Needs and Achievements of the Juvenile Justice System: Insights From Two Empirical Studies With Portuguese Young Adults

Abstract

Over the last decade, studies have evaluated the effectiveness of interventions for juvenile offenders; nonetheless, those studies were more focused on recidivism than on the mechanisms associated with criminal perpetration. The current study explores the role of juvenile justice involvement and detention measures in a set of psychological, social, and criminal behavior characteristics in early adulthood. Seventy-five young adults with official records of juvenile delinquency in 2010-2011 and 240 young adults from the community filled out our protocol in 2014-2015. Young adults with juvenile justice involvement showed worse psychological, social, and criminal outcomes than those from community. Detention appears to be related to the number of deviant friends, delinquency, and school achievement in early adulthood. Our findings are in line with the labeling and deviant peer contagion theories and establish the main areas of interventions that affect the identified needs. A set of policy implications is provided.

Keywords

juvenile justice system detention measures juvenile delinquency crime social marginalization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baglivio

M. T.

Epps

Swartz

Huq

M. S.

Hardt

N. S.

(2014). The prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) in the lives of juvenile offenders. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 3, 1-23.

Barriga

A. Q.

Gibbs

J. C.

Potter

Liau

A. K.

(2001). The How I Think Questionnaire manual. Champaign, IL: Research Press.

Basto-Pereira

Começanha

Ribeiro

Maia

(2015). Long-term predictors of crime desistance in juvenile delinquents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Aggressive and Violent Behavior, 25, 332-342. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.09.012

Basto-Pereira

Miranda

Ribeiro

Maia

. (2016). The psychometric properties of a questionnaire for measuring delinquency and crime (D-CRIM). In n/a (Ed.), Avances en Psicología Clínica, 2015. Granada, Espanã: Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual.

Bennett

Holloway

Farrington

(2008). The effectiveness of neighborhood watch. Campbell collaboration systematic review final report. Retrieved from http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib/download/248/

Bernburg

Krohn

Rivera

(2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 43, 67-88. doi:10.1177/0022427805280068

Bouchery

E. E.

Harwood

H. J.

Sacks

J. J.

Simon

C. J.

Brewer

R. D.

(2011). Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41, 516-524. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.045

Canavarro

(1999). Inventário de sintomas psicopatológicos—BSI [Brief Symptom Inventory—BSI]. In Simões

M. R.

Gonçalves

M. M.

(Eds.), Testes e provas psicológicas em Portugal (pp. 95-109). Braga, Portugal: Associação dos Psicólogos Portugueses/ Sistemas Humanos e Organizacionais.

Derogatis

L. R.

(1993). BSI Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring, and procedure manual (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computers Systems.

10.

Derzon

(2010). The correspondence of family features with problem, aggressive, criminal, and violent behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6, 263-292. doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9098-0

11.

General Direction of Social Rehabilitation, Ministry of Justice, Direcção Geral de Reinserção Social. (2012). Auto-avaliação e Relatório de Atividades—DGRS 2011 [Self-assessment and Activity Report—DGSR-2011]. Lisboa, Portugal: Direção de Serviços de Estudos e Planeamento. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/hv7mdzv

12.

General Direction of Prison and Probation Service, Ministry of Justice, Direcção Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais. (2016). Relatório Estatístico Anual—DGRS 2015 [Annual Statistics Report—DGRSP 2015]. Lisboa, Portugal: Direção de Serviços de Estudos e Planeamento. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/nmesstb

13.

Dishion

T. J.

Tipsord

J. M.

(2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 189-214. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.06.020

14.

Dmitrieva

Monahan

K. C.

Cauffman

Steinberg

(2012). Arrested development: The effects of incarceration on the development of psychosocial maturity. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 1073-1090. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000545

15.

Enzmann

Marshall

Killias

Junger-Tas

Steketee

Gruszczynska

(2010). Self-reported youth delinquency in Europe and beyond: First results of the second international self-report delinquency study in the context of police and victimization data. European Journal of Criminology, 7, 159-183. doi:10.1177/1477370809358018

16.

Farrington

D. P.

Loeber

Howell

J. C.

(2012). Young adult offenders: The need for more effective legislative options and justice processing. Criminology & Public Policy, 11, 729-750. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00842.x

17.

Fredriksen

Dahl

A. A.

Martinsen

E. W.

Klungsoyr

Faraone

S. V.

Peleikis

D. E.

(2014). Childhood and persistent ADHD symptoms associated with educational failure and long-term occupational disability in adult ADHD. Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 6, 87-99. doi:10.1007/s12402-014-0126-1

18.

Gatti

Tremblay

R. E.

Vitaro

(2009). Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 991-998. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02057.x

19.

Green

S. B.

(1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 499-510. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7

20.

Helmond

P. E.

Overbeek

Brugman

Gibbs

J. C.

(2015). A meta-analysis on cognitive distortions and externalizing problem behavior: Associations, moderators, and treatment effectiveness. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 245-262. doi:10.1177/0093854814552842

21.

Henggeler

S. W.

Schoenwald

S. K.

(2011). Evidence-based interventions for juvenile offenders and juvenile justice policies that support them. Social Policy Report, 25, 3-20.

22.

Henry

K. L.

Knight

K. E.

Thornberry

T. P.

(2012). School disengagement as a predictor of dropout, delinquency, and problem substance use during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 156-166. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9665-3

23.

Jakobsen

Fergusson

Horwood

(2012). Early conduct problems, school achievement and later crime: Findings from a 30-year longitudinal study. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 47, 123-135. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.10.002

24.

Jolliffe

Farrington

D. P.

Hawkins

J. D.

Catalano

R. F.

Hill

K. G.

Kosterman

(2003). Predictive, concurrent, prospective and retrospective validity of self-reported delinquency. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 13, 179-197.

25.

Katsiyannis

Thompson

M. P.

Barrett

D. E.

Kingree

J. B.

(2012). School predictors of violent criminality in adulthood: Findings from a nationally representative longitudinal study. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 205-214. doi:10.1177/0741932512448255

26.

Lambie

Randell

(2013). The impact of incarceration on juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 33, 448-459. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.007

27.

Law nº 4/2015 of 15th January 2015: First Amendment to the Portuguese Guardianship Law.

28.

Law nº 166/1999 of 14th September 1999: Establishes the Portuguese Guardianship Law.

29.

Law nº 323-D/2000 of 20th December 2000: Establishes the General Regulation for the Educational Centers.

30.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4, 24-147. doi:10.1080/15564880802612573

31.

Loeber

Farrington

D. P.

(2012). From juvenile delinquency to adult crime: Criminal careers, justice policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

32.

Mathys

Born

(2009). Intervention in juvenile delinquency: Danger of iatrogenic effects? Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1217-1221. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.015

33.

McCord

(2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 16-30. doi:10.1177/0002716202250781

34.

Mears

D. P.

Shollenberger

T. L.

Willison

J. B.

Owens

C. E.

Butts

J. A.

(2010). Practitioner views of priorities, policies, and practices in juvenile justice. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 535-563. doi:10.1177/0011128708324664

35.

Moffitt

T. E.

(1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.

36.

Moffitt

T. E.

(2006). A review of research on the taxonomy of lifecourse-persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In Cullen

F. T.

Wright

J. P.

Blevins

K. R.

(Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 277-311). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

37.

Mulvey

E. P.

(2011). Highlights from pathways to desistance: A longitudinal study of serious adolescent offenders. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

38.

Nagin

D. S.

Cullen

F. T.

Jonson

C. L.

(2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. In Tonry

(Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 115-200). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

39.

Osgood

D. W.

Briddell

(2006). Peer effects in juvenile justice. In Dodge

K. A.

Dishion

T. J.

Lansford

J. E.

(Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youths (pp. 141-161). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

40.

Piquero

A. R.

Jennings

W. G.

Diamond

Reingle

J. M.

(2015). A systematic review of age, sex, ethnicity, and race as predictors of violent recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59, 5-26. doi:10.1177/0306624X13514733

41.

Ruxton

G. D.

(2006). The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 688-690. doi:10.1093/beheco/ark016

42.

Schwalbe

C. S.

Gearing

R. E.

MacKenzie

M. J.

Brewer

K. B.

Ibrahim

(2012). A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 26-33. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.002

43.

Shufelt

Cocozza

(2006). Youth with mental health disorders in the juvenile justice system: Results from a multi-state prevalence study. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/tdad/usmentalhealthprevalence06(3).pdf

44.

Simonoff

Elander

Holmshaw

Simonoff

Elander

Holmshaw

Rutter

(2004). Predictors of antisocial personality: Continuities from predictors of antisocial personality: Continuities from childhood to adult life. British Journal of Psychiatry British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 118-127. doi:10.1192/bjp.184.2.118

45.

Sweeten

(2006). Who will graduate? Disruption of high school education by arrest and court involvement. Justice Quarterly, 23, 462-480.

46.

Tabachnick

Fidell

(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

47.

Tanner

Davies

O’Grady

(1999). Whatever happened to yesterday’s rebels? Longitudinal effects of youth delinquency on education and employment. Social Problems, 46, 250-274.

48.

Van Voorhis

C. R.

Morgan

B. L

. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3, 43-50.

49.

Veloso

A. C. C.

(2013). Validação do How I Think: Questionnaire para a população adulta portuguesa [Portuguese validation of How I Think: Questionnaire for the Portuguese adult population] (Tese de mestrado não publicada/Unpublished master’s thesis). Lisboa, Portugal: Instituto Superior de Ciências da Saúde Egas Moniz.

50.

Verbruggen

Blokland

van der Geest

V. R.

(2012). Effects of employment and unemployment on serious offending in a high-risk sample of men and women from ages 18 to 32 in the Netherlands. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 845-869. doi:10.1093/bjc/azs023

51.

Welsh

B. C.

Rocque

(2014). When crime prevention harms: A review of systematic reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10, 245-266. doi:10.1007/s11292-014-9199-2