A large body of research reveals support for Agnew’s general strain theory (GST) and Gottfredson and Hirschi’s self-control theory, yet the two perspectives make decidedly different predictions concerning the relationships between self-control, negative affect (e.g., anger), and criminal/deviant behavior. Where GST specifies indirect and conditioning effects of self-control and negative affect on criminal/deviant behavior, self-control theory states that the independent effect of indicators of anger would be spurious and should disappear on controlling for self-control. We test these propositions using survey data from a probability sample of young adults. The structural equation models indicate that, although anger is largely the consequence of self-control, self-control and negative affect exert significant direct effects on driving aggression. These results highlight the need to integrate GST and self-control theories to better explain this form of deviant behavior.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-87.
2.
AgnewR. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 38, 319-361.
3.
AgnewR. (2002). Experienced, vicarious, and anticipated strain: An exploratory study on physical victimization and delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 19, 603-632.
4.
AgnewR. (2006a). Pressured into crime. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
5.
AgnewR. (2006b). General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 15; pp. 101-126). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
6.
AgnewR.BrezinaT. (1997). Relational problems with peers, gender, and delinquency. Youth & Society, 29, 84-111.
7.
AgnewR.BrezinaT.WrightJ. P.CullenF. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40, 43-72.
8.
AgnewR.WhiteH. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30, 475-499.
9.
AishA. M.JoreskogK. G. (1990). A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: An application of LISERAL 7 with weighted least squares. Quality & Quantity, 19, 716-723.
10.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street. Philadelphia, PA: W.W. Norton.
11.
ArneklevB. J.CochranJ. K.GaineyR. R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s “low self-control” stability hypothesis: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 225-247.
12.
AseltineR. H.GoreS.GordonJ. (2000). Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 256-275.
13.
BaronS. (2003). Self-control, social consequences, and criminal behavior: Street youth and the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 40, 403-425.
14.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
15.
BroidyL. M. (2001). A test of general strain theory. Criminology, 39, 9-35.
16.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
CapowichG. E.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. R. (2001). General strain theory, situational anger, and social networks: An assessment of conditioning influences. Journal of Crime and Justice, 29, 445-461.
18.
CheungN. W.CheungY. W. (2008). Self-control, social factors, and delinquency: A test of the general theory of crime among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 412-430.
19.
CohnE. G. (2011). Changes in scholarly influence in major American criminology and criminal justice journals between 1986 and 2005. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 493-525.
20.
CullenF. T. (1989). Having trouble getting published? Ten lessons for success. The Criminologist, 14, 19-21.
21.
EllwangerS. J. (2007). Strain, attribution, and traffic delinquency among young drivers: Measuring and testing General Strain Theory in the context of driving. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 523-551.
22.
FelsonM.BobaR. (2010). Crime and everyday life (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
FranklinC. A.BouffardL. A.PrattT. C. (2012). Sexual assault on the college campus: Fraternity affiliation, male peer support, and low self-control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1457-1480.
24.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1994). Aggression. In HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (Eds.), The generality of deviance (pp. 23-46). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
26.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
27.
HayC. (2003). Family strain, gender, and delinquency. Sociological Perspectives, 46, 107-135.
28.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (1994). The generality of deviance. In HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (Eds.), The generality of deviance (pp. 1-22). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
29.
HochstetlerA.DeLisiM.PrattT. C. (2010). Social support and feelings of hostility among released inmates. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 588-607.
30.
HoltfreterK.BeaverK. M.ReisigM. D.PrattT. C. (2010). Low self-control and fraud offending. Journal of Financial Crime, 17, 295-307.
31.
HoltfreterK.ReisigM. D.PrattT. C. (2008). Low self-control, routine activities, and fraud victimization. Criminology, 46, 189-219.
32.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts issues and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
HullJ. G.TedlieJ. C.LehnD. A. (1995). Modeling the relation of personality variables to symptom complaints: The unique role of negative affectivity. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 217-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
JangS. J.JohnsonB. R. (2003). Strain, negative emotions, and deviant coping among African Americans: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 79-105.
35.
KiddP.HuddlestonS. (1994). Psychometric properties of the driving practices questionnaire: Assessment of risky driving. Research in Nursing and Health, 17, 51-58.
36.
KleckG.BarnesJ. C. (2011). Article productivity among the faculty of criminology and criminal justice doctoral programs, 2005-2009. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 43-66.
37.
LangtonL.PiqueroN. L. (2007). Can general strain theory explain white-collar crime? A preliminary investigation of the relationship between strain and select white-collar offenses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 1-15.
38.
LangtonL.PiqueroN. L.HollingerR. (2006). An empirical test of the relationship between low self-control and employee theft. Deviant Behavior, 27, 537-565.
39.
LaubJ. H.SampsonR. J.SweetenG. A. (2006). Assessing Sampson and Laub’s life-course theory of crime. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 15; pp. 313-334). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
40.
MazerolleP.MaahsJ. (2000). General strain and delinquency: An alternative examination of conditioning influences. Justice Quarterly, 17, 753-778.
41.
MazerolleP.PiqueroA. R. (1997). Violent responses to situations of strain: A structural examination. Justice Quarterly, 15, 65-91.
42.
MazerolleP.PiqueroA. R.CapowichG. E. (2003). Examining the links between strain, situational and dispositional anger, and crime: Further specifying and testing general strain theory. Youth & Society, 35, 131-157.
43.
McGloinJ. M.PrattT. C.MaahsJ. (2004). Rethinking the IQ-delinquency relationship: A longitudinal analysis of multiple theoretical models. Justice Quarterly, 21, 601-631.
44.
McGloinJ. M.SullivanC.PiqueroA. R.PrattT. C. (2007). Local life circumstances and offending specialization/diversity: Comparing opportunity and propensity models. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 44, 321-346.
45.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27, 467-496.
46.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2004). Traffic safety facts: 2004 data. Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.
47.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2005). Motor vehicle traffic crashes as a leading cause of death in the U.S., 2002—A demographic perspective. Washington, DC: National Center for Statistics and Analysis.
48.
PaternosterR.MazerolleP. (1994). General strain theory and delinquency: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 31, 235-263.
49.
PerroneD.SullivanC.PrattT. C.MargaryanS. (2004). Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquent behavior: A test of a general theory of crime on a nationally-representative sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 298-312.
50.
PiqueroA. R.Gomez-SmithZ.LangtonL. (2004). Discerning unfairness where others may not: Low self-control and unfair sanction perceptions. Criminology, 42, 699-734.
51.
PiqueroA. R.MacIntoshR.HickmanM. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al.’s self-control scale. Criminology, 38, 897-929.
52.
PiqueroA. R.TibbettsS. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13, 481-510.
53.
PiqueroN. L.SealockM. D. (2000). Generalizing general strain theory: An examination of an offending population. Justice Quarterly, 17, 449-484.
54.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
55.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.BlevinsK. R.DaigleL. E.MadensenT. D. (2006). The empirical status of deterrence theory: A meta-analysis. In CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.BlevinsK. R. (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 15, pp. 367-395). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
56.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.SellersC. S.WinfreeL. T.MadensenT.DaigleL.GauJ. M. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 765-802.
57.
PrattT. C.GauJ. M.FranklinT. F. (2011). Key ideas in criminology and criminal justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
PrattT. C.TuranovicJ. J. (2012). Going back to the beginning: Crime as a process. In SullivanC. J.McGloinJ. M.KennedyL. W. (Eds.), When crime appears: The role of emergence (pp. 39-52). New York, NY: Routledge.
59.
PrattT. C.TurnerM. G.PiqueroA. R. (2004). Parental socialization and community context: A longitudinal analysis of the structural sources of low self-control. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 41, 219-243.
60.
ReisigM. D.PrattT. C. (2011). Low self-control and imprudent behavior revisited. Deviant Behavior, 32, 589-625.
61.
ReisigM. D.PrattT. C.HoltfreterK. (2009). Perceived risk of internet theft victimization: Examining the effects of social vulnerability and impulsivity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 369-384.
62.
ReisigM. D.WolfeS. E.PrattT. C. (2012). Low self-control and the religiosity-crime relationship. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1172-1191.
63.
RobertsonA. R.SteinJ. A.Schaefer-RohlederL. (2010). Effects of hurricane Katrina and other adverse life events on adolescent female offenders: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 47, 469-495.
64.
SigfusdottirI.-D.FarkasG.SilverE. (2004). The role of depressed mood and anger in the relationship between family conflict and delinquent behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 509-523.
65.
TittleC. R. (1995). Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
66.
TittleC. R. (2000). Theoretical developments in criminology. In LaFreeG.ShortJ. F.BursikR. J.Sr.TaylorR. B. (Eds.), Criminal Justice 2000 (pp. 51-101). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
67.
TittleC. R.BotchkovarE. V. (2005). Self-control, criminal motivation and deterrence: An investigation using Russian respondents. Criminology, 43, 307-353.
68.
TittleC. R.WardD. A.GrasmickH. G. (2003). Self-control and crime/deviance: Cognitive vs. behavioral measures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 333-365.
69.
TuranovicJ. J.PrattT. C. (2012). The consequences of maladaptive coping: Integrating general strain and self-control theories to specify a causal pathway between victimization and offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. doi: 10.1007/s10940-012-9180-z.
70.
TurnerM. G.PiqueroA. R.PrattT. C. (2005). The school context as a source of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 327-339.
71.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T.PrattT. C. (2003). Parental management, ADHD, and delinquent involvement: Reassessing Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory. Justice Quarterly, 20, 471-500.
72.
VazsonyiA. T.PickeringL. E.JungerM.HessingD. (2001). An empirical test of a general theory of crime: A four-nation comparative study of self-control and the prediction of deviance. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 32, 91-131.
73.
WarrM. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183-216.
74.
WatkinsA. M.MeldeC. (2007). The effect of self-control on unit and item nonresponse in an adolescent sample. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 44, 267-294.
