The Effect of Treatment Completion on Recidivism Among TASC Program Clients

Abstract

Despite the enormous resources spent by states in the United States on bridging the gap between criminal justice and behavioral health services, there have been relatively few statewide evaluations of drug treatment client recidivism. We present the results of an evaluation of recidivism outcomes for a sample of individuals (n = 1,274) referred to the Treatment Accountability for Safer Communities (TASC) program in North Carolina from 2007 to 2008. The methodology accounted for both client and offense characteristics drawn from TASC, court, and corrections records. Multivariate analyses indicated that program completion is the most important predictor of re-arrest in the 3-year follow-up period, followed by a number of protective and risk factors. More specifically, being female, older at the time of program entry, as well as higher levels of educational attainment decreased the odds of re-arrest, whereas using crack/cocaine increased the odds of re-arrest. Suggestions for future research and policy implications are provided.

Keywords

recidivism substance abuse treatment TASC propensity score matching survival analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

P. D.

(2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Anglin

M. D.

Brown

B. S.

Dembo

Leukefeld

(2009). Criminality and addiction: Selected issues for future policies, practice, & research. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 89-100. doi:10.1177/002204260903900108

Anglin

M. D.

Longshore

Turner

(1999). Treatment alternatives to street crime: An evaluation of five programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 168-195. doi:10.1177/0093854899026002002

Apel

R. J.

Sweeten

(2010). Propensity score matching in criminology and criminal justice. In Piquero

Wiesburd

(Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 543-562). New York, NY: Springer.

Belenko

Foltz

Lang

M. A.

Sung

H.-E.

(2004). Recidivism among high-risk drug felons: A longitudinal analysis following residential treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, 105-132. doi:10.1300/J076v40n01_06

Brown

(2010). Associations with substance abuse treatment completion among drug court participants. Substance Use & Misuse, 45, 1874-1891. doi:10.3109/10826081003682099

Campbell

K. M.

(2005). Rule your data with the link king (A SAS/AF application for record linkage and unduplication. SUGI Paper 020-30). In SAS Institute Inc. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

Campbell

K. M.

(2009). Impact of record-linkage methodology on performance indicators and multivariate relationships. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36, 110-117. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.05.004

Campbell

K. M.

Deck

Krupski

(2007). Impact of substance abuse treatment on arrests among opiate users in Washington State. The American Journal on Addictions, 16, 510-520. doi:10.1080/10550490701641157

10.

Clark

C. B.

McCullumsmith

C. B.

Redmond

Hardy

Waesche

M. C.

Osula

Cropsey

K. L.

(2013). Factors associated with rapid failure in a Treatment Alternatives for Safer Communities (TASC) program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 45, 376-380. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2013.05.007

11.

Craddock

Flinchum

Gallagher

Hall

Hevener

Katzenelson

Perdue

(2012). Correctional program evaluation: Offenders placed on probation or released from prison in fiscal year 2008/09. Raleigh: North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission.

12.

DeVall

K. E.

Lanier

C. L.

(2012). Successful completion: An examination of factors influencing drug court completion for white and non-white male participants. Substance Use & Misuse, 47, 1106-1116. doi:10.3109/10826084.2012.680171

13.

Drake

R. E.

O’Neal

E. L.

Wallach

M. A.

(2008). A systematic review of psychosocial research on psychosocial interventions for people with co-occurring severe mental and substance use disorders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 34, 123-138. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.01.011

14.

Evans

Huang

Hser

Y.-I.

(2011). High-risk offenders participating in court-supervised substance abuse treatment: Characteristics, treatment received, and factors associated with recidivism. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 38, 510-525. doi:10.1007/s11414-011-9241-3

15.

Evans

Urada

Anglin

M. D.

(2014). Comparative effectiveness of California’s Proposition 36 and drug court programs before and after propensity score matching. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 909-938. doi:10.1177/0011128710382342

16.

Farabee

Hser

Y. I.

Anglin

M. D.

Huang

(2004). Recidivism among an early cohort of California’s Proposition 36 offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 563-584. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2004.tb00063.x

17.

Garrido

M. M.

Kelley

A. K.

Paris

Roza

Meier

D. E.

Morrison

R. S.

Aldridge

M. D.

(2014). Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Services Research, 49, 1701-1720. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12182

18.

Guo

Fraser

M. W.

(2015). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

19.

Harrell

Mitchell

Hirst

Marlowe

Merrill

(2002). Breaking the cycle of drugs and crime: Findings from the Birmingham BTC demonstration. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 189-216. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2002.tb00086.x

20.

Huebner

B. M.

Berg

M. T.

(2011). Examining the sources of variation in risk for recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28, 146-173. doi:10.1080/07418820903365213

21.

Klein

J. P.

Moeschberger

M. L.

(1997). Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data. New York, NY: Springer.

22.

Krebs

C. P.

Strom

K. J.

Koetse

W. H.

Lattimore

P. K.

(2009). The impact of residential and nonresidential drug treatment on recidivism among drug-involved probationers: A survival analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 553, 442-471. doi:10.1177/0011128707307174

23.

Lattimore

P. K.

Krebs

C. P.

Koetse

Lindquist

Cowell

A. J.

(2005). Predicting the effect of substance abuse treatment on probationer recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 159-189. doi:10.1007/s11292-005-1617-z

24.

Owens

S. J.

Klebe

K. J.

Arens

S. A.

Durham

R. L.

Hughes

Moor

C. J.

. . . Stommel

(1997). The effectiveness of Colorado’s TASC programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 26, 161-176. doi:10.1300/J076v26n01_10

25.

Peters

D. J.

Hochstetler

DeLisi

Kuo

H.-J.

(2015). Parolee recidivism and successful treatment completion: Comparing hazard models across propensity methods. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 149-181. doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9229-2

26.

Petersilia

(2011). Beyond the prison bubble. National Institute of Justice Journal, 268, 26-31.

27.

Peyton

E. A.

(2001). TASC in the 21st century: A guide for practitioners and policymakers. Washington, DC: National Treatment Accountability for Safer Communities.

28.

Roque

Lurigio

A. J.

(2009). An outcome evaluation of a treatment readiness group program for probationers with substance use problems. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 744-757. doi:10.1080/10509670903288046

29.

Rosenbaum

P. R.

Rubin

D. B.

(1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516-524. doi:10.2307/2288398

30.

Sung

H.-E.

(2011). From diversion to reentry: Recidivism risks among graduates of an alternative to incarceration program. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22, 219-234. doi:10.1177/0887403410376588

31.

Sung

H.-E.

Richter

(2006). Contextual barriers to successful reentry of recovering drug offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 365-374. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.05.010

32.

Taxman

F. S.

(2010). Probation and diversion: Is there a place at the table and what should we serve? Victims and Offenders, 5, 233-239. doi:10.1080/15564886.2010.485903

33.

Taxman

F. S.

Perdoni

M. L.

Harrison

L. D.

(2007). Drug treatment services for adult offenders: The state of the state. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 239-254. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.019

34.

Terrell

D. M.

(1993). Ethnocultural factors and substance abuse: Toward culturally sensitive treatment models. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 7, 162-167.

35.

van Stelle

K. R.

Mauser

Moberg

D. P

. (1994). Recidivism to the criminal justice system of substance-abusing offenders diverted into treatment. Crime & Delinquency, 40, 175-196. doi:10.1177/0011128794040002003

36.

Ventura

L. A.

Lambert

E. G.

(2004). Recidivism 12 months after TASC. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39, 63-82. doi:10.1300/J076v39n01_04