Life Stress,Strain,and Deviance Across Schools: Testing the Contextual Version of General Strain Theory in China

Abstract

General Strain Theory delineates different types of strain and intervening processes from strain to deviance and crime. In addition to explaining individual strain–crime relationship, a contextualized version of general strain theory, which is called the Macro General Strain Theory, has been used to analyze how aggregate variables influence aggregate and individual deviance and crime. Using a sample of 1,852 students (Level 1) nested in 52 schools (Level 2), the current study tests the Macro General Strain Theory using Chinese data. The results revealed that aggregate life stress and strain have influences on aggregate and individual deviance, and reinforce the individual stress–deviance association. The current study contributes by providing the first Macro General Strain Theory test based on Chinese data and offering empirical evidence for the multilevel intervening processes from strain to deviance. Limitations and future research directions are discussed.

Keywords

life stress strain delinquency schools MST

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agnew

(1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-87.

Agnew

(1999). A general strain theory of community differences in crime rates. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 123-155.

Agnew

(2007). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Agnew

(2013). When criminal coping is likely: An extension of general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 34, 653-670.

Agnew

(2015). Using general strain theory to explain crime in Asian societies. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10, 131-147.

Agnew

Brezina

Wright

J. P.

Cullen

F. T.

(2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40(1), 43-72.

Bao

W. N.

Haas

(2004). Life strain, negative emotions, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory in the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 281-297.

Bao

W. N.

Haas

(2007). Life strain, coping, and delinquency in the People’s Republic of China: An empirical test of general strain theory from a matching perspective in social support. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 9-24.

Botchkovar

Broidy

(2013). Accumulated strain, negative emotions, and crime test of general strain theory in Russia. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 837-860.

10.

Brezina

Piquero

A. R.

Mazerolle

(2001). Student anger and aggressive behavior in school: An initial test of Agnew’s macro-level strain theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 362-386.

11.

Burns

P. J.

(2009). Disadvantaged neighborhoods and anger: Implications for community-level theories of crime and delinquency (Unpublished master’s thesis). Faculty of Sociology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.

12.

Cao

Deng

(1998). Shoplifting: A test of an integrated model of strain, differential association, and seduction theories. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 1, 65-83.

13.

Chapple

C. L.

McQuillan

J. A.

Berdahl

T. A.

(2005). Gender, social bonds, and delinquency: A comparison of boys’ and girls’ models. Social Science Research, 34, 357-383.

14.

Cheung

N. W.

Cheung

Y. W.

(2009, November 3). Linking individual and contextual strains to adolescent gambling: A macro-level general strain theory assessment. Paper presented at the ASC annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA.

15.

Cohen

M. P.

(1998). Determining sample sizes for surveys with data analyzed by hierarchical linear models. Journal of Official Statistics, 14, 267-275.

16.

De Beeck

Pauwels

Put

. (2012). Schools, strain and offending: Testing a school contextual version of General Strain Theory. European Journal of Criminology, 9, 52-72.

17.

DeLisi

(2011). How general is general strain theory? Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 1-2.

18.

Froggio

Agnew

(2007). The relationship between crime and “objective” versus “subjective” strains. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 81-87.

19.

Gao

Y. J.

Wong Dennis

S. W.

Y. P.

(2014). Maltreatment and delinquency in China: Examining and extending the intervening process of General Strain Theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(1), 38-61.

20.

Haynie

D. L.

(2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 99-134.

21.

Hoffmann

J. P.

(2003). A contextual analysis of differential association, social control, and Strain theories of delinquency. Social Forces, 81, 753-785.

22.

Hoffmann

J. P.

Ireland

T. O.

(2004). Strain and opportunity structures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 263-292.

23.

Hox

J. J.

(1998). Multilevel modeling: When and why. In Balderjahn

Mathar

Schader

(Eds.), Classification, data analysis, and data highways (pp. 147-154). New York, NY: Springer Verlag.

24.

Jang

S. J.

Johnson

B. R.

(2003). Strain, negative emotions, and deviance among African Americans: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 79-105.

25.

Mazerolle

Burton

V. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Evans

T. D.

Payne

G. L.

(2000). Strain, anger, and delinquent adaptations: Specifying general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 89-101.

26.

Mazerolle

Maahs

(2000). General strain and delinquency: An alternative examination of conditioning influences. Justice Quarterly, 17, 753-778.

27.

Moon

Morash

(2004). Adaptation of theory for alternative cultural contexts: Agnew’s general strain theory in South Korea. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 28, 77-103.

28.

Moon

Morash

McCluskey

J. D.

(2012). General strain theory and school bullying: An empirical test in South Korea. Crime & Delinquency, 58, 827-855.

29.

Ostrowsky

M. K.

Messner

S. F.

(2005). Explaining crime for a young adult population: An application of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 463-476.

30.

Sexton

C. W.

(2011). The impact of strain on hate crime: Testing Agnew’s macro-level general strain theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Sociology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.

31.

Sigfusdottir

I. D.

Kristjansson

A. L.

Agnew

(2012). A comparative analysis of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 117-127.

32.

Snijders

T. A.

Bosker

R. J.

(1993). Standard errors and sample sizes for two-level research. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 18, 237-259.

33.

Vincent

M. B.

(2011). Chicago neighborhoods and crime: A test of Agnew’s Macro-level Strain Theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Sociology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.

34.

Wareham

Cochran

J. K.

Dembo

Sellers

C. S.

(2003). Community, strain, and delinquency: A test of a multi-level model of general strain theory. Western Criminology Review, 6, 177-133.

35.

Xin

Yao

(2015). Validity and reliability of the Adolescent Self-Rating Life Events Check List in middle school students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 29, 355-360. (In Chinese)