Drug courts seek to break the cycle of substance use and crime by providing a community-based intervention to individuals with criminal justice involvement and substance-related issues. This study examined recidivism over a 2-year follow-up period as well as factors associated with recidivism for a sample of drug court participants (i.e., graduates and terminators) and a non-equivalent comparison group (i.e., individuals referred/assessed for the program who did not enter). In the 2-year follow-up window, fewer drug court graduates had any convictions compared with program terminators and referrals; specifically, fewer drug court graduates had drug trafficking convictions compared with program terminators and referrals. Fewer graduates were arrested and incarcerated in jail and/or prison in the 2-year follow-up; furthermore, graduates had spent less time incarcerated compared with program terminators and referrals. Demographics (i.e., age, race, marital status) and prior criminal justice system involvement were associated with recidivism; however, these factors had differential impacts for the three groups (i.e., graduates, terminators, and referrals). Drug court shows promise as a community-based intervention that helps keep individuals out of the criminal justice system during a 2-year follow-up period.
AosS.MillerM.DrakeE. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/Reports
2.
BelenkoS. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. New York, NY: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.
3.
BorakoveE. N.MahoneyB.WhitcombD. (2011). Strengthening rural courts: Challenges and progress. Available from http://www.ncsc.org
4.
BrownR. (2011). Drug court effectiveness: A matched cohort study in the Dane County drug treatment court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 191-201.
CooperC. (2003). Frequently asked questions series: Rural drug courts. Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) Drug Court Clearinghouse. Available from http://www.ndcrc.org
7.
FiniganM. W.CareyS. M.CoxA. A. (2007). The impact of a mature drug court over 10 years of operation: Recidivism and costs. Portland, OR: NPC Research. Available from www.npcresearch.com
8.
GottfredsonD. C.KearleyB. W.NajakaS. S.RochaC. M. (2005). The Baltimore City drug treatment court: 3-year self-report outcome study. Evaluation Review, 29(1), 42-64.
9.
GottfredsonD. C.NajakaS. S.KearleyB. W. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 171-196.
10.
GroßJ. (2003). Linear regression. In BickelP.DiggleP.FienbergS.KrickbergK.OlkinI.WermuthN.ZegerS. (Eds.), Lecture notes in statistics (Vol. 175). Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
11.
HartleyR. E.PhillipsR. C. (2001). Who graduates from drug court? Correlates of client success. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 107-119.
HuddlestonW.MarloweD. B. (2011). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
14.
KalichD. M.EvansR. D. (2006). Drug court: An effective alternative to incarceration. Deviant Behavior, 27, 569-590.
15.
KrebsC. P.LindquistC. H.KoetseW.LattimoreP. K. (2007). Assessing the long-term impact of drug court participation on recidivism with generalized estimating equations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 91, 57-68.
16.
LatimerJ.Morton-BourgonK.ChrétienJ. (2006). A meta-analytic examination of drug treatment courts: Do they reduce recidivism?Canada Department of Justice, Research and Statistics Division. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rr06_7/
17.
LaudetA.StanickV. (2010). Predictors of motivation for abstinence at the end of outpatient substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38, 317-327.
18.
ListwanS. J.SundtJ. L.HolsingerA. M.LatessaE. J. (2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 389-411.
19.
LoganT. K.HoytW. H.McCollisterK. E.FrenchM. T.LeukefeldC. G.MintonL. (2004). Economic evaluation of drug court: Methodology, results, and policy implications. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 381-396.
20.
LowenkampC. T.HolsingerA. M.LatessaE. J. (2005). Are drug courts effective? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 177-206.
21.
McLellanA.LuborskyL.O’BrienC.WoodyG. (1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 26-33.
22.
MitchellO.WilsonD. B.EggersA.MacKenzieD. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60-71.
23.
National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (1997). Defining drug courts: The ten key components. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Court Program office.
RomanJ.TownsendW.BhatiA. S. (2003). Recidivism rates for drug court graduates: Nationally based estimates, final report. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/201229.pdf
26.
SanfordJ. S.ArrigoB. A. (2005). Lifting the cover on drug courts: Evaluation findings and policy concerns. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 239-259.
27.
SchuenemeyerJ.DrewL. (2011). Statistics for earth and environmental scientists. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
ShafferD. K.HartmanJ. L.ListwanS. J. (2009). Drug abusing women in the community: The impact of drug court involvement on recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 803-827.
30.
WilsonD. B.MitchellO.MacKenzieD. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459-487.
31.
WolfeE.GuydishJ. R.TermondtJ. (2002). A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrests in a two year follow-up period. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 1155-1172.
