Most structured sex-offender programs are based on a cognitive-behavioural model of behaviour change. Within this overarching theoretical paradigm, extensive use of cognitive distortions is seen as a central core symptom among sex offenders. However, the literature on cognitive distortions lacks a clear and consistent definition of the term. It is unclear whether cognitive distortions are consciously employed excuses or unconscious processes serving to protect the offender from feelings of guilt or shame. In this article, the dominant cognitive-behavioural interpretation of cognitive distortions is contrasted with two alternative interpretations. One is based on an attributional perspective and the notion of attributional biases. The other explanation is based on a narrative approach focusing on the action elements of cognitive distortions, that is, as something people do rather than something they have. Clinical implications of these alternative conceptualizations are discussed and illustrated throughout by a case example.
AbelG. G.GoreD. K.HollandC. L.CampN.BeckerJ. V.RathnerB. A. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions of child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135-153.
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
4.
AuburnT. (2005). Narrative reflexivity as a repair device for discounting “cognitive distortions” in sex offender treatment. Discourse & Society, 16, 697-718.
5.
AuburnT.LeaS. (2003). Doing cognitive distortions: A discursive psychology analysis of sex offender treatment talk. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 281-298.
6.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
BeauregardE.LeclercB. (2007). An application of the rational choice approach to the offending process of sex offenders: A closer look at the decision-making. Sex Abuse, 19, 115-133.
8.
BovensM. (1998). The quest for responsibility. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrunerJ. (2004). The narrative creation of self. In AngusL. E.McLeodJ. (Eds.), The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy (pp. 3-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
CombsG.FreedmanJ. (2004). A poststructuralist approach to narrative work. In AngusL. E.McLeodJ. (Eds.), The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy (pp. 137-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York, NY: Springer.
12.
EdwardsD.PotterJ. (1995). Attribution. In HarréR.StearnsP. (Eds.), Discursive psychology in practice (pp. 87-119). London, England: Sage.
13.
EiserJ. R.Van der PligtJ. (1988). Attitudes and decisions. London, England: Routledge.
14.
GannonT. A. (2009). Current cognitive distortion theory and research: An internalist approach to cognition. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 225-246.
15.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control. Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
GendreauP.GrantB. A.LeipcigerM. (1979). Self-esteem, incarceration and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 6, 67-75.
17.
HaneyC.ZimbardoP. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford prison experiment. American Psychologist, 53, 709-727.
18.
HansonK. R.BussiereM. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
19.
HansonK. R.Morton-BourgonK. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
LangtonC. M.BarbareeH. E.HarkinsL.ArenovichT.McNameeJ.PeacockE. J.. . . MarconH. (2008). Denial and minimization among sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 69-98.
22.
LernerM. J.SimmonsC. H. (1966). Observer’s reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203-210.
23.
MannR.BeechA. (2003). Cognitive distortions, schemas, and implicit theories. In WardT.LawsD. R.HudsonS. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 135-153). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
MarshallW. L.AndersonD.FernandezY. M. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of sexual offenders. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
25.
MarshallW. L.BarbareeH. E. (1990). An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In MarshallW. L.LawsD. R.BarbareeH. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 232-252). New York, NY: Plenum.
26.
MarshallW. L.MazzuccoA. (1995). Self-esteem and parental attachments in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 279-285.
27.
MarunaS. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
MarunaS. (2004). Is rationalization good for the soul? In ArrigoB. A. (Ed.), Psychological jurisprudence (pp. 179-199). New York: State University of New York Press.
29.
MarunaS.CopesH. (2005). What have we learnt from five decades of neutralization research?Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 32, 221-320.
30.
MarunaS.MannR. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155-177.
31.
McAdamsD. P. (1985). Power, intimacy and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York, NY: Guilford.
32.
McAdamsD. P.BowmanP. J. (2002). Narrating life’s turning points: Redemption and contamination. In McAdamsD. P.JosselsonR.LieblichA. (Eds.), Turns in the road: Narrative studies of lives in transition (pp. 3-34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
NunesK. L.HansonK. R.FirestoneP.MouldenH. M.GreenbergD. M.BradfordJ. M. (2007). Denial predicts recidivism for some sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 91-105.
34.
PetrunikM.DeutschmannL. (2008). The exclusion-inclusion spectrum in state and community response to sex offenders in Anglo-American and European jurisdictions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 499-519.
35.
PolkinghorneD. E. (2004). Narrative therapy and postmodernism. In AngusL. E.McLeodJ. (Eds.), The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy (pp. 53-67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
PresserL. (2008). Been a heavy life: Stories of violent men. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
37.
PresserL. (2009). The narratives of offenders. Theoretical Criminology, 13, 177-200.
38.
RossL. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 170-214). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SingerJ. B. (2002). Living in the amber cloud: A life story analysis of a heroin addict. In McAdamsD. P.JosselsonR.LieblichA. (Eds.), Turns in the road: Narrative studies of lives in transition (2nd ed., pp. 253-277). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
StangorC. G. (1995). Stereotyping. In MansteadA. S. R.HewstoneM.FiskeS. T.HoggM. A.ReisH. T.SeminG. R. (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 628-633). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
41.
ThorntonD.BeechA.MarshallW. L. (2004). Pretreatment self-esteem and posttreatment sexual recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 587-599.
42.
WaldramJ. B. (2008). The narrative challenge to cognitive behavioral treatment of sexual offenders. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 32, 421-439.
43.
WardT.BrownM. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 243-257.
44.
WardT.GannonT. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 77-94.
45.
WardT.HudsonS. M.JohnstonL.MarshallW. L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 479-507.
WardT.KeenanT.HudsonS. M. (2000). Understanding cognitive, affective, and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A developmental perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 41-62.
WardT.SorbelloL. (2003). Explaining child sexual abuse: Integration and elaboration. In WardT.LawsD. R.HudsonS. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 3-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
WardT.StewartC. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 353-360.
