Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Keywords

halfway house recidivism alternative sanction evaluation meta-analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baldry

McDonnell

Maplestone

Peeters

(2003). Australian prisoners’ post-release housing. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 15, 155-169.

Bonta

Motiuk

(1990). Classification of halfway houses: A quasi-experimental evaluation. Criminology, 28, 497-506.

Bouchard

Wong

J. S.

(2017). Examining the effects of intensive supervision and aftercare programs for at-risk youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(6), 1509-1534. doi:10.1177/0306624X17690449

Bouchard

Wong

J. S.

(2018). The new panopticon? Examining the effect of home confinement on criminal recidivism. Victims & Offenders, 13, 589-608.

Caputo

G. A.

(2004). Intermediate sanctions in corrections. Denton: University of North Texas Press.

*Costanza

S. E.

Cox

S. M.

Kilburn

J. C.

(2015). The impact of halfway houses on parole success and recidivism. Journal of Sociological Research, 6, 39-55.

Deeks

J. J.

Altman

D. G.

Bradburn

M. J.

(2001). Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In Egger

Smith

Altman

D. G.

(Eds.), Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context (2nd ed., pp. 285-312). London, England: BMJ Publishing.

Doble

Lindsay

(2003). Is NIMBY inevitable? Washington, DC: Center for Community Corrections.

Egger

Smith

G. D.

Schneider

Minder

(1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634.

10.

*Eisenberg

(1990). Special release and supervision programs two year outcome study Halfway House/PPT placements. Huntsville, TX: Budget and Planning, Pardons and Paroles Division, Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

11.

Evans

D. G.

(2005). Conference report: From the inside out: An international halfway house colloquium. Journal of Community Corrections, 67(4), 22-24.

12.

Freudenberg

Daniels

Crum

Perkins

Richie

B. E.

(2005). Coming home from jail: The social and health consequences of community reentry for women, male adolescents, and their families and communities. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1725-1736.

13.

Garland

Wodahl

Hershberger

(2011). Prisoner reentry in a small metropolitan community: Obstacles and policy recommendations. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 90-110.

14.

Gojkovic

Mills

Meek

(2012). Accommodation for ex-offenders: Third sector housing advice and provision (Working paper 77). Birmingham, UK: Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham. Retrieved from https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/tsrc/documents/tsrc/working-papers/working-paper-77.pdf

15.

Guolo

Varin

(2017). Random-effects meta-analysis: The number of studies matters. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 26, 1500-1518.

16.

*Hamilton

Z. K.

Campbell

C. M.

(2014). Uncommonly observed: The impact of New Jersey’s halfway house system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 1354-1375.

17.

Hammerstrom

Wade

Jorgenson

A. M. K.

(2010). Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Systematic Reviews (Suppl. 1).

18.

Hartman

D. J.

Friday

P. C.

Minor

K. I.

(1994). Residential probation: A seven-year follow-up study of halfway house discharges. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 503-515.

19.

Hetz-Burrell

English

(2006). Community corrections in Colorado: A study of program outcomes and recidivism, FY00-FY04. Denver, CO: Department of Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice, Office of Research and Statistics.

20.

Higgins

J. P. T.

Thomson

S. G.

Deeks

J. J.

Altman

D. G.

(2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 327, 557-560.

21.

Homeless Link. (2010). SNAP 2010: Criminal justice findings. London, England: Author. Retrieved from https://www.homeless.org.uk/sites/default/files/site-attachments/SNAP2010_Full_Report.pdf

22.

James

(2015). Offender reentry: Correctional statistics, reintegration into the community, and recidivism. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34287.pdf

23.

Jonson

Cullen

(2015). Prisoner reentry programs. Crime & Justice, 44, 517-575.

24.

*Latessa

E. J.

Lovins

L. B.

Smith

(2010). Final report: Follow-up evaluation of Ohio’s community based correctional facility and halfway house programs—Outcome study. Cincinnatti, OH: University of Cincinnatti.

25.

*Latessa

E. J.

Travis

L. F.

(1991). Halfway house or probation: A comparison of alternative dispositions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 53-75.

26.

Lipsey

M. W.

Wilson

D. B.

(2001). Applied Social Research Methods Series: Vol. 49. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

27.

*Lowenkamp

C. T.

Latessa

E. J.

(2002). Evaluation of Ohio’s community based correctional facilities and halfway house programs. Cincinnati, OH: Division of Criminal Justice, Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati.

28.

Miller

J. M.

(2014). Identifying collateral effects of offender reentry programming through evaluative fieldwork. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 41-58.

29.

Nagin

D. S.

Piquero

A. R.

Scott

E. S.

Steinberg

(2006). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 627-652.

30.

Ndrecka

(2014). The impact of reentry programs on recidivism: A meta-analysis (Doctoral dissertation). School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati. Retrieved from http://cech.uc.edu/content/dam/cech/programs/criminaljustice/Docs/Dissertations/Ndreckam.pdf

31.

Nelson

Dees

Allen

(1999). The first month out: Post-incarceration experiences in New York City. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.

32.

*Ostermann

(2009). An analysis of New Jersey’s Day Reporting Center and Halfway Back programs: Embracing the rehabilitative ideal through evidence based practices. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 139-153.

33.

Petersilia

(2004). What works in prisoner reentry? Reviewing and questioning the evidence. Federal Probation, 68, 4-8.

34.

Seiter

R. P.

Kadela

K. R.

(2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 360-388.

35.

Sherman

L. W.

Gottfredson

D. C.

MacKenzie

D. L.

Eck

Reuter

Bushway

S. D.

(1998). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising (National Institute of Justice Research in Brief). U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/171676.PDF

36.

Taxman

F. S.

(2002). Supervision: Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness. Federal Probation, 66, 14-27.

37.

von Hirsch

. (1976). Doing justice. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.

38.

Watkins

(2017, November 20). Bureau of prisons ending contracts with 16 halfway houses. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/20/politics/bureau-of-prisons-mark-inch-jeff-sessions/index.html

39.

Weisburd

(2010). Justifying the use of non-experimental methods and disqualifying the use of randomized controlled trials: Challenging folklore in evaluation research in crime and justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6, 209-227.

40.

*White

M. D.

Mellow

Englander

Ruffinengo

(2011). Halfway back: An alternative to revocation for technical parole violators. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 140-166.

41.

Wodahl

E. J.

Boman

J. H.

Garland

B. E.

(2015). Responding to probation and parole violations: Are jail sanctions more effective than community-based graduated sanctions? Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 242-250.

42.

*Yeoman

K. O.

(2015). Recidivism among Icelandic prison inmates released in 2009-2011. Reykjavik, Iceland: Reykjavik University.

RETRACTED: Halfway Out: An Examination of the Effects of Halfway Houses on Criminal Recidivism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References