The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP) is a set of structured professional judgment guidelines for conducting management-oriented sexual violence risk assessments. We investigated the interrater reliability (IRR) and the concurrent validity of the RSVP in the Republic of Korea. A total of 32 experienced and specially trained correctional psychologists in teams of four used an authorized translation of the RSVP to independently assess 47 adult male sexual offenders through a case history review and interviews. IRR, as indexed using intraclass correlations coefficients, was typically good to excellent for rating the presence and relevance of risk factors. Concurrent validity was also good, as indexed by correlations between RSVP ratings and total scores on two instruments for assessing risk for sexual violence: the Hallym Assessment Guide for Sex Offender Risk and Static-99R. Implications for the use of the RSVP by professionals and agencies, both within and outside Korea, are discussed.
BarbareeH. E.SetoM. C.LangtonC. M.PeacockE. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4), 490–521.
2.
BelfrageH.StrandS.StoreyJ. E.GibasA.KroppP. R.HartS. D. (2012). Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA). Law and Human Behavior, 36(1), 60–67.
3.
BoerD. P.HartS. D.KroppP. R.WebsterC. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk – 20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
4.
BoerD. P.HartS. D.KroppP. R.WebsterC. D. (2017). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk – 20, Version 2: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Protect International Risk and Safety Services Inc.
5.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.
DouglasK. S.BelfrageH. (2014). Interrater reliability and concurrent validity of the HCR-20 Version 3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 130–139.
8.
DucroC.PhamT. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18(1), 15.
9.
EdensJ. F.BoccacciniM. T. (2017). Taking forensic mental health assessment “out of the lab” and into “the real world”: Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 599–610.
10.
FleissJ. L. (1981). Balanced incomplete block designs for inter-rater reliability studies. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5(1), 105–112.
11.
GreenB.CarrollA.BrettA. (2010). Structured risk assessment in community forensic mental health practice. Australasian Psychiatry, 18(6), 538–541.
12.
GuyL. S.DouglasK. S.HartS. D. (2015). Risk assessment and communication. In CutlerB.ZapfP. (Eds.), APA handbook of forensic psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 35–86). American Psychological Association.
13.
HansonR. K.LloydC. D.HelmusL.ThorntonD. (2012). Developing non-arbitrary metrics for risk communication: Percentile ranks for the Static-99/R and Static-2002/R sexual offender risk tools. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(1), 9–23.
14.
HansonR. K.LunettaA.PhenixA.NeeleyJ.EppersonD. (2014). The field validity of Static-99/R sex offender risk assessment tool in California. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 1(2), 102–117.
15.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163.
16.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. Solicitor General Canada.
17.
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002 (User report 2003-01). Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
18.
HareR. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Multi-Health Systems Inc.
19.
HareR. D. (2003). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) (2nd ed.). Multi-Health Systems Inc.
20.
HarrisA. J. R.PhenixA.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2003). Static-99 coding rules: Revised 2003. Solicitor General Canada.
21.
HartS. D.BoerD. P. (2010). Structured professional judgment guidelines for sexual violence risk assessment. In OttoR. K.DouglasK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 269–294). Routledge.
22.
HartS. D.DouglasK. S.GuyL. S. (2016). The structured professional judgment approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. In CraigL.RettenbergerM. (Volume Eds.) and BoerD. (Series Ed.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment, treatment of sexual offending: Volume II. Assessment (pp. 643–666). Wiley.
23.
HartS. D.KroppP. R.LawsD. R.KlaverJ.LoganC.WattK. A. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
24.
HartS. D.LoganC. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In SturmeyP.McMurranM. (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). Wiley-Blackwell.
25.
HelmusL.ThorntonD.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 64–101.
26.
HoganN. R.OlverM. (2016). Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of five measures. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 233–243.
27.
JacksonK. J. (2016). Validation of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol in adult sexual offenders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University.
28.
JoeU. K. (2010). Hallym Assessment Guide for Sex Offender Risk (HAGSOR). Korean Correctional Service Publisher.
29.
KhiroyaR.WeaverT.MadenT. (2009). Use and perceived utility of structured violence risk assessments in English medium secure forensic units. Psychiatric Bulletin, 33(4), 129–132.
30.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163.
31.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
32.
LeeS. J.KoR. J.ChoeH. L. (2010). A recidivism follow-up study based on the Korean sex offender risk assessment. Journal of Korean Psychology: General, 29(4), 999–1016.
33.
McGrathR. J.LasherM. P.CummingG. F. (2012). The Sex Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS): Psychometric properties and incremental predictive validity with Static-99R. Sexual Abuse, 24(5), 431–458.
34.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). “Forming inferences about some intraclass correlations coefficients”: Correction. Psychological Methods, 1(4), 390. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.390
35.
MichelS. F.RiazM.WebsterC. D.HartS. D.LevanderS.Müller-IsbernerR.TiihonenJ.TiihonenE.TuningerE.HodginsS. (2013). Using the HCR-20 to predict aggressive behaviour among men with schizophrenia: Accuracy of prediction, general and forensic settings, and dynamic risk factors. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12(1), 1–13.
36.
MonahanJ.SkeemJ. L. (2016). The evolution of violence risk assessment. Violence in Psychiatry, 17, 1–9.
37.
MüllerM. J.WetzelH. (1998). Improvement of interrater reliability of PANSS items and subscales by a standardized rater training. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 98(2), 135–139.
38.
NealT. M. S.GrissoT. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry: An international snapshot. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(12), 1406–1421.
39.
QuinseyV.HarrisG.RiceM.CormierC. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. American Psychological Association.
40.
ReicheltF. K.JamesI. A.BlackburnI. M. (2003). Impact of training on rating competence in cognitive therapy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34(2), 87–99.
41.
SeaJ. H.KimH. S.KimK. I. (2017). The evolution of sexual risk assessment: The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol based on SPJ. Korean Criminological Review, 28, 215–256.
42.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420.
43.
SinghJ. P.DesmaraisS. L.HurducasC.Arbach-LucioniK.CondemarinC.DeanK.DoyleM.FolinoJ. O.Godoy-CerveraV.GrannM.HoR. M. Y.LargeM. M.NielsenL. H.PhamT. H.RebochoM. F.ReevesK. A.RettenbergerM.de RuiterC.SeewaldK.OttoR. K. (2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 193–206.
44.
SinghJ. P.GrannM.FazelS. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 499–513.
45.
SjöstedtG.LångströmN. (2001). Actuarial assessment of sex offender recidivism risk: A cross-validation of the RRASOR and the Static-99 in Sweden. Law and Human Behavior, 25(6), 629–645.
46.
SmidW. J.KamphuisJ. H.WeverE. C.Van BeekD. J. (2014). A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 691–703.
47.
StoreyJ. E.KroppP. R.HartS. D.BelfrageH.StrandS. (2014). Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 256–271.
48.
SutherlandA. A.JohnstoneL.DavidsonK. M.HartS. D.CookeD. J.KroppP. R.LoganC.MichieC.StocksR. (2012). Sexual violence risk assessment: An investigation of the interrater reliability of professional judgments made using the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(2), 119–133.
49.
ThorntonD.MannR.WebsterS.BludL.TraversR.FriendshipC.EriksonM. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 225–235.
50.
VargenL. M.JacksonK. A.HartS. D. (2020). Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and predictive validity of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol. Law and Human Behavior, 44, 37–50.
51.
WilsonC. M. (2013). Reliability and consistency of risk formulations in assessments of sexual violence risk (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University.
52.
WilsonC. M.DesmaraisS. L.NichollsT. L.HartS. D.BrinkJ. (2013). Predictive validity of dynamic factors: Assessing violence in forensic psychiatric inpatients. Law and Human Behavior, 37(6), 377–388.
