Drawing upon historical developments and legal interpretations of “crimes against nature” as it relates to bestiality, this paper endeavors to promote further discussions surrounding the conception of “natural” and/or extant law, by which an understanding of historical and modern objections to crimes against nature opens them up to the critique of thin-universalism—that is, that despite disparate socio-moral fundaments, laws of prohibition coalesce around evangelical totalities. We contend that a paradigm shift in respect of naturalness is necessitated—naturalness should be packaged and represented, in part, by the empirical. Thus, conceptions of vulnerability and sentience rooted in social scientific understandings and in hospitable forms of rights protections ought to provide a new understanding of governance of the natural. In turn, this naturalness ought to be reflected in law so long as the boundaries we propose are not unduly transgressed. If unnatural acts like bestiality have their prohibitions in the legal tethering points of Judeo-Christian and, later Victorian roots, the new natural law ought to be apprised of rights-based constitutionalism and informed by green criminological and animal rights logics. Law, apprised of these ethics, would evolve to expand protections for animals, human and non-human alike. Laws based on the new naturalness could protect species and environments as evidence demands.
AdamsC. (2006). Woman-battering and harm to animals. In AdamsC.DonovanJ. (Eds.), Animals & women: Feminist theoretical explorations (pp. 55–84). Duke University Press.
BisgouldL. (2014). Gay penguins and other inmates in the canadian legal system. In SorensonJ. (Ed.), Critical animal studies: Thinking the unthinkable (pp. 154–165). Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.
8.
BoesM. R. (2002). On trial in early modern Germany. In BetteridgeT. (Ed.), Sodomy in early modern Europe (pp. 27–45). Manchester University Press.
9.
BoggsC. (2010). American bestiality: Sex, animals, and the construction of subjectivity. Cultural Critique, 76(76), 98–125.
10.
BoggsC. (2013). Animalia Americana: Animal representations and biopolitical subjectivity. Columbia University Press.
11.
BrismanA.SouthN. (2013). A green-cultural criminology: An exploratory outline. Crime, Media & Culture, 9(2), 115–35.
12.
BrismanA.SouthN. (2014). Green cultural criminology: Constructions of environmental harm, consumerism and resistance to ecocide. Routledge.
13.
BrismanA.McClanahanB.SouthN. (2014). Toward a green-cultural criminology of ‘the rural’. Critical Criminology, 22(4), 479–94.
14.
CazauxG. (1999). Beauty and the beast: Animal abuse from a non-speciesist crimological perspective. Crime, Law and Social Change, 31(2), 105–125.
15.
CazauxG. (2007). Labelling animals: Non-speciesist criminology and techniques to identify other animals. In: BeirneP.SouthN. (Eds.), Issues in green criminology. Willan Publishing.
16.
ChenierE. (2008). Strangers in our midst: Sexual deviancy in postwar Ontario. University of Toronto Press.
17.
CossmanB. (2007). Sexual citizens: The legal and cultural regulation of sex and belonging. Stanford University Press.
18.
DavidsonN. S. (2002). Sodomy in early modern Venice. In BetteridgeT. (Ed.), Sodomy in early modern Europe (pp. 65–81). Manchester University Press.
19.
Deane-DrummondC. (2015). Wild justice and human obligations for other animals. Journal of the Society for Christian Ethics, 35(2), 159–173.
20.
DelaneyD. (2003). Law and nature. Cambridge University Press.
21.
DerridaJ. (1992). Force of law: The ‘mystical foundation of authority’. In CornellD.RosenfieldM.CarlsonD. G. (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice. Routledge.
22.
DonigerW. (2004). The mythology of masquerading animals, or bestiality. Social Research, 71(3), 711–732.
23.
DworkinR. (1986). Law’sempire. Harvard University Press.
24.
FoucaultM.BurchellG.GordonC.MillerP. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality: With two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. University of Chicago Press.
25.
FullerF. (1969). The morality of law (rev. ed.). Yale University Press.
26.
GacekJ. (2017). Species justice for police eagles: Critiquing the Dutch ‘flying squad’ and animal-human relations. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice, 21(1), 2–15.
27.
GacekJ. (2019). Confronting animal cruelty: Understanding evidence of harm towards animals. Manitoba Law Journal, 42(4), 315–342.
28.
GacekJ.JochelsonR. (2017a). Placing “bestial” acts in Canada: Legal meanings of “bestiality” and judicial engagements with sociality. The Annual Review of Interdisciplinary Justice Research, 6, 236–261.
29.
GacekJ.JochelsonR. (2017b). ‘Animal justice’ and sexual (ab)use: Consideration of legal recognition of sentience for animals in Canada. Manitoba Law Journal, 40(3), 335–362.
30.
GacekJ.JochelsonR. (2019). Conclusions and future directions—moving towards making the ‘strange’ familiar. In JochelsonR.GacekJ. (Eds.), Sexual regulation and the law – a Canadian perspective (pp. 333–341). Demeter Press.
31.
GacekJ.JochelsonR. (2020). Animals as something more than mere property: Interweaving green criminology and law together. Social Sciences, 9(122), 1–16.
32.
GarlandD.YoungP. (1983). Towards a social analysis of penality. In GarlandD.YoungP. (Eds.), The power to punish (pp. 1–36). Heinemann.
33.
HallM. (2014). The roles and use of law in green criminology. International Journal of Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(2), 96–109.
34.
HamburgerP. A. (1993). Natural rights, natural law, and American constitutions. Yale Law Journal, 102(4), 907–960.
35.
HartH. L. A. (1994). The concept of law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
36.
HigginsP.ShortD.SouthN. (2013). Protecting the planet: A proposal for a law of ecocide. Crime, Law and Social Change, 59(3), 251–266.
37.
HillyardP.TombsS. (2007). From ‘crime’ to social harm?Crime, Law and Social Change, 48(1), 9–25.
38.
HoldronC. (2013). The case for legal personhood for nonhuman animals and the elimination of their atatus as property in Canada (LLM Thesis). University of Toronto Faculty of Law. [unpublished].
39.
HonoréT. (2002). The necessary connection between law and morality. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(3), 489–495.
40.
HooperT. (2014) ‘More than two is a crowd’: Mononormativity and gross indecency in the criminal code, 1981–82. Journal of Canadian Studies, 48(1), 53–81.
41.
JarrellM.OzymyJ.SandelW. L. (2017). Where the wild things are: Animal victimization in federal environmental crime cases. Contemporary Justice Review, 20(3), 319–335.
42.
JochelsonR.GacekJ. (2018). ‘Ruff’ justice: Canine cases and judicial law making as an instrument of change. Animal Law Review, 24(1), 171–195.
43.
JochelsonR.GacekJ.MenzieL. (2018). Criminal law and precrime: Legal studies in Canadian punishment and surveillance in anticipation of criminal guilt. Routledge.
44.
JochelsonR.Dueck-ReadA.GacekJ. (2019). Rethinking bestial regulation: Bestiality jurisprudence in Canada. In JochelsonR.GacekJ. (Eds.), Sexual regulation and the law – a Canadian perspective (pp. 209–259). Demeter Press.
45.
KelchT. G. (1999). The role of the rational and emotive in a theory of animal rights. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 27(1), 1–41.
46.
LemieuxA. M.ClarkeR. V. (2009). The international ban on ivory sales and its effects on elephant poaching in Africa. The British Journal of Criminology, 49(4), 451–471.
47.
Maxwell-StuartP. G. (2002). ‘Wild, filthie, execrabill, detestabill and unnatural sin’: Bestiality in early modern Scotland. In BetteridgeT. (Ed.), Sodomy in early modern Europe (pp. 82–93). Manchester University Press.
48.
MiletskiH. (2009). A history of bestiality. In BeetzA.PodberscekA. (Eds.), Bestiality and zoophilia: Sexual relations with animals (pp. 1–22). Berg.
49.
MineurD. (2012). The moral foundation of law and the ethos of liberal democracies. Ratio Juris, 25(2), 133–148.
50.
MurrinJ. M. (1998). Things fearful to name: Bestiality in colonial America. Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies, 65(5), 8–43.
51.
NæssA. (1972). Shallow and the deep – long-range ecology movements: A summary. Inquiry, 16(1), 95–100.
52.
PiercesonJ. (2005). Courts, liberalism, and rights: Gay law and politics in the United States and Canada. Temple University Press.
53.
QuinneyR. (1970). The social reality of crime. Little, Brown.
54.
ReganT. (1983). The case for animal rights. University of California Press.
55.
RosenbergG. (2017). How meat changed sex: The law of interspecies intimacy after industrial reproduction. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 23(4), 473–507.
RydströmJ. (2000). Sodomitical sins are threefold: Typologies of bestiality, masturbation, and homosexuality in Sweden, 1880–1950. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 9(3), 240–276.
58.
RydströmJ. (2003). Sinners and citizens: Bestiality and homosexuality in Sweden, 1880–1950. University of Chicago Press.
59.
RydströmJ. (2005). From sodomy to homosexuality: Rural sex and the inclusion of lesbians in criminal discourse. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 13(1), 20–35.
60.
SellinE. (1938). Culture, conflict, and crime. Social Science Research.
61.
SenjoS. (2011). Sexual deviance and the law: Legal regulation of human sexuality. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
62.
SingerP. (1975). Animal liberation: The definitive classic of the animal movement. HarperCollins Publishers.
63.
SternA. W.Smith-BlackmoreM. (2016). Veterinary forensic pathology of animal sexual abuse. Veterinary Pathology, 53(5), 1057–1066.
64.
StreteskyP. B.LynchM. J. (2009). A cross-national study of the association between per capita carbon dioxide emissions and exports to the United States. Social Science Research, 38(1), 239–250.
65.
SutherlandE. (1940). White-Collar Criminality. American Sociological Association, 5(1), 1–12.
66.
TraïniC. (2016). The animal rights struggle: An essay in historical sociology. Amsterdam University Press.
67.
Van UhmD. P. (2015). Towards moral principles regarding non-human animals: A green criminological perspective. In De JongF. (Ed.), Overarching views of crime and deviancy: Rethinking the legacy of the Utrecht school (pp. 565–587). Eleven International Publishing.
68.
YoungA. (2008). The state is still in the bedrooms of the nation: The control and regulation of sexuality in Canadian criminal law. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 17(4), 203–220.
69.
WiseS. M. (1998). Hardly a revolution—the eligibility of nonhuman animals for dignity—rights in a liberal democracy. Vermont Law Review, 22(4), 793–916.
70.
WhiteR. (2003). Environmental issues and the criminological imagination. Theoretical Criminology, 7(4), 483–506.
71.
WhiteR. (2008). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Willan.
72.
WhiteR. (2016). Inter-species violence: Humans and the harming of animals. In StubbsJ.TomsenS. (Eds.), Australian violence: Crime, criminal justice and beyond (pp. 161–179). The Federation Press.
73.
WhiteR. (2018). Ecocentrism and criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology, 22(3), 342–362.
