Finding and maintaining employment is difficult for ex-offenders due to their criminal history but often required for community supervision. How ex-offenders discuss criminal history can influence their employment chances. Research has not yet explored moderating effects of race and ethnicity on ex-offender impression management when seeking employment. This study investigates how impression management strategies affect ex-offender hiring and whether race or ethnicity moderates such effects. College students (N = 198) were randomly assigned to vignettes describing an ex-offender job applicant which varied in impression management and race and ethnicity. Participants rated applicants on factors related to hiring decisions. Results indicate ex-offenders who apologized when discussing criminal history received stronger hiring recommendations. Race and ethnicity of the participant or ex-offender did not moderate the effect of impression management on hiring. Overall, ex-offenders benefitted equally from an apologetic strategy when discussing their criminal history regardless of their or the hiring manager’s race or ethnicity.
AliA. A.LyonsB. J.RyanA. M. (2017). Managing a perilous stigma: Ex-offenders’ use of reparative impression management tactics in hiring contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(9), 1271–1285. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000226
3.
AlperM.DuroseM.MarkmanJ. (2018). 2018 update on prisoner recidivism: A 9-year follow-up period (2005–2014) (p. 1–24). US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
4.
AndrewsD. A. (with Bonta, J.). (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Lexis Nexis/Anderson Pub.
5.
ApelR.HorneyJ. (2017). How and why does work matter? Employment conditions, routine activities, and crime among adult male offenders. Criminology, 55(2), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12134
AyoubL. H. (2020). The impact of reentry court on recidivism: A randomized controlled trial in Harlem, New York. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09420-3
8.
BollingerC. R.YelowitzA. (2021). Targeting intensive job assistance to ex-offenders by the nature of offense: Results from a randomized control trial. Economic Inquiry, 59(3), 1308–1327. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12984
9.
BontaJ.Wallace-CaprettaS.RooneyJ. (2000). A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation supervision program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(3), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854800027003003
10.
Brooks HollidayS.HeilbrunK.FretzR. (2012). Examining improvements in criminogenic needs: The risk reduction potential of a structured re-entry program. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2016
11.
BrownS. L.St AmandM. D.ZambleE. (2009). The dynamic prediction of criminal recidivism: A three-wave prospective study. Law and Human Behavior, 33(1), 25–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9139-7
CarsonE. A.SandlerD.BhaskarR.FernandezL.PorterS. (2021). Employment of persons released from federal prison in 2010 (pp. 1–34). US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
15.
CaudyM. S.DursoJ. M.TaxmanF. S. (2013). How well do dynamic needs predict recidivism? Implications for risk assessment and risk reduction. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.08.004
16.
CerdaJ. A.StenstromD. M.CurtisM. (2015). The role of type of offense and work qualifications on perceived employability of former offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(2), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9244-8
17.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Revised ed.). Academic Press.
D’AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL.FlexonJ. L. (2015). The effect of Hawaii’s ban the box law on repeat offending. American Journal of Criminal Justice : AJCJ, 40(2), 336–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9251-9
20.
DeckerS. H.OrtizN.SpohnC.HedbergE. (2015). Criminal stigma, race, and ethnicity: The consequences of imprisonment for employment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.02.002
21.
Degiorgio WorthyL. (2017). Self-reported inmate conduct: Using static and dynamic factors to predict inmate recidivism. The Prison Journal, 97(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885516679390
22.
DenverM.DeWittS. E. (2023). “[It’s] what you do after the mistake that counts”: Positive employment credentials, criminal record stigma, and potential pathways of mediation. Criminology, 61(1), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12319
23.
DeWittS. E.DenverM. (2020). Criminal records, positive employment credentials, and race. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 57(3), 333–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427819886111
24.
DoleacJ. L.HansenB. (2020). The unintended consequences of “ban the box”: Statistical discrimination and employment outcomes when criminal histories are hidden. Journal of Labor Economics, 38(2), 321–374. https://doi.org/10.1086/705880
DuweG. (2015). An outcome evaluation of a prison work release program: Estimating its effects on recidivism, employment, and cost avoidance. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(6), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403414524590
27.
DyckH. L.CampbellM. A.WershlerJ. L. (2018). Real-world use of the risk-need-responsivity model and the level of service/case management inventory with community-supervised offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 42(3), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000279
28.
FarabeeD.ZhangS. X.WrightB. (2014). An experimental evaluation of a nationally recognized employment-focused offender reentry program. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9201-z
29.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
30.
FlakeD. F. (2019). Do ban-the-box laws really work?Iowa Law Review, 104(3), 1079–1127.
31.
GaddisS. M. (2017a). How Black are Lakisha and Jamal? Racial perceptions from names used in correspondence audit studies. Sociological Science, 4, 469–489. https://doi.org/10.15195/v4.a19
32.
GaddisS. M. (2017b). Racial/ethnic perceptions from Hispanic names: Selecting names to test for discrimination. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 3, 1–11.
33.
GardnerD. M.AliA. A.RyanA. M. (2023). Reparative impression management for ex-offender applicants: Understanding mechanisms, race/ethnicity, and disclosure timing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(3), 561–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09880-0
34.
GellerA.CooperC. E.GarfinkelI.Schwartz-SoicherO.MincyR. B. (2012). Beyond absenteeism: Father incarceration and child development. Demography, 49(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0081-9
35.
GiulianoL.LevineD. I.LeonardJ. (2009). Manager race and the race of new hires. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(4), 589–631. https://doi.org/10.1086/605946
36.
GordonH. R. D.WeldonB. (2003). The impact of career and technical education programs on adult offenders: Learning behind bars. Journal of Correctional Education, 54(4), 200–209.
37.
HaganJ.FosterH. (2012). Intergenerational educational effects of mass imprisonment in America. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 259–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711431587
38.
HolzerH. J.RaphaelS.StollM. A. (2006). Perceived criminality, criminal background checks, and the racial hiring practices of employers. The Journal of Law and Economics, 49(2), 451–480. https://doi.org/10.1086/501089
39.
HullK. A.ForresterS.BrownJ.JobeD.McCullenC. (2000). Analysis of recidivism rates for participants of the academic/vocational/transition education programs offered by the Virginia Department of Correctional Education. Journal of Correctional Education, 51(2), 256–261.
KeithM. G.McKayA. S. (2024). Too anecdotal to be true? Mechanical Turk is not all bots and bad data: Response to Webb and Tangney (2022). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(6), 900–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916241234328
43.
KirkE. M. (2022). Community consequences of mass incarceration: Sparking neighborhood social problems and violent crime. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2021.1887751
44.
KrylovaK. O.LongacreT. E.PhillipsJ. S. (2018). Applicants with a tarnished past: Stealing thunder and overcoming prior wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(3), 793–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3216-5
45.
LattimoreP. K.BarrickK.CowellA.DawesD.SteffeyD.TuellerS.VisherC. A. (2012). Prisoner reentry services: What worked for SVORI evaluation participants? (pp. 1–560). National Institute of Justice.
46.
LeasureP.KaminskiR. J. (2021). The effectiveness of certificates of relief: A correspondence audit of hiring outcomes. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 18(4), 849–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12297
47.
LindsayS. L. (2022). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t: How formerly incarcerated men navigate the labor market with prison credentials. Criminology, 60(3), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12307
48.
LovinsB.LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J. (2009). Applying the risk principle to sex offenders: Can treatment make some sex offenders worse?The Prison Journal, 89(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885509339509
49.
MakariosM.SteinerB.TravisL. F. (2010). Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(12), 1377–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810382876
50.
MelvinK. B.GramlingL. K.GardnerW. M. (1985). A scale to measure attitudes toward prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12(2), 241–254.
51.
MeredithT.SpeirJ. C.JohnsonS. (2007). Developing and implementing automated risk assessments in parole. Justice Research and Policy, 9(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.9.1.2007.1
52.
MestersG.GeestV.BijleveldC. (2016). Crime, employment and social welfare: An individual-level study on disadvantaged males. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9258-5
53.
MobasseriS. (2019). Race, place, and crime: How violent crime events affect employment discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 125(1), 63–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/703883
54.
NallyJ. M.LockwoodS.HoT.KnutsonK. (2014). Post-release recidivism and employment among different types of released offenders: A 5-year follow-up study in the United States. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 9(1), 16–34.
55.
ReichS. E. (2017). An exception to the rule: Belief in redeemability, desistance signals, and the employer’s decision to hire a job applicant with a criminal record. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(2), 110–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2016.1268235
56.
SerinR. C.LloydC. D.HelmusL.DerkzenD. M.LuongD. (2013). Does intra-individual change predict offender recidivism? Searching for the Holy Grail in assessing offender change. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.09.002
57.
StewartL.GaboraN.KroppP.LeeZ. (2014). Effectiveness of risk-needs-responsivity-based family violence programs with male offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 29(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9575-0
SwansonS. J.Langfitt-ReeseS.BondG. R. (2012). Employer attitudes about criminal histories. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 35(5), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094498
60.
TripodiS. J.KimJ. S.BenderK. (2010). Is employment associated with reduced recidivism?: The complex relationship between employment and crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(5), 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09342980
VanceS. E. (2011). Federal reentry court programs: A summary of recent evaluations. Federal Probation, 75(2), 64–73, 88.
64.
VargheseF. P.HardinE. E.BauerR. L. (2009). Factors influencing the employability of Latinos: The roles of ethnicity, criminal history, and qualifications. Race and Social Problems, 1(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-009-9014-2
65.
VargheseF. P.HardinE. E.BauerR. L.MorganR. D. (2010). Attitudes toward hiring offenders: The roles of criminal history, job qualifications, and race. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(5), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09344960
66.
VisherC. A.LattimoreP. K.BarrickK.TuellerS. (2017). Evaluating the long-term effects of prisoner reentry services on recidivism: What types of services matter?Justice Quarterly, 34(1), 136–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1115539
67.
WebbM. A.TangneyJ. P. (2024). Too good to be true: Bots and bad data from mechanical Turk. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(6), 887–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221120027
68.
WesternB.SiroisC. (2019). Racialized re-entry: Labor market inequality after incarceration. Social Forces, 97(4), 1517–1542.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
