Group climate in residential youth care is considered to be essential for treatment of youth and young adults. Various instruments exist to measure quality of living group climate, but some are lengthy, use complicated wording, which make them difficult to fill out by youth and individuals with a mild intellectual disability. The present study describes the development and rationale for the Group Climate Instrument—Revised (GCI-R). Construct validity and reliability of the GCI-R were examined by means of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in a two-step validation process using a construction sample (n = 190 youth, representing 41 groups) and a validation sample (n = 207 youth, representing 42 groups). Results indicated a good fit of a five-factor model (Support, Growth, Physical Environment, Peer interactions, and Repression). Reliability of the scales was good. These findings indicate that the GCI-R can be used as a parsimonious, valid, and reliable instrument to assess perceptions of group climate in youth. Recommendations for future research and practice are suggested.
BaartA. (2004). Een theorie van de presentie. Boom Lemma uitgevers.
2.
BaoH. W. S. (2023). bruceR: Broadly useful convenient and efficient R functions. R package version 0.8.x.
3.
BiemannT.ColeM. S.VoelpelS. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.006
4.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and Analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass, Inc.
5.
BooneM.AlthoffM.KoenraadtF. (2016). Het leefklimaat in justitiële inrichtingen. Boom Uitgevers.
6.
BosmaA. Q.Van GinnekenE.PalmenH.PasmaA. J.BeijersbergenK. A.NieuwbeertaP. (2020). A new instrument to measure prison climate: The psychometric quality of the Prison Climate Questionnaire. The Prison Journal, 100(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885520916819
7.
ChiezeM.HurstS.KaiserS.SentissiO. (2019). Effects of seclusion and restraint in adult psychiatry: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491
8.
Clark CraigS. (2004). Rehabilitation versus control: An organizational theory of prison management. The Prison Journal, 84, 928–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885504269394
De DeckerA.LemmensL.Van der HelmP.BruckersL.MolenberghsG.TremmeryS. (2018). The relation between aggression and the living group climate in a forensic treatment unit for adolescents: A pilot study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(7), 1821–1837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17712347
11.
De DreuC. K. W.GiebelsE.Van de VliertE. (1998). Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.408
De ValkS. M.KuiperC. H. Z.Van der HelmG. H. P.MaasA. J. J. A.StamsG. J. J. M. (2016). Repression in residential youth care: A scoping review. Adolescent Research Review, 1, 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-016-0029-9
14.
De ValkS. M.KuiperC. H. Z.Van der HelmG. H. P.MaasA. J. J. A.StamsG. J. J. M. (2019). Repression in residential youth care: a qualitative study examining the experiences of adolescents in open, secure and forensic institutions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(6), 757–782.
15.
De ValkS. M.Van der HelmG. H. P.BeldM.SchaftenaarP.KuiperC. H. Z.StamsG. J. J. M. (2015). Does punishment in secure residential youth care work? An overview of the evidence. Journal of Children’s Services, 10(1), 3–16.
16.
De VriesM. G.BrazilI. A.Van der HelmG. H. P.VerkesR.-J.BultenB. H. (2018). Ward climate in a high-secure forensic psychiatric setting: Comparing two instruments. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2018.1478915
17.
De WitM.MoonenX.DoumaJ. (2011). Richtlijn Effectieve Interventies LVB: Aanbevelingen voor het ontwikkelen, aanpassen en uitvoeren van gedragsveranderende interventies voor jeugdigen met een licht verstandelijke beperking. Landelijk Kenniscentrum LVG.
18.
DickensG. L.JohnsonA.EverettB.TonkinM. (2022). Interventions to improve social climate in acute mental health inpatient settings: Systematic review of content and outcomes. SAGE Open Nursing, 8, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221124291
19.
EltinkE. M. A. (2020). Back to basic: Relations between residential group climate and juvenile antisocial behavior [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Amsterdam.
20.
GrietensH.KnorthE.BarthR.CummingsM.SteinM.CourtneyM.BellonciC.ThompsonR.IzzoC.BravoA.BravoA. (2015). Therapeutic residential care for children and youth: Developing evidence-based international practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
21.
HachtelH.VogelT.HuberC. G. (2019). Mandated treatment and its impact on therapeutic process and outcome factors. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00219
22.
HeynenE.Van Der HelmG. H. P.CimaM.StamsG. J. J. M.KorebritsA. (2017). The relation between living group climate, aggression, and callous-unemotional traits in delinquent boys in detention. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(15), 1701–1718. http://doi.org./10.1177/0306624X16630543
23.
HeynenE.Van Der HelmG. H. P.StamsG. J. J. M.KorebritsA. (2014). Measuring group climate in a German youth prison: A German validation of the Prison Group Climate Instrument. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 14(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2013.868176
24.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
25.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
26.
KingG.CurrieM.PetersenP. (2014). Child and parent engagement in the mental health intervention process: A motivational framework. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 19, 2–8. http://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12015
27.
KinnafickaF.-E.Thøgersen-NtoumanibC. (2014). The effect of the physical environment and levels of activity on affective states. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.02.007
28.
KlineR. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
29.
KlitzmanS.StellmanJ. (1989). The impact of the physical environment of the psychological well-being of office workers. Social Science and Medicine, 29(6), 733–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(89)90153-6
30.
LeipoldtJ. D.HarderA. T.KayedN. S.GrietensH.RimehaugT. (2019). Determinants and outcomes of social climate in therapeutic residential youth care: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.010
31.
Leloux-OpmeerH.KuiperC. H. Z.SwaabH. T.ScholteE. M. (2017). Children referred to foster care, family-style group care, and residential care: (How) do they differ?Children and Youth Services Review, 77, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.03.018
32.
LevrouwD.RooseR.Van der HelmG. H. P.StrijboschE. L.VandeveldeS. (2018). Developing a positive living group climate in residential youth care: A single case study. Child and Family Social Work, 23(4), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12467
33.
MeijersJ. (2018). Do not restrain the prisoner’s brain: Executive functions, self-regulation and the impoverished prison environment [Doctoral dissertation]. Vrije Universiteit.
34.
MoosR. H. (1968). The assessment of the social climates of correctional institutions. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 5, 174–188. http://.doi.org/10.1177/002242786800500207
35.
NeimeijerE. G.DelforterieM. J.RoestJ. J.Van der HelmG. H. P.DiddenH. C. M. (2021). Group climate, aggressive incidents and coercion in a secure forensic setting for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 34(4), 1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12841
36.
NeimeijerE. G.RoestJ. J.Van der HelmG. H. P.DiddenH. C. M. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Group Climate Instrument (GCI) in individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 63, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12567
37.
NorcrossJ. C.LambertM. J. (2019). Evidence-based psychotherapy relationships: The third task force. In NorcrossJ. C.LambertM. J. (Eds.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based therapist contributions (pp. 1–23). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190843953.003.0001
38.
OwensJ. S.GoldfineM. E.EvangelistaN. M.HozaB.KaiserN. M. (2007). A critical review of self-perceptions and the positive illusionary bias in children with ADHD. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 10, 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-007-0027-3
39.
RaineA. (2013). The anatomy of violence: The biological roots of crime. Pantheon Books.
40.
R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
41.
RosN. M.Van der HelmG. H. P.WissinkI.StamsG. J. J. M.SchaftenaarP. (2013). Institutional climate and aggression in a secure psychiatric setting. TheJournal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(6), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2013.848460
42.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
43.
RoyC.MarizotJ.LamotheJ.GeoffrionS. (2020). The influence of residential workers social climate on the use of restraint and seclusion: A longitudinal study in a residential treatment center for youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 114, 105035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105035
44.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. Guilford Press.
45.
SchaftenaarP. (2018). Contact gezocht, Relationeel werken en het alledaagse als werkzame principes in de klinische forensische zorg [Doctoral dissertation]. Universiteit voor Humanistiek.
46.
SchalastN.RediesM.CollinsM.StaceyJ.HowellsK. (2008). EssenCES, a short questionnaire for assessing the social climate of forensic psychiatric wards. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.677
47.
SevilirR.Van der HelmG. H. P.RoestJ. J.BeldM. H. M.DiddenR. (2020). Differences in perceived living group climate between youth with a Turkish/Moroccan and native Dutch background in residential youth care. Children and Youth Services Review, 114, 105081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105081
48.
SondermanJ.BekkenF. F.Van der HelmG. H. P.RoestJ. J.KuiperC. H. Z.Van de MheenD. (2020). Peer interactions in residential youth care: A validation study of the Peer Interactions in Residential Youth Care (PIRY) Questionnaire. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 39(3), 239–260. http://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2020.1781924
49.
StamsG. J. J. M.Van der HelmG. H. P. (2017). What works in residential programs for aggressive and violent youth? Treating youth at risk for aggressive and violent behavior in (secure) residential care. In SturmeyP. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of violence and aggression. (p. 116). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057574.whbva116
50.
StrijboschE. L. L.Van der HelmG. H. P.Van BrandenburgM. E. T.MeckingM.WissinkI. B.StamsG. J. J. M. (2013). Children in residential care: Development and validation of a group climate instrument. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(4), 462–469. http://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513510045
51.
StrijboschE. L. L.WissinkI. B.Van der HelmG. H. P.StamsG. J. J. M. (2019). Building a positive group climate together: How monitoring instruments are part of an improvement process in residential care for children. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.051
52.
Ten BrummelaarM.HarderA. T.KalverboerM. E.PostW. J.KnorthE. J. (2018). Participation of youth in decision-making procedures during residential care: A narrative review. Child and Family Social Work, 23, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016681661
53.
TonkinM. (2016). A review of questionnaire measures for assessing the social climate in prisons and forensic psychiatric hospitals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(12), 1376–1405.
54.
TrieschmannA. E.WhittakerL. K.BrendtoL. K. (1969). The other 23 hours: Child-care work with emotionally disturbed children in a therapeutic milieu. Aldine.
55.
Van den TillaartJ.EltinkE.StamsG. J. J. M.Van der HelmG. H. P.WissinkI. B. (2018). Aggressive incidents in residential youth care. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(13), 3991–4007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18758898
56.
Van der HelmG. H. P. (2019). Leefklimaat! Voor jeugd en volwassenen. Uitgeverij SWP.
57.
Van der HelmG. H. P.KlapwijkM.StamsG. J. J. M.Van der LaanP. H. (2009). “What works” for juvenile prisoners: The role of group climate in a youth prison. Journal of Children’s Services, 4(2), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/17466660200900011
58.
Van der HelmG. H. P.KuiperC. H. Z.StamsG. J. J. M. (2018). Group climate and treatment motivation in secure residential and forensic youth care from the perspective of self-determination theory. Children and Youth Services Review, 93, 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.028
59.
Van der HelmG. H. P.StamsG. J. J. M.Van der LaanP. H. (2011). Measuring group climate in prison. The Prison Journal, 91(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511403595
60.
Van der HelmG. H. P.StamsG. J. J. M.Van der StelJ. C.Van LangenM. A. M.Van der LaanP. H. (2011). Group climate and empathy in a sample of incarcerated boys. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11421649
61.
Van GinnekenE. F. J. C.NieuwbeertaP. (2020). Climate consensus: A multilevel study testing assumptions about prison climate. Journal of Criminal Justice, 69, 101693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101693
62.
Van MiertV. S. L.DekkerA. L.Van der HelmG. H. P.Robinson, (2021). Young people’s perception of group climate in juvenile justice centers in an Australian state, a pilot study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 66(8), 856–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X211022664
63.
WhittakerJ. K.HolmesL.del ValleJ. F.AinsworthF.AndreassenT.AnglinJ. P.BellonciC.BerridgeD.BravoA.CanaliC.CourtneyM.CurreyL.DalyD. L.GilliganR.GrietensH.HarderA. T.HoldenM. J.JamesS.KendrickA.. . . ZeiraA. (2016). Therapeutic residential care for children and youth: A consensus statement of the international work group on therapeutic residential care. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 33(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2016.121575
64.
WhittakerJ. W.Del ValleJ. F.HolmesL. (Eds.). (2014). Therapeutic residential care with children and youth: Developing evidence-based international practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
