Methamphetamine use was historically a problem facing Western states; however, in recent years it has methodically spread throughout the nation. Methamphetamine use impacts communities, families, and the criminal justice system in a variety of ways. As such, many jurisdictions are developing policies to reduce the sale and consumption of this drug as well as increase penalties for its use. The question of whether methamphetamine users can be safely and effectively treated in the community is unresolved. This study explores whether community-based drug courts are a reasonable option for treating this population. Results of the study indicate that drug of choice does not influence outcome in a drug court setting. Policy implications are discussed.
Anglin, M.D., & Hser, Y. ( 1990). Treatment of drug abuse. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and crime (pp. 393-460). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Aos, S., Phipps, P., Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. ( 2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
3.
Belenko, S. ( 2002). The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings. Substance Use and Misuse, 37, 1635-1664.
4.
Belenko, S., Mara-Drita, I., & McElroy, J. ( 1992). Drug tests and the prediction of pretrial misconduct: Findings and policy issues. Crime & Delinquency, 38, 557-582.
5.
Belenko, S., Peugh, J., Califano, J.A., Usdansky, M., & Foster, S.E. ( 1998). Substance abuse and the prison population: A three-year study by Columbia University reveals widespread substance abuse among offender population. Corrections Today, 60, 82-89, 154.
6.
Bouffard, J.A. and Richardson, K.A. ( 2007). The effectiveness of drug court programming for specific kinds of offenders: Methamphetamine and DWI offenders versus other drug-involved offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18(3), 274-293.
7.
Brewster, M.P. ( 2001). An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) drug court program . Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 177-206.
Currie, E. ( 1998). Crime and punishment in America. New York: Owl Books.
10.
Deschenes, E.P., & Greenwood, P.W. (1994). Maricopa County’s drug court: An innovative program for first-time drug offenders on probation . The Justice System Journal, 17, 99-115.
11.
Dynia, P., & Sung, H. ( 2000). The safety and effectiveness of diverting felony drug offenders to residential treatment as measured by recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 299-311.
12.
Fagan, J.A. ( 1994). Do criminal sanctions deter drug crimes? In D. L. MacKenzie & C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 89-131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. ( 1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [computer program]. Bonn University, Department of Psychology.
14.
French, M.T., Zarkin, G.A., Hubbard, R.L., & Valley, R.J. ( 1993). The effects of time in drug abuse treatment and employment on post-treatment drug use and criminal activity. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19, 19-25.
15.
Goldkamp, J.S. ( 1999). Challenges for research and innovation: When is a drug court not a drug court? In W. C. Terry (Ed.), The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation (pp. 166-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Gottfredson, D.C., Najaka, S.S., & Kearley, B. ( 2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 171-196.
17.
Granfield, R., Eby, C., & Brewster, T. ( 1998). An examination of the Denver drug court: The impact of a treatment-oriented drug-offender system. Law & Policy , 20, 183-202.
18.
Hansell, B. ( 2006). The meth epidemic in America: The criminal effects of meth on communities: A 2006 survey on U.S. counties. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties.
19.
Harrell, A., Roman, J., & Sack, E. ( 2001). Drug court services for female offenders, 1996-1999: Evaluation of the Brooklyn Treatment Court. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center. Retrieved February 12, 2004, from http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410356
20.
Hartley, R.E., & Phillips, R.C. (2001). Who graduates from drug courts? Correlates of client success. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 107-119.
21.
Hartman, J.L., Listwan, S.J., and Shaffer, D.K. ( 2007). Methamphetamine users in a community based drug court: Does gender matter? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45(3/4), 109-130.
22.
Herz, D.C. ( 2000). Drugs in the heartland: Methamphetamine use in rural Nebraska. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
23.
Hser, Y., Huang, D., Chou, C., Teruya, C., & Anglin, M.D. ( 2003). Longitudinal patterns of treatment utilization and outcomes among methamphetamine abusers: A growth curve modeling approach. Journal of Drug Issues, 33, 921-938.
24.
Huddleston, C.W. ( 2005). Drug courts: An effective strategy for communities facing methamphetamine. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
25.
Jensen, E., & Mosher, C. ( 2006). Adult drug courts: Emergence, growth, outcome evaluations, and the need for a continuum of care. Idaho Law Review, 42, 443-470.
26.
Listwan, S.J., Sundt, J., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 389-411.
27.
Loman, L.A. ( 2004). A cost-benefit analysis of the St. Louis City Adult Felony Drug Court. St. Louis, MO: Institute of Applied Research. Retrieved August 2, 2005, from http://www.iarstl.org/papers/SLFDCcostbenefit.pdf
28.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., Wenzel, S., Morral, A., Harrell, A., McBride, D., et al. (2001). Drug courts: A conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 7-26.
29.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. ( 2005, Fall). Are drug courts effective: A meta-analytic review . Journal of Community Corrections, 5-10, 28.
30.
Martinez, A.I., & Eisenberg, M. ( 2003). Initial process and outcome evaluation of drug courts in Texas. Austin, TX: Criminal Justice Policy Council.
31.
Miethe, T.D., Lu, H., & Reese, E. ( 2000). Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in drug court: Explanations for some unexpected findings. Crime & Delinquency , 46, 522-541.
32.
Miller, J.M., & Shutt, J.E. ( 2001). Considering the need for empirically grounded drug court screening mechanisms. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 91-106.
33.
National Association of Drug Court Professionals, Drug Court Standards Committee. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Courts Program Office.
34.
Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project. (2004). Summary of drug court activity by state and county. Retrieved August 22, 2006 , from http://spa.american.edu/justice/publications/drgchart2k.pdf#search=%22ojp%20drug%20court%20clearing%20house%22
35.
Peters, R.H., Haas, A.L., & Murrin, M.R. ( 1999). Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2, 33-60.
36.
Peters, R., & Murrin, M.R. ( 2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 72-96.
37.
Prendergast, M., Anglin, M.D., & Wellisch, J. ( 1995). Up to speed: Treatment for drug-abusing offenders under community supervision. Federal Probation, 59, 66-75.
38.
Rawson, R.A., Anglin, M.D., & Ling, W. ( 2002). Will the methamphetamine problem go away? Journal of Addictive Diseases, 21, 5-19.
39.
Rawson, R.A., Marinelli-Casey, P., Anglin, M.D., Dickow, A., Frazier, Y., Gallagher, C., et al. (2004). A multi-site comparison of psychosocial approaches for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. Addiction, 99, 708-717.
40.
Rempel, M., Fox-Kralstein, D., Cissner, A., Cohen, R., Labriola, M., Farole, D., et al. (2003). The New York State Adult Drug Court evaluation: Policies, participants and impacts. Technical Report, Center for Court Innovation.
41.
Schiff, M., & Terry, W.C., III. (1997). Predicting graduation from Broward County’s dedicated drug treatment county. Justice Systems Journal, 19, 291-310.
42.
Shaffer, D.K. ( 2006). Reconsidering drug court effectiveness: A meta-analytic review (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts International, 67, 09A (AAT No. 3231113).
43.
Shaffer, D.K., Listwan, S.J., Latessa, E.J., & Lowenkamp, C.T. (2007). The drug court phenomenon: Findings from Ohio. Drug Court Review, 6, 33-66.
44.
Stoops, W.W., Tindall, M.S., Mateyoke-Scrivner, A., & Leukefeld, C. ( 2005). Methamphetamine use in non-urban and urban drug court clients. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 260-276.
45.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Statistics. (2002). Emergency department trends from the Drug Abuse Warning Network, final estimates 1994-2001 (DHHS Publication No. SMA 02-3635). Rockville, MD: Author.
46.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Statistics. (2004). Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 1992-2002. National admissions to substance abuse treatment services (DHHS Publication No. SMA 04-3965). Rockville, MD: Author.
47.
Truitt, L., Rhodes, W.M., Hoffmann, N.G., Seeherman, A.M., Jalbert, S.K., Kane, M., et al. (2002). Evaluating treatment drug courts in Kansas City, Missouri and Pensacola, Florida: Executive summary. Technical Report, Abt Associates. Retrieved September 7, 2005 , from http://www.abtassociates.com/reports/es-eval_treatment.pdf
48.
Van Stelle, K.R., Mauser, E., & Moberg. P.D. ( 1994). Recidivism to the criminal justice system of substance abusing offenders diverted into treatment. Crime and Delinquency , 40, 175-196.
49.
Vito, G., & Tewksbury, R.A. (1998). The impact of treatment: The Jefferson County (Kentucky) drug court program. Federal Probation, 62, 46-52.
50.
Walker, S. ( 1994). Sense and nonsense about crime and drugs: A policy guide (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
51.
Weisheit, R.A., & Fuller, J. ( 2004). Methamphetamines in the heartland: A review and initial exploration. Journal of Crime and Justice, 27, 131-151.
52.
Wilson, D.B., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D.L. (2002, November). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago.
53.
Wolfe, E., Guydish, J., & Termondt, J. ( 2002). A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrests in a two year follow-up period. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 1155-1172.
54.
Wright, D., & Sathe, N. ( 2006). State estimates of substance use from the 2003-2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (DHHS Publication No. SMA 06-4142, NSDUH Series H-29). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Statistics .
55.
Yeh, B.T., & Doyle, C. ( 2005). USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005: A brief look. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service (RS22348).
