This article describes the process and results of monitoring the programme integrity of FOR . . . A Change, a group programme for offenders, as it was being delivered in three prisons in the United Kingdom. In so doing, it briefly describes the aims, structure, and theoretical orientation of the programme; explains what informed the particular approach to checking for integrity and how it was implemented; outlines the results; and finally, postulates the requisite conditions for the successful maintenance of programme integrity.
Antonowicz, D., & Ross, R. ( 1994). Essential components of successful rehabilitation programs for offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38, 97-104.
2.
Bernfeld, G. ( 2001). The struggle for treatment integrity in a "disintegrated" service delivery system. In G. A. Bernfeld , D. P. Farrington, & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice. Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 167-188). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
3.
Bonta, J., Bogue, B., Crowley, M., & Motiuk, L. ( 2001). Implementing offender classification systems: Lessons learned. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice. Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 227-246). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
4.
Clancy, A., Hudson, K., Maguire, M., Peake, R., Raynor, P., Vanstone, M., et al. (2006). Getting out and staying out. Results of the prisoner resettlement pathfinders. Researching criminal justice series. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
5.
Egan, G. ( 1990). The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
6.
Fabiano, E., & Porporino, F. ( 2002). Focus on resettlement-a change. Canada: T3.
7.
Gendreau, P., Coggin, C., & Smith, P. ( 1999). The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment . International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43(2), 180-187.
8.
Gendreau, P., Coggin, C., & Smith, P. ( 2001). Implementation guidelines for correctional programs in the "real world." In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice. Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 247-268). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
9.
Ginsburg, J.I.D., Mann, R.E., Rotgers, F., & Weekes, J.R. ( 2002). Motivational interviewing with criminal justice populations . In W. R. Miller & S. Rollnick (Eds.), Motivational interviewing. Preparing people for change (2nd ed., pp. 333-346). New York: Guildford.
10.
Hollin, C. ( 1995). The meaning and implications of "programme integrity ." In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 195-208). Chichester , UK: Wiley.
11.
Hollin, C. ( 2001). The role of the consultant in developing effective correctional programs. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice. Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 269-282). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
12.
Lipsey, M. ( 1995). What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 63-78). Chichester , UK: Wiley.
13.
Losel, F. ( 1995). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 79-114). Chichester , UK: Wiley.
14.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., & Smith, P. ( 2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(3), 575-594.
15.
McGuire, J. ( 1995). What works: Reducing reoffending. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
16.
McIvor, G. ( 1990). Sanctions for serious or persistent offenders: A review of the literature. Stirling, Scotland: Social Work Research Centre, University of Stirling.
17.
Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. ( 1991). Motivational interviewing. Preparing people to change addictive behaviours. New York: Guildford.
18.
Petersilia, J. ( 1990). Conditions that permit intensive supervision programmes to survive. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 126-145.
19.
Raynor, P., & Vanstone, M. ( 1996). Reasoning and rehabilitation in Britain: The results of the Straight Thinking on Probation (STOP) programme. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40, 279-291.
20.
Raynor, P., & Vanstone, M. ( 1997). Straight Thinking on Probation (STOP): The Mid-Glamorgan Experiment. Oxford, UK: Probation Studies Unit, Oxford University.
21.
Ross, R.R., & Fabiano, E.A. ( 1985). Time to think. A cognitive model of delinquency prevention and offender rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN: Institute of Social Sciences and Arts.
22.
Ross, R.R., Fabiano, E.A., & Elwes, C.D. ( 1988). Reasoning and rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32, 29-35.
23.
Trotter, C. ( 1993). The supervision of offenders-What works? A study undertaken in community-based corrections. Victoria, Melbourne: Social Work Department, Monash University, and the Victoria Department of Justice.
24.
Underdown, A. ( 1998). Strategies for effective offender supervision. London: Home Office.
