In violent crime cases, aggravating factors in United States criminal codes, such as “heinous,” “atrocious,” or “depraved,” are used to distinguish elements of the crime warranting more severe sentencing. These aggravating terms are vaguely defined and applied arbitrarily in violent cases. This paper details the development of a 25 item Depravity Standard to operationalize an evidence-based approach to distinguishing the worst of violent crimes. The items were applied to 393 detailed case files drawn from several American jurisdictions to develop and refine the item definitions, determine interrater reliability, and mine for the frequency of each item’s occurrence. This information was combined with 1,590 participant responses ranking the relative depravity of each item to develop a straightforward scoring system for measuring depravity in violent cases. The Depravity Standard guide can seamlessly be applied to identify the worst violent crimes, and provide support for those cases that may deserve leniency or early-release.
AltmanD. G. (1990). Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall.
2.
Berghuis v. Smith. (2010). 559 U.S. 314.
3.
BriggsS. R.CheekJ. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
4.
CaplanJ. M. (2007). What factors affect parole: A review of empirical research. Federal Probation, 71(1), 16–19.
5.
CarrollJ. S.BurkeP. A. (1990). Evaluation and prediction in expert parole decisions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017003006
CrickN. R.DodgeK. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993–1002. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131875
9.
Cunningham v. California. (2007). 549 U.S. 270.
10.
DavisA. J. (2008). Arbitrary justice: The power of the American prosecutor. Oxford University Press.
Franco-ParedesC.GhandnooshN.LatifH.KrsakM.Henao-MartinezA. F.RobinsM.Vargas BarahonaL.PoeschlaE. M. (2021). Decarceration and community re-entry in the COVID-19 era. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 21(1), E11–E16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30730-1
15.
Godfrey v. Georgia. (1980). 446 U.S. 420.
16.
GoodmanB. (2016). Turn it upside down [television series episode]. In dohertyR. (created by), Elementary. Columbia broadcasting system.
17.
Gregg v. Georgia. (1976). 428 U.S. 153.
18.
GwetK. L. (2008). Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711006x126600
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
23.
MeloyJ. R. (2006). Empirical basis and forensic application of affective and predatory violence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01837.x
24.
MonahanJ.SteadmanH.SilverE.AppelbaumP.RobbinsP.MulveyE.RothL.GrissoT.BanksS. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. Oxford University Press.
25.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
26.
PiedmontR. L. (2014). Inter-item correlations. In MichalosA. C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-being Research (pp. 3303–3304). Springer.
27.
ProctorJ. L. (1999). The “new parole”: An analysis of parole board decision making as a function of eligibility. Journal of Crime and Justice, 22(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.1999.9721100
28.
WeinshenkerN. J.SiegelA. (2002). Bimodal classification of aggression: Affective defense and predatory attack. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-1789(01)00042-8
29.
WelnerM. (2003). Response to Simon: Legal relevance demands that evil be defined and standardized. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31, 417–421.
30.
WelnerM. (2009). The justice and therapeutic promise of science-based research on criminal evil. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37(4), 442–449.
31.
WelnerM. (2013). Classifying crimes by severity: from aggravators to depravity. In In. DouglasJ. E.BurgessA. W.BurgessA. G.ResslerR. K. (Eds.), Crime Classification Manual (3rd ed., pp. 55–72). John Wiley & Sons.
WelnerM.O’MalleyK. Y.GonidakisJ.SaxenaA.BurnesJ. (2018b). The Depravity Standard II: Developing a Measure of the Worst of Crimes. Criminal Justice Journal, 55, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.12.009
34.
WelnerM.O’MalleyK. Y.GonidakisJ.SaxenaA.Stewart-WillisJ. (2018c). The Depravity Standard III: Validating an Evidence-Based Guide. Criminal Justice Journal, 55, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.12.010
