This study aimed to test the effects of a 25-session version of the Growing Pro-Social (GPS-25) program over schemas and schema-related emotions in male young offenders. Participants included 123 youth aged between 14 and 19 years, placed in eight Portuguese detention facilities. Youth were allocated to receive GPS (n = 63) or treatment as usual (n = 60), and answered a self-report measure assessing schemas and schema-related emotions at baseline and posttreatment. Two-factor mixed multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA; group change) and the Reliable Change Index (individual change) revealed nonsignificant differences between groups for the schema’s endorsement. Significant differences between groups were found for the schema-related emotions: Treatment participants presented lower scores and/or higher clinical improvements after GPS, when compared with controls. GPS-25 produced change at an emotional level but not in schema’s endorsement, suggesting that longer interventions should be tested in their capability to promote cognitive and emotional change in young offenders.
AntonioM. E.CrossetA. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of the national curriculum and training institute’s “cognitive life skills” program among parolees supervised by Pennsylvania’s board of probation & parole. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 514–532.
2.
BrazãoN.da MottaC.RijoD. (2013). From multimodal programs to a new cognitive–interpersonal approach in the rehabilitation of offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 636–643.
3.
BrazãoN.RijoD.Ribeiro da SilvaD.SalvadorM. C.Pinto-GouveiaJ. (2019). Personality pathology profiles as moderators of the Growing Pro-Social Program outcomes on cognitive, emotion and behavior regulation in male prison inmates. Journal of Personality Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2019_33_424
4.
BrazãoN.RijoD.SalvadorM. C.Pinto-GouveiaJ. (2017). The effects of the Growing Pro-Social Program on cognitive distortions and early maladaptive schemas over time in male prison inmates: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 11, 1064–1079.
5.
BrazãoN.RijoD.SalvadorM. C.Pinto-GouveiaJ. (2018a). Promoting emotion and behavior regulation in male prison inmates: A secondary data analysis from a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of the Growing Pro-Social Program. Law and Human Behavior, 42, 57–70.
6.
BrazãoN.RijoD.SalvadorM. C.Pinto-GouveiaJ. (2018b). The efficacy of the Growing Pro-Social Program in reducing anger, shame and paranoia over time in male prison inmates: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 55, 649–686.
7.
CalveteE. (2008). Justification of violence and grandiosity schemas as predictors of antisocial behavior in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1083–1095.
8.
CalveteE.OrueI. (2010). Cognitive schemas and aggressive behavior in adolescents: The mediating role of social information processing. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 190–201.
9.
CapinhaM.da MottaC. D.RijoD. (2017). Inventário de Avaliação de Esquemas por Cenários Activadores-Comportamento Anti-Social-IAECA-CA. [Schema assessment inventory through activating scenarios for antisocial behavior–SAIAS-AB]. In SimõesM. R.AlmeidaL. S.GonçalvesM. M. (Eds.), Psicologia Forense: Instrumentos de Avaliação [Forensic psychology: Assessment instruments] (pp. 287–304). PACTOR.
10.
ChabrolH.LeeuwenN.RodgersR.GibbsJ. (2011). Relations between self-serving cognitive distortions, psychopathic traits, and antisocial behavior in a non-clinical sample of adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 887–892.
11.
ChakhssiF.BernsteinD.RuiterC. (2012). Early maladaptive schemas in relation to facets of psychopathy and institutional violence in offenders with personality disorders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 356–372.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Des JarlaisD. C.LylesD.CrepazN., & the TREND Group. (2004). Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 361–366.
14.
FarrellJ. M.ShawI. A.WebberM. A. (2009). A schema-focused approach to group psychotherapy for outpatients with borderline personality disorder: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 317–328.
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
16.
Giesen-BlooJ.van DyckR.SpinhovenP.van TilburgW.DirksenC.van AsseltT.ArntzA. (2006). Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs transference-focused psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatric, 63, 649–658.
17.
GilbertF.DaffernM. (2013). The association between early maladaptive schema and personality disorder traits in an offender population. Psychology, Crime and Law, 19, 933–946.
18.
HelmondP.OverbeekG.BrugmanD.GibbsJ. C. (2015). A meta-analysis on cognitive distortions and externalizing problem behavior: Associations, moderators, and treatment effectiveness. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 245–262.
19.
Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2011). Classificação Portuguesa das profissões 2010 [2010 Portuguese classification of professions].
20.
JacobsonN. S.TruaxP. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 39, 12–19.
21.
Keulen-de VosM.BernsteinD. P.ArntzA. (2013). Schema therapy for aggressive offenders with personality disorders. In TrafateR. C.MitchellD. (Eds.), Forensic CBT: A handbook for clinical practice (pp. 66–85). Wiley-Blackwell.
22.
KoehlerJ. A.LöselF.AkoensiT. D.HumphreysD. K. (2013). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programs in Europe. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 19–43.
23.
LipseyM. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4, 124–147.
24.
McGuireJ. (2013). “What works” to reduce re-offending: 18 years on. In CraigL. A.DixonL.GannonT. A. (Eds.), What works in offender rehabilitation: An evidence-based approach to assessment and treatment (pp. 20–49). Wiley-Blackwell.
25.
NadortM.ArntzA.SmitJ. H.Giesen-BlooJ.EikelenboomM.SpinhovenP.. . . van DyckR. (2009). Implementation of outpatient schema therapy for borderline personality disorder with versus without crisis support by the therapist outside office hours: A randomized trial. Behavior Research and Therapy, 47, 961–973.
26.
NeumannA.OjongT. N.YanesP. K.Tumiel-BerhalterL.DaiglerG. E.BlondellR. D. (2010). Differences between adolescents who complete and fail to complete residential substance abuse treatment. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 29, 427–435.
27.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 6–21.
RaynorP.UgwudikeP.VanstoneM. (2014). The impact of skills in probation work: A reconviction study. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14, 235–249.
30.
RijoD. (2017). O Questionário de Esquemas de Young (YSQ-S3). In GonçalvesM. M.SimõesM. R.AlmeidaL. S. (Coord.), Psicologia clínica e da saúde: Instrumentos de avaliação [Clinical and health psychology: Assessment instruments] (pp. 159–174). PACTOR.
31.
RijoD.BrazãoN.BarrosoR.RibeirodaSilvaD.VagosP.VieiraA.. . .MacedoM. (2016). Mental health problems in male young offenders in custodial versus community based-programs: Implications for juvenile justice interventions. Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Psychiatry, 10, 40–52.
32.
RijoD.SousaM. N.LopesJ.PereiraJ.VasconcelosJ.MendonçaM. C.MassaS. (2007). Gerar Percursos Sociais: Programa de prevenção e reabilitação para jovens com comportamento social desviante [Growing Pro-Social: Prevention and rehabilitation program for youths with deviant social behavior]. EQUAL.
33.
SchmidtN. B.JoinerT. E.YoungJ. E.TelchM. J. (1995). The Schema Questionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 295–321.
34.
ShoreyR.AndersonS.StuartG. (2014). The relation between antisocial and borderline personality symptoms and early maladaptive schemas in a treatment seeking sample of male substance users. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 21, 341–351.
35.
SkeemJ. L.PolaschekD. L.ManchakS. (2009). Appropriate treatment works but how? Rehabilitating general psychopathic, and high-risk offenders. In SkeemJ. L.DouglasK. S.LillenfeldS. O. (Eds.), Psychological science in the courtroom: Consensus and controversy (pp. 358–384). Guilford.
36.
SpechtM. W.ChapmanA.CellucciT. (2009). Schemas and borderline personality symptoms in incarcerated woman. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 256–264.
37.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
38.
TrotterC. (2013). Reducing recidivism through probation services: What we know and don’t know from four decades of research. Federal Probation, 77, 43–88.
39.
van AsseltA. D.DirksenC. D.ArntzA.Giesen-BlooJ. H.van DijkR.SpinhovenP.. . . SeverensJ. L. (2008). Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cost-effectiveness of schema-focused therapy versus transference-focused therapy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 450–457.
40.
WaltersG. D. (2007). The latent structured of the criminal lifestyle: A taxometric analysis of the lifestyle criminality screening form and Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1623–1637.
41.
WiseE. A. (2004). Methods for analyzing psychotherapy outcomes: A review of clinical significance, reliable change, and recommendations for future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82, 50–59.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
