Processes of the 19th and 20th Dynasties. SDAIK 41. Berlin: 127–137.
31.
HesseM. L.2008. Understanding gang theories: Social process theories, part one, Journal of Gang Research15(4): 1–14.
32.
HölscherU.1941. The Excavation of Medinet Habu, Volume III: The Mortuary Temple of Ramses III, Part I. OIP 54. Chicago.
33.
HornungE.2006. The New Kingdom. In: HornungE.KraussR.WarburtonD. A. (eds), Ancient Egyptian Chronology. Handbook of Oriental Studies 83. Leiden, Boston: 214–217.
34.
JanssenJ. J.1975. Commodity Prices from the Ramessid Period: An Economic Study of the Village of Necropolis Workmen at Thebes. Leiden.
35.
JanssenJ. J.1992. A New Kingdom settlement: The verso of Pap. BM. 10068, AoF19(1): 8–23.
36.
JanssenJ. J.1997. Village Varia: Ten studies on the History and Administration of Deir el-Medina. EU 11. Leiden.
37.
Jansen-WinkelnK.1995. Die Plünderung der Königsgräber des Neuen Reiches, ZÄS122: 62–78.
38.
KrutchenJ.-M.1985. Un instrument politique original : la belle fête de pH-nTr des rois-prêtres de la XXIe dynastie, BSFE103: 15–18.
LichtheimM.2006. Ancient Egyptian Literature: A Book of Readings, I: The Old and Middle Kingdom. London.
41.
LullJ.2004. El problema de la supresión del primer sacerdote de Amón Jmnw-Htp: documentación y consideraciones cronológicas, AulOr22: 211–228.
42.
MontetP.1951. La Nécropole Royale de Tanis : Les constructions et le tombeau de Psusennes à Tanis. Paris.
43.
McDowellA. G.1990. Jurisdiction in the Workmen’s Community of Deir el-Medîna. EU 5. Leiden.
44.
MurnaneW. J.1980. United with Eternity: A Concise Guide to the Monuments of Medinet Habu. Chicago.
45.
NäserC.2013. Equipping and stripping the dead: A case-study on the procurement, compilation, arrangement, and fragmentation of grave inventories in New Kingdom Thebes. In: StutzL. N.TarlowS. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial. Oxford: 643–661.
46.
PetrieA.SabinC.2000. Medical Statistics at a Glance. London.
47.
PeetT. E.1920. The Mayer Papyri A & B. London.
48.
PeetT. E.1930. The Great Tomb-Robberies of the Twentieth Egyptian Dynasty: Being a Critical Study, With Translations and Commentaries, of the Papyri in Which These are Recorded, I. Oxford.
49.
PhillipsJ.1992. Tomb-robbers and their booty in ancient Egypt. In: OrelS. E. (ed.), Death and Taxes in the Ancient Near East. New York: 157–192.
50.
QuackJ. F.2000. Eine Revision im Tempel von Karnak (Neuanalyse von Papyrus Rochester MAG 51.346.1), ZÄS28: 219–232.
51.
QuibellJ. E.1908. Tomb of Yuaa and Thuiu: Nos 51001–51191. Cairo.
52.
RaynerB.2000. Tomb Robbery in the Late New Kingdom: The Social and Political Implications. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham.
53.
ReevesN. C.1990. Valley of the Kings: The Decline of a Royal Necropolis. London.
54.
ReevesN. C.1990b. The Complete Tutankhamun: The King - the Tomb - the Royal Treasure. London.
55.
ReevesN.WilkinsonR. H.1996. The Complete Valley of the Kings: Tombs and Treasures of Egypt’s Greatest Pharaohs. London.
56.
RizzoJ.2015. À propos de sanx, « faire vivre », et de ses dérivés, Cahiers de l’ENIM8: 73–101.
57.
StrudwickN.2020. Observations on the sources of the coffins reused in the 21st Dynasty. In: SousaR.AmentaA.CooneyK. M. (eds), Bab el-Gasus in Context: Rediscovering the Tomb of the Priests of Amun. Lisbon: 91–107.
58.
StrudwickN.2021. ‘And many men of the land rob them as well, and are (our) companions’: The Deir el-Medina gang and the involvement of wider society in late New Kingdom tomb robbery. In: GeisenC.LiJ.ShubertS.YamamotoK. (eds), His Good Name: Essays on Identity and Self-Presentation in Ancient Egypt in Honor of Ronald J. Leprohon. Atlanta: 103–122.
59.
TaylorJ. H.1992. Aspects of the history of the Valley of the Kings in the Third Intermediate Period. In: ReevesN. C. (ed.), After Tut’ankhamūn: Research and Excavation in the Royal Necropolis at Thebes. London: 186–206.
60.
ThijsA.1998. Reconsidering the end of the Twentieth Dynasty, part I: The fisherman Pnekhtemope and the date of BM 10054, GM167: 95–108.
61.
ThijsA.1999. Reconsidering the end of the Twentieth Dynasty, part III: Some hitherto unrecognised documents from the wHm mswt, GM173: 175–191.
62.
ThijsA.2000. Reconsidering the end of the Twentieth Dynasty, part V: P. Ambras as an advocate of a shorter chronology, GM179: 69–82.
63.
ThijsA.2018. Some observations on the Tomb-Robbery Papyri. In: BlöbaumA. I.Eaton- KraussM.WüthrichA. (eds), Pérégrinations avec Erhart Graefe, Festschrift zu seinem 75. Geburtstag. ÄAT 87. Münster: 519–536.
64.
ThomasE.1976. Cairo ostracon J. 72460. In: JohnsonJ.WenteE. F. (eds), Studies in Honor of George R. Hughes: January 12, 1977. SAOC 39. Chicago: 209–216.
65.
TrauneckerC.1989. Château de l’Or de Thoutmosis III et les magasins nord du temple d’Amon, CRIPEL11: 89–111.
66.
ValbelleD.1985. « Les ouvriers de la tombe » : Deir el-Médineh à l’époque ramesside. BdE 96. Cairo.
67.
VernusP.1993. Affaires et scandales sous les Ramsès : la crise des valeurs dans l’Égypte du Nouvel Empire. Paris.
68.
von LievenA.2007. Im Schatten des Goldhauses. Berufsgeheimnis und Handwerkerinitiation im alten Ägypten, SAK36: 147–155.
69.
WainwrightG. A.1938. Thoughts on three recent articles, JEA24: 59.
70.
WilkinsonH.2000. The Complete Temples of Ancient Egypt. London.
71.
WinandJ.2011. À propos du P. Ambras, CdE86: 32–40.
72.
WinandJ.2018. Words of thieves. In: CromwellJ.GrossmanE. (eds), Scribal Repertoires in Egypt from the New Kingdom to the Early Islamic Period. Oxford: 127–152.
